update skills

.agents/skills/to-tickets/SKILL.md

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
 ---
 name: to-tickets
 description: Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
-disable-model-invocation: true
 ---
 
 # To Tickets
 
 Break a plan, spec, or conversation into a set of **tickets** — tracer-bullet vertical slices, each declaring the tickets that **block** it.
 
+Honor the requested deliverable: a local breakdown stays local; publication requires a request to file tickets. Carry existing publication approval forward without asking again. Ticket decomposition does not itself authorize implementation or edits to unrelated issues.
+
 The issue tracker and triage label vocabulary should have been provided to you — run `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` if not.
 
 ## Process
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@ Break the work into **tracer bullet** tickets.
 
 Give each ticket its **blocking edges** — the other tickets that must complete before it can start. A ticket with no blockers can start immediately.
 
-**Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing.** A **wide refactor** is one mechanical change — rename a column, retype a shared symbol — whose **blast radius** fans across the whole codebase, so a single edit breaks thousands of call sites at once and no vertical slice can land green. Don't force it into a tracer bullet; sequence it as **expand–contract**. First expand: add the new form beside the old so nothing breaks. Then migrate the call sites over in batches sized by blast radius (per package, per directory), each batch its own ticket blocked by the expand, keeping CI green batch to batch because the old form still exists. Finally contract: delete the old form once no caller remains, in a ticket blocked by every migrate batch. When even the batches can't stay green alone, keep the sequence but let them share an integration branch that all block a final integrate-and-verify ticket — green is promised only there.
+**Wide refactors are the exception to vertical slicing.** For a mechanical change whose callers must change together, plan a cohesive replacement and a final integration check. Follow [the development data lifecycle](../../../AGENTS.md#development-data-lifecycle): this repository replaces obsolete schemas and contracts directly, updates all callers and tests in the same change, and reseeds disposable data. Do not introduce expand–contract, dual paths, or compatibility adapters merely to make batches independently green. If the work needs multiple tickets, use a scoped integration branch and make their shared verification gate explicit. Reconsider compatibility only after an explicit project decision requires preserving production data.
 
 ### 4. Quiz the user
 
@@ -47,22 +48,22 @@ Present the proposed breakdown as a numbered list. For each ticket, show:
 - **Blocked by**: which other tickets (if any) must complete first
 - **What it delivers**: the end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work
 
-Ask the user:
+When the breakdown contains a consequential unresolved choice, ask the user about:
 
 - Does the granularity feel right? (too coarse / too fine)
 - Are the blocking edges correct — does each ticket only depend on tickets that genuinely gate it?
 - Should any tickets be merged or split further?
 
-Iterate until the user approves the breakdown.
+Honor an already approved plan and requested granularity. Do not require another approval round for routine decomposition; state reasonable assumptions and proceed within the requested publication scope.
 
 ### 5. Publish the tickets to the configured tracker
 
-Publish the approved tickets. **How** depends on the tracker `/setup-matt-pocock-skills` configured — the tickets are the same either way, only the shape of the blocking edges changes:
+When publication is requested, publish the in-scope tickets using the configured tracker. Preserve a user-selected local output path. Check ambiguous creation results before retrying to avoid duplicates; on unavailable access, keep drafts and report what remains. The representation depends on the tracker:
 
 - **Local files** → write one file per ticket under `.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md`, numbered from `01` in dependency order (blockers first). Each file's "Blocked by" lists the numbers/titles it depends on. Use the per-ticket file template below — one ticket per file, never a single combined file.
 - **A real issue tracker (GitHub, Linear, …)** → publish one issue per ticket in dependency order (blockers first) so each ticket's blocking edges can reference real identifiers. Use the platform's native blocking / sub-issue relationship where it has one; otherwise set each ticket's "Blocked by" to the blocking issues. Apply the `ready-for-agent` triage label unless instructed otherwise — the tickets are agent-grabbable by construction.
 
-Work the **frontier**: any ticket whose blockers are all done. For a purely linear chain that means top to bottom.
+The **frontier** is the set of tickets whose blockers are all done; identify it in the handoff without starting implementation.
 
 Do NOT close or modify any parent issue.
 
@@ -103,3 +104,5 @@ The end-to-end behaviour this ticket makes work, from the user's perspective —
 </issue-template>
 
 In either form, avoid specific file paths or code snippets — they go stale fast. Exception: if a prototype produced a snippet that encodes a decision more precisely than prose can (state machine, reducer, schema, type shape), inline it and note briefly that it came from a prototype. Trim to the decision-rich parts — not a working demo, just the important bits.
+
+Stop after the requested decomposition/publication and report the first actionable tickets. Use `/implement` only if the user also asks to implement them.