Add writing-for-agents skill documentation and related files

- Created SKILL.md and SKILL-MECHANICS.md for writing agent skills.
- Added openai.yaml for agent interface configuration.
- Introduced AGENTS.md for agent skills overview.
- Established CONTEXT.md for personal leave planning terminology.
- Documented ordered heuristic optimization in ADRs.
- Defined personal client-side planner limitations in ADRs.
- Created domain documentation for engineering skills.
- Added issue tracker guidelines for GitLab.
- Mapped triage labels for issue tracking.
- Initialized skills-lock.json to manage skill dependencies.
This commit is contained in:
nessar committed 2026-08-11 23:34:09 +02:00
1 parent a990e7e971
commit bb8d09dda4
82 files changed
+3627

No files matched your search

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
# Domain Docs
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
## Before exploring, read these
- **`CONTEXT.md`** at the repo root, or
- **`CONTEXT-MAP.md`** at the repo root if it exists — it points at one `CONTEXT.md` per context. Read each one relevant to the topic.
- **`docs/adr/`** — read ADRs that touch the area you're about to work in. In multi-context repos, also check `src/<context>/docs/adr/` for context-scoped decisions.
If any of these files don't exist, **proceed silently**. Don't flag their absence; don't suggest creating them upfront. The `/domain-modeling` skill (reached via `/grill-with-docs` and `/improve-codebase-architecture`) creates them lazily when terms or decisions actually get resolved.
## File structure
Single-context repo (most repos):
```
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
```
Multi-context repo (presence of `CONTEXT-MAP.md` at the root):
```
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/adr/ ← system-wide decisions
└── src/
├── ordering/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
└── billing/
├── CONTEXT.md
└── docs/adr/
```
## Use the glossary's vocabulary
When your output names a domain concept (in an issue title, a refactor proposal, a hypothesis, a test name), use the term as defined in `CONTEXT.md`. Don't drift to synonyms the glossary explicitly avoids.
If the concept you need isn't in the glossary yet, that's a signal — either you're inventing language the project doesn't use (reconsider) or there's a real gap (note it for `/domain-modeling`).
## Flag ADR conflicts
If your output contradicts an existing ADR, surface it explicitly rather than silently overriding:
> _Contradicts ADR-0007 (event-sourced orders) — but worth reopening because…_