nessar/vac-optimizer
1
0 Fork 0
Code Issues 5 Pull Requests 4 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity

Tracer les obligations, le risque et les préférences du calcul original #49

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-08-30 20:20:15 +02:00 by nessar · 6 comments
nessar commented 2026-08-30 20:20:15 +02:00 (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928)
Copy link
Copy source

Parent

#46

What to build

Expose the original calculation history for validation, joint obligations, at-risk placement, and ordered preferences. The advanced trace view groups the actual run by phase, atomic planning decision, and candidate evaluation, including joint multi-date branches, shared placements, pruning reasons, and earned-entitlement activation. The history is captured during the producing run rather than reconstructed afterward.

Acceptance criteria

  • The calculation context exposes trace readiness separately from the planning outcome.
  • The outcome can become available before trace delivery completes.
  • Trace events for validation, obligations, at-risk balances, and every ordered preference come from the original run.
  • Events are grouped as calculation phase, atomic planning decision, then actual candidate evaluations.
  • A joint obligation branch remains one atomic multi-date decision rather than artificial independent day steps.
  • Shared placements and earned-entitlement activation appear in their real order.
  • Accepted, rejected, pruned, not-examined, and ineligible branches retain their real reason; no unperformed comparison receives a vector.
  • One initial state plus ordered deltas can reconstruct the planner state through the traced phases.
  • The advanced annual-calendar view can navigate the traced phases and expand candidate evaluations.
  • Trace capture cannot change candidate order, completed phases, incumbent, or outcome.
  • Only the latest run’s trace is retained in memory and a new calculation discards the previous one.
  • Tests use the public planner and rendered annual-calendar seams and include joint obligations, at-risk placement, ordered preferences, shared placements, and an earned-entitlement chain.

Blocked by

  • #47 — Afficher l’explication stable d’un placement final
## Parent #46 ## What to build Expose the original calculation history for validation, joint obligations, at-risk placement, and ordered preferences. The advanced trace view groups the actual run by phase, atomic planning decision, and candidate evaluation, including joint multi-date branches, shared placements, pruning reasons, and earned-entitlement activation. The history is captured during the producing run rather than reconstructed afterward. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] The calculation context exposes trace readiness separately from the planning outcome. - [ ] The outcome can become available before trace delivery completes. - [ ] Trace events for validation, obligations, at-risk balances, and every ordered preference come from the original run. - [ ] Events are grouped as calculation phase, atomic planning decision, then actual candidate evaluations. - [ ] A joint obligation branch remains one atomic multi-date decision rather than artificial independent day steps. - [ ] Shared placements and earned-entitlement activation appear in their real order. - [ ] Accepted, rejected, pruned, not-examined, and ineligible branches retain their real reason; no unperformed comparison receives a vector. - [ ] One initial state plus ordered deltas can reconstruct the planner state through the traced phases. - [ ] The advanced annual-calendar view can navigate the traced phases and expand candidate evaluations. - [ ] Trace capture cannot change candidate order, completed phases, incumbent, or outcome. - [ ] Only the latest run’s trace is retained in memory and a new calculation discards the previous one. - [ ] Tests use the public planner and rendered annual-calendar seams and include joint obligations, at-risk placement, ordered preferences, shared placements, and an earned-entitlement chain. ## Blocked by - #47 — Afficher l’explication stable d’un placement final
gitlab-35-issue-49.md
3.5 KiB
gitlab-35-issue-49.json
18 KiB
nessar commented 2026-08-30 20:20:16 +02:00 (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928)
Copy link
Copy source

mentioned in issue #50

mentioned in issue #50
nessar commented 2026-08-30 20:20:18 +02:00 (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928)
Copy link
Copy source

mentioned in issue #53

mentioned in issue #53
nessar commented 2026-10-02 14:54:30 +02:00 (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928)
Copy link
Copy source

Completion audit — 2026-10-02

Original-run early-phase tracing, separate artifact readiness and snapshot ownership exist. However, the published preference trace test explicitly expects the used first-compatible balance candidate to remain evaluated-rejected, with a separate chosen placement event. Candidate acceptance and decision grouping need verification against the exact-history requirement; local commit 51978f7 changes TraceRecorder candidate grouping. The required joint-obligation/shared/earned-chain trace coverage also needs verification before closure.

Evidence: reviewed issue requirements/discussions and f1f0835 (published application source; live main 57a39c81 only adds Renovate configuration). Tested an isolated checkout of the published source: 20 test files, 157/157 tests passed, including the five benchmark scenarios. Local commit 51978f7 and uncommitted edits were inspected separately and are not evidence of published completion.

Completion audit — 2026-10-02 Original-run early-phase tracing, separate artifact readiness and snapshot ownership exist. However, the published preference trace test explicitly expects the used first-compatible balance candidate to remain evaluated-rejected, with a separate chosen placement event. Candidate acceptance and decision grouping need verification against the exact-history requirement; local commit 51978f7 changes TraceRecorder candidate grouping. The required joint-obligation/shared/earned-chain trace coverage also needs verification before closure. Evidence: reviewed issue requirements/discussions and f1f0835 (published application source; live main 57a39c81 only adds Renovate configuration). Tested an isolated checkout of the published source: 20 test files, 157/157 tests passed, including the five benchmark scenarios. Local commit 51978f7 and uncommitted edits were inspected separately and are not evidence of published completion.
nessar commented 2026-10-03 15:17:27 +02:00 (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928)
Copy link
Copy source

Implemented with $luna-verified-implement and independently verified.

The original run records obligation branches, sequential at-risk placement, preference comparisons, shared satisfaction, earned activation, and exact state deltas with selected branch ancestry.

Validation: 198/198 tests across 23 files, app/spec TypeScript checks, ESLint, and production build pass. Chromium keyboard, focus-restoration, background comparison, and responsive checks at 375/768/1440 pixels pass with no page errors. Original benchmark outcomes match the pre-change baseline in all five scenarios, with and without tracing.

The implementation is in the local working tree based on 0ce33cc9d6fe7381965a9162571abe205d0b7350; no commit or push has been made.

Implemented with $luna-verified-implement and independently verified. The original run records obligation branches, sequential at-risk placement, preference comparisons, shared satisfaction, earned activation, and exact state deltas with selected branch ancestry. Validation: 198/198 tests across 23 files, app/spec TypeScript checks, ESLint, and production build pass. Chromium keyboard, focus-restoration, background comparison, and responsive checks at 375/768/1440 pixels pass with no page errors. Original benchmark outcomes match the pre-change baseline in all five scenarios, with and without tracing. The implementation is in the local working tree based on 0ce33cc9d6fe7381965a9162571abe205d0b7350; no commit or push has been made.
nessar (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928) closed this issue 2026-10-03 15:17:28 +02:00
nessar commented 2026-10-03 16:23:32 +02:00 (Migrated from 172.24.0.1:8928)
Copy link
Copy source

mentioned in issue #46

mentioned in issue #46
gitea-emergency commented 2026-10-11 22:11:11 +02:00
Copy link
Copy source

Preserved GitLab #49 history: source attribution, exact timestamps, discussion grouping and review positions. Historical diff snapshots: 0; visible source notes: 5.

gitlab-35-issue-49.md (SHA-256 40631ad60694fac4d6441379e2e52da1c045fd05d99d057c5fc86634da673fed)

gitlab-35-issue-49.json (SHA-256 befd60c4a42bb58d696a08dbaaff9849a87852e7de6da4d33cf79930662960a0)

Old CI job execution and reports are omitted. Original source files and rollback backups remain protected.

<!-- gitlab-to-gitea-history:35:Issue:49 --> Preserved GitLab #49 history: source attribution, exact timestamps, discussion grouping and review positions. Historical diff snapshots: 0; visible source notes: 5. [gitlab-35-issue-49.md](https://gitea.nessar.fr/attachments/830d785f-fd69-42c0-98b2-2fe5c2bf3eb8) (SHA-256 `40631ad60694fac4d6441379e2e52da1c045fd05d99d057c5fc86634da673fed`) [gitlab-35-issue-49.json](https://gitea.nessar.fr/attachments/e923f64a-ca2f-4423-b2b1-24a32184de91) (SHA-256 `befd60c4a42bb58d696a08dbaaff9849a87852e7de6da4d33cf79930662960a0`) Old CI job execution and reports are omitted. Original source files and rollback backups remain protected.
gitea-emergency added this to the Development project 2026-10-11 22:14:32 +02:00
gitea-emergency moved this to Closed in Development on 2026-10-11 22:14:32 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Labels
Clear labels
bug
dependencies
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
github_actions
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
javascript
needs-info
needs-triage
question
ready-for-agent
wontfix
No labels
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No projects
Development
Closed
Assignees
Clear assignees
renovate (renovate) Bot nessar (nessar)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: nessar/vac-optimizer#49