Files
vac-optimizer/.agents/skills/setup-matt-pocock-skills/domain.md
T
nessar bb8d09dda4 Add writing-for-agents skill documentation and related files
- Created SKILL.md and SKILL-MECHANICS.md for writing agent skills.
- Added openai.yaml for agent interface configuration.
- Introduced AGENTS.md for agent skills overview.
- Established CONTEXT.md for personal leave planning terminology.
- Documented ordered heuristic optimization in ADRs.
- Defined personal client-side planner limitations in ADRs.
- Created domain documentation for engineering skills.
- Added issue tracker guidelines for GitLab.
- Mapped triage labels for issue tracking.
- Initialized skills-lock.json to manage skill dependencies.
2026-08-11 23:34:09 +02:00

2.0 KiB

Domain Docs

How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.

Before exploring, read these

  • CONTEXT.md at the repo root, or
  • CONTEXT-MAP.md at the repo root if it exists — it points at one CONTEXT.md per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
  • docs/adr/ — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check src/<context>/docs/adr/ for context-scoped decisions.

If any of these files don't exist, proceed silently. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The /domain-modeling skill (reached via /grill-with-docs and /improve-codebase-architecture) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.

File structure

Single-context repo (most repos):

/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/adr/
│   ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│   └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

Multi-context repo (presence of CONTEXT-MAP.md at the root):

/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
└── src/
    ├── ordering/
    │   ├── CONTEXT.md
    │   └── docs/adr/                  ← context-specific decisions
    └── billing/
        ├── CONTEXT.md
        └── docs/adr/

Use the glossary's vocabulary

When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in CONTEXT.md. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.

If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for /domain-modeling).

Flag ADR conflicts

If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:

Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…