refactor(planning): remove the original decision trace

Merge pull request 'ci: migrate to Gitea Actions' (#271 ) from feature/gitea-actions into develop
Reviewed-on: #271
2026-10-15 20:42:33 +02:00 · 2026-10-15 19:55:10 +02:00 · 2026-10-13 19:43:08 +02:00 · 2026-10-13 19:38:32 +02:00 · 2026-10-10 14:56:48 +00:00 · 2026-10-10 16:42:04 +02:00
101 changed files with 9552 additions and 10868 deletions
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Inspect `git status --short` and distinguish pre-existing user changes from task
 Look for the originating spec, in this order:

 1. The user's explicit spec, ticket, path, or acceptance criteria in the conversation. Preserve it as authoritative even when commits reference other work.
-2. Issue/MR references in relevant commit messages — fetch via `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md` when no explicit source was supplied.
+2. Issue/PR references in relevant commit messages — fetch via `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md` when no explicit source was supplied.
 3. A PRD/spec file under `docs/`, `specs/`, or `.scratch/` matching the branch name or feature.
 4. If nothing is found or the source is inaccessible, continue the Standards review and report the Spec coverage limitation. Ask for a source only when needed to answer the user's request; do not invent requirements or require tracker setup.

@@ -42,10 +42,11 @@ Preserve the configured tracker. For a new setup, infer a likely tracker from th

 - **GitHub** — issues live in the repo's GitHub Issues (uses the `gh` CLI)
 - **GitLab** — issues live in the repo's GitLab Issues (uses the [`glab`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cli) CLI)
+- **Gitea** — issues live in the repo's Gitea Issues (uses `tea-cli`, or `tea` where that is the installed binary; inspect its help for supported commands)
 - **Local markdown** — issues live as files under `.scratch/<feature>/` in this repo (good for solo projects or repos without a remote)
 - **Other** (Jira, Linear, etc.) — ask the user to describe the workflow in one paragraph; the skill will record it as freeform prose

-Record the choice in `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`. The GitHub and GitLab templates carry a "PRs as a request surface" flag, defaulted **off** — leave it off and don't raise it; a user who wants external PRs in the triage queue can flip the flag in the file later.
+Record the choice in `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`. The GitHub, GitLab, and Gitea templates carry a "PRs as a request surface" flag, defaulted **off** — leave it off and don't raise it; a user who wants external PRs in the triage queue can flip the flag in the file later.

 **Section B — Triage label vocabulary.** Skip this section entirely if the `triage` skill isn't installed (exploration told you) — an uninstalled skill needs no labels.

@@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ Then write the docs files using the seed templates in this skill folder as a sta

 - [issue-tracker-github.md](./issue-tracker-github.md) — GitHub issue tracker
 - [issue-tracker-gitlab.md](./issue-tracker-gitlab.md) — GitLab issue tracker
+- [issue-tracker-gitea.md](./issue-tracker-gitea.md) — Gitea issue tracker
 - [issue-tracker-local.md](./issue-tracker-local.md) — local-markdown issue tracker
 - [triage-labels.md](./triage-labels.md) — label mapping (only if `triage` is installed)
 - [domain.md](./domain.md) — domain doc consumer rules + layout
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Issue tracker: Gitea
+
+Issues and specs for this repo live as Gitea issues. Use the [`tea`](https://gitea.com/gitea/tea) CLI, called `tea-cli` on some systems. Record the instance URL, repository owner/name, installed command version, and supported operations when adapting this template.
+
+## Access and conventions
+
+Use the existing configured login and infer the repository from `git remote -v`. Check the installed binary's help before selecting commands: tea 1.0 changes the command groups, authentication, flags, and output formats. The examples here use `tea-cli` 0.9.2; options precede positional issue or PR numbers.
+
+- **Authenticate**: use the existing login; for a new login, run interactive `tea-cli login add` with the repository's instance URL.
+- **Create an issue**: `tea-cli issues create --title "..." --description "..." --labels "needs-triage"`. Pass multiline descriptions as one quoted argument.
+- **Read an issue**: `tea-cli issues --comments <number>`.
+- **List issues**: `tea-cli issues --state open --labels "..." --fields index,title,body,state,labels,assignees,url --output yaml`. Paginate with `--page` and `--limit` until all matching issues have been read.
+- **Comment**: `tea-cli comment <number> "..."`.
+- **Close**: post the explanation first, then `tea-cli issues close <number>`.
+- **Pull requests**: `tea-cli pulls create --base <integration-branch> --title "..." --description "..."`, `tea-cli pulls --comments <number>`, and `tea-cli pulls --state open --output yaml`.
+- **Milestones**: `tea-cli milestones --state all --fields id,title --output tsv`. Verify migrated milestone IDs rather than copying source-tracker IDs.
+
+This version has no JSON output, issue-edit command, or `api` command. Structured output flags apply to lists; detail views render for display. For unsupported operations, use the instance's `/api/swagger` explorer and `/swagger.v1.json` schema, or the Gitea UI. Authenticate API requests with an authorized token without displaying or committing it. API paths below are relative to the instance's `/api/v1`:
+
+- Read issue details and comments with `GET /repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<number>` and its `/comments` endpoint; paginate comments.
+- Resolve label IDs with `GET /repos/<owner>/<repo>/labels`. Add labels with `POST /repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<number>/labels`, body `{"labels":[<label-id>]}`; remove one with `DELETE` on `/labels/<label-id>`. Preserve unrelated labels.
+- Edit a body or assignment with `PATCH /repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<number>`, body `{"body":"..."}` or `{"assignees":["<username>"]}`. Read current assignees before updating the list.
+- Read a PR diff with `GET /repos/<owner>/<repo>/pulls/<number>.diff`.
+
+## Pull requests as a triage surface
+
+**PRs as a request surface: no.** _(Set to `yes` if this repo treats external pull requests as feature requests; `/triage` reads this flag.)_
+
+When enabled, read and list with `tea-cli pulls`; keep only external requests after checking collaborator or organization membership. Use `tea-cli comment`, the issue-label API, and `tea-cli pulls close <number>` for comment / label / close operations.
+
+Resolve bare `#<number>` references by checking the resource kind with `tea-cli issues --kind all --fields index,kind,title,url --output yaml` or the issue API's `pull_request` field. Issue URLs use `/issues/<number>`; PR URLs use `/pulls/<number>`.
+
+## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
+
+Create a Gitea issue with `tea-cli issues create`.
+
+## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
+
+Run `tea-cli issues --comments <number>` and read its labels and assignees.
+
+## Wayfinding operations
+
+- **Map**: an issue labelled `wayfinder:map`, holding the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body. Create it with `tea-cli issues create --title "..." --description "..." --labels "wayfinder:map"`.
+- **Child ticket**: an issue with `Part of #<map>` at the top of its description, labels `wayfinder:<type>` (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`), and an ordered link in the map's body.
+- **Blocking**: `POST /repos/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<child>/dependencies`, body `{"owner":"<owner>","repo":"<repo>","index":<blocker-number>}`. `GET` lists blockers; `DELETE` with the same body removes one. Where native dependencies are unavailable, use `Blocked by: #<n>, #<n>` at the top of the description. Every blocker must be closed before the ticket is unblocked.
+- **Frontier query**: list all open children with bodies and assignees, drop assigned tickets and those with an open native or description-line blocker; first in map order wins.
+- **Claim**: assign the authenticated username through the issue API or Gitea UI — the session's first write.
+- **Resolve**: comment with `tea-cli comment`, close with `tea-cli issues close`, and update the map's Decisions-so-far through the issue API or Gitea UI.
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ A wizard is ephemeral by default — built for one run, saved to a scratch or `s

 Work out every manual step the human must take and every value that gets captured along the way. Read the repo first — don't ask cold:

- For setup: configuration examples, README, compose/framework configuration, and the actual CI files (this repository uses `.gitlab-ci.yml`). Inspect secret names and references without displaying existing secret values. Include only values needed for the requested procedure, not every variable in the repository.
+- For setup: configuration examples, README, compose/framework configuration, and the actual CI files. This repository is hosted on Gitea; read `.gitea/workflows/` and `docs/gitea-actions.md` for the configured workflow and owner-activation requirements. Inspect secret names and references without displaying existing secret values. Include only values needed for the requested procedure, not every variable in the repository.
 - For a migration or transition: the current state, the target state, and the irreversible actions between them.

 Then show the user the ordered list of stages and the values each produces, and confirm — they may add, drop, or reorder.
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@ All AI agents (including Cline, Antigravity, Cursor, and Copilot) must adhere to
   - The overall project code coverage (Statements, Lines, and Functions) must be maintained at **80% or higher**.
   - Verify coverage by running:
     ```bash
-     bun run test --watch=false --coverage
+     bun scripts/generate-langs.js
+     NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=2048 bunx vitest run --coverage --maxWorkers=1 --exclude='src/app/benchmark/**'
     ```
   - If your changes introduce new code or modify existing code in a way that drops the coverage below 80%, you must write appropriate unit tests in `.spec.ts` files to bring it back up.

@@ -24,10 +25,12 @@ All AI agents (including Cline, Antigravity, Cursor, and Copilot) must adhere to
     bun run build
     ```

-4. **GitLab Pipeline Checks**:
-   - You must execute the local equivalent of the GitLab CI/CD pipeline steps before completing your task. All of the following commands must pass:
+4. **CI Checks**:
+   - You must execute the local validation commands before completing your task. The Gitea workflow is `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`; owner activation is tracked in issue #268, and local checks do not satisfy the migration gate. All of the following commands must pass:
     - **Linting check**: `bun run lint` (or use `bun run lint:fix` to resolve auto-fixable issues)
     - **Formatting check**: `bun run format:check`
-     - **TypeScript Type check**: `bunx tsc --noEmit`
-     - **Unit Tests and Coverage**: `bun run test --watch=false --coverage`
+     - **TypeScript Type check**: `bunx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.app.json` and `bunx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.spec.json`
+     - **Unit Tests and Coverage**: generate the language registry, then run the coverage command in rule 1, matching the Gitea functional-test job.
+     - **CI policy and publication**: `node scripts/ci-policy.test.mjs` and `node scripts/ci-image.test.mjs`
     - **Production Build**: `bun run build -- --configuration production`
+   - The separate performance benchmark remains advisory while issue #78 is open. Run it outside coverage with `NODE_OPTIONS=--max-old-space-size=2048 bunx vitest run src/app/benchmark/leave-planner-benchmark.spec.ts --maxWorkers=1` when verifying performance; see `docs/benchmark/README.md`.
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+${PullRequestTitle}
+
+${ClosingIssues}
+
+See pull request ${PullRequestReference}
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+name: CI
+
+on:
+    push:
+    pull_request:
+        types: [opened, reopened, synchronize, edited]
+    workflow_dispatch:
+
+permissions:
+    contents: read
+
+concurrency:
+    group: ci-${{ github.event_name }}-${{ github.ref }}
+    cancel-in-progress: ${{ !startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/') }}
+
+jobs:
+    policy:
+        name: policy
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        outputs:
+            slug: ${{ steps.policy.outputs.slug }}
+            tag: ${{ steps.policy.outputs.tag }}
+        steps:
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  fetch-depth: 0
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - name: Policy regression tests
+              run: node scripts/ci-policy.test.mjs && node scripts/ci-image.test.mjs
+            - name: Validate event and commit
+              id: policy
+              run: node scripts/ci-policy.mjs
+
+    validate:
+        name: validate
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        steps:
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - run: npm install --global bun@1.4.2
+            - run: bun install --frozen-lockfile
+            - run: bun run lint
+            - run: bun run format:check
+            - run: bunx prettier --check 'scripts/ci-*.mjs' '.gitea/workflows/*.yml'
+            - run: bunx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.app.json
+            - run: bunx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.spec.json
+
+    test:
+        name: test
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        env:
+            NODE_OPTIONS: --max-old-space-size=2048
+        steps:
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - run: npm install --global bun@1.4.2
+            - run: bun install --frozen-lockfile
+            - run: bun scripts/generate-langs.js
+            - name: Functional coverage
+              run: bunx vitest run --coverage --maxWorkers=1 --exclude='src/app/benchmark/**'
+            - name: Coverage report
+              if: ${{ always() }}
+              uses: https://gitea.com/actions/upload-artifact@v3
+              with:
+                  name: coverage
+                  path: coverage/
+                  retention-days: 7
+                  if-no-files-found: error
+
+    benchmark:
+        name: benchmark
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        # shortcut: advisory while #78 is open; restore the gate after the protocol passes.
+        continue-on-error: true
+        env:
+            NODE_OPTIONS: --max-old-space-size=2048
+        steps:
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - run: npm install --global bun@1.4.2
+            - run: bun install --frozen-lockfile
+            - run: bun scripts/generate-langs.js
+            - name: Unchanged benchmark protocol
+              run: timeout 300s bunx vitest run src/app/benchmark/leave-planner-benchmark.spec.ts --maxWorkers=1
+
+    build:
+        name: build
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        steps:
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - run: npm install --global bun@1.4.2
+            - run: bun install --frozen-lockfile
+            - run: bun run build -- --configuration production
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/upload-artifact@v3
+              with:
+                  name: dist
+                  path: dist/
+                  retention-days: 7
+                  if-no-files-found: error
+
+    security:
+        name: security
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        steps:
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - name: Install scanners
+              run: |
+                  apt-get update
+                  apt-get install --yes --no-install-recommends python3-venv
+                  python3 -m venv /tmp/semgrep
+                  /tmp/semgrep/bin/pip install semgrep==1.180.0
+                  case "$(uname -m)" in
+                    x86_64) trivy_arch=64bit ;;
+                    aarch64) trivy_arch=ARM64 ;;
+                    *) echo 'Unsupported Trivy architecture' >&2; exit 1 ;;
+                  esac
+                  archive="trivy_0.75.0_Linux-${trivy_arch}.tar.gz"
+                  curl --fail --location --silent --show-error "https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/releases/download/v0.75.0/${archive}" --output "/tmp/${archive}"
+                  curl --fail --location --silent --show-error https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/releases/download/v0.75.0/trivy_0.75.0_checksums.txt --output /tmp/trivy-checksums.txt
+                  (cd /tmp && sha256sum --check --ignore-missing trivy-checksums.txt)
+                  tar -xzf "/tmp/${archive}" -C /usr/local/bin trivy
+            - name: JavaScript and TypeScript SAST
+              run: /tmp/semgrep/bin/semgrep scan --config p/javascript --config p/typescript --metrics off --sarif --output semgrep-results.sarif src scripts
+            - name: Dependency and secret scan
+              if: ${{ !cancelled() }}
+              run: trivy fs --format sarif --output trivy-results.sarif --skip-dirs node_modules,dist,coverage .
+            - name: Security reports
+              if: ${{ always() }}
+              uses: https://gitea.com/actions/upload-artifact@v3
+              with:
+                  name: security
+                  path: '*-results.sarif'
+                  retention-days: 7
+                  if-no-files-found: error
+
+    images:
+        name: images
+        needs: [policy, validate, test, build, security]
+        if: >-
+            success() &&
+            (github.event_name == 'push' ||
+             (github.event_name == 'pull_request' &&
+              github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository))
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: docker:29.8.2
+        concurrency:
+            group: image-${{ needs.policy.outputs.tag != '' && 'stable' || needs.policy.outputs.slug }}
+            cancel-in-progress: false
+        services:
+            docker:
+                image: docker:29.8.2-dind
+                env:
+                    DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: ''
+                options: >-
+                    --privileged
+                    --health-cmd "docker info"
+                    --health-interval 5s
+                    --health-timeout 5s
+                    --health-retries 12
+        env:
+            DOCKER_HOST: tcp://docker:2375
+            DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: ''
+        defaults:
+            run:
+                shell: sh
+        steps:
+            - name: Install checkout and policy runtimes
+              run: apk add --no-cache nodejs git
+            - uses: https://gitea.com/actions/checkout@v4
+              with:
+                  fetch-depth: 0
+                  persist-credentials: false
+            - name: Build branch images or promote a release
+              env:
+                  REGISTRY_USERNAME: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_USERNAME }}
+                  REGISTRY_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.REGISTRY_PASSWORD }}
+              run: node scripts/ci-image.mjs
+
+    required:
+        name: required
+        if: ${{ always() }}
+        needs: [policy, validate, test, build, security, images]
+        runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+        container: node:24.21.0
+        env:
+            CHECK_RESULTS: ${{ needs.policy.result }} ${{ needs.validate.result }} ${{ needs.test.result }} ${{ needs.build.result }} ${{ needs.security.result }}
+            IMAGE_RESULT: ${{ needs.images.result }}
+            IMAGE_EXPECTED: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' || (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name == github.repository) }}
+        steps:
+            - name: Require successful validation and expected publication
+              run: |
+                  test "$CHECK_RESULTS" = 'success success success success success'
+                  if [ "$IMAGE_EXPECTED" = 'true' ]; then
+                      test "$IMAGE_RESULT" = 'success'
+                  else
+                      test "$IMAGE_RESULT" = 'skipped'
+                  fi
@@ -1,115 +0,0 @@
-image: oven/bun:latest
-
-stages:
-    - validate
-    - test
-    - build
-    - security
-    - docker
-
-variables:
-    DOCKER_DRIVER: overlay2
-    DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: ''
-
-cache:
-    key:
-        files:
-            - bun.lock
-    paths:
-        - .bun/
-
-.node_setup:
-    before_script:
-        - bun install --frozen-lockfile
-
-# -- Validate Stage --
-
-lint:
-    extends: .node_setup
-    stage: validate
-    script:
-        - bunx eslint "src/**/*.ts"
-
-prettier:
-    extends: .node_setup
-    stage: validate
-    script:
-        - bunx prettier --check "src/**/*.{ts,html,scss,css,json}"
-
-type-check:
-    extends: .node_setup
-    stage: validate
-    script:
-        - bunx tsc --noEmit
-
-# -- Test Stage --
-
-test:
-    image: node:24.21.0
-    extends: .node_setup
-    stage: test
-    before_script:
-        - npm install --global bun@1.4.2
-        - bun install --frozen-lockfile
-    script:
-        - bun run test --watch=false --coverage
-    artifacts:
-        when: always
-        paths:
-            - coverage/
-        reports:
-            coverage_report:
-                coverage_format: cobertura
-                path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml
-        expire_in: 7 days
-
-# -- Build Stage --
-
-build:
-    image: node:24.21.0
-    extends: .node_setup
-    stage: build
-    before_script:
-        - npm install --global bun@1.4.2
-        - bun install --frozen-lockfile
-    script:
-        - bun run build -- --configuration production
-    artifacts:
-        paths:
-            - dist/
-        expire_in: 7 days
-
-# -- Security Stage --
-
-include:
-    - template: Security/SAST.gitlab-ci.yml
-
-trivy_scan:
-    stage: security
-    image:
-        name: aquasec/trivy:latest
-        entrypoint: ['']
-    before_script: [] # override global before_script
-    script:
-        # Trivy will scan the project directory
-        - trivy fs --format sarif --output trivy-results.sarif .
-    artifacts:
-        reports:
-            sast: trivy-results.sarif
-        expire_in: 7 days
-
-# -- Docker Stage --
-
-docker-build:
-    stage: docker
-    image: docker:29.8.2
-    services:
-        - docker:29.8.2-dind
-    before_script:
-        - echo "$CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD" | docker login $CI_REGISTRY -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER --password-stdin
-    script:
-        - docker build -t "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG" -t "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:latest" .
-        - docker push "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG"
-        - docker push "$CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:latest"
-    rules:
-        - if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == $CI_DEFAULT_BRANCH
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#61](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/61)
+**Gitea:** [#61](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/61)

-Source : [issue #13](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter le glossaire du domaine et les ADR 0002, 0005, 0006 et 0007.
+Source : [issue #13](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter le glossaire du domaine et les ADR 0002, 0005, 0006 et 0007.

 - [ ] Un mode explicite « Saisir les jours déjà posés » présente l’horizon actuellement choisi et permet de sélectionner CP, RTT ou Autre. Autre couvre toutes les autres raisons de ne pas travailler ; ANY reste uniquement un sélecteur de règle.
 - [ ] Un clic sur une date admissible ajoute le type sélectionné ; un deuxième clic avec ce type supprime la déclaration ; un clic avec un autre type la remplace. Une date porte au maximum une déclaration.
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@

 **Blocked by:**

- 01 — Saisir, sauvegarder et figer les jours déjà posés ([#61](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/61)).
+- 01 — Saisir, sauvegarder et figer les jours déjà posés ([#61](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/61)).

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#62](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/62)
+**Gitea:** [#62](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/62)

-Source : [issue #13](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter les définitions de période de repos, gain en jours non travaillés, séquence de travail et semaine de jour férié du glossaire, ainsi que les ADR 0006 et 0007.
+Source : [issue #13](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter les définitions de période de repos, gain en jours non travaillés, séquence de travail et semaine de jour férié du glossaire, ainsi que les ADR 0006 et 0007.

 - [ ] Un vendredi ordinaire déclaré Autre, sans solde ni règle, produit une période vendredi–dimanche de trois jours. Cette période existe sans nouveau placement et ne provoque aucun débit.
 - [ ] Les déclarations, nouveaux placements, week-ends et jours fériés adjacents forment des périodes contiguës fusionnées. Chaque date contribue une seule fois à leur durée ; l’origine et le type des déclarations restent distincts des placements.
@@ -4,13 +4,13 @@

 **Blocked by:**

- 01 — Saisir, sauvegarder et figer les jours déjà posés ([#61](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/61)).
+- 01 — Saisir, sauvegarder et figer les jours déjà posés ([#61](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/61)).

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#63](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/63)
+**Gitea:** [#63](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/63)

-Source : [issue #13](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter les quantités, fenêtres inclusives, obligations conjointes, priorités et contributions partagées du glossaire, ainsi que l’ADR 0007.
+Source : [issue #13](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter les quantités, fenêtres inclusives, obligations conjointes, priorités et contributions partagées du glossaire, ainsi que l’ADR 0007.

 - [ ] Dans une semaine ordinaire, avec quatre CP restants, un mercredi déclaré CP et une obligation de cinq CP du lundi au vendredi, le calcul ajoute quatre CP et débite uniquement ces quatre jours.
 - [ ] Les déclarations compatibles contribuent aux obligations exactes et aux préférences demandant jusqu’à une quantité donnée, dans l’intersection entre la fenêtre inclusive de la règle et l’horizon soumis. Une déclaration extérieure à ces limites ne contribue pas à la règle.
@@ -4,14 +4,14 @@

 **Blocked by:**

- 02 — Optimiser les périodes de repos autour des jours déclarés ([#62](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/62)).
- 03 — Compter les jours déclarés dans les règles de période ([#63](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/63)).
+- 02 — Optimiser les périodes de repos autour des jours déclarés ([#62](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/62)).
+- 03 — Compter les jours déclarés dans les règles de période ([#63](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/63)).

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#64](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/64)
+**Gitea:** [#64](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/64)

-Source : [issue #13](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter les occurrences et modes IF_THEN, les droits acquis et l’ordre des objectifs du glossaire, ainsi que les ADR sur les artefacts du même calcul et l’ADR 0007.
+Source : [issue #13](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/13), entretien et spécification de développement. Respecter les occurrences et modes IF_THEN, les droits acquis et l’ordre des objectifs du glossaire, ainsi que les ADR sur les artefacts du même calcul et l’ADR 0007.

 - [ ] Les motifs IF_THEN utilisent les véritables jours fériés français nationaux et les modes before, after, around et auto existants. Une déclaration ne crée pas une occurrence de jour férié et ne permet pas de déplacer le motif hors de ses limites admissibles.
 - [ ] Une déclaration compatible occupe sa position normale dans le motif et réduit le nombre de nouveaux placements nécessaires. Une déclaration incompatible ne peut être retypée ou déplacée, ni être sautée pour reporter la position demandée sur un jour plus éloigné. Les obligations restent obligatoires pour chaque occurrence ; les préférences conservent leur exigence de motif complet et leurs priorités.
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#65](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/65)
+**Gitea:** [#65](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/65)

-Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/29), in milestone %3: V1 stats. Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0002, 0004, 0006, and 0007.
+Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/29), in milestone V1 stats. Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0002, 0004, 0006, and 0007.

 - [ ] A labelled calendar control opens one statistics popup for the latest calculated valid plan. Opening it runs no optimization and changes no planning data.
 - [ ] The popup shows the number of leave placement dates with an explicit leave-day label. Declared non-working days consume no balance and are excluded from this count. A valid plan with no placements displays 0 and still permits opening the popup.
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
 **Blocked by:**

 - 01 — Open plan statistics for calculated leave usage.
- [#62 — Optimiser les périodes de repos autour des jours déclarés](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/62), which establishes time-off periods and work sequences that include declared non-working days.
+- [#62 — Optimiser les périodes de repos autour des jours déclarés](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/62), which establishes time-off periods and work sequences that include declared non-working days.

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#66](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/66)
+**Gitea:** [#66](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/66)

-Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/29), including [#7](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/7). The existing longest work-sequence metric from #28 is reused. Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.
+Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/29), including [#7](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/7). The existing longest work-sequence metric from #28 is reused. Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.

 - [ ] Add five labelled metrics: non-working-day gain, average work-sequence length, longest work-sequence length, average time-off period length, and longest time-off period length. Work lengths use working days; break lengths use calendar days.
 - [ ] The work-sequence average includes every non-empty sequence inside the submitted horizon, including both edges. Weekends and French public holidays neither count nor split a sequence; leave placements and declared non-working days interrupt it. Consecutive days off introduce no zero-length samples.
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
 **Blocked by:**

 - 01 — Open plan statistics for calculated leave usage.
- [#64 — Appliquer les motifs IF_THEN et les droits acquis aux jours déclarés](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/64), which establishes finalized earned entitlements and the fixed Europe/Paris calculation-date cutoff.
+- [#64 — Appliquer les motifs IF_THEN et les droits acquis aux jours déclarés](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/64), which establishes finalized earned entitlements and the fixed Europe/Paris calculation-date cutoff.

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#67](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/67)
+**Gitea:** [#67](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/67)

-Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/29), including [#8](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/8). Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.
+Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/29), including [#8](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/8). Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.

 - [ ] Display gross earned leave from every applicable generating rule, including Samedi Malin, with a per-rule breakdown whose quantities sum to the total.
 - [ ] A plan earning 3 days and consuming 2 reports 3 earned days. Fully consumed earned entitlements remain included even when absent from remaining balances; generating a future entitlement does not require consuming it inside the horizon.
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
 **Blocked by:**

 - 01 — Open plan statistics for calculated leave usage.
- [#62 — Optimiser les périodes de repos autour des jours déclarés](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/62), which provides shared time-off periods including declared non-working days and adjacent context dates.
+- [#62 — Optimiser les périodes de repos autour des jours déclarés](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/62), which provides shared time-off periods including declared non-working days and adjacent context dates.

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#68](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/68)
+**Gitea:** [#68](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/68)

-Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/29), including [#9](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/9). Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.
+Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/29), including [#9](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/9). Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.

 - [ ] Show the number of distinct Monday-to-Friday French public-holiday dates in planned time-off periods containing at least one Saturday or Sunday. Each qualifying period contains at least one leave placement or declared non-working day.
 - [ ] Count direct Monday/Friday connections and connections through leave, such as a Tuesday holiday joined to a weekend by Monday off. Declared non-working days can provide the same connection without consuming a balance.
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@
 **Blocked by:**

 - 01 — Open plan statistics for calculated leave usage.
- [#61 — Saisir, sauvegarder et figer les jours déjà posés](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/61), which carries fixed declared non-working days with the producing calculation and its outcomes.
+- [#61 — Saisir, sauvegarder et figer les jours déjà posés](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/61), which carries fixed declared non-working days with the producing calculation and its outcomes.

 **Status:** ready-for-agent

-**GitLab:** [#69](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/69)
+**Gitea:** [#69](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/69)

-Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/29), including the clarification that working only one day in a full week is undesirable. Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.
+Source: the agreed Plan Statistics Popup spec for [#3](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/3) and [#29](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/29), including the clarification that working only one day in a full week is undesirable. Follow the domain glossary and ADRs 0004, 0006, and 0007.

 - [ ] Count Monday-to-Sunday calendar weeks whose five Monday-to-Friday dates all lie inside the submitted half-open horizon and that contain exactly one remaining working day after excluding French public holidays, leave placements, and declared non-working days.
 - [ ] Four weekdays off and one remaining workday qualify. Weeks with zero or two remaining workdays do not qualify, including two-workday weeks containing separate one-day work sequences.
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# 01 — Unifier l’évaluation et la comparaison des objectifs
+
+**Gitea:** [#70](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/70)
+
+**What to build:** Le planificateur conserve ses résultats actuels pendant une préparation qui rend les six objectifs évaluables à partir de configurations de règles. Le contrat commun permet ensuite aux règles fournies et aux règles personnelles d’utiliser les mêmes mesures, sans dépendre de leur nom ou de leur identité.
+
+**Blocked by:** None — can start immediately.
+
+**Status:** ready-for-agent
+
+Préparation du remplacement décrit par l’ADR 0008, justifiée par les comparaisons aujourd’hui dispersées dans le moteur. Ouvrir une branche d’intégration consacrée à cette évolution ; la mise en service de l’ensemble dépend du ticket 06. Préserver les données utilisateur est une décision explicite du cadrage.
+
+**Hypothèses de travail :** Pour clore les détails techniques restés ouverts dans la spécification, partir du catalogue minimal nécessaire aux six préréglages : somme, comptage et maximum, directions minimiser ou maximiser, valeur zéro sur ensemble vide. Le déficit de reprise possède un seuil entier positif, initialement cinq ; la pondération des semaines fériées reste la mesure métier existante. Les autres agrégations et filtres ne sont pas requis par ce découpage.
+
+- [ ] Décrire le contrat composé : éléments observés, conditions applicables, mesure, agrégation et direction. Définir une table finie des combinaisons compatibles et des paramètres acceptés, avec les unités en jours travaillés ou calendaires selon la mesure. Le catalogue permet de composer des configurations, sans se réduire à six identifiants d’objectifs.
+- [ ] Exprimer dans ce contrat les six préréglages : somme des soldes à risque non placés à minimiser ; somme des valeurs des semaines fériées complètes à maximiser ; gain de jours non ouvrés à maximiser ; longueur maximale des séquences de travail à minimiser ; déficit des courtes séquences internes à minimiser ; nombre de placements d’appoint à minimiser.
+- [ ] Conserver les définitions exactes : pondération des fériés du lundi au vendredi de 1, 2, 3, 2, 1 ; déficit de cinq moins la longueur pour chaque séquence interne non vide de moins de cinq jours ; séquences aux bords de l’horizon incluses dans le maximum et exclues du déficit interne.
+- [ ] Définir explicitement zéro pour le comptage, la somme et le maximum sur un ensemble vide, en reprenant les résultats actuels. Valider le domaine et l’unité des paramètres ; une combinaison non prise en charge est identifiable.
+- [ ] Une même configuration appliquée au même plan produit la même valeur quels que soient le nom et l’identité de la règle. Vérifier aussi une configuration paramétrée distincte du préréglage, par exemple le déficit à trois jours, sans inventer une nouvelle mesure métier.
+- [ ] Regrouper l’évaluation et les comparaisons nécessaires à la sélection des solutions d’obligations, aux déplacements, aux placements d’appoint, aux départages et aux explications. Remplacer les calculs dupliqués concernés ; ne pas ajouter un second moteur ou un adaptateur de compatibilité.
+- [ ] Cette préparation conserve l’ordre historique pour ses scénarios de référence : prévention des pertes, préférences, semaines fériées, gain de jours non ouvrés, séquence maximale, déficit des reprises, placements d’appoint, expiration puis dates.
+- [ ] Les tests existants de placements, soldes, obligations conjointes, congés gagnés et trace de qualité conservent leurs résultats observables pendant ce prefactoring. Les mesures sont également vérifiées sur des plans concrets comportant des jours déclarés et des périodes aux limites de l’horizon.
+- [ ] Consigner le contrat minimal et ses cas limites pour les tickets suivants, en distinguant les décisions déjà confirmées des hypothèses techniques retenues. Les tickets suivants partagent ce contrat et cette branche d’intégration.
+
+**Vérification de bout en bout :** Comparer les résultats et les explications des scénarios de référence avant et après la préparation ; vérifier que les six recettes et une variante paramétrée évaluent correctement les mêmes plans.
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# 02 — Piloter la prévention des pertes depuis les règles
+
+**Gitea:** [#71](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/71)
+
+**What to build:** L’utilisateur crée une règle d’optimisation de prévention des pertes, l’enregistre, la déplace parmi ses préférences et constate son effet sur les congés placés et les soldes restants. La désactiver retire réellement sa priorité automatique.
+
+**Blocked by:** 01 — Unifier l’évaluation et la comparaison des objectifs.
+
+**Status:** ready-for-agent
+
+Première tranche fonctionnelle du modèle commun de l’ADR 0008. Continuer la branche d’intégration du ticket 01 ; l’ajout des six préréglages aux données existantes et la mise en service sont traités au ticket 06. Les scénarios de cette tranche soumettent explicitement leurs règles.
+
+- [ ] Proposer la famille Optimisation dans la liste existante et permettre de créer, nommer, éditer, activer, désactiver, supprimer et réordonner une règle utilisant la somme des soldes à risque non placés. Seul le mode préférence est disponible pour cette famille.
+- [ ] L’édition, les résumés et les commandes utilisent le contrat du ticket 01, sont traduits et accessibles au clavier. La configuration complète est sauvegardée localement et restaurée, avec son identité, ses paramètres, son activation et sa position.
+- [ ] Le calcul résout les obligations conjointement puis utilise l’ordre des préférences actives pour arbitrer les placements. Placer la prévention des pertes sous une préférence personnelle peut laisser davantage de congés à risque inutilisés ; la remonter restaure sa priorité.
+- [ ] Remplacer l’exécution implicite de la prévention des pertes par l’exécution de sa configuration explicite. Mettre en place le parcours ordonné partagé des règles ; aucun objectif n’est ajouté implicitement à une requête pour compenser une règle absente ou une configuration non prise en charge.
+- [ ] Une règle désactivée donne le même plan que son absence, à autres entrées identiques. Une requête sans règle active n’ajoute aucun congé, même avec des soldes à risque, et conserve les jours déclarés. Les départages par expiration et dates ne déclenchent aucun placement.
+- [ ] Les quantités, disponibilités, expirations, jours éligibles et jours déclarés restent des contraintes de validité. Une configuration active incompatible ou mal formée produit une erreur d’entrée rattachable à la règle, sans devenir un conflit d’obligations ni réactiver un défaut.
+- [ ] Les chemins direct et worker conservent tous les paramètres de la règle dans l’instantané du calcul. L’explication, la trace et les analyses contrefactuelles suivent le même ordre actif ; une modification ultérieure dans l’éditeur ne change pas le résultat soumis.
+- [ ] Adapter les consommateurs concernés, notamment ceux qui supposent qu’une règle comporte toujours un nombre de jours à poser. L’estimation de durée reste finie et les règles existantes Si… alors… et Période restent utilisables.
+- [ ] Les tests de comportement couvrent création et rechargement, déplacement au clavier, priorité inversée contre une préférence personnelle, désactivation équivalente à suppression, absence de règles, entrée invalide et passage par le worker. S’appuyer sur les suites existantes de gestion des règles, de planification et d’instantané immuable.
+- [ ] Les fonctionnalités communes de cette tranche sont réutilisables par les familles des tickets 03 à 05. Ne pas conserver une exécution historique parallèle comme solution transitoire ; la série est livrée après sa validation commune.
+
+**Vérification de bout en bout :** Avec un solde à risque et une préférence personnelle concurrente, déplacer la prévention des pertes, recalculer et comparer les placements et soldes ; désactiver ensuite toutes les règles et vérifier l’absence de nouveaux congés.
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# 03 — Composer les règles de semaines fériées et de repos
+
+**Gitea:** [#72](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/72)
+
+**What to build:** L’utilisateur crée et règle les préférences « Compléter les semaines avec un jour férié » et « Profiter des week-ends et jours fériés », puis choisit laquelle prime dans le planning et dans ses explications.
+
+**Blocked by:** 02 — Piloter la prévention des pertes depuis les règles.
+
+**Status:** ready-for-agent
+
+Tranche de calendrier de l’ADR 0008, sur la branche d’intégration commune. Elle utilise l’édition, la persistance, le transport et l’ordre actif introduits au ticket 02. Elle peut avancer indépendamment du ticket 04 ; la mise en service reste conditionnée au ticket 06.
+
+- [ ] Permettre de composer, enregistrer et modifier les règles sur les semaines fériées et les périodes de repos avec les conditions, mesures et agrégations compatibles du contrat commun. Les deux préréglages sont des configurations du même modèle que les règles personnelles.
+- [ ] Le préréglage des semaines fériées maximise la somme des valeurs des semaines complètes. Compter chaque férié du lundi au vendredi selon sa distance au week-end le plus proche ; additionner les contributions de plusieurs fériés dans une semaine sans compter la semaine deux fois.
+- [ ] Le préréglage du gain maximise les dates distinctes de week-end et de jour férié contenues dans les périodes de repos. Les jours de congé posés ne constituent pas eux-mêmes ce gain.
+- [ ] Conserver les contributions des jours déclarés et les règles d’adjacence aux limites de l’horizon. Les placements restent dans l’horizon et sur des dates éligibles ; une semaine ordinaire entièrement déclarée ne devient pas une semaine fériée.
+- [ ] Les règles s’arbitrent selon leur position parmi toutes les préférences actives. Un scénario où la meilleure semaine fériée concurrence un gain de jours non ouvrés plus élevé démontre les deux ordres possibles.
+- [ ] Une préférence de calendrier peut être placée avant ou après Samedi Malin et les autres préférences. Aucun ancien garde-fou ne rétablit automatiquement la priorité d’une semaine fériée ou d’une prévention des pertes désactivée.
+- [ ] La recherche peut utiliser des placements d’appoint admissibles lorsque l’objectif actif les justifie et que les préférences supérieures et obligations sont préservées. Leur classification est conservée pour le ticket 05.
+- [ ] La configuration éditée et sauvegardée est celle utilisée par le calcul direct, le worker, les explications, la trace et les comparaisons de dates. Les libellés et commandes sont traduits et accessibles.
+- [ ] Adapter les scénarios de comportement existants sur les semaines fériées, le gain, les jours déclarés et les placements d’appoint : férié du mercredi, plusieurs fériés, horizon partiel, concurrence entre objectifs et désactivation équivalente à absence. Les requêtes de référence fournissent explicitement leurs règles.
+
+**Vérification de bout en bout :** Créer les deux règles, inverser leur ordre sur un cas concurrent, recalculer et constater la modification du planning et du premier objectif décisif dans l’explication ; recharger et retrouver la configuration.
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# 04 — Composer les règles de séquences de travail
+
+**Gitea:** [#73](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/73)
+
+**What to build:** L’utilisateur compose des préférences sur ses séquences de travail : réduire la plus longue séquence ou limiter le déficit des reprises courtes, avec un seuil configurable. Leur position parmi les autres préférences influence le planning.
+
+**Blocked by:** 02 — Piloter la prévention des pertes depuis les règles.
+
+**Status:** ready-for-agent
+
+Tranche de séquences de travail de l’ADR 0008, sur la branche d’intégration commune. Elle utilise le contrat minimal et les fonctions de gestion du ticket 02 et peut avancer indépendamment du ticket 03. Le seuil initial de cinq jours reproduit le comportement existant.
+
+- [ ] Permettre de créer, éditer, sauvegarder et réordonner une règle sur la longueur maximale des séquences de travail et une règle sur le déficit des séquences internes, à partir du même modèle composable.
+- [ ] Le préréglage de la séquence maximale minimise son nombre de jours travaillés, en incluant les séquences situées aux deux bords de l’horizon. Les week-ends et jours fériés ne comptent pas et ne coupent pas une séquence.
+- [ ] Le préréglage des reprises courtes minimise la somme des déficits pour les séquences internes non vides : avec le seuil initial de cinq jours, une reprise d’un jour contribue quatre et une reprise de quatre jours contribue un. Les séquences aux bords de l’horizon sont exclues de cette mesure.
+- [ ] Le seuil de la mesure de déficit est un entier strictement positif, initialement cinq. Une règle personnelle utilisant un autre seuil, par exemple trois, calcule son propre déficit et peut produire un autre arbitrage ; il ne s’agit pas d’un seuil impératif de validité.
+- [ ] Les conditions de sélection, mesures, unités et paramètres compatibles sont contrôlés à l’édition et à l’entrée du calcul. Une collection vide ou des séquences internes vides respectent la valeur zéro définie au ticket 01.
+- [ ] Deux règles portant sur la même famille mais ayant des paramètres distincts sont évaluées séparément selon leur position. L’évaluation et les caches éventuels ne confondent pas les configurations sur la seule base du type de mesure.
+- [ ] Les placements choisis respectent les obligations, les préférences supérieures et les jours déclarés. Désactiver une règle retire son influence, y compris lors de la recherche de placements d’appoint, sans conserver une protection fixe de la longueur maximale ou du déficit.
+- [ ] L’interface, la restauration, le worker, l’explication, la trace et les comparaisons contrefactuelles utilisent la même configuration capturée. Les libellés distinguent jours travaillés, seuil de préférence et unité de la mesure.
+- [ ] Les tests prolongent les suites de statistiques et de planification : bords de l’horizon, séquences vides, jours déclarés, seuil initial, autre seuil, deux règles paramétrées, priorité face à une règle personnelle et désactivation. Les vérifications portent sur les placements et valeurs observables, y compris après rechargement.
+
+**Vérification de bout en bout :** Créer une préférence de reprise courte à cinq jours, constater sa mesure et le plan, puis la modifier à trois jours et recalculer un cas discriminant ; retrouver le seuil et son effet après rechargement.
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# 05 — Piloter l’économie des jours d’appoint
+
+**Gitea:** [#74](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/74)
+
+**What to build:** L’utilisateur ajoute une préférence « Économiser les jours d’appoint » et décide, par sa position, jusqu’où les améliorations du planning peuvent consommer des congés qui expirent après l’horizon.
+
+**Blocked by:** 03 — Composer les règles de semaines fériées et de repos ; 04 — Composer les règles de séquences de travail.
+
+**Status:** ready-for-agent
+
+Tranche d’économie des placements d’appoint de l’ADR 0008, sur la branche d’intégration commune. Les tickets 03 et 04 fournissent les objectifs qui peuvent justifier ces placements et contre lesquels cette préférence doit être vérifiée. La migration globale est réservée au ticket 06.
+
+- [ ] Permettre de créer, éditer, activer, désactiver, supprimer, réordonner et sauvegarder une règle qui minimise le nombre de placements d’appoint selon le contrat commun.
+- [ ] Compter uniquement les placements d’appoint au sens du domaine : des placements supplémentaires issus de soldes expirant après l’horizon pour améliorer le plan. Les placements explicitement demandés par une règle ne deviennent pas tous des placements d’appoint parce que leur solde expire plus tard.
+- [ ] En position supérieure aux objectifs de calendrier ou de séquences de travail, cette préférence peut empêcher des ajouts d’appoint qui amélioreraient seulement ces objectifs inférieurs. En position inférieure, elle économise des placements sans dégrader les objectifs supérieurs ni les obligations.
+- [ ] La suppression, le déplacement ou la réaffectation d’un placement conserve une classification et une provenance cohérentes. Les conditions chronologiques des congés gagnés et les soldes disponibles restent valides.
+- [ ] Désactiver cette règle retire son critère de comparaison ; aucune étape fixe ne rétablit la minimisation du nombre de placements d’appoint. Sa désactivation ne déclenche pas à elle seule de nouveaux placements : un objectif actif doit justifier un ajout.
+- [ ] Les cas à égalité sur les règles actives conservent les départages finaux par expiration puis dates. Un objectif supprimé ne réapparaît pas sous forme de départage caché.
+- [ ] La gestion dans l’interface, la persistance et les commandes au clavier traversent jusqu’au calcul réel. Explications, trace et analyses contrefactuelles rendent compte de la règle active et de la contribution des placements concernés.
+- [ ] Adapter les tests existants sur la conservation de provenance et l’économie des placements d’appoint. Ajouter des arbitrages vérifiables contre une amélioration de calendrier et contre une amélioration des séquences de travail, avec inversion des priorités et comparaison entre désactivation et absence.
+
+**Vérification de bout en bout :** Comparer un plan qui ajoute des jours d’appoint pour améliorer le repos à un plan où la préférence d’économie est remontée ; montrer les jours consommés, les soldes conservés et l’objectif décisif.
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# 06 — Migrer les règles sauvegardées et valider le comportement fonctionnel
+
+**Gitea:** [#75](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/75)
+
+Blocked by: #74
+
+Les exigences de performance sont transférées à #78. La clôture de ce ticket dépend de la migration et de la validation fonctionnelle, pas du passage du protocole de performance. Les limites du benchmark restent inchangées. À la demande de l’utilisateur, son job CI est séparé et non bloquant tant que #78 est ouvert ; #78 doit rétablir ce contrôle obligatoire après réussite du protocole. Les tests fonctionnels et les autres contrôles CI restent obligatoires.
+
+## What to build
+
+Au prochain chargement, l’utilisateur retrouve ses règles et les six anciens comportements du moteur sous forme de préréglages actifs. Il peut ensuite les modifier ou les supprimer durablement, et l’ensemble est validé avant sa mise en service.
+
+Livraison intégrée de l’ADR 0008 sur la branche commune aux tickets #70, #71, #72, #73, #74. La préservation des données enregistrées et la migration unique ont été explicitement approuvées : ne pas réinitialiser les données pour simplifier le changement de contrat.
+
+## Acceptance criteria
+
+- [x] À l’initialisation, fournir les six préréglages actifs avec cet ordre : prévention des pertes, règles personnelles ou règles initiales existantes dans leur ordre, semaines fériées, gain de jours non ouvrés, séquence maximale, déficit des reprises et économie des placements d’appoint.
+- [x] Migrer une seule fois les listes enregistrées avant cette évolution, y compris une ancienne liste vide. Préserver intégralement l’identité, le nom, les paramètres, les dates, la force, l’activation et l’ordre relatif des règles existantes.
+- [x] Enregistrer de façon cohérente les règles migrées et le fait que la migration a eu lieu. Ne pas considérer l’opération terminée si les règles n’ont pas été sauvegardées ; gérer les échecs de stockage sans écraser les données utilisateur valides.
+- [x] Les chargements suivants ne dupliquent pas les préréglages, ne rétablissent pas ceux supprimés et ne réactivent pas ceux désactivés. Une liste vidée volontairement après migration reste vide. Les nouveaux utilisateurs reçoivent directement la nouvelle configuration initiale.
+- [x] La restauration et la migration précèdent le premier calcul utilisant ces données. L’utilisateur peut immédiatement éditer les six configurations avec les mêmes commandes que ses règles personnelles et retrouver ses choix après rechargement.
+- [x] Vérifier de bout en bout les six préréglages dans l’ordre initial, leurs réordonnancements et leurs désactivations. Une configuration personnelle différente d’un préréglage traverse édition, sauvegarde, worker, calcul et explication ; les paramètres ont un effet vérifiable.
+- [x] La liste entièrement désactivée, la liste supprimée après migration et une requête directe sans règle active n’ajoutent aucun congé malgré des soldes à risque. Les jours déclarés, les quantités restantes et les raisons pertinentes restent cohérents.
+- [x] Les obligations conjointes, les conditions des congés gagnés et les contraintes de validité sont respectées pour tout ordre des préférences. Une annulation restitue le meilleur plan valide disponible selon la configuration soumise. La suppression de la trace originale est suivie séparément dans #76.
+- [x] Les explications et analyses contrefactuelles utilisent le même ordre actif que le calcul. Modifier les règles durant le calcul ou pendant la livraison des explications ne change pas ses résultats. Les anciens objectifs implicites n’interviennent plus dans aucune comparaison ou protection.
+- [x] Les fixtures et scénarios de benchmark qui dépendaient d’une optimisation implicite demandent explicitement les préréglages nécessaires. Les tests d’absence de règles n’utilisent aucun défaut implicite pour retrouver l’ancien résultat.
+- [x] Exécuter les suites fonctionnelles concernées de règles, interface, moteur, worker réel, explication, annulation et estimation de durée, ainsi que les contrôles habituels de compilation et de qualité. Préserver les assertions de résultat et de déterminisme des fixtures, y compris les horizons longs. L’exécution complète du protocole de benchmark, la réactivité mesurée, les durées, la consommation mémoire et les optimisations nécessaires relèvent de #78 et ne conditionnent plus la clôture de #75. Ne pas introduire de délai d’arrêt automatique.
+- [x] La vérification fonctionnelle commune des tickets #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75 est la condition de clôture fonctionnelle de ce ticket. Documenter les choix finaux du contrat composable ; ne laisser ni double moteur, ni chemin historique implicite, ni adaptateur provisoire ajouté pour rendre les étapes indépendamment livrables. Les limites de performance mesurées et leur amélioration sont suivies dans #78 ; les tests fonctionnels et les autres contrôles CI restent obligatoires, avec la seule exception temporaire du job de benchmark décrite ci-dessus.
+
+**Vérification de bout en bout :** Partir d’une ancienne sauvegarde contenant des règles personnalisées et désactivées, charger la nouvelle version, vérifier le premier calcul, modifier ou supprimer des préréglages, recharger et constater la conservation exacte des choix.
+
+## Blocked by
+
+- #74 — Piloter l’économie des jours d’appoint
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# 01 — Remove the original decision trace end to end
+
+**Gitea:** [#76](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/76)
+
+## What to build
+
+Calculations no longer record, retain or deliver an original decision trace. Users receive the displayed plan, its stable explanation and remaining-balance reasons, and can still analyze an alternative date for a displayed placement. The advanced trace explorer, historical calendar replay and historical attempt lists disappear completely.
+
+This is one cohesive contract replacement across the planner, calculation service, workers and UI. Use a scoped integration branch containing the existing #70–#75 implementation work; #75's final verification must not be treated as a prerequisite for removing tracing. The shared functional integration verification gate is #77 — Verify integrated planning after trace removal. Benchmark performance acceptance and any required optimization are owned by #78; performance is no longer a completion gate for #75.
+
+## Acceptance criteria
+
+- [ ] Delete trace capture, materialization, candidate-history retention, replay, historical eligibility and caches or evidence pools used exclusively for tracing. Remove observational work while preserving search breadth, allocation previews, rule priority and incumbent selection.
+- [ ] Replace trace contracts directly and update all callers in the same change. Remove trace promises, callbacks, public types, streaming messages, status indexes, acknowledgements and backpressure queues across real-worker, browser-fallback and server-side calculation paths. Do not retain debug toggles, compatibility adapters, empty trace results or replacement history.
+- [ ] Preserve immutable calculation, valid-incumbent and final-state snapshots needed by retained behavior. Rename retained state contracts independently of tracing; do not delete cancellation or explanation data because it currently has a trace-related name.
+- [ ] Retain stable plan explanations, including placement entitlement and rule provenance, objective contributions and the first decisive objective, time-off periods, remaining balances and concrete non-placement reasons. Preserve invalid-input and conflict explanations and incomplete-calculation behavior.
+- [ ] Keep alternative-date analysis for a displayed placement using the captured calculation configuration, the same entitlement, leave type and provenance, and fixed unrelated placements. Remove analysis based on historical decisions; hypothetical analysis never mutates the displayed plan.
+- [ ] Remove the advanced trace panel, replay controls, historical calendar overlays and candidate statuses. Remove remaining-balance historical attempt lists, pagination and loading state while retaining classification, validity, earned-entitlement source and truthful displayed-plan reasons. Leave no dead controls or trace-unavailable messages.
+- [ ] Preserve explicit cancellation before and after a valid incumbent, best-valid-partial-plan recovery, heartbeat monitoring, stale-response rejection and the existing technical-budget contract. Interrupted calculations do not imply an obligation conflict. Explanation delivery failures do not discard an available outcome, and planning workers do not wait for trace acknowledgements after required delivery.
+- [ ] Preserve completed placements, balances, objective values, joint obligation satisfaction, earned-entitlement chronology, deterministic tie-breaking, user-controlled priorities and empty-active-rule behavior. Do not reset saved entitlements, declarations or rule configurations or change the existing migration.
+- [ ] Update component styles and translations across supported languages, preserving keyboard access and accessibility for retained explanations, calendar interactions and date analysis.
+- [ ] Adapt existing planner, service, worker, explanation, cancellation, calendar and remaining-balance tests. Delete tests exclusively for tracing while retaining assertions for supported behavior in mixed tests. Update benchmark callers, output and assertions to remove obsolete trace requirements without reducing scenarios or changing performance gates.
+- [ ] Supersede trace-specific requirements in the domain vocabulary and explanation/cancellation ADRs, and update benchmark documentation. Preserve the remaining planning contracts and document that the original decision trace and historical analysis are removed.
+
+No new dependency, replacement telemetry, optimization-quality change, allocation-preview reduction or benchmark deadline relaxation is part of this ticket. No separate prefactor is required: retained explanation and hypothetical-analysis behavior already exists.
+
+## Blocked by
+
+None — can start immediately.
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# 02 — Verify integrated planning after trace removal
+
+**Gitea:** [#77](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/77)
+
+Blocked by: #76
+
+## What to build
+
+Demonstrate that the integrated #70–#75 work retains its supported behavior after trace removal. Provide a functionally verified trace-free baseline for #78, which now owns benchmark performance acceptance and optimization. Benchmark performance is no longer a completion gate for #75 or this functional verification ticket.
+
+## Acceptance criteria
+
+- [ ] Review the integrated contract replacement across all calculation paths and UI callers. Confirm there is no trace recorder, trace transport, acknowledgement wait, historical replay API or retained trace-dependent control or compatibility shell.
+- [ ] Compare completed outcomes and stable explanations against existing deterministic fixtures, including typed joint obligations, earned-entitlement chains, custom objective formulas, reordered priorities, two- and three-year horizons and no active optimization rules. Do not rewrite placement expectations to hide a behavioral regression.
+- [ ] Verify real-worker outcome and explanation delivery, heartbeat monitoring, stale-response rejection and explanation failure handling. Exercise cancellation before any valid incumbent and after a valid incumbent, and confirm that partial outcomes remain valid without false conflicts.
+- [ ] Verify displayed-placement alternative-date analysis and remaining-balance reasons without historical data. Check that captured settings remain immutable and hypothetical alternatives do not change the displayed plan.
+- [ ] Run the existing full correctness, coverage, static, formatting and build checks appropriate to the integrated change, and resolve regressions within the trace-removal scope. Preserve the repository's required thresholds.
+- [ ] Complete browser QA for the retained explanation, calendar, cancellation and alternative-date flows, including keyboard interaction and a narrow viewport. Confirm the advanced trace explorer, historical overlays and historical attempt controls are absent.
+- [ ] Verify that benchmark callers use the supported trace-free calculation contract and retain their correctness, determinism, horizon, placement-count and completed-stage assertions. Full protocol execution, the unchanged 2 GB/300-second performance gates and any required optimization belong to #78.
+- [ ] Hand off the functionally verified integrated baseline and unchanged benchmark inputs to #78. Verify retained outcome and explanation delivery without waiting for removed trace artifacts or inventing replacement trace counters.
+- [ ] Keep the original #70–#75 dependency order and report the functional integration result. Apply #75’s revised functional completion criteria: a benchmark performance failure alone does not block #75 or this ticket. Outstanding benchmark requirements remain open in #78, without deadline relaxation or an automatic engine cutoff.
+
+The removal is agreed; its measured speedup is unresolved and is now evaluated in #78. This ticket owns functional verification after trace removal. It does not itself implement performance optimizations or close other issues.
+
+## Blocked by
+
+- #76 — Remove the original decision trace end to end (https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/76).
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# 03 — Verify and optimize planning to meet the benchmarks from #75
+
+**Gitea:** [#78](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/78)
+
+Blocked by: #75, #77
+
+## Parent
+
+#75 — Performance acceptance separated from the functional migration ticket at the user's request.
+
+## What to build
+
+Verify the integrated planner against the benchmark requirements originally attached to #75 and apply performance optimizations when needed until those requirements pass. Start from the functionally verified implementation after original-decision-trace removal. #75 can finish on its functional requirements; performance acceptance belongs to this ticket.
+
+If the measured baseline already passes, keep the engine unchanged and record the evidence. Otherwise profile the real failing path, apply the smallest complete improvement and verify both performance and retained planning behavior.
+
+## Acceptance criteria
+
+- [ ] Keep the existing seven benchmark scenarios and inputs, including the loaded year, typed joint obligations, chained earned entitlements and two- and three-year horizons. Keep explicit optimization configurations, quotas, expected outcomes, placement counts, completed-stage and determinism assertions.
+- [ ] Run the real existing benchmark protocol: one warm-up and two measured repetitions per scenario, outside coverage instrumentation, with a 2 GB Node heap limit and the 300-second timeout for the full protocol. All scenarios and repetitions must finish and pass; a timeout, skipped scenario or partial report does not satisfy this ticket.
+- [ ] Restore the benchmark as a required CI check after the unchanged protocol passes. While this ticket is open, the user approved a separate automatic benchmark job with `allow_failure: true` so its failure does not block functional delivery. Passing CI during this exception does not satisfy benchmark acceptance or justify closing this ticket.
+- [ ] After #76 removes tracing and #77 verifies the retained behavior, benchmark outcome and explanation delivery without obsolete trace counters, trace transfer or trace-acknowledgement waits. Do not reintroduce tracing as profiling infrastructure.
+- [ ] When the baseline fails, profile CPU, allocation and repeated planning work; apply optimizations and rerun the unchanged protocol until it passes. Preserve planning semantics, rule ordering, joint obligations, earned-entitlement chronology, final-plan quality and deterministic tie-breaking. Use behavior-level or differential tests to demonstrate that caching, deduplication or pruning is valid across the relevant configurations.
+- [ ] Preserve responsive browser interaction, explicit cancellation, heartbeat monitoring and best-valid-partial-plan recovery during representative and long-horizon calculations. Keep the existing duration-estimation contract and recalibrate estimates only when measured results require it.
+- [ ] Do not increase the benchmark timeout or heap allowance, reduce scenarios or repetitions, weaken correctness assertions, add an automatic elapsed-time engine cutoff, or reduce search breadth or planning quality to make the protocol pass.
+- [ ] Record reproducible before/after preparation, planning, total-duration, responsiveness and available peak-heap measurements, including environment and protocol. Clearly distinguish actual completed benchmark runs from diagnostics or interrupted measurements and document any reference-hardware checks that could not be performed.
+- [ ] Run required correctness, coverage, static and build checks after any optimization. Preserve the captured configuration, stable explanations, displayed-placement alternative-date analysis and saved-user-data behavior.
+- [ ] Update benchmark documentation with the final measured limits and evidence. Close this ticket only after the unchanged benchmark gates pass; a failed measurement remains an open performance requirement here rather than reopening #75 for performance alone.
+
+## Existing evidence and scope
+
+The previous real protocol timed out at 300 seconds without an out-of-memory failure. The loaded-year warm-up took about 184 seconds and its first measured repetition started about 252 seconds into the protocol. Original trace recording and repeated allocation previews were observed costs; the benefit of trace removal has not yet been measured. These are starting points for profiling, not permission to change optimization quality.
+
+This ticket authorizes verification and implementation of performance improvements when needed. Functional migration remains in #75, trace removal in #76 and trace-removal functional verification in #77. Existing benchmark limits remain unchanged; only the benchmark job's blocking status is temporarily waived at the user's request until this ticket restores it.
+
+## Blocked by
+
+- #75 — Finish the functional saved-rule migration and integrated planning validation.
+- #77 — Verify integrated planning after trace removal (itself blocked by #76).
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

 ### Issue tracker

-Issues and specs live in GitLab Issues; use `glab` for tracker operations. See `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md`.
+Issues and specs live in Gitea Issues; use `tea-cli` for supported tracker operations. Before tracker work, read `docs/agents/issue-tracker.md` for commands and API alternatives.

 ### Triage labels

@@ -11,3 +11,16 @@ Use the default canonical labels: `needs-triage`, `needs-info`, `ready-for-agent
 ### Domain docs

 This is a single-context repo using root `CONTEXT.md` and `docs/adr/`. See `docs/agents/domain.md`.
+
+## GitFlow
+
+- `develop` is the default integration branch; `main` contains releases. Start `feature/*` branches from the current `origin/develop` and target their PRs to `develop`.
+- Rebase working branches onto the latest `origin/develop` before opening or merging a PR. If `develop` advances, rebase and rerun the PR checks before merging.
+- Integrate through PRs with successful required checks and merges restricted to designated maintainers through Gitea's merge allowlist. Use merge commits (`--no-ff`) with squashing disabled. Direct and forced pushes to `main` and `develop` are forbidden.
+- Use Conventional Commits for new commits and PR titles.
+- Create `release/X.Y.Z` from `develop` and `hotfix/X.Y.Z` from `main`. Only `release/*` and `hotfix/*` PRs target `main`. Merge each release or hotfix into both `main` and `develop`, keeping its branch until both PRs are merged.
+- Use merges and back-merges for releases and hotfixes. Never rebase `main`, `develop`, or a frozen release branch.
+
+The CI workflow is `.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`. Activation is tracked in Gitea issue #268; Actions is enabled with owner approval, and the migration gate stays required until live workflow validation and merge-message review. Before changing CI, image publication, or activation settings, read [Gitea Actions](docs/gitea-actions.md).
+
+Before preparing a release or hotfix, creating a tag, or changing image publication, read [GitFlow and releases](README.md#gitflow-and-releases) for package versions, explicit stable tags, and image promotion.
@@ -83,17 +83,29 @@ The greatest number of working days in any work sequence within the planning hor
 **Short work sequence**:
 A work sequence of fewer than five working days between two planned time-off periods.

+**Short work-sequence deficit**:
+The total number of working days missing for all short work sequences to reach five working days each; empty sequences contribute zero.
+
 **Week with one workday**:
 An undesirable Monday-to-Sunday calendar week with exactly one working day remaining after excluding leave placements and declared non-working days. All five Monday-to-Friday dates must fall within the planning horizon.

 **Planning rule**:
-A user instruction that requests leave placements around a calendar opportunity or inside a date window. Its force is either an obligation or a preference.
+A named instruction, supplied by the application or defined by the user, that guides leave placement. Only enabled rules influence the plan, and each rule's force is either an obligation or a preference.
+
+**Optimization rule**:
+A preference rule that minimizes or maximizes a measure over selected planning elements, such as leave balances, time-off periods, or work sequences.
+
+**Optimization rule preset**:
+A predefined optimization rule configuration supplied by the application that the user can use as an editable planning rule.
+
+**Loss prevention rule**:
+An optimization rule that minimizes unplaced at-risk leave.

 **Obligation rule**:
 A planning rule that every valid plan must satisfy. Obligation rules are resolved jointly; their order only breaks ties between valid plans.

 **Preference rule**:
-A planning rule that guides placement but may remain unsatisfied to preserve validity or prevent more at-risk leave from expiring.
+A planning rule that guides placement but may remain unsatisfied to preserve validity or satisfy higher-priority preferences.

 **IF_THEN rule**:
 A planning rule evaluated independently for every French public holiday on its configured weekday. A preference requests a complete pattern around each occurrence when possible; an obligation requires it for every occurrence.
@@ -105,7 +117,7 @@ A planning rule evaluated independently for every French public holiday on its c
 A planning rule counting compatible leave placements and declared non-working days in an inclusive date window. A preference requests up to its configured quantity; an obligation requires exactly that quantity.

 **Rule priority**:
-The user-defined lexicographic order of preference rules. Each earlier preference is satisfied as far as possible before a later preference is considered.
+The user-defined lexicographic order shared by all active preference rules, including optimization rules. Each earlier preference is satisfied as far as possible before a later preference is considered.

 **Rule satisfaction**:
 The relationship in which a plan fulfils a planning rule. One compatible leave placement or declared non-working day may contribute to the satisfaction of multiple rules.
@@ -120,23 +132,8 @@ The numerical summary of a calculated valid plan's leave usage, time-off periods
 A stable account of why an optimization result or incomplete calculation contains its displayed leave placements, expressed through placement provenance, planning objectives, time-off periods, and remaining balances. It reports every contribution of a placement while highlighting the first planning objective that made its position decisive, and describes the displayed plan rather than the calculation history.
 _Avoid_: calculation explanation

-**Calculation trace**:
-The complete, untruncated, ordered history of the planning decisions and candidate evaluations from the same calculation that produced a planning outcome, grouped by calculation phase. It is not reconstructed by replaying the calculation afterward; for an incomplete calculation it ends at the actual interruption point.
-_Avoid_: plan explanation
-
-**Planning decision**:
-An atomic choice within a calculation phase that accepts, moves, removes, or rejects one or more related leave placements. A joint obligation decision may therefore concern several dates.
-_Avoid_: calendar day, step
-
-**Candidate evaluation**:
-The comparison the planner actually performs between a possible leave-placement change and the current plan. It belongs to the calculation trace whether the candidate is accepted or rejected.
-
-**Candidate date status**:
-The historical relationship between a date and a planning decision: chosen, evaluated and rejected, not examined, or ineligible with a reason. A later counterfactual date analysis never changes this historical status.
-
 **Counterfactual date analysis**:
-An on-demand evaluation that changes only the date of one selected leave placement while preserving its leave balance, leave type, and placement provenance. The planner did not necessarily examine that date; the analysis explains a hypothetical alternative but never influences the planning outcome and is not part of the calculation trace.
-_Avoid_: candidate evaluation, calculation trace
+An on-demand hypothetical comparison of another date for a displayed leave placement. It uses the immutable calculation configuration and final-state snapshot, preserving the same leave entitlement, leave type, and placement provenance while keeping unrelated placements fixed. It never mutates the displayed plan.

 **Conflict explanation**:
 A stable account of why no plan can jointly satisfy a set of obligation rules within the planning horizon and available leave balances.
@@ -154,17 +151,11 @@ The result of a calculation: invalid input, a planning conflict, an optimization
 **Stable plan explanation**:
 A deterministic explanation derived from the final displayed plan. It identifies each placement's entitlement and rule provenance, contributions, full objective vector, and the first objective that distinguishes the plan with that placement restored from the same plan with only that placement removed.

-**Original decision trace**:
-The untruncated phase-by-phase record captured by the calculation that produced the displayed outcome, including atomic decisions, candidate statuses, and state deltas. It is historical evidence and is never recomputed from the final plan.
-
-**Counterfactual date analysis**:
-A hypothetical comparison that keeps the calculation snapshot and all unrelated placements fixed while testing one selected placement across every date in the half-open planning horizon. It neither mutates the plan nor rewrites the original trace.
-
 **Incomplete calculation**:
 A calculation stopped by user cancellation or another interruption before it completed the planning objective order. On user cancellation it exposes its best available valid plan as partial, if one exists, and never implies that the obligations conflict.

 **Planning objective order**:
-The lexicographic quality order applied after joint obligation feasibility: minimize unplaced at-risk leave; satisfy each preference in user order; maximize public-holiday week value; maximize non-working-day gain; minimize the longest work sequence; minimize the total deficit of internal work sequences shorter than five days; minimize supporting placements; consume earlier-expiring balances; then prefer earlier placement dates. Complete holiday weeks therefore precede broader calendar-gain and work-sequence optimization. A lower criterion never degrades a higher one.
+The lexicographic quality order applied after joint obligation feasibility, with active preference rules, including optimization rules, sharing the user-defined rule priority. A lower criterion never degrades a higher one.

 **Earned leave**:
 The total quantity of earned leave entitlements generated by all applicable planning rules for a plan, counted before consumption and attributed to their generating rules. Only entitlements becoming available strictly after the calculation's Europe/Paris calendar date qualify, including those becoming available after the planning horizon.
@@ -180,4 +171,6 @@ A valid deterministic plan produced after completing the planning objective orde
 Any quantity left unspent by the optimization result, reported as unavoidable expiry, an unplaced at-risk balance, or a deferred balance.

 **Non-placement reason**:
-A concrete explanation of why a quantity of a leave balance remains unspent in the displayed plan, distinguishing a blocking condition from a decision to preserve leave for later. It includes the relevant dates, is distinct from the balance's expiry-based classification, and can be supported by recorded candidate evaluations.
+A concrete explanation of why a quantity of a leave balance remains unspent in the displayed plan, distinguishing a blocking condition from a decision to preserve leave for later. It includes the relevant dates, is distinct from the balance's expiry-based classification and is derived from the displayed plan.
+
+The original decision trace, historical date analysis, historical calendar replay, candidate statuses, and remaining-balance attempt lists were removed by issue #76. Calculations retain only the snapshots needed for outcomes, cancellation recovery, stable explanations, and displayed-placement date analysis.
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@

 VacOptimizer is a personal leave planner for turning dated leave balances into a deterministic plan around weekends and French public holidays. It handles mandatory rules, ordered preferences, earned leave, expiring balances, and interrupted calculations without relying on a backend solver.

+Source code, issues, and pull requests are hosted on [Gitea](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer). The [issue-tracker guide](docs/agents/issue-tracker.md) documents `tea-cli` access and tracker conventions.
+
 The planner answers these questions:

 - Is the request valid?
@@ -9,7 +11,7 @@ The planner answers these questions:
 - What is the best plan found by the ordered heuristic?
 - If calculation stops early, what valid incumbent is available?
 - Why did each displayed placement survive the objective order?
- Which alternatives were considered, and what would another date change?
+- What would another date change for a displayed placement?

 ## Architecture

@@ -35,25 +37,24 @@ flowchart LR
        Worker --> Core
        Core --> Holidays
        Worker -- "heartbeats, progress, checkpoints, outcome" --> Facade
-        Worker -- "after outcome: explanation + trace batches" --> Facade
-        Facade -- "trace acknowledgements" --> Worker
+        Worker -- "after outcome: stable explanation + final state" --> Facade
        Facade --> UI
    end
 ```

-Leave calculation stays in the browser. The production Express process serves the generated Angular application; it does not participate in planning. Browser calculations run cooperatively in a dedicated worker. The resumable core is emitted as a separate worker/lazy chunk and retains a synchronous adapter for direct core callers. Trace delivery uses bounded batches with receiver acknowledgements; large calendars and traces can still cause UI pauses and substantial memory use, as recorded in the benchmark report.
+Leave calculation stays in the browser. The production Express process serves the generated Angular application; it does not participate in planning. Browser calculations run cooperatively in a dedicated worker. The resumable core is emitted as a separate worker/lazy chunk and retains a synchronous adapter for direct core callers. The original decision trace and historical analysis were removed in issue #76; immutable checkpoints and final state remain available for cancellation recovery and displayed-placement alternatives.

 ### Main execution path

 1. `PlanningDurationService` reads the pending horizon, balances, and ordered rules to estimate the wait without running the planner.
 2. On startup or an explicit Calculate action, `CalendarYear` submits those inputs through `CalendarService`, which opens one immutable planning calculation context.
 3. `leave-planner.service.ts` copies the request into a canonical transport shape and starts the worker.
-4. `leave-planner.worker.ts` runs the framework-free core, sends progress and valid checkpoints, publishes the outcome first, then delivers its stable explanation and original trace.
+4. `leave-planner.worker.ts` runs the framework-free core, sends progress and valid checkpoints, publishes the outcome first, then delivers its stable explanation and final state.
 5. `CalendarYear` ignores stale calculations, renders the selected dates, reports remaining balances or errors, and records successful request-to-rendered-calendar timing for duration refinement.

-Calculations run until all objectives complete or the user cancels; there is no automatic elapsed-time cutoff. During preparation and optimization, Cancel interrupts the worker cooperatively and preserves its best jointly valid candidate as a cancelled, incomplete calculation. A cancellation before a valid candidate reports no plan. The final calendar is delivered before the explanation and complete original trace, whose later arrival or failure cannot change the retained plan. Worker heartbeats distinguish responsive long phases from a worker that stops responding. See [the cancellation mechanism and checks](docs/planner-cancellation.md).
+Calculations run until all objectives complete or the user cancels; there is no automatic elapsed-time cutoff. During preparation and optimization, Cancel interrupts the worker cooperatively and preserves its best jointly valid candidate as a cancelled, incomplete calculation. A cancellation before a valid candidate reports no plan. The final calendar is delivered before the stable explanation, whose later arrival or failure cannot change the retained plan. Worker heartbeats distinguish responsive long phases from a worker that stops responding. See [the cancellation mechanism and checks](docs/planner-cancellation.md).

-Technical callers may explicitly supply `deadlineMs`, a finite non-negative planning-work budget of any size. Omission means no deadline; the calendar and benchmark never supply one. This opt-in budget starts after calendar preparation and excludes trace capture, observer callbacks, and post-outcome artifact work. Expiry returns `PlanningIncomplete` with the latest valid checkpoint, if any, rather than a conflict. It is independent of worker liveness monitoring.
+Technical callers may explicitly supply `deadlineMs`, a finite non-negative planning-work budget of any size. Omission means no deadline; the calendar and benchmark never supply one. This opt-in budget starts after calendar preparation and excludes observer callbacks and post-outcome explanation work. Expiry returns `PlanningIncomplete` with the latest valid checkpoint, if any, rather than a conflict. It is independent of worker liveness monitoring.

 ## Planning model

@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ All planning dates are normalized as `YYYY-MM-DD` calendar values in the Europe/

 Settings save a fixed start date and an inclusive last planning date. The planner's exclusive end is the following calendar date, so matching settings dates cover one day. Without saved dates, the default is today in Europe/Paris through the same date twelve months later, exclusive (February 29 uses February 28 in the following year). Invalid edits prevent calculation and preserve the last valid saved dates. Changes to dates, balances, and rules apply to the displayed calendar on the next explicit Calculate action.

-An indicative range beside Calculate follows the current dates, balances, and rules. Completed plans refine it locally for the current browser session using request-to-rendered-calendar time; later trace delivery is excluded. The range never stops a calculation. See [the duration model and measurement contract](docs/planning-duration.md).
+An indicative range beside Calculate follows the current dates, balances, and rules. Completed plans refine it locally for the current browser session using request-to-rendered-calendar time; later explanation delivery is excluded. The range never stops a calculation. See [the duration model and measurement contract](docs/planning-duration.md).

 ## Optimization pipeline

@@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ stateDiagram-v2
    Plan --> [*]
 ```

-`PlanningIncomplete` is reachable from every active calculation state. Cancellation retains the best available jointly valid candidate, even before a stage completes; completed stages also publish checkpoints for other interruption paths. An explicit technical deadline applies only after calendar preparation, while worker failure can interrupt any active phase. `PlanningConflict` is produced only when the obligations are valid but jointly infeasible. Outcome delivery does not wait for explanation or trace completion.
+`PlanningIncomplete` is reachable from every active calculation state. Cancellation retains the best available jointly valid candidate, even before a stage completes; completed stages also publish checkpoints for other interruption paths. An explicit technical deadline applies only after calendar preparation, while worker failure can interrupt any active phase. `PlanningConflict` is produced only when the obligations are valid but jointly infeasible. Outcome delivery does not wait for explanation completion.

 1. validate and normalize the request;
 2. find joint obligation assignments;
@@ -148,9 +149,9 @@ stateDiagram-v2

 Every placement records its source balance and all rules it satisfies. Remaining balances are classified as unavoidable expiry, at risk, or deferred.

-The calendar keeps plan details and the advanced trace collapsed initially. Plan details navigate final placements chronologically, showing provenance, contributions, the first decisive objective, and the full ordered comparison including obligation validity. **Compare dates** opens an on-demand hypothetical comparison across the submitted horizon, preserving the selected balance, type, and provenance without changing the plan.
+The calendar keeps plan details collapsed initially. Plan details navigate final placements chronologically, showing provenance, contributions, the first decisive objective, and the full ordered comparison including obligation validity. **Compare dates** opens an on-demand hypothetical comparison across the submitted horizon, preserving the selected balance, type, and provenance without changing the plan.

-The trace explorer navigates original phases and atomic decisions, expands candidate evaluations, and shows before/after calendar states. Historical date statuses remain separate from hypothetical results. Incomplete outcomes explain the retained plan and unfinished phases; conflicts identify the reported obligations and bottleneck. Controls support keyboard navigation, labelled dates, live announcements, and text or icons alongside color. Only the latest trace is retained locally in memory.
+Incomplete outcomes explain the retained plan and unfinished phases; conflicts identify the reported obligations and bottleneck. Remaining balances retain their classification, validity, earned-entitlement source and concrete displayed-plan reasons, without historical attempt lists. Controls support keyboard navigation, labelled dates, live announcements, and text or icons alongside color.

 ## Technical stack

@@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ The trace explorer navigates original phases and atomic decisions, expands candi
 - Vitest through the Angular test builder
 - ESLint and Prettier
 - Angular server build hosted by Express
- GitLab CI and a multi-stage Docker image
+- Gitea repository hosting and a multi-stage Docker image

 The `/benchmark` route and planner core are lazy-loaded, so the normal application does not execute the benchmark or bundle the planner core into its main entry point.

@@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ Open <http://localhost:4200>. The development server reloads when source files c

 ## Performance benchmark

-Build or start the application, then open `/benchmark`. The isolated harness covers a representative year, typed obligations, chained earned entitlements, a deliberate conflict, a loaded year, and two- and three-year horizons with dated annual balances. It reports preparation time, planning latency, separate trace-delivery latency, total wall time, UI timer delay, available main-thread heap measurements, outcome, last completed stage, placement count, determinism, and trace size/status.
+Build or start the application, then open `/benchmark`. The isolated harness covers a representative year, typed obligations, chained earned entitlements, a deliberate conflict, a loaded year, and two- and three-year horizons with dated annual balances. It reports preparation time, planning latency, planning-work time, total wall time through explanation delivery, UI timer delay, available main-thread heap measurements, outcome, last completed stage, placement count, and determinism.

 The release protocol, recorded desktop measurements, and hardware limitations are documented in [docs/benchmark/README.md](docs/benchmark/README.md). No reference-phone run or multi-year duration ceiling is established; timing measurements are release evidence, not CI assertions.

@@ -236,13 +237,48 @@ The image builds the Angular application with Bun and Node, then runs the genera

 ## Continuous integration

-GitLab CI runs independent validation, test, build, security, and image stages:
+[`.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`](.gitea/workflows/ci.yml) defines Gitea Actions validation, functional coverage, production builds, security scans, and Docker image publication. [Issue #268](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/268) tracks activation. Actions is enabled with owner approval; publisher credentials and live workflow validation are still pending. The [activation guide](docs/gitea-actions.md) records runner, credential, permission, and merge-gate requirements.

- ESLint, Prettier, and TypeScript checks;
- Vitest with coverage artifacts;
- an optimized production build;
- GitLab SAST and Trivy filesystem scanning;
- Docker image publication from the default branch.
+The workflow runs on branch/tag pushes, PR opening/reopening/synchronization/edits, and manual dispatch. Manual runs validate without publishing images. Required jobs cover policy regression tests, GitFlow and Conventional Commits, ESLint, Prettier, application/test type checks, Vitest coverage, the production build, Semgrep SAST, and Trivy dependency/secret scans. Coverage, build output, and SARIF reports are retained for seven days.
+
+Functional tests use one worker and a 2 GiB Node heap. The separate benchmark job runs without coverage and keeps its five-minute protocol timeout. At the user's request, it has `continue-on-error: true` while [#78](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/78) is open. #78 must restore the benchmark gate after the protocol passes. Passing functional checks during this exception does not establish benchmark acceptance.
+
+The `required` job aggregates successful validation and expected image publication, accepting the image job's intentional skip for fork PRs and manual runs. Image jobs require successful validation and are limited to pushes and same-repository PRs. Registry credentials are confined to the publishing step.
+
+Both protected branches still require `gitlab-to-gitea/ci-conversion-required` until the owner approves the first merge message and a successful Gitea PR run, then replaces the migration gate with the actual pull-request context for `required`. Local validation does not satisfy this status. Historical CI reports and artifacts remain in administrator rollback backups; the original configuration is retained in Git history.
+
+### GitFlow and releases
+
+`develop` is the default integration branch. Create `feature/*` branches from it, rebase them onto the current `origin/develop` before opening or merging their PR, and merge into `develop` with a merge commit (`--no-ff`). Existing working-branch names such as `feat/*` follow the same rules. Working branches cannot merge `develop` into themselves instead of rebasing.
+
+Create `release/X.Y.Z` from `develop` when the release scope is ready. Set `package.json` to `X.Y.Z` on this branch, stabilize it, then merge it into `main` and back into `develop`. Keep the release branch until both PRs have merged. A `hotfix/X.Y.Z` starts from `main`, changes the package version, and follows the same two-target merge process. Do not rebase `main`, `develop`, or a frozen release onto ongoing development.
+
+Use Conventional Commits for new commits and PR titles, for example `feat(calendar): add planning periods`, `fix(planner): handle expired balances`, or `chore(release): prepare 1.6.0`. Scopes are optional; `!` marks a breaking change. The merge commit subject must preserve the validated PR title. Gitea supports a [Git-based merge-message template](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/issues-prs/merge-message-templates/) at `.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md`, using `${PullRequestTitle}` and `${PullRequestReference}`. The committed template and a checked example expansion are documented in the [activation guide](docs/gitea-actions.md); legacy history is not rewritten.
+
+The image publisher implements this tag contract in `gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer`:
+
+| Trigger | Published image tags |
+| --- | --- |
+| Successful push to any branch | `branch-<normalized branch slug>` and `sha-<full commit SHA>` |
+| Explicit release tag `vX.Y.Z` | `vX.Y.Z` and `latest`, using the existing SHA image |
+
+For example, `feature/calendar` uses `branch-feature-calendar`; integration uses `branch-develop`. Preserve the previous slug normalization: lowercase the branch name, replace characters other than `a-z` and `0-9` with `-`, truncate to 63 bytes, and remove leading/trailing `-`. Choose branch names with distinct slugs. Only valid release tags can update `latest`. Automatic image publication and tag promotion begin after the owner provisions publisher credentials and validates publication permissions.
+
+After owner activation, the PR into `main` has merged, and its full checks and SHA image publication have succeeded, tag the published main commit:
+
+```bash
+git fetch origin
+git tag -a v1.6.0 origin/main -m "Release 1.6.0"
+git push origin v1.6.0
+```
+
+The tag must match the tagged commit's `package.json` version, use stable `vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH` syntax, and point to a commit reachable from `main`. Wait for the main checks and image publication before tagging: promotion requires its `sha-<commit>` image. Tags do not increment the version automatically.
+
+The Gitea repository policy requires `develop` as the default branch and **Merge commit** as the merge method, with squash and rebase merge methods disabled. Configure [branch protection](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/access-control/protected-branches/) for `main` and `develop` to disable direct and forced pushes, restrict the merge allowlist to designated maintainers, require successful status checks, and block outdated PRs. Administrators must follow the protection rules. After merge-message approval and a successful reviewed PR run, replace the migration gate with the reported pull-request context for the `required` job, as described in the activation guide. These are required settings; the migration does not establish that every setting has already been applied.
+
+Only `release/*` and `hotfix/*` PRs may target `main`; working PRs target `develop`. CI validates these rules and checks working-branch rebases against the fetched integration head. If `develop` advances after validation, rebase and rerun the PR checks before merging.
+
+Run `node scripts/ci-policy.test.mjs` and `node scripts/ci-image.test.mjs` locally to verify GitFlow event handling and image publication without writing to a registry. The adapter reads Gitea webhook data through the runner's `GITHUB_*` compatibility variables. Local checks do not satisfy the migration gate.

 ## Domain and design references

@@ -250,6 +286,6 @@ GitLab CI runs independent validation, test, build, security, and image stages:
 - [ADR 0001](docs/adr/0001-ordered-heuristic-optimization.md) records the ordered heuristic decision.
 - [ADR 0002](docs/adr/0002-personal-client-side-planner-for-now.md) records the client-side scope.
 - [ADR 0003](docs/adr/0003-constraint-first-lexicographic-planning.md) records the constraint-first planner architecture.
- [ADR 0004](docs/adr/0004-stable-explanation-original-trace-counterfactual.md) separates the outcome, stable explanation, original trace, and hypothetical analysis.
+- [ADR 0004](docs/adr/0004-stable-explanation-original-trace-counterfactual.md) separates the outcome, stable explanation and displayed-placement hypothetical analysis.
 - [ADR 0005](docs/adr/0005-saved-planning-inputs-before-random-defaults.md) records saved-input restoration and random fallback behavior.
 - [ADR 0006](docs/adr/0006-user-selected-horizons-and-cancellable-calculations.md) records fixed saved horizons, cancellation, duration estimation, and the removal of the automatic deadline.
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
        "@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "22.2.1",
        "@angular/platform-server": "22.2.1",
        "@angular/router": "22.2.1",
-        "@angular/ssr": "22.2.1",
+        "@angular/ssr": "22.2.2",
        "date-holidays": "^3.30.2",
        "dayjs": "^1.11.21",
        "express": "^5.2.1",
@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@
        "@analogjs/platform": "^2.7.5",
        "@analogjs/vite-plugin-angular": "^2.7.5",
        "@analogjs/vitest-angular": "^2.7.5",
-        "@angular/build": "22.2.1",
-        "@angular/cli": "22.2.1",
+        "@angular/build": "22.2.2",
+        "@angular/cli": "22.2.2",
        "@angular/compiler-cli": "22.2.1",
        "@eslint/js": "^10.0.1",
        "@nx/devkit": "^23.0.0",
@@ -67,17 +67,17 @@

    "@angular-devkit/architect": ["@angular-devkit/architect@0.2202.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.1", "rxjs": "7.8.2" }, "bin": { "architect": "bin/cli.js" } }, "sha512-WGRAxFj+R9LC8HuK3DnDgxHo/XrgfklNQeNgjq/phTEVq5ZdWxc8kDoPA4uQz4vF+HY2eycAAtOPfMvj2TBEiQ=="],

-    "@angular-devkit/core": ["@angular-devkit/core@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "ajv": "8.20.0", "ajv-formats": "3.0.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "picomatch": "4.0.7", "rxjs": "7.8.2", "source-map": "0.8.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "chokidar": "^5.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["chokidar"] }, "sha512-2oiuWVbUg7pE9kh2grp+MF2ynys+tMWZ/mmoYlqWrhMS2n5oV304ir0/IvvCCSGz9qsbL2A1vZhnlI2UbTSNiA=="],
+    "@angular-devkit/core": ["@angular-devkit/core@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "ajv": "8.20.0", "ajv-formats": "3.0.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "picomatch": "4.0.7", "rxjs": "7.8.2", "source-map": "0.8.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "chokidar": "^5.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["chokidar"] }, "sha512-iQexb5xUON9AkTzvBiMftrHWLguIlYv6M/BOH/sj7U5L8eOPMu8N269WF74xPo4n/X5tusFLqniGI0zolT2Sjg=="],

    "@angular-devkit/schematics": ["@angular-devkit/schematics@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "magic-string": "1.4.1", "ora": "9.4.1", "rxjs": "7.8.2" } }, "sha512-frHhFwu2TEfTZX5jfAYL2bztuG5mGggfJhiM9bo5/QtLAi49LtRbJxIktsu6vjJdujxeB2TKD7KqnXwNYgd41Q=="],

    "@angular/animations": ["@angular/animations@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "tslib": "^2.3.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/core": "22.2.1" } }, "sha512-vTxZN6uL/m61lv7ZCvfmQ3VuFb4o/tniGLpc3SpkNHE6MLM8WN0IjfNBRLMYMovd1uUBSPwhcG4Llcmucr9dmw=="],

-    "@angular/build": ["@angular/build@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@ampproject/remapping": "2.3.0", "@angular-devkit/architect": "0.2202.1", "@babel/core": "8.0.5", "@inquirer/confirm": "6.3.2", "@parcel/watcher": "2.6.0", "@vitejs/plugin-basic-ssl": "2.3.0", "beasties": "0.5.4", "browserslist": "^4.26.0", "chokidar": "5.0.0", "esbuild": "0.28.2", "https-proxy-agent": "9.1.0", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "listr2": "11.1.0", "magic-string": "1.4.1", "mrmime": "2.0.1", "oxc-parser": "0.150.0", "parse5-html-rewriting-stream": "8.0.1", "picomatch": "4.0.7", "piscina": "5.3.2", "rolldown": "1.2.8", "sass": "1.104.1", "sass-embedded": "1.104.1", "semver": "7.8.5", "source-map-support": "0.5.21", "tinyglobby": "0.2.17", "vite": "8.3.0", "xxhash-wasm": "1.1.0" }, "optionalDependencies": { "lmdb": "3.5.6" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/compiler": "^22.0.0", "@angular/compiler-cli": "^22.0.0", "@angular/core": "^22.0.0", "@angular/localize": "^22.0.0", "@angular/platform-browser": "^22.0.0", "@angular/platform-server": "^22.0.0", "@angular/service-worker": "^22.0.0", "@angular/ssr": "^22.2.1", "istanbul-lib-instrument": "^6.0.0", "karma": "^6.4.0", "less": "^4.2.0", "ng-packagr": "^22.0.0", "postcss": "^8.4.0", "rollup": "^4.0.0", "tailwindcss": "^2.0.0 || ^3.0.0 || ^4.0.0", "tslib": "^2.3.0", "typescript": ">=6.0 <6.1", "vitest": "^4.0.8 || ^5.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["@angular/core", "@angular/localize", "@angular/platform-browser", "@angular/platform-server", "@angular/service-worker", "@angular/ssr", "istanbul-lib-instrument", "karma", "less", "ng-packagr", "postcss", "rollup", "tailwindcss", "vitest"] }, "sha512-VA8EkK5Y6sJbBFyn2x5jzd3KByh29DDpI7n6hucT0sK6YkMJEvsojPUWet9ifwF3OL+ZrGvxYlAHyZGKVlqw0g=="],
+    "@angular/build": ["@angular/build@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@ampproject/remapping": "2.3.0", "@angular-devkit/architect": "0.2202.2", "@babel/core": "8.0.5", "@inquirer/confirm": "6.3.2", "@parcel/watcher": "2.6.0", "@vitejs/plugin-basic-ssl": "2.3.0", "beasties": "0.5.4", "browserslist": "^4.26.0", "chokidar": "5.0.0", "esbuild": "0.28.2", "https-proxy-agent": "9.1.0", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "listr2": "11.1.0", "magic-string": "1.4.1", "mrmime": "2.0.1", "oxc-parser": "0.150.0", "parse5-html-rewriting-stream": "8.0.1", "picomatch": "4.0.7", "piscina": "5.3.2", "rolldown": "1.2.8", "sass": "1.104.1", "sass-embedded": "1.104.1", "semver": "7.8.5", "source-map-support": "0.5.21", "tinyglobby": "0.2.17", "vite": "8.3.0", "xxhash-wasm": "1.1.0" }, "optionalDependencies": { "lmdb": "3.5.6" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/compiler": "^22.0.0", "@angular/compiler-cli": "^22.0.0", "@angular/core": "^22.0.0", "@angular/localize": "^22.0.0", "@angular/platform-browser": "^22.0.0", "@angular/platform-server": "^22.0.0", "@angular/service-worker": "^22.0.0", "@angular/ssr": "^22.2.2", "istanbul-lib-instrument": "^6.0.0", "karma": "^6.4.0", "less": "^4.2.0", "ng-packagr": "^22.0.0", "postcss": "^8.4.0", "rollup": "^4.0.0", "tailwindcss": "^2.0.0 || ^3.0.0 || ^4.0.0", "tslib": "^2.3.0", "typescript": ">=6.0 <6.1", "vitest": "^4.0.8 || ^5.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["@angular/core", "@angular/localize", "@angular/platform-browser", "@angular/platform-server", "@angular/service-worker", "@angular/ssr", "istanbul-lib-instrument", "karma", "less", "ng-packagr", "postcss", "rollup", "tailwindcss", "vitest"] }, "sha512-QHJWkZdEWTqqb3+HiSp8lnuS4iQJCa7yTK9gg5TaMIjCoZzP9mD9L417stiVDZGj2J3Y9mrml044nEVvSbW0ig=="],

    "@angular/cdk": ["@angular/cdk@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "parse5": "^8.0.0", "tslib": "^2.3.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/common": "^22.0.0 || ^23.0.0", "@angular/core": "^22.0.0 || ^23.0.0", "@angular/forms": "^22.0.0 || ^23.0.0", "@angular/platform-browser": "^22.0.0 || ^23.0.0", "rxjs": "^6.5.3 || ^7.4.0" } }, "sha512-0vjlqYBbLif1EwHhKz2r4thTDvtRI2CKi2js9TzPRD0n4VlFUnAXaaW47s5TCCObIoYun6Bo1zZ0uPgwb+qEMw=="],

-    "@angular/cli": ["@angular/cli@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/architect": "0.2202.1", "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.1", "@angular-devkit/schematics": "22.2.1", "@inquirer/prompts": "8.7.2", "@listr2/prompt-adapter-inquirer": "4.2.7", "@modelcontextprotocol/server": "2.0.0", "@schematics/angular": "22.2.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "listr2": "11.1.0", "npm-package-arg": "14.0.0", "parse5-html-rewriting-stream": "8.0.1", "semver": "7.8.5", "yargs": "18.1.0", "zod": "4.6.5" }, "bin": { "ng": "bin/ng.js" } }, "sha512-tKMP68SZP+A9YCSRg0c+2e/+yWp7qiFrjCuQAomHK7owNaxHnLigAbra+8QA4xmWHoGaQk89NMmUPyA1BsBp8w=="],
+    "@angular/cli": ["@angular/cli@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/architect": "0.2202.2", "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.2", "@angular-devkit/schematics": "22.2.2", "@inquirer/prompts": "8.7.2", "@listr2/prompt-adapter-inquirer": "4.2.7", "@modelcontextprotocol/server": "2.3.1", "@schematics/angular": "22.2.2", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "listr2": "11.1.0", "npm-package-arg": "14.0.0", "parse5-html-rewriting-stream": "8.0.1", "semver": "7.8.5", "yargs": "18.1.0", "zod": "4.6.5" }, "bin": { "ng": "bin/ng.js" } }, "sha512-AALIN+zai0CiA7HgSCGVPHyZyiw3yFWliCfbaS4ueHDJHVZ8QhVjRUrnfGZc3EJnigcyQ0w2DKeTxjwqpDjKew=="],

    "@angular/common": ["@angular/common@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "tslib": "^2.3.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/core": "22.2.1", "rxjs": "^6.5.3 || ^7.4.0" } }, "sha512-OqBH3EY4i8e3PvnYDugZGipSs1HWs2ZrqoClndKtFDS9mQULSSuLoxjG9nF1J/c+yUqhuyZlHjkXWS0n32pEfw=="],

@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@

    "@angular/router": ["@angular/router@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "tslib": "^2.3.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/common": "22.2.1", "@angular/core": "22.2.1", "@angular/platform-browser": "22.2.1", "rxjs": "^6.5.3 || ^7.4.0" } }, "sha512-HJfJ4yA1znKd9YFtbDOJfKmD12x0PhS7LkmYdWlJRu2WkQZRBVrdGKdmbvV5UvrqCRllVWKpzw1TIZJM69rlcw=="],

-    "@angular/ssr": ["@angular/ssr@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "beasties": "0.5.4", "tslib": "^2.3.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/common": "^22.0.0", "@angular/core": "^22.0.0", "@angular/platform-server": "^22.0.0", "@angular/router": "^22.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["@angular/platform-server"] }, "sha512-I228uYQ53Eyc30B+7ZGzw35N36MG9F6E6IUPAlK2dhuxZsCLherbElIa1FPTh5R2qcr+xVJw0Ej6QEUj59+KvA=="],
+    "@angular/ssr": ["@angular/ssr@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "beasties": "0.5.4", "tslib": "^2.3.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "@angular/common": "^22.0.0", "@angular/core": "^22.0.0", "@angular/platform-server": "^22.0.0", "@angular/router": "^22.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["@angular/platform-server"] }, "sha512-iMcwT5ZynIj33R0XSq+AtC5Ra6FGKOvV3qU0sjRr+lUaGfL6MjygPovPFsKLi8HzuGOA5dYDKffJfPedsC9Rxg=="],

    "@asamuzakjp/css-color": ["@asamuzakjp/css-color@7.1.3", "", { "dependencies": { "@csstools/css-calc": "^3.4.2", "@csstools/css-color-parser": "^4.2.5", "@csstools/css-parser-algorithms": "^4.0.2", "@csstools/css-tokenizer": "^4.0.2", "lru-cache": "^11.5.3" } }, "sha512-1t1U8Cm3RBl9vh3RAZhjkPaduzLSvQJRToRrxpGR/eDRW99mOREleuu+mWfiFa795bUzjwht7NgphCKTs2ianQ=="],

@@ -555,9 +555,9 @@

    "@mapbox/node-pre-gyp": ["@mapbox/node-pre-gyp@2.0.3", "", { "dependencies": { "consola": "^3.2.3", "detect-libc": "^2.0.0", "https-proxy-agent": "^7.0.5", "node-fetch": "^2.6.7", "nopt": "^8.0.0", "semver": "^7.5.3", "tar": "^7.4.0" }, "bin": { "node-pre-gyp": "bin/node-pre-gyp" } }, "sha512-uwPAhccfFJlsfCxMYTwOdVfOz3xqyj8xYL3zJj8f0pb30tLohnnFPhLuqp4/qoEz8sNxe4SESZedcBojRefIzg=="],

-    "@modelcontextprotocol/core": ["@modelcontextprotocol/core@2.0.0", "", { "dependencies": { "zod": "^4.2.0" } }, "sha512-pJCEwGG7Lfr/+PQp9ZTwKXNeO5wzbfKL7H3MYpCorM4oFBoQrdjnBgEoqG+RjhsvS1FKrDbKux+M1HhlnGWqcA=="],
+    "@modelcontextprotocol/core": ["@modelcontextprotocol/core@2.3.1", "", { "dependencies": { "zod": "^4.2.0" } }, "sha512-laVmIhPGpWi7rG9q+0UigblRN0Hws/Yjlb6qLFtVqryXVLkc4h+yN8z731POD2LnAGQlFe7/tXhUm7Bi0YB91g=="],

-    "@modelcontextprotocol/server": ["@modelcontextprotocol/server@2.0.0", "", { "dependencies": { "@modelcontextprotocol/core": "2.0.0", "zod": "^4.2.0" } }, "sha512-YhHWdHfpFMQfd0prsEnxKeS3Qz3ytIGmsS0sth4KDjnacIT7hxk6hXHkJ9KysxlkvTM+WZAtQbbcUhdoP4Hvtw=="],
+    "@modelcontextprotocol/server": ["@modelcontextprotocol/server@2.3.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@modelcontextprotocol/core": "2.3.1", "zod": "^4.2.0" } }, "sha512-e59MfWuSssj6DoQ96JCTqdW1AXT5/XtnTl0WWd6MU1Ka434fFUGGosCLJbGNySDhHGvxQWoRWK137FXYFkYNWw=="],

    "@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-darwin-arm64": ["@msgpackr-extract/msgpackr-extract-darwin-arm64@3.0.4", "", { "os": "darwin", "cpu": "arm64" }, "sha512-LCkGo6JDfaBhgST7UpPWgNgLINpcpabaHfyz5OBx75nUYxBsaEPxjnyNjWpeb/xBup/682QnBfRBy2/LvPutZQ=="],

@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@

    "@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc": ["@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc@4.60.4", "", { "os": "win32", "cpu": "x64" }, "sha512-QVTUovf40zgTqlFVrKA1uXMVvU2QWEFWfAH8Wdc48IxLvrJMQVMBRjuQyUpzZCDkakImib9eVazbWlC6ksWtJw=="],

-    "@schematics/angular": ["@schematics/angular@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.1", "@angular-devkit/schematics": "22.2.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "oxc-parser": "0.150.0", "typescript": "6.0.3" } }, "sha512-L4Nl8D43znCzXwze9PtbQhG1GKlhWq9ip8Hz+e3LHgG3WpT5Tlr7aVsyHDqb9Qetuy0Mpd4tXE15STtGdA897w=="],
+    "@schematics/angular": ["@schematics/angular@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.2", "@angular-devkit/schematics": "22.2.2", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "oxc-parser": "0.150.0", "typescript": "6.0.3" } }, "sha512-JxpXKpxdmQcRsJbriWJOhB7HeVTzz9CEsPNw6fQ0LOuPFnvtyUIXLxyFbKv/LfoFUz8wFADCtNU5sjowME5Mvg=="],

    "@sinclair/typebox": ["@sinclair/typebox@0.34.49", "", {}, "sha512-brySQQs7Jtn0joV8Xh9ZV/hZb9Ozb0pmazDIASBkYKCjXrXU3mpcFahmK/z4YDhGkQvP9mWJbVyahdtU5wQA+A=="],

@@ -2379,16 +2379,26 @@

    "@analogjs/vite-plugin-nitro/esbuild": ["esbuild@0.27.3", "", { "optionalDependencies": { "@esbuild/aix-ppc64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/android-arm": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/android-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/android-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/darwin-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/darwin-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/freebsd-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/freebsd-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-arm": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-ia32": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-loong64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-mips64el": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-ppc64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-riscv64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-s390x": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/linux-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/netbsd-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/netbsd-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/openbsd-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/openbsd-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/openharmony-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/sunos-x64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/win32-arm64": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/win32-ia32": "0.27.3", "@esbuild/win32-x64": "0.27.3" }, "bin": { "esbuild": "bin/esbuild" } }, "sha512-8VwMnyGCONIs6cWue2IdpHxHnAjzxnw2Zr7MkVxB2vjmQ2ivqGFb4LEG3SMnv0Gb2F/G/2yA8zUaiL1gywDCCg=="],

+    "@angular-devkit/architect/@angular-devkit/core": ["@angular-devkit/core@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "ajv": "8.20.0", "ajv-formats": "3.0.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "picomatch": "4.0.7", "rxjs": "7.8.2", "source-map": "0.8.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "chokidar": "^5.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["chokidar"] }, "sha512-2oiuWVbUg7pE9kh2grp+MF2ynys+tMWZ/mmoYlqWrhMS2n5oV304ir0/IvvCCSGz9qsbL2A1vZhnlI2UbTSNiA=="],
+
    "@angular-devkit/core/source-map": ["source-map@0.8.0", "", {}, "sha512-d8EqvL+k/SOXCreS/SUzg2ciyHqBBLcN/yuRjFsbvVhHTE2pgei7oAhmPM7kWFbkX6OSMQfUq4KbkF3au9lhYQ=="],

+    "@angular-devkit/schematics/@angular-devkit/core": ["@angular-devkit/core@22.2.1", "", { "dependencies": { "ajv": "8.20.0", "ajv-formats": "3.0.1", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "picomatch": "4.0.7", "rxjs": "7.8.2", "source-map": "0.8.0" }, "peerDependencies": { "chokidar": "^5.0.0" }, "optionalPeers": ["chokidar"] }, "sha512-2oiuWVbUg7pE9kh2grp+MF2ynys+tMWZ/mmoYlqWrhMS2n5oV304ir0/IvvCCSGz9qsbL2A1vZhnlI2UbTSNiA=="],
+
    "@angular-devkit/schematics/magic-string": ["magic-string@1.4.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec": "^1.6.0" } }, "sha512-8lyCu36ErXR0J9uaGKlKQoiLZKmtI63YGLE8G2o9jyRPdr4X47LusSOwgOJOzcVtp81fTAAjxR7BwKz682Jhow=="],

+    "@angular/build/@angular-devkit/architect": ["@angular-devkit/architect@0.2202.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.2", "rxjs": "7.8.2" }, "bin": { "architect": "bin/cli.js" } }, "sha512-7ScBo47haHyRGG5M5ZEpbhwHgO2LEDbCLwNCjpjwhtRFDIEmAFbULM1OQjIybN3x+wOyY1kWRK7KvihCbs371g=="],
+
    "@angular/build/magic-string": ["magic-string@1.4.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec": "^1.6.0" } }, "sha512-8lyCu36ErXR0J9uaGKlKQoiLZKmtI63YGLE8G2o9jyRPdr4X47LusSOwgOJOzcVtp81fTAAjxR7BwKz682Jhow=="],

    "@angular/build/oxc-parser": ["oxc-parser@0.150.0", "", { "dependencies": { "@oxc-project/types": "^0.150.0" }, "optionalDependencies": { "@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-arm64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-x64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-freebsd-x64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm64-musl": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-riscv64-musl": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-s390x-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-x64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-x64-musl": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-openharmony-arm64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-win32-arm64-msvc": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-win32-ia32-msvc": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-win32-x64-msvc": "0.150.0" } }, "sha512-zwajKw1GUa57IOdafIS7/yOObGF2NihwIfZfs5yJTRprMSkiwhWOc/k+n8bwnUPbHr2/XsjfBO8KyTPaW3VpWg=="],

    "@angular/build/vite": ["vite@8.3.0", "", { "dependencies": { "lightningcss": "^1.33.0", "picomatch": "^4.0.7", "postcss": "^8.5.28", "rolldown": "~1.2.6", "tinyglobby": "^0.2.17" }, "optionalDependencies": { "fsevents": "~2.3.3" }, "peerDependencies": { "@types/node": "^20.19.0 || >=22.12.0", "@vitejs/devtools": "^0.7.1", "esbuild": "^0.27.0 || ^0.28.0", "jiti": ">=1.21.0", "less": "^4.0.0", "sass": "^1.70.0", "sass-embedded": "^1.70.0", "stylus": ">=0.54.8", "sugarss": "^5.0.0", "terser": "^5.16.0", "tsx": "^4.8.1", "yaml": "^2.4.2" }, "optionalPeers": ["@types/node", "@vitejs/devtools", "esbuild", "jiti", "less", "sass", "sass-embedded", "stylus", "sugarss", "terser", "tsx", "yaml"], "bin": { "vite": "bin/vite.js" } }, "sha512-lhZBVvEHefgE+HQZC9O7EBJgCU/nVzFNl7vkS4RE0APtWLP02/8QVIkQtzBxPquh7lq5/78NHipTj7ODQ6XuyQ=="],

+    "@angular/cli/@angular-devkit/architect": ["@angular-devkit/architect@0.2202.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.2", "rxjs": "7.8.2" }, "bin": { "architect": "bin/cli.js" } }, "sha512-7ScBo47haHyRGG5M5ZEpbhwHgO2LEDbCLwNCjpjwhtRFDIEmAFbULM1OQjIybN3x+wOyY1kWRK7KvihCbs371g=="],
+
+    "@angular/cli/@angular-devkit/schematics": ["@angular-devkit/schematics@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.2", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "magic-string": "1.4.1", "ora": "9.4.1", "rxjs": "7.8.2" } }, "sha512-uCpFZbQgFUrOjKHLeYSCaYCJdufauYom8yFGggm67yetMAGKPbmRvUEko8i8auNFoBQ+1w1CivjSTwtmXQzZkA=="],
+
    "@angular/compiler-cli/@babel/core": ["@babel/core@8.0.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@babel/code-frame": "^8.0.0", "@babel/generator": "^8.0.0", "@babel/helper-compilation-targets": "^8.0.0", "@babel/helpers": "^8.0.0", "@babel/parser": "^8.0.0", "@babel/template": "^8.0.0", "@babel/traverse": "^8.0.0", "@babel/types": "^8.0.0", "@types/gensync": "^1.0.5", "convert-source-map": "^2.0.0", "empathic": "^2.0.1", "gensync": "^1.0.0-beta.2", "import-meta-resolve": "^4.2.0", "json5": "^2.2.3", "obug": "^2.1.1", "semver": "^7.7.3" } }, "sha512-5FgxM4dLQpMJHSiVATk8foW263dVHQHBVpXYiimNECVWG01f4nFyEbQixeT6Mwvg7TayREJ2gpKl3o2RoMdnqw=="],

    "@angular/compiler-cli/yargs": ["yargs@18.0.0", "", { "dependencies": { "cliui": "^9.0.1", "escalade": "^3.1.1", "get-caller-file": "^2.0.5", "string-width": "^7.2.0", "y18n": "^5.0.5", "yargs-parser": "^22.0.0" } }, "sha512-4UEqdc2RYGHZc7Doyqkrqiln3p9X2DZVxaGbwhn2pi7MrRagKaOcIKe8L3OxYcbhXLgLFUS3zAYuQjKBQgmuNg=="],
@@ -2787,6 +2797,8 @@

    "@rollup/pluginutils/picomatch": ["picomatch@4.0.4", "", {}, "sha512-QP88BAKvMam/3NxH6vj2o21R6MjxZUAd6nlwAS/pnGvN9IVLocLHxGYIzFhg6fUQ+5th6P4dv4eW9jX3DSIj7A=="],

+    "@schematics/angular/@angular-devkit/schematics": ["@angular-devkit/schematics@22.2.2", "", { "dependencies": { "@angular-devkit/core": "22.2.2", "jsonc-parser": "3.3.1", "magic-string": "1.4.1", "ora": "9.4.1", "rxjs": "7.8.2" } }, "sha512-uCpFZbQgFUrOjKHLeYSCaYCJdufauYom8yFGggm67yetMAGKPbmRvUEko8i8auNFoBQ+1w1CivjSTwtmXQzZkA=="],
+
    "@schematics/angular/oxc-parser": ["oxc-parser@0.150.0", "", { "dependencies": { "@oxc-project/types": "^0.150.0" }, "optionalDependencies": { "@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-arm64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-darwin-x64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-freebsd-x64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-arm64-musl": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-riscv64-musl": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-s390x-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-x64-gnu": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-linux-x64-musl": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-openharmony-arm64": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-win32-arm64-msvc": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-win32-ia32-msvc": "0.150.0", "@oxc-parser/binding-win32-x64-msvc": "0.150.0" } }, "sha512-zwajKw1GUa57IOdafIS7/yOObGF2NihwIfZfs5yJTRprMSkiwhWOc/k+n8bwnUPbHr2/XsjfBO8KyTPaW3VpWg=="],

    "@types/babel__core/@babel/parser": ["@babel/parser@7.29.7", "", { "dependencies": { "@babel/types": "^7.29.7" }, "bin": "./bin/babel-parser.js" }, "sha512-hnORnjP/1P/zFEndoeX+n+t1RwWRJiJpM/jO7FW32Kn9r5+sJB2JWOdYo4L6k78j15eCwY3Gm/7364B1EMwtNg=="],
@@ -3235,6 +3247,10 @@

    "@analogjs/vite-plugin-nitro/esbuild/@esbuild/win32-x64": ["@esbuild/win32-x64@0.27.3", "", { "os": "win32", "cpu": "x64" }, "sha512-4uJGhsxuptu3OcpVAzli+/gWusVGwZZHTlS63hh++ehExkVT8SgiEf7/uC/PclrPPkLhZqGgCTjd0VWLo6xMqA=="],

+    "@angular-devkit/architect/@angular-devkit/core/source-map": ["source-map@0.8.0", "", {}, "sha512-d8EqvL+k/SOXCreS/SUzg2ciyHqBBLcN/yuRjFsbvVhHTE2pgei7oAhmPM7kWFbkX6OSMQfUq4KbkF3au9lhYQ=="],
+
+    "@angular-devkit/schematics/@angular-devkit/core/source-map": ["source-map@0.8.0", "", {}, "sha512-d8EqvL+k/SOXCreS/SUzg2ciyHqBBLcN/yuRjFsbvVhHTE2pgei7oAhmPM7kWFbkX6OSMQfUq4KbkF3au9lhYQ=="],
+
    "@angular/build/oxc-parser/@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi": ["@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi@0.150.0", "", { "os": "android", "cpu": "arm" }, "sha512-oQef2Zu4Prz1KLKznz3HqZzU9uVoA5PMoDZuuLmqms7hKmKSAPzlaMnLllJq3t+rgKmfJJ2siPrpZfFrW06btw=="],

    "@angular/build/oxc-parser/@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm64": ["@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm64@0.150.0", "", { "os": "android", "cpu": "arm64" }, "sha512-B6ofpoFiAUwIZ0MJ2IgHPvZK8FAtL4qzSZRwOkAKIfxEobE1mQC8nDdiFZj7pUaJiVUVCsfkMsBJKedzO8rZvA=="],
@@ -3277,6 +3293,8 @@

    "@angular/build/vite/rolldown": ["rolldown@1.2.12", "", { "dependencies": { "@oxc-project/types": "=0.152.0", "@rolldown/pluginutils": "^1.0.0" }, "optionalDependencies": { "@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-android-arm64": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc": "1.2.12", "@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc": "1.2.12" }, "bin": { "rolldown": "./bin/cli.mjs" } }, "sha512-8wafseiaG80xmXSfqidUNqZcylTlhmPZZt+za2m+js2sFZ8dTNlhIOV2WcbIPx2hgwPBJpEUGFAMZ9bgBBLTSQ=="],

+    "@angular/cli/@angular-devkit/schematics/magic-string": ["magic-string@1.4.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec": "^1.6.0" } }, "sha512-8lyCu36ErXR0J9uaGKlKQoiLZKmtI63YGLE8G2o9jyRPdr4X47LusSOwgOJOzcVtp81fTAAjxR7BwKz682Jhow=="],
+
    "@angular/compiler-cli/@babel/core/convert-source-map": ["convert-source-map@2.0.0", "", {}, "sha512-Kvp459HrV2FEJ1CAsi1Ku+MY3kasH19TFykTz2xWmMeq6bk2NU3XXvfJ+Q61m0xktWwt+1HSYf3JZsTms3aRJg=="],

    "@angular/compiler-cli/yargs/string-width": ["string-width@7.2.0", "", { "dependencies": { "emoji-regex": "^10.3.0", "get-east-asian-width": "^1.0.0", "strip-ansi": "^7.1.0" } }, "sha512-tsaTIkKW9b4N+AEj+SVA+WhJzV7/zMhcSu78mLKWSk7cXMOSHsBKFWUs0fWwq8QyK3MgJBQRX6Gbi4kYbdvGkQ=="],
@@ -5401,6 +5419,8 @@

    "@oxc-parser/binding-wasm32-wasi/@napi-rs/wasm-runtime/@tybys/wasm-util": ["@tybys/wasm-util@0.10.2", "", { "dependencies": { "tslib": "^2.4.0" } }, "sha512-RoBvJ2X0wuKlWFIjrwffGw1IqZHKQqzIchKaadZZfnNpsAYp2mM0h36JtPCjNDAHGgYez/15uMBpfGwchhiMgg=="],

+    "@schematics/angular/@angular-devkit/schematics/magic-string": ["magic-string@1.4.1", "", { "dependencies": { "@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec": "^1.6.0" } }, "sha512-8lyCu36ErXR0J9uaGKlKQoiLZKmtI63YGLE8G2o9jyRPdr4X47LusSOwgOJOzcVtp81fTAAjxR7BwKz682Jhow=="],
+
    "@schematics/angular/oxc-parser/@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi": ["@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm-eabi@0.150.0", "", { "os": "android", "cpu": "arm" }, "sha512-oQef2Zu4Prz1KLKznz3HqZzU9uVoA5PMoDZuuLmqms7hKmKSAPzlaMnLllJq3t+rgKmfJJ2siPrpZfFrW06btw=="],

    "@schematics/angular/oxc-parser/@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm64": ["@oxc-parser/binding-android-arm64@0.150.0", "", { "os": "android", "cpu": "arm64" }, "sha512-B6ofpoFiAUwIZ0MJ2IgHPvZK8FAtL4qzSZRwOkAKIfxEobE1mQC8nDdiFZj7pUaJiVUVCsfkMsBJKedzO8rZvA=="],
@@ -2,4 +2,6 @@

 The ten-second automatic deadline is superseded by [ADR 0006](0006-user-selected-horizons-and-cancellable-calculations.md), implemented by issue #59. Technical callers can still opt into an explicit planning-work budget; the user flow has no automatic cutoff.

+The fixed ordering between user preferences and configurable optimization objectives, including the unconditional priority for at-risk loss prevention, is superseded by [ADR 0008](0008-user-controlled-planning-objectives.md); implementation of that decision is pending.
+
 VacOptimizer resolves obligation rules exactly and jointly, then applies deterministic heuristic stages for at-risk loss, ordered preferences, complete public-holiday weeks, calendar gain, work-sequence quality, supporting placements, balance expiry, and dates in that order; complete holiday weeks therefore precede broader calendar-gain and work-sequence optimization. A completed plan does not claim mathematical global optimality. The dependency-free planner targets five seconds, returns `PlanningIncomplete` if those stages are interrupted, and stops after ten seconds. A HiGHS WebAssembly spike missed that hard limit on representative inputs even on the development machine, so no solver dependency is accepted. This supersedes ADR 0001.
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
-# Separate Plan Explanations from Calculation Traces
+# Stable Plan Explanations Without Decision History

-The automatic planning deadline referenced below is superseded by [ADR 0006](0006-user-selected-horizons-and-cancellable-calculations.md), implemented by issue #59. Technical callers can still opt into an explicit planning-work budget; the user flow has no automatic cutoff.
+Issue #76 supersedes this ADR's original requirement to capture and deliver a complete calculation trace. The original decision trace, historical analysis, replay and candidate-history retention are removed end to end.

-VacOptimizer provides a stable plan explanation separately from the complete, untruncated calculation trace captured during the same planning run; on-demand counterfactual date analysis is identified as hypothetical and never presented as trace history. Explanation and tracing must not alter the planning outcome, so trace instrumentation is excluded from the planner deadline and the result may appear before the latest run's in-memory trace finishes loading; this narrows ADR 0003's ten-second hard limit to planning work rather than end-to-end trace delivery. This accepts additional transient memory and wall-clock time instead of inventing scalar day scores, truncating history, or reconstructing a trace by replay.
+The stable explanation describes the displayed plan, including valid incomplete incumbents: entitlement and rule provenance, contributions, the full ordered objective comparison and first decisive objective, time-off periods, remaining balances and concrete non-placement reasons. Invalid input and obligation conflicts retain their distinct explanations.
+
+Outcomes are delivered before explanation work. Explanation failures cannot discard an available outcome. Immutable calculation, valid-incumbent and final-state snapshots remain available for cancellation recovery and hypothetical analysis; they are independent of tracing. ADR 0006's opt-in technical planning-work budget excludes observer callbacks and post-outcome explanation work. The user flow has no automatic elapsed-time cutoff.
@@ -1,11 +1,9 @@
-# Stable Explanation, Original Trace, and Counterfactuals
+# Stable Explanation and Displayed-Placement Counterfactuals

-The automatic planning deadline referenced below is superseded by [ADR 0006](0006-user-selected-horizons-and-cancellable-calculations.md), implemented by issue #59. Technical callers can still opt into an explicit planning-work budget; the user flow has no automatic cutoff.
+Issue #76 supersedes the original decision-trace and historical-counterfactual requirements of this ADR. Calculations no longer capture, retain or deliver decision history, and the UI has no trace explorer, replay, historical candidate statuses or balance-attempt lists.

-VacOptimizer exposes one client-side calculation context. Its immutable submitted snapshot and planning outcome are independent from three explanation concerns:
+VacOptimizer exposes one client-side calculation context with an immutable submitted configuration. Its outcome is independent from the stable explanation, which describes the final displayed plan and remains useful for complete and valid incumbent plans.

- the stable plan explanation is derived from the final displayed plan and remains useful for complete or incumbent plans;
- the calculation trace is captured while the producing run executes, grouped by phase and atomic decision, and may become ready after the outcome;
- counterfactual date analysis is an explicitly hypothetical operation that removes only the selected final placement, or starts from a selected trace decision's exact pre-decision state, and never rewrites the plan or historical trace.
+Counterfactual date analysis tests a displayed placement over every date of the submitted half-open horizon. It uses the captured configuration and final-state snapshot, releases only that placement, preserves its entitlement, leave type and rule provenance, and fixes unrelated placements. Earned-entitlement chronology and all obligations still apply. The result is explicitly hypothetical and never mutates the displayed plan. Historical decisions are not selectable analysis baselines.

-The public planning outcome is delivered as soon as planning work finishes. Trace capture and delivery have separate readiness/failure state, remain local to the latest calculation, and cannot turn a valid outcome into an explanation error. Counterfactual work is cancellable or ignored when its calculation identity is stale. The existing deterministic constraint-first planner and its planning-work deadline remain unchanged.
+The public outcome is delivered as soon as planning work finishes. Explanation delivery failures cannot replace it. Counterfactual work is cancelled or ignored when its calculation identity is stale. Search breadth, allocation previews, user priorities, deterministic selection and ADR 0006's cancellation, liveness and technical-budget contracts remain unchanged. Workers finish after required outcome and explanation delivery without acknowledgement queues.
@@ -1,17 +1,19 @@
 # User-Selected Horizons and Cancellable Calculations

-Accepted for [issue #12](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/12). Fixed, saved planning horizons are implemented by [issue #57](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/57); user cancellation with a retained valid plan and original trace is implemented by [issue #58](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/58); removal of the automatic calculation deadline and heartbeat-based worker liveness are implemented by [issue #59](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/59). The indicative duration estimate is implemented by [issue #60](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/60); its initial model, session-local refinement and calendar-rendering measurement are documented in [planning-duration.md](../planning-duration.md).
+Accepted for [issue #12](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/12). Fixed, saved planning horizons are implemented by [issue #57](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/57); user cancellation with a retained valid plan is implemented by [issue #58](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/58); removal of the automatic calculation deadline and heartbeat-based worker liveness are implemented by [issue #59](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/59). The indicative duration estimate is implemented by [issue #60](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/60); its initial model, session-local refinement and calendar-rendering measurement are documented in [planning-duration.md](../planning-duration.md).

-`deadlineMs` remains an opt-in contract for technical callers: a finite non-negative planning-work budget with no ten-second cap. An omitted value is unlimited. It starts after calendar preparation and excludes trace capture, observer callbacks, and post-outcome artifact work. The calendar and benchmark omit it. A one-second worker heartbeat renews the coordinator's thirty-second inactivity timer during cooperative preparation and search; total elapsed time never triggers that timer while activity continues. Worker errors and unavailable execution retain their explicit outcomes, and monitoring ends when the outcome arrives so delayed trace delivery cannot invalidate it.
+`deadlineMs` remains an opt-in contract for technical callers: a finite non-negative planning-work budget with no ten-second cap. An omitted value is unlimited. It starts after calendar preparation and excludes observer callbacks and post-outcome explanation work. The calendar and benchmark omit it. A one-second worker heartbeat renews the coordinator's thirty-second inactivity timer during cooperative preparation and search; total elapsed time never triggers that timer while activity continues. Worker errors and unavailable execution retain their explicit outcomes, and monitoring ends when the outcome arrives so delayed explanation delivery cannot invalidate it.

-VacOptimizer accepts explicitly selected, fixed planning horizons whose start may be past and whose duration may exceed twelve months, retaining today through the same date twelve months later as the default. Calculations remain in the browser and run to completion without an automatic elapsed-time cutoff, with an indicative duration estimate and an explicit Cancel action; this accepts variable waiting time and resource use to make longer horizons usable without silently changing the user's dates. This supersedes ADR 0003's ten-second automatic planning limit and its retention in both ADR 0004 documents, while preserving the separation between the planning outcome, stable explanation, and original trace.
+VacOptimizer accepts explicitly selected, fixed planning horizons whose start may be past and whose duration may exceed twelve months, retaining today through the same date twelve months later as the default. Calculations remain in the browser and run to completion without an automatic elapsed-time cutoff, with an indicative duration estimate and an explicit Cancel action; this accepts variable waiting time and resource use to make longer horizons usable without silently changing the user's dates. This supersedes ADR 0003's ten-second automatic planning limit and its retention in both ADR 0004 documents, while preserving the separation between the planning outcome and stable explanation.

-The settings' end date is the inclusive last planning date. The planner retains its half-open horizon by using the following calendar date as its exclusive end, matching the inclusive date-selection convention of TIME_WINDOW rules.
+The planning-period control in Configure your leave uses an inclusive last planning date. The planner retains its half-open horizon by using the following calendar date as its exclusive end, matching the inclusive date-selection convention of TIME_WINDOW rules.

 Editing the horizon does not trigger a calculation. The user can adjust dates, balances, and rules before using the existing Calculate action; until a new calculation is requested, the displayed calendar retains its preceding outcome and horizon.

-A successful calculation displays the calendar once, as soon as the full planning objective order is complete, without displaying intermediate plans during optimization. Trace delivery continues in the background and never delays or changes that final calendar. The indicative duration estimate covers elapsed time until the final calendar is usable, including any trace capture that delays the outcome, rather than the additional time to deliver the complete trace.
+A successful calculation displays the calendar once, as soon as the full planning objective order is complete, without displaying intermediate plans during optimization. Stable explanation delivery follows the outcome and never changes that final calendar. The indicative duration estimate covers elapsed time until the final calendar is usable, excluding later explanation work.

 Before Calculate, the estimate is shown as an approximate range in seconds or minutes based on the horizon, balances, and rules. It starts with a rough estimate and is refined using measured calculation durations on the same device; it never becomes an automatic stopping deadline.

 User cancellation during optimization preserves the best valid plan already found and labels it as a cancelled, incomplete calculation. Before any valid plan exists, cancellation reports that the calculation was cancelled without presenting a plan or claiming an obligation conflict.
+
+Issue #76 supersedes all original-trace requirements in this ADR and both ADR 0004 documents. Decision capture, historical analysis and replay are removed. Immutable calculation, valid-incumbent and final-state snapshots remain for the retained explanation, cancellation recovery and displayed-placement counterfactuals. Cancellation still preserves the best available jointly valid plan and never implies an obligation conflict.
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ status: accepted

 # Declared Non-Working Days and Reported Leave Balances

-For [issue #13](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/13), users declare fixed non-working dates among normal working days, with a CP, RTT, or Other type; Other covers every other reason for not working. Reported balances already account for booked leave, so these declarations consume no remaining balance and cannot receive another placement; they count towards compatible planning rules, including rules that earn leave.
+For [issue #13](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/13), users declare fixed non-working dates among normal working days, with a CP, RTT, or Other type; Other covers every other reason for not working. Reported balances already account for booked leave, so these declarations consume no remaining balance and cannot receive another placement; they count towards compatible planning rules, including rules that earn leave.

 Declared dates can form time-off periods without new leave placements, interrupt work sequences, and guide further optimization. Each calculation uses today's Europe/Paris calendar date, with reported balances assumed current as of that date: the planner adds only entitlements available strictly afterward, while earlier entitlements are already represented in the reported balances. This keeps existing bookings useful without debiting them again or asking users to manually add prospective gains; it relies on the user keeping reported balances current as the employer's system credits earned leave.

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+---
+status: accepted
+---
+
+# User-Controlled Planning Objectives
+
+VacOptimizer represents configurable plan-wide objectives as named optimization rules in the same user-controlled list as calendar-based planning rules, adding rule types where existing calendar patterns cannot express the objective. All active preference rules share one user-defined lexicographic order, so moving an optimization preference above Samedi Malin may deliberately forgo earned leave to improve that higher-priority objective. Making the displayed order authoritative supersedes the fixed ordering between user preferences and optimization objectives in [ADR 0003](0003-constraint-first-lexicographic-planning.md).
+
+At-risk loss prevention also becomes an optimization rule, enabled in first position by default and freely disableable or reorderable. The planner follows the resulting preference order even when a higher-priority preference leaves more at-risk leave unplaced; this also supersedes ADR 0003's unconditional priority for loss prevention.
+
+Optimization rules use preference mode. Supporting them as obligations would require explicit thresholds and additional conflict semantics, which are outside this change.
+
+The shared model for user-created optimization rules selects planning elements and applicable conditions, a measure and its aggregation, and a direction to minimize or maximize. At minimum, the application supplies six presets expressed in that same model: loss prevention, public-holiday week value, non-working-day gain, longest work-sequence length, the deficit of internal work sequences shorter than five working days, and the number of supporting placements.
+
+These presets retain their existing domain meanings, including the weekday-dependent value of complete public-holiday weeks and the total deficit of short work sequences rather than their count. Supporting placements are additional uses of balances expiring after the planning horizon to improve the plan. User-created rules can compose supported planning elements and measures; introducing a new domain measure requires extending the planner.
+
+The six presets are initially enabled, ordered as loss prevention, existing calendar-based rules, then the other five optimization presets in their former engine order. Existing saved rule lists, including an empty list, receive this addition once while preserving every existing rule's identity, parameters, force, enabled state, and relative order. Subsequent loads restore the user's saved choices without reinserting deleted presets or reactivating disabled ones.
+
+After all active rules compare equally, earlier balance expiry and then earlier placement dates remain deterministic tie-breakers.
+
+Only active rules drive placement decisions and preference comparisons; disabled or deleted optimization rules have no residual influence through fixed optimization stages or protected metrics. With no active rules, the planner adds no leave placements, even when balances are at risk of expiring, and retains declared non-working days. Final tie-breakers cannot independently trigger new placements.
+
+Implemented in the #70–#75 series. Saved-rule migration and functional verification
+are covered by #75. Benchmark performance acceptance and any required optimization
+are tracked separately in #78; the benchmark limits remain unchanged.
@@ -1,46 +1,57 @@
-# Issue tracker: GitLab
+# Issue tracker: Gitea

-Issues and specs for this repo live as GitLab issues. Use the [`glab`](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cli) CLI for all operations.
+Issues and specs live in [nessar/vac-optimizer on Gitea](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer). Use the configured [`tea-cli`](https://gitea.com/gitea/tea) login for supported operations.
+
+## Access and command version
+
+The installed binary is `tea-cli` 0.9.2. Its commands below use the pre-1.0 interface; other installations may call the binary `tea`. Check `tea-cli --help` and subcommand help before using commands from another version. This version supports YAML, TSV, CSV, simple, and table output; it has no JSON output, issue-edit command, or `api` command.
+
+Run inside the clone so the CLI discovers the repository and login from `origin`. Use `--repo nessar/vac-optimizer` and `--login <login-name>` when an explicit selection is needed. Options go before positional issue or PR numbers. Existing authentication can be checked with `tea-cli whoami`; for a new login, use interactive `tea-cli login add` and select `https://gitea.nessar.fr`.

 ## Conventions

- **Create an issue**: `glab issue create --title "..." --description "..."`. Use a heredoc for multi-line descriptions. Pass `--description -` to open an editor.
- **Read an issue**: `glab issue view <number> --comments`. Use `-F json` for machine-readable output.
- **List issues**: `glab issue list -F json` with appropriate `--label` filters.
- **Comment on an issue**: `glab issue note <number> --message "..."`. GitLab calls comments "notes".
- **Apply / remove labels**: `glab issue update <number> --label "..."` / `--unlabel "..."`. Multiple labels can be comma-separated or by repeating the flag.
- **Close**: `glab issue close <number>`. `glab issue close` does not accept a closing comment, so post the explanation first with `glab issue note <number> --message "..."`, then close.
- **Merge requests**: GitLab calls PRs "merge requests". Use `glab mr create`, `glab mr view`, `glab mr note`, etc. — the same shape as `gh pr ...` with `mr` in place of `pr` and `note`/`--message` in place of `comment`/`--body`.
+- **Create an issue**: `tea-cli issues create --title "..." --description "..." --labels "needs-triage"`. Multiple labels or assignees are comma-separated. For multiline text, prepare a draft and pass its contents as one quoted description argument.
+- **Read an issue**: `tea-cli issues --comments <number>`. Detail views render for display even with `--output yaml`; use list output or the REST operations below for structured data.
+- **List issues**: `tea-cli issues --state open --labels "needs-triage" --fields index,title,body,state,labels,assignees,url --output yaml`. Use `--page` and `--limit` to read all pages; the server may cap the requested page size.
+- **Comment**: `tea-cli comment <number> "..."`; this works for issues and PRs.
+- **Apply / remove labels, edit a body, or assign**: use the Gitea UI or the REST operations below; this CLI version does not support these edits. Preserve unrelated labels and assignees.
+- **Close**: post the explanation with `tea-cli comment <number> "..."`, then run `tea-cli issues close <number>`.
+- **Create a pull request**: `tea-cli pulls create --base develop --title "docs: update Gitea documentation" --description "..."`. Read with `tea-cli pulls --comments <number>`; list with `tea-cli pulls --state open --output yaml`.
+- **List milestones**: `tea-cli milestones --state all --fields id,title --output tsv`. Issue numbers were preserved during migration, but milestone IDs changed; V1 stats is [milestone 13](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/milestone/13).

-Infer the repo from `git remote -v` — `glab` does this automatically when run inside a clone.
+## REST operations for CLI gaps

-## Merge requests as a triage surface
+The instance's [API explorer](https://gitea.nessar.fr/api/swagger) and [schema](https://gitea.nessar.fr/swagger.v1.json) describe the supported endpoints. Paths below are relative to `https://gitea.nessar.fr/api/v1`; authenticate with an existing authorized Gitea API token without displaying or committing it. Check the installed CLI help first when it is upgraded.

-**MRs as a request surface: no.** _(Set to `yes` if this repo treats external merge requests as feature requests; `/triage` reads this flag.)_
+- **Read full issue data or comments as JSON**: `GET /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/<number>` and `GET /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/<number>/comments`. Paginate comment lists.
+- **Find label IDs**: `GET /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/labels`; paginate and match exact names from `triage-labels.md`.
+- **Add labels**: `POST /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/<number>/labels` with `{"labels":[<label-id>]}`. **Remove one label**: `DELETE /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/<number>/labels/<label-id>`. These operations preserve other labels.
+- **Edit a body or assign**: `PATCH /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/<number>` with `{"body":"..."}` or `{"assignees":["<username>"]}`. Read current assignees before updating the list.
+- **Read a PR diff**: `GET /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/pulls/<number>.diff`.

-When set to `yes`, MRs run through the same labels and states as issues, using the `glab mr` equivalents:
+## Pull requests as a triage surface

- **Read an MR**: `glab mr view <number> --comments` and `glab mr diff <number>` for the diff.
- **List external MRs for triage**: `glab mr list -F json`, then keep only MRs whose author is not a project member/owner (a contributor's MR, not a maintainer's in-flight work).
- **Comment / label / close**: `glab mr note`, `glab mr update --label`/`--unlabel`, `glab mr close`.
+**PRs as a request surface: no.** _(Set to `yes` if this repo treats external pull requests as feature requests; `/triage` reads this flag.)_

-Unlike GitHub, GitLab numbers issues and MRs separately, so `#42` is unambiguous once you know which surface the maintainer means.
+When enabled, use `tea-cli pulls --comments <number>` to read and `tea-cli pulls --state open --fields index,title,body,author,labels,url --output yaml` to list. Keep only external contributors' requests, checking repository collaborators or organization membership rather than guessing from the author's name. Comment with `tea-cli comment`, edit labels through the issue-label API, and close with `tea-cli pulls close <number>`.
+
+For a bare `#<number>`, check the resource kind: `tea-cli issues --kind all --fields index,kind,title,url --output yaml`, or inspect the issue API's `pull_request` field. PR URLs use `/pulls/<number>`; issue URLs use `/issues/<number>`.

 ## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"

-Create a GitLab issue.
+Create a Gitea issue with `tea-cli issues create`.

 ## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"

-Run `glab issue view <number> --comments`.
+Run `tea-cli issues --comments <number>` and read its labels and assignees.

 ## Wayfinding operations

 Used by `/wayfinder`. The **map** is a single issue with **child** issues as tickets.

- **Map**: a single issue labelled `wayfinder:map`, holding the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body. `glab issue create --label wayfinder:map`. (On GitLab tiers with native epics, an epic may hold the map instead; a labelled issue works everywhere.)
- **Child ticket**: an issue carrying `Part of #<map>` at the top of its description and labels `wayfinder:<type>` (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`). Once claimed, the ticket is assigned to the driving dev.
- **Blocking**: GitLab's **native blocking link** — the canonical, UI-visible representation. Add it with the `/blocked_by #<n>` quick action, posted as a note (`glab issue note <child> --message "/blocked_by #<blocker>"`). Native blocking links are a Premium/Ultimate feature; on the free tier (or where unavailable) fall back to a `Blocked by: #<n>, #<n>` line at the top of the description. A ticket is unblocked when every blocker is closed.
- **Frontier query**: `glab issue list -F json` scoped to the map's children, drop any with an open blocker — a native `blocked_by` link to an open issue (`glab api projects/:id/issues/:iid/links`), or an open issue in the `Blocked by` line — or an assignee; first in map order wins.
- **Claim**: `glab issue update <n> --assignee @me` — the session's first write.
- **Resolve**: `glab issue note <n> --message "<answer>"`, then `glab issue close <n>`, then append a context pointer (gist + link) to the map's Decisions-so-far.
+- **Map**: create an issue labelled `wayfinder:map`, holding the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body, with `tea-cli issues create --title "..." --description "..." --labels "wayfinder:map"`.
+- **Child ticket**: an issue carrying `Part of #<map>` at the top of its description and labels `wayfinder:<type>` (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`). Maintain the ordered child links in the map's body. Once claimed, the ticket is assigned to the driving dev.
+- **Blocking**: use Gitea's native dependencies. `POST /repos/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/<child>/dependencies` with `{"owner":"nessar","repo":"vac-optimizer","index":<blocker-number>}` makes the child depend on that blocker. Read blockers with `GET` on the same path; use `DELETE` with the same body to remove a dependency. Where dependencies are unavailable, retain a `Blocked by: #<n>, #<n>` line at the top of the description. A ticket is unblocked when every blocker is closed.
+- **Frontier query**: list the map's open children with `tea-cli issues --state open --fields index,title,body,assignees,labels --output yaml`, reading all pages. Drop tickets with an assignee or an open native dependency or description-line blocker; first in map order wins.
+- **Claim**: assign the authenticated username through the issue `PATCH` endpoint or Gitea UI — the session's first write.
+- **Resolve**: `tea-cli comment <n> "<answer>"`, then `tea-cli issues close <n>`, then append a context pointer (gist + link) to the map's Decisions-so-far through the issue `PATCH` endpoint or Gitea UI.
@@ -1,16 +1,52 @@
 # Mobile leave-planner benchmark

+## Composable optimization rules: current verification status
+
+The #70–#75 implementation uses explicit active optimization configurations in
+the benchmark fixtures. Before trace removal, the full functional coverage run passed 652 tests
+across 34 files under the 2 GB Node heap limit, excluding the separate benchmark.
+That run does not establish a passing performance protocol.
+
+On 2026-10-15, the #76 worktree based on `ea42561` passed 630 functional tests
+across 33 files with coverage under the 2 GB Node heap limit. Complete outcome
+comparisons against that baseline matched for all seven benchmark scenarios.
+The separate, unchanged benchmark did not complete within its 300-second limit
+(external timeout exit 124). Performance acceptance and any further optimization
+remain with #78.
+
+Before the Gitea migration, GitLab pipeline 320 passed all 652 functional tests
+in 109.43 seconds, then the seven-scenario protocol timed out at its unchanged
+300-second limit without an out-of-memory failure. In an earlier diagnostic run, the loaded-year warm-up took
+184.36 seconds and its first measured repetition began about 251.78 seconds into
+the protocol. Those diagnostic timings precede the final period-projection cache
+and the original-decision-trace removal in #76, and are not a result for either.
+
+At the user's request, #75 finishes on saved-rule migration and functional
+verification. #78 owns benchmark verification and implementation of further
+optimizations when needed, after trace removal in #76 and integrated functional verification in #77. All seven scenarios, one warm-up and two measured repetitions per
+scenario, the 2 GB heap limit and the 300-second timeout remain required for #78.
+At the user's request, the Gitea CI configuration defines the benchmark in a
+separate job with `continue-on-error: true` while #78 is open. Functional coverage
+tests and all other required checks remain blocking. #78 must restore the required benchmark gate
+after the unchanged protocol passes. A green pipeline during this exception
+does not establish a passing benchmark. No automatic elapsed-time planning
+cutoff is introduced. Gitea Actions is enabled; live workflow validation is tracked in
+[issue #268](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/268). The converted
+workflow preserves the separate advisory benchmark job. See the
+[CI migration status](../../README.md#continuous-integration).
+
+The results below document earlier implementations and protocols. They are
+historical measurements rather than the performance result for composable rules or trace removal. Their trace counts, timings and controls describe the former implementation only.
+
+## Reference-phone protocol
+
 Open the deployed application at `/benchmark` on the reference phone. Tap
 **Run benchmark**, wait for the seven scenarios to finish, then tap **Copy
 report** and save the tab-separated output with the date and build identifier.

-The harness measures preparation, planning-to-outcome latency, later trace
-delivery, and total wall time separately. It also reports planning work, trace
-capture, trace materialization, and trace transfer independently, plus the
-largest extra delay of a 50 ms UI heartbeat. It records the outcome, last
-completed quality stage, placement count, determinism, trace status, and trace
-candidate count. `PlanningIncomplete` is not a conflict: its last completed
-stage and incumbent are retained.
+The harness measures preparation, planning-to-outcome latency, planning work, and total wall time through stable explanation delivery. It also reports the largest extra delay of a 50 ms UI heartbeat, available main-thread heap, outcome, last completed quality stage, placement count and determinism. `PlanningIncomplete` retains its last completed stage and valid incumbent and is distinct from a conflict.
+
+Issue #76 removes all trace timing, status and candidate-count columns, along with trace promises and delivery requirements. The seven scenarios, warm-ups, repetitions, 2 GB heap limit, 300-second timeout and performance gates are unchanged. #77 owns integrated functional verification; #78 owns performance acceptance and any necessary optimization.

 ## Protocol

@@ -33,23 +69,16 @@ stage and incumbent are retained.

 The browser page uses the same `createPlanningCalculation(request)` context as
 the calendar and adds no solver or backend dependency. It omits `deadlineMs`.
-Trace delivery is reported separately and cannot replace a valid planning outcome.
+Explanation delivery is independent of the outcome and cannot replace a valid plan.

-`planning_ms` is the observed latency until the outcome is usable;
-`planning_work_ms` excludes trace capture. `trace_capture_ms` accounts for
-instrumentation during planning, `trace_materialization_ms` accounts for
-building the stable explanation and finishing the trace after the outcome.
-`trace_transfer_ms` measures worker transfer and receiver assembly work;
-`trace_delivery_ms` measures elapsed time until the complete trace is ready. `max_ui_delay_ms` includes
-planning, trace delivery, and report preparation. Trace readiness has no
-elapsed-time ceiling and never permits truncating actual candidate evaluations.
+`planning_ms` is the observed latency until the outcome is usable. `planning_work_ms` excludes observer callbacks and post-outcome explanation work. `wall_ms` includes preparation, outcome and explanation delivery. `max_ui_delay_ms` covers this entire interval; there is no decision recording, trace materialization or trace transfer.

 `peak_main_thread_heap_bytes` is Chromium's available `performance.memory`
 sample, taken alongside the 50 ms UI heartbeat. A blank value means this API is
 unavailable. This measures the page's JS heap, excludes the worker heap, and is
 not a claim about total application memory. For a browser profile, record the
 isolated Chrome process-tree RSS separately during planning and subsequent
-trace delivery, including the worker and renderer. State the sampling interval,
+explanation delivery, including the worker and renderer. State the sampling interval,
 CPU throttling, viewport, and whether a warm-up preceded each measurement.

 For cancellation measurements, use the normal calendar with the same saved
@@ -57,11 +86,15 @@ two- or three-year dates and balances. Cancel during preparation and an active
 optimization phase, using the keyboard in one run. Record request-to-outcome
 latency separately from request-to-artifacts latency; verify the partial-plan
 status or absence of a plan, one planning request, no placements before the
-outcome, and continued acknowledged delivery of the original trace. Confirm
+outcome, and delivery of its stable explanation. Confirm
 that editing an input remains possible during active worker CPU work. These
 measurements describe that device and workload; they impose no latency limit.

-## Hardware status
+## Historical measurements before trace removal
+
+The following records remain as evidence for their dated builds. Trace-related behavior and metrics below are superseded by issue #76.
+
+### Hardware status

 No reference-phone run has been recorded. The project owner elected to close
 the release tickets on 2026-09-25 using the emulated run below, accepting its
@@ -90,10 +123,10 @@ and each flow sent exactly one planning request. All 1,949 and 3,956 trace
 packets respectively were acknowledged, carrying 122,621 and 249,234 candidate
 records without truncation. Heartbeats continued during the producing runs.

-| Horizon | Calendar usable | Later trace delivery | Placements | Maximum UI timer delay before calendar / during trace | Peak page heap before calendar / during trace | Peak Chrome process-tree RSS before calendar / during trace |
-| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| Two years | 5.08 s | 2.55 s | 60 | 1.47 s / 0.70 s | 22.7 / 314.6 MiB | 1,143.2 / 1,606.8 MiB |
-| Three years | 10.86 s | 4.14 s | 90 | 2.11 s / 1.48 s | 22.9 / 597.6 MiB | 1,386.8 / 2,217.8 MiB |
+| Horizon     | Calendar usable | Later trace delivery | Placements | Maximum UI timer delay before calendar / during trace | Peak page heap before calendar / during trace | Peak Chrome process-tree RSS before calendar / during trace |
+| ----------- | --------------- | -------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- |
+| Two years   | 5.08 s          | 2.55 s               | 60         | 1.47 s / 0.70 s                                       | 22.7 / 314.6 MiB                              | 1,143.2 / 1,606.8 MiB                                       |
+| Three years | 10.86 s         | 4.14 s               | 90         | 2.11 s / 1.48 s                                       | 22.9 / 597.6 MiB                              | 1,386.8 / 2,217.8 MiB                                       |

 A 50 ms page timer measured extra event-loop delay and sampled available
 main-thread JS heap. RSS was sampled every 500 ms across that isolated Chrome
@@ -111,10 +144,10 @@ completed stage. An editable input accepted focus while the worker remained
 active. Both flows kept a 44 px Cancel control, fit the viewport without
 horizontal overflow, and delivered the original trace after their outcome.

-| Cancellation point | Request to outcome | Request to complete artifacts | Retained placements |
-| --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| Calendar preparation | 21.9 ms | 874.8 ms | 0 |
-| Active holiday-week optimization, keyboard | 21.5 ms | 1,431.7 ms | 90 |
+| Cancellation point                         | Request to outcome | Request to complete artifacts | Retained placements |
+| ------------------------------------------ | ------------------ | ----------------------------- | ------------------- |
+| Calendar preparation                       | 21.9 ms            | 874.8 ms                      | 0                   |
+| Active holiday-week optimization, keyboard | 21.5 ms            | 1,431.7 ms                    | 90                  |

 No browser errors occurred. Cancellation issued one cancel request and no
 additional calculation. Separate tests cover late artifact errors and stale
@@ -151,11 +184,11 @@ at the worker's terminal artifact delivery. The application's own calibration
 uses its request timestamp and `afterNextRender` endpoint as described in
 [planning-duration.md](../planning-duration.md).

-| Horizon | Range before Calculate (with one local sample) | Observed calendar wait | Additional trace delivery | Range after completion | Placements |
-| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
-| One year | 1–4 s | 1.74 s | 1.23 s | 1–5 s | 30 |
-| Two years | 2–16 s | 5.08 s | 2.88 s | 2–16 s | 60 |
-| Three years | 7–44 s | 11.03 s | 5.60 s | 6–39 s | 90 |
+| Horizon     | Range before Calculate (with one local sample) | Observed calendar wait | Additional trace delivery | Range after completion | Placements |
+| ----------- | ---------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------- |
+| One year    | 1–4 s                                          | 1.74 s                 | 1.23 s                    | 1–5 s                  | 30         |
+| Two years   | 2–16 s                                         | 5.08 s                 | 2.88 s                    | 2–16 s                 | 60         |
+| Three years | 7–44 s                                         | 11.03 s                | 5.60 s                    | 6–39 s                 | 90         |

 All three outcomes completed through `dates`, with no intermediate placements,
 implicit deadline, extra request or date movement. The three-year result
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# Gitea Actions conversion
+
+[Issue #268](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/268) converts the
+repository's CI to [`.gitea/workflows/ci.yml`](../.gitea/workflows/ci.yml).
+The workflow and merge-message template have passed implementation review.
+Repository Actions is enabled with owner approval. Publisher credentials and
+live workflow validation are still pending.
+The existing `gitlab-to-gitea/ci-conversion-required` status stays in place until
+that review, a successful Gitea PR run, and approval of the prepared first merge
+message.
+
+## Jobs and triggers
+
+Every branch and tag push runs CI. Pull requests run on opening, reopening,
+synchronization, and title/body edits. Manual dispatch runs validation without
+publishing images. There is no schedule or deployment job in the preserved
+configuration; the Compose files remain manual deployment options.
+
+| Job         | Behavior                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
+| ----------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| `policy`    | Tests the policy and publisher, then validates the checked-out commit, GitFlow, PR title, commits, and stable release version.                                                                            |
+| `validate`  | Runs lint, formatting, and application/test type checks.                                                                                                                                                  |
+| `test`      | Runs functional coverage with one worker and a 2 GiB Node heap; uploads coverage for seven days even on failure.                                                                                          |
+| `benchmark` | Runs outside coverage with the same worker/heap limits and 300-second protocol timeout. Advisory while #78 is open.                                                                                       |
+| `build`     | Builds browser/server production bundles and retains `dist` for seven days.                                                                                                                               |
+| `security`  | Runs Semgrep JavaScript/TypeScript SAST and Trivy dependency/secret scans; retains SARIF reports for seven days. Scanner execution must succeed; findings remain reports rather than a new severity gate. |
+| `images`    | Publishes branch/SHA images after required validation, or promotes an existing SHA image for a stable tag. Runs only for pushes and same-repository PRs.                                                  |
+| `required`  | Fails on failed, cancelled, or skipped required validation. Requires image publication when expected; accepts its intentional skip for fork PRs and manual dispatch. Excludes the advisory benchmark.     |
+
+Push and PR runs are separate so PR title and rebase checks run on the PR event.
+New runs cancel older runs for the same event/ref. Image jobs serialize per
+branch slug; stable promotions share one group and are not cancelled in progress.
+
+## Runners and permissions
+
+Validation uses Node 24.21.0 and Bun 1.4.2 with the frozen lockfile. The image
+job uses Docker 29.8.2 and its matching Docker-in-Docker service. Scanner
+versions are Semgrep 1.180.0 and Trivy 0.75.0; Trivy downloads are checksum-checked.
+Jobs select the `ubuntu-latest` label and require Linux container-job support.
+Allow at least the preserved 2 GiB Node heap plus runner and container overhead.
+
+The instance currently has an online inherited runner named `srvhome`, labelled
+`ubuntu-latest` and `ubuntu-24.04`. Repository runners, secrets, and variables
+were empty at implementation time. The owner must verify that this runner can
+run the job containers, JavaScript actions, artifact uploads, and the privileged
+Docker-in-Docker service before replacing the migration gate. Use isolated runners for untrusted
+contributor code; the privileged publishing service belongs to trusted runs.
+
+The workflow requests a read-only repository token. Checkout removes persisted
+credentials; publication credentials are passed only to the image step. Fork PRs
+and manual dispatches cannot run that step. Gitea's job token cannot publish
+container packages, so provision the two repository Actions secrets below.
+See [job-token permissions](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/actions/token-permissions/)
+and [package authorization](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/actions/comparison/).
+
+| Secret              | Purpose                                                                     |
+| ------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
+| `REGISTRY_USERNAME` | The package publisher's Gitea username, authorized to publish for `nessar`. |
+| `REGISTRY_PASSWORD` | A dedicated personal access token with `write:package` permission.          |
+
+Keep secret values in Gitea's Actions secret store. The configured tea account's
+administrator token is not a CI publishing credential. No SSH or deployment
+secret is required by this workflow.
+
+## Images and releases
+
+Images use the [Gitea container registry](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/packages/container/)
+at `gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer`. Branch pushes and same-repository PRs
+publish `branch-<slug>` and `sha-<full commit SHA>`. Slugs retain the previous
+lowercase, non-alphanumeric-to-hyphen, 63-byte normalization; choose distinct
+branch slugs.
+
+Only stable `vX.Y.Z` tags matching the tagged commit's `package.json` version
+and reachable from `main` may promote images. Promotion first pulls the existing
+SHA image, then publishes the version tag and `latest`; it never rebuilds.
+An absent SHA image fails before either stable tag changes. Wait for the main
+image job before tagging. No version increment or deployment is automatic.
+
+## Merge messages and activation
+
+The [merge template](../.gitea/default_merge_message/MERGE_TEMPLATE.md) translates
+the previous title, closing-issue references, and review reference using
+[Gitea's supported variables](https://docs.gitea.com/usage/issues-prs/merge-message-templates/).
+For a PR titled `ci: migrate to Gitea Actions`, closing #268, with reference #271,
+the checked expansion is:
+
+```text
+ci: migrate to Gitea Actions
+
+close #268
+
+See pull request #271
+```
+
+The owner has enabled Actions and approved validation before adding publisher
+secrets. Complete the remaining activation checks in this order:
+
+1. Review this workflow against the protected administrator exports for runner
+   requirements, triggers/schedules, permissions, secrets, publishing, and
+   deployment dependencies. The original CI definition is retained in Git:
+   `git show 0d900fd72d1a405d257f5a566c55cc0cb3d2bc61:.gitlab-ci.yml`.
+2. Publish the reviewed feature branch and open its PR to register the workflow.
+   Once registered, manual dispatch verifies validation and artifacts without
+   publishing images. Push and PR validation can also run now; their image and
+   aggregate checks remain blocked until publisher secrets are provisioned.
+3. Verify runner isolation and Docker service support, then provision the two
+   publisher secrets. Review the package publisher's permissions and registry
+   namespace before permitting publication. Rerun the PR workflow and require a
+   successful **pull-request run** on the final commit, including PR title and
+   rebase checks, artifact handling, and actual image publication. A push run
+   or manual run alone does not validate the PR policy and publication.
+4. Prepare and review the first PR's merge message before replacing the migration
+   gate. The target branch will not contain the new template until that first
+   merge, so explicitly use the validated PR title, closing references, and PR
+   reference for its merge message. Keep the migration gate throughout this
+   review.
+5. After the successful PR run and merge-message approval, replace the migration
+   status requirement on both protected branches with the **actual reported
+   pull-request context** for the `required` job. Select it from the PR's reported
+   checks rather than a push run or a guessed context spelling. Fork PRs must
+   also be able to satisfy this check without base-repository push permissions.
+   Keep direct/force pushes disabled, merges restricted to maintainers, outdated
+   PRs blocked, and administrator protection bypass disabled. Select merge
+   commits and disable squash/rebase merge methods.
+6. Merge the first PR using the approved message, then verify the resulting merge
+   commit. Subsequent merges read the committed template. No direct
+   integration-branch push is needed.
+
+Historical job execution, reports, and downloadable artifacts remain in the
+administrator rollback backups. They are not recreated or uploaded by this
+conversion.
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Cancelling a planning calculation

-Issue [#58](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/work_items/58) implements the cancellation portion of ADR 0006. Issue #59 removes the automatic deadline while keeping the same cancellation and original-trace protocol. The duration estimate remains in issue #60.
+Issue [#58](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/58) implements the cancellation portion of ADR 0006. Issue #59 removes the automatic deadline. Issue #76 removes decision tracing while preserving cancellation and valid-plan recovery. The duration estimate remains in issue #60.

 `PlanningCalculationContext.cancel()` requests user cancellation once while its outcome is pending. `CalendarYear` keeps an accessible Cancel button visible during preparation, obligation search, and optimization. It announces the request, disables duplicate cancellation, and moves keyboard focus to the result heading when the outcome arrives. Cancellation never triggers Calculate. A subsequent explicit Calculate creates a fresh immutable calculation snapshot.

@@ -10,25 +10,25 @@ The core exposes resumable generator steps. `calculatePlanningAsyncInternal` dri

 The synchronous `calculatePlanningInternal` adapter drains the same steps without pauses for existing direct core callers. The public non-browser calculation context uses the asynchronous driver so its cancellation method also works.

-User cancellation is distinct from replacement by another calculation (`stale-calculation`) and isolated worker failure (`worker-error` or `worker-unavailable`). Replacement retains the existing termination and stale-response protection. User cancellation leaves the producing worker alive until its explanation and trace have been delivered.
+User cancellation is distinct from replacement by another calculation (`stale-calculation`) and isolated worker failure (`worker-error` or `worker-unavailable`). Replacement retains the existing termination and stale-response protection. User cancellation leaves the producing worker alive until its outcome and explanation data have been delivered.

 ## Retaining a valid plan

-The asynchronous calculation retains a copied incumbent as soon as the obligation search finds a jointly valid solution, before that entire stage has completed. It also considers accepted placements and every feasible evaluated quality candidate, including candidates rejected by a stage's narrower comparator. Each candidate is reconciled for earned entitlement availability and checked against all obligation rules before retention. The existing full lexicographic comparator chooses the best available incumbent; its comparisons are recorded in the original trace.
+The asynchronous calculation retains a copied incumbent as soon as the obligation search finds a jointly valid solution, before that entire stage has completed. It also considers accepted placements and every feasible evaluated quality candidate, including candidates rejected by a stage's narrower comparator. Each candidate is reconciled for earned entitlement availability and checked against all obligation rules before retention. The existing full lexicographic comparator chooses the best available incumbent.

-Retention reuses quality metrics already computed for an evaluated candidate. An intermediate state with more unplaced at-risk leave, or worse preferences at equal unplaced leave, is rejected using that objective prefix alone, with the actual short-circuited comparison recorded in the trace. This avoids rescoring dominated states during large obligation previews without skipping any produced history or a candidate that could improve the retained plan.
+Retention reuses quality metrics already computed for an evaluated candidate. An intermediate state with more unplaced at-risk leave, or worse preferences at equal unplaced leave, is rejected using that objective prefix alone. This avoids rescoring dominated states during large obligation previews without skipping a candidate that could improve the retained plan.

-Preference occurrence dates and patterns are calculated once for the run's immutable calendar and rules. Each comparison still checks the candidate's actual placements against those patterns; candidate scores and trace records are not cached.
+Preference occurrence dates and patterns are calculated once for the run's immutable calendar and rules. Each comparison still checks the candidate's actual placements against those patterns; candidate scores are not cached.

 On cancellation, the core materializes the retained state with consistent placements, balances, periods, rule provenance, and preference satisfaction. It returns `PlanningIncomplete` with reason `user-cancelled`. With an incumbent the French status is **Calcul annulé — plan partiel**; without one it is **Calcul annulé**, without a plan or an obligation conflict. Temporary search states never become the displayed incumbent.

-## Preserving the original trace
+## Delivering the outcome and explanation

-Cancellation follows the core's normal finish path. Quality evaluations are recorded before their incumbent comparisons, and each greedy placement attempt starts its own atomic decision. The recorder closes interrupted and unexecuted phases and drains every remaining operation from that run. The worker retains staged updates, including ones not yet posted, and continues its bounded, acknowledged trace delivery after optimization has stopped. It sends `artifacts-complete` only when all queued updates have been sent and acknowledged. The facade drains its own received update queue before resolving the trace. Neither layer replays planning to reconstruct this history.
+Cancellation follows the normal finish path. The stable explanation is derived from the retained state. Outcome and explanation have separate promises: delayed or failed explanation delivery cannot replace or remove an already settled valid partial plan. Repeated and late outcome messages cannot change that outcome, and calculation identities protect the UI against obsolete results and explanations.

-The stable explanation is derived from the retained state. The outcome, explanation, and trace have separate promises: delayed or failed artifact delivery cannot replace or remove an already settled valid partial plan. Repeated and late outcome messages cannot change that outcome, and calculation identities protect the UI against obsolete results and artifacts.
+Immutable `PlanningStateSnapshot` values preserve exact entitlement metadata, earned activations, declarations and placements for checkpoints and the final state. A worker failure retains the latest delivered valid checkpoint and can recover its stable explanation in a separate worker without rerunning planning. Displayed-placement alternatives use the captured configuration and state; no original decisions or historical baselines are retained.

-If Cancel is accepted just before a queued natural result reaches the facade, the pending outcome still becomes a user cancellation. An already computed valid plan can be retained, while a queued conflict cannot become the cancellation result. Its existing explanation receives interruption metadata, and the original phase history is preserved even when the worker had already completed those phases.
+If Cancel is accepted just before a queued natural result reaches the facade, the pending outcome still becomes a user cancellation. An already computed valid plan can be retained, while a queued conflict cannot become the cancellation result. Its existing explanation receives interruption metadata. The planning worker terminates after delivering the required artifacts; it never waits for trace acknowledgements.

 ## Verification

@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ bunx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.app.json
 bunx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.spec.json
 ```

-The public cancellation tests cover immediate cancellation, queued trace updates on both sides of the request, a stable partial outcome despite late completion or artifact error, distinct worker failure and replacement (including non-browser explanation metadata), and cancellation after settlement. A core regression compares the retained plan's full objective vector with every valid candidate actually evaluated before cancellation. The CalendarYear tests cover keyboard activation, translated statuses with and without an incumbent, focus, no implicit recalculation, explicit recalculation, and obsolete trace delivery.
+The public cancellation tests cover immediate cancellation, a stable partial outcome despite late completion or artifact error, distinct worker failure and replacement (including non-browser explanation metadata), and cancellation after settlement. Core regressions verify retained validity, provenance, earned chronology and the best available partial plan through the existing checkpoint seam. The CalendarYear tests cover keyboard activation, translated statuses with and without an incumbent, focus, no implicit recalculation, explicit recalculation, and obsolete explanation delivery.

-The real-worker suite bundles the production worker source with Bun and runs it on a separate Node worker thread. Its small host adapter maps browser worker messages to the thread's message port; the planner, CPU work, cancellation handling, and acknowledged trace protocol are real. It checks interruption after preparation has started, before the first obligation solution, during active obligation CPU work after a solution exists, and after a completed checkpoint. It also compares an uncancelled outcome with the synchronous adapter's deterministic result. These checks complement the controlled worker boundary tests.
+The real-worker suite bundles the production worker source with Bun and runs it on a separate Node worker thread. Its small host adapter maps browser worker messages to the thread's message port; the planner, CPU work, cancellation handling, and outcome and explanation delivery protocol are real. It checks interruption after preparation has started, before the first obligation solution, during active obligation CPU work after a solution exists, and after a completed checkpoint. It also compares an uncancelled outcome with the synchronous adapter's deterministic result. These checks complement the controlled worker boundary tests.

-For a browser check, serve the production browser build and use native Chromium Web Workers with a saved annual horizon. Check cancellation during calendar preparation, a broad obligation search, and a quality pass. Confirm one planning request per Calculate, no new request on Cancel, the appropriate translated status, joint rule satisfaction and balance accounting for an incumbent, and complete trace delivery after the outcome. Also check the Cancel control with the keyboard, at 375px width, and in light and dark themes.
+For a browser check, serve the production browser build and use native Chromium Web Workers with a saved annual horizon. Check cancellation during calendar preparation, a broad obligation search, and a quality pass. Confirm one planning request per Calculate, no new request on Cancel, the appropriate translated status, joint rule satisfaction and balance accounting for an incumbent, and stable explanation delivery after the outcome. Also check the Cancel control with the keyboard, at 375px width, and in light and dark themes.

-The production build was checked in native Chromium for all three interruption points, including keyboard cancellation during a 375px dark-theme obligation search and desktop light-theme checks. An editable input could still receive focus during CPU work, and focus moved to the result heading after keyboard cancellation. Each run sent one planning request and one cancellation request, displayed the appropriate French status, and completed acknowledged artifact delivery. The Cancel control was 44px high and the page had no horizontal overflow. In these sample runs, cancellation through artifact completion took under 200ms; this is measured evidence, not a latency guarantee.
+Earlier browser checks before #76: the production build was checked in native Chromium for all three interruption points, including keyboard cancellation during a 375px dark-theme obligation search and desktop light-theme checks. An editable input could still receive focus during CPU work, and focus moved to the result heading after keyboard cancellation. Each run sent one planning request and one cancellation request, displayed the appropriate French status, and completed acknowledged artifact delivery. The Cancel control was 44px high and the page had no horizontal overflow. In these sample runs, cancellation through artifact completion took under 200ms; this is measured evidence, not a latency guarantee.
@@ -79,13 +79,12 @@ The existing initial calculation falls back to the start of `startCalculation`.
 The endpoint is Angular's `afterNextRender` callback after the complete plan has
 been projected into the calendar, its months and placements have been rendered,
 and the loading overlay has been removed. This measures request scheduling,
-calendar preparation, worker startup, search, trace capture that delays the
-outcome, outcome transport, projection and Angular rendering. It is a DOM
+calendar preparation, worker startup, search, outcome transport, projection and Angular rendering. It is a DOM
 readiness endpoint, rather than a claim to measure a physical screen's paint.

 Neither core `planningWorkMs` nor artifact timings supply the calibration
-measurement. The callback does not wait for the explanation or trace promises;
-later delivery, navigation and trace errors never add a second measurement.
+measurement. The callback does not wait for the explanation promise;
+later delivery, navigation and explanation errors never add a second measurement.
 Cancellation (including a retained incumbent), incomplete outcomes, invalid
 inputs, conflicts and calculation errors do not calibrate successful-plan
 waiting time. Superseded calculations and callbacks for destroyed calendars
@@ -98,12 +97,12 @@ timer, date adjustment or new calculation. **Cancel** remains explicit.

 Controlled-clock tests at the existing calendar and input seams cover initial
 estimation, unsubmitted edits, minute formatting, local refinement, request
-scheduling, a twenty-second calculation exceeding its initial range, a trace
-that fails five minutes after calendar readiness, cancellation with and without
+scheduling, a twenty-second calculation exceeding its initial range, an explanation
+that arrives after calendar readiness, cancellation with and without
 an incumbent, incomplete/error outcomes and superseded calculations. No timing
 assertion depends on CI hardware speed. Existing settings, planner and worker
-tests cover saved horizons, long calculations and original interrupted traces.
+tests cover saved horizons, long calculations and interrupted-plan explanations.

 Rendered annual, two-year and three-year references, with the actual displayed
-range and separate later trace wait, are recorded in
+range and historical artifact-delivery wait, are recorded in
 [the benchmark report](benchmark/README.md).
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+# Composable planning objective contract
+
+The common implementation for tickets #70–#75 is on `feature/optimization-rules-70-75`.
+`src/app/services/planning-objectives.ts` evaluates supported configurations; rule names and
+identifiers never enter the evaluator. Supplied and personal optimization rules share this
+model, editor, persistence and ordered calculation pipeline.
+
+## Configuration
+
+`OptimizationConfiguration` contains `elements`, `conditions`, `measure`, `aggregation`,
+`direction`, and, only for `work-sequence-deficit`, `thresholdDays`. Conditions are a list
+of distinct selectors, combined with AND; an empty list selects every observed element.
+Directions are `minimize` and `maximize`. The finite `OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG` contains the
+following compatible combinations. Each row accepts any subset of its listed conditions.
+
+| Elements               | Applicable conditions   | Measure                     | Aggregations              | Measure unit          | Parameters                                             |
+| ---------------------- | ----------------------- | --------------------------- | ------------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------ |
+| `leave-balances`       | `at-risk`               | `unplaced-quantity`         | `sum`, `count`, `maximum` | working days          | none                                                   |
+| `public-holiday-weeks` | `complete`              | `public-holiday-week-value` | `sum`, `count`, `maximum` | calendar-day distance | none                                                   |
+| `time-off-periods`     | none                    | `non-working-day-gain`      | `sum`, `count`, `maximum` | calendar days         | none                                                   |
+| `work-sequences`       | `internal`, `non-empty` | `work-sequence-length`      | `sum`, `count`, `maximum` | working days          | none                                                   |
+| `work-sequences`       | `internal`, `non-empty` | `work-sequence-deficit`     | `sum`, `count`, `maximum` | working days          | `thresholdDays`: positive safe integer in working days |
+| `leave-placements`     | `supporting`            | `placement-count`           | `sum`, `count`, `maximum` | count                 | none                                                   |
+
+`count` counts selected elements, including selected elements whose measured value is zero;
+its unit is always count. `sum` and `maximum` aggregate the selected measured values.
+All three return **zero on an empty collection**. An empty work sequence has zero deficit,
+even if a configuration selects it. The maximum of an empty work-sequence collection is zero;
+the existing optional average statistics keep their separate null semantics.
+
+`validateOptimizationConfiguration(unknown)` returns `{ valid: true, configuration }` or
+`{ valid: false, code, message }`. Malformed values use `invalid-optimization-configuration`;
+unsupported elements/measure/condition/aggregation/parameter combinations use
+`unsupported-optimization-configuration`. Unknown fields, duplicate conditions, missing,
+fractional, non-positive, non-finite and unsafe thresholds are rejected. Other measures
+reject `thresholdDays`. Direct and worker calculations attach each configuration error to
+its rule, including malformed sparse selector lists; they never replace it with a preset.
+
+For example, a personal rule can select internal non-empty work sequences, sum their
+deficits at a threshold of three, and minimize the result. It uses the same measure as
+the five-day preset. Another can maximize the longest sequence or count complete holiday
+weeks; composition never dispatches by a preset identifier.
+
+## Six supplied recipes
+
+`OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS` provides configurations, without identities, display labels or enabled
+states. `RuleService` wraps copies in named planning rules and persists the full configuration.
+
+| Export key             | Elements and conditions                 | Measure and aggregation            | Direction |
+| ---------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------- |
+| `unplacedAtRisk`       | leave balances, at risk                 | unplaced quantity, sum             | minimize  |
+| `holidayWeekValue`     | public-holiday weeks, complete          | public-holiday week value, sum     | maximize  |
+| `nonWorkingDayGain`    | time-off periods                        | non-working-day gain, sum          | maximize  |
+| `longestWorkSequence`  | work sequences, including horizon edges | work-sequence length, maximum      | minimize  |
+| `shortSequenceDeficit` | internal non-empty work sequences       | deficit at `thresholdDays: 5`, sum | minimize  |
+| `supportingPlacements` | leave placements, supporting            | placement count, count             | minimize  |
+
+## Concrete observations and boundaries
+
+`OptimizationObservations` carries collections from one concrete valid plan:
+
+- Leave balances expose unplaced working-day quantity and the at-risk flag. Expiry on either
+  the horizon start or its exclusive end is at risk, preserving the existing classification;
+  placement dates themselves stay within the half-open horizon.
+- Public-holiday weeks expose their weekday holiday value and whether every other working
+  date is a placement or declared non-working day. Monday through Friday contributions are
+  **1, 2, 3, 2, 1**; several holidays in one week are summed once in that week's observation.
+  Ordinary fully declared weeks never become holiday weeks. A partial horizon only admits
+  a week when every required date outside it is already declared, preserving the existing rule.
+- Time-off periods carry distinct natural non-working dates; periods are disjoint and include
+  adjacent weekends, holidays and declared days at either horizon edge. Placements and declared
+  working days anchor periods but do not themselves contribute non-working-day gain.
+- Work sequences carry a working-day length and an `internal` flag. Weekends and holidays
+  neither count nor split them. Both horizon-edge sequences contribute to the maximum and
+  are excluded by the `internal` condition. Internal zero-length observations contribute zero
+  deficit and are excluded by `non-empty`.
+- Leave placements expose their supporting classification. Declared days are fixed observations
+  and do not consume balances or count as supporting placements.
+
+`evaluateOptimization(configuration, observations)` validates the configuration and evaluates
+these collections. The core's `optimizationObservations(state, context, periods?)` builds the
+collections once; `evaluateStateOptimization(configuration, state, context)` is the shared core
+seam for a personal rule. The preset metrics call the same evaluator, with no second engine.
+
+## Ordered rule execution
+
+Named `type: 'optimization'` rules contain a full `configuration` and preference-only
+force. Storage, editor buffers, direct calculation snapshots and worker transport copy
+the nested configuration. The core executes only explicitly submitted active rules;
+it never adds presets to a request.
+
+Obligations are solved jointly. Each active preference then runs in the displayed
+rule order. Disabled rules are excluded before validation and search. A request
+with no active rules preserves declared days and adds no placements, including
+when balances are at risk of expiry. Statistics may still report preset metrics;
+only the active configured objectives affect selection.
+
+The shared core seams are:
+
+- `activeObjectiveVector(state, context, throughIndex?)` evaluates active preferences
+  in display order, with unique `optimization:<rule-id>` and `preference:<rule-id>`
+  identities. Optimization measurements use their full configurations; calendar
+  preferences measure actual matching dates/patterns.
+- `evaluateRuleCandidate(before, candidate, context, throughIndex, dates, sourceDate?,
+addition?, baseline?, beforeVector?, incumbentVector?)` validates mandatory type/date/pattern memberships and earned
+  entitlement availability and compares the active prefix. Its comparison preserves
+  the source state; technical selection facts compare with the actual current best
+  candidate. It returns the valid state, its full vector and
+  optional trace evaluation. Additions must improve an active prefix objective.
+- `optimizeRulePlacements(state, context, throughIndex, allowAdd, rule?)` generates
+  single additions/removals/moves, atomic balance reassignments and balance swaps.
+  `relocateForAddition` handles augmenting chains when a scarce balance needs an
+  occupied date. Complete typed calendar patterns are reassigned atomically too.
+  Coordinated family bundles can pass through `evaluateRuleCandidate` and rank through
+  `compareObligationPreviews(candidate, incumbent, context)` without fixed metric guards.
+- `applyPreferenceStep` dispatches every optimization and calendar window through
+  the same kernel. Earlier preferences replay when a later rule changes their state
+  or creates an earned entitlement.
+
+Earned entitlements follow actual completed active producer patterns, including patterns
+already fulfilled by another rule or declared days. Shared finalization reconciles those
+rights before candidate comparisons, cancellation retention and unchanged-state caching.
+Availability starts after the complete merged producing period; its own reward cannot
+finance a placement inside that period. Earning is a validity consequence, rather than
+an extra objective that an active configuration can suppress.
+
+`compareObjectiveValues`, `compareObjectiveLists` and `firstDifferentObjective`
+serve both selection and explanation. Earlier balance expiry and placement dates
+are final tie-breaks after all active objectives compare equally; they only reshape
+existing placements. Equal expiry values are compared independently of arbitrary balance
+identifiers, so earlier placement dates remain the next tie-break. Captured rule identities, names and configurations label the
+result independently of subsequent editor changes.
+
+Loaded plans retain the established sampling strategy for flexible move destinations
+above 24 placements, including non-working-adjacent, weekly and calendar-window dates.
+Excluded move destinations are recorded as `not-examined`, never as proven rejected.
+There is no automatic elapsed-time cutoff. Complete holiday weeks, joined time-off
+periods and work-sequence changes are compared as coordinated valid bundles.
+Moves that preserve every active objective can be pruned when their final tie-breaks
+cannot improve. Per-iteration vectors are reused; preset statistics are materialized
+only for selected incumbents and published plans.
+
+For large non-earned window obligation searches above the existing exact-branch
+threshold, the joint feasibility search retains its existing limit. Feasible
+solutions are ranked by actual active objectives and final ties; the first eight
+receive full optimization previews. Other feasible solutions are recorded as
+`not-examined`. Small searches and earned-entitlement chains keep all previews.
+This deterministic sampling has no elapsed-time cutoff or user-facing setting.
+
+A deferred optimization addition is supporting only when it provides one of the
+calendar benefits in the domain definition, rather than merely extending a period.
+Holiday occurrences and eligible patterns are immutable per request and cached
+independently of mutable placement states.
+
+## Saved rules and initialization
+
+`vacationRules` uses one versioned envelope: `{ version: 1, rules: [...] }`.
+`RuleService` restores it synchronously before the first duration estimate or calculation.
+A legacy array, including `[]`, receives loss prevention first, every original record in
+its original relative order, then the other five presets. Each original raw record is
+preserved, including names, IDs, dates, parameters, disabled state and a missing legacy
+force. Getters interpret missing force as preference without rewriting that record.
+Preset IDs use collision-free suffixes when a personal rule already uses a proposed ID.
+New users receive the six active presets around the existing Samedi Malin and Christmas
+calendar defaults.
+
+The migration and its version are written by one synchronous `setItem`; no separate
+marker can succeed while the rules fail to save. A failed write leaves the original
+key intact and permits a later complete save or a fresh reload to retry. Failed reads,
+malformed saved data and unsupported versions disable writes for that service instance
+so later editing cannot overwrite unknown persisted user data. Storage unavailable
+in the runtime leaves an in-memory configuration usable.
+
+Every later edit, toggle, reorder or deletion saves the full versioned list. Versioned
+empty lists stay empty; disabled and deleted presets stay that way. With no active
+rules, eligible unused leave remains visible with its original expiry classification
+and a translated explanation that the active planning rules justified no addition.
+Physical availability, occupation, expiry and incomplete-calculation reasons keep
+precedence where they apply. Declared days remain fixed and consume no leave.
+
+## Search and trace limits
+
+These are deterministic search limits, rather than claims of global optimality:
+
+- Above 24 placements, flexible moves examine the existing non-working-adjacent,
+  declared-adjacent, weekly and calendar-window destinations. Other destinations
+  retain `not-examined` trace records.
+- Non-earned obligation searches whose estimated branch count exceeds 10,000 retain
+  at most 4,096 feasible solutions. Large window searches rank them by the actual
+  active vector and final ties, then fully preview the first eight; the other
+  feasible solutions are marked `not-examined`. Earned chains and small searches
+  retain all previews.
+- Calendar bundles rank original donors once by the actual active vector of the
+  source plan with each donor released, then retain that order during recursive
+  allocation. They keep the first prefix-valid allocation and collapse equivalent
+  donor tokens. Work-sequence bundles use the nearest center per balance and the
+  first accepted allocation. These choices can miss another coordinated allocation.
+- When a completed specialized bundle strictly improves the current active prefix,
+  the kernel commits its full-vector best before scanning generic alternatives for
+  the old state. The old generic neighborhood is marked `not-examined`, then bundles
+  and generic candidates continue from the improved state. Earlier preferences replay
+  and the final expiry/date pass still runs. This scheduling can make a better unseen
+  old-state generic branch unreachable; it is an explicit heuristic rather than an
+  exhaustive comparison of all bundles and moves.
+- Additions require a strict improvement through the current rule. A custom
+  maximum/minimize unplaced-quantity rule with two tied at-risk CP1 balances can
+  therefore keep both unused: either single addition leaves the maximum at one,
+  while a coordinated addition of both would reduce it to zero. This balance
+  plateau has no specialized bundle generator; the supplied sum/minimize loss
+  preset does consume both.
+
+A completely enumerated single obligation solution has no alternative to rank, so
+its discarded full preference preview is skipped; the real ordered execution still
+runs in full. Earlier rules reuse their completed evaluation only when the complete
+ordered incoming state matches their last output, including balance quantities and
+validity, earned activations, placement insertion order, supporting status and rule
+provenance. The trace records that unchanged state as `not-examined` with the earlier
+decisions retained. A candidate unable to beat a valid local incumbent already
+offered to cancellation retention keeps its primary comparison but avoids a duplicate
+global incumbent comparison. These are exact reuse decisions, not additional sampling.
+At the first explicit sum/minimize quantity preference, complete single additions can
+reuse an evaluated funding score when eligible at-risk balances have the same expiry
+and matching signature across every enabled time-window rule, including obligations.
+The first original-order funder is preserved; later equivalent alternatives are recorded
+as `not-examined` without fabricated comparisons. This applies only without active
+IF_THEN rules or earned activations, without a balance maximum objective, and with a
+safe combined remaining quantity. Recursive bundles and augmenting allocation retain
+every funding choice: equal current scores do not prove equivalent future capacity.
+A first-position sum/minimize unplaced-quantity rule finishes its preference stage when
+its reconciled value reaches zero. The same bound applies to a prefix consisting of
+that zero quantity followed only by fully satisfied time-window preferences or maximizing
+public-holiday-week preferences at their configured upper bound. Windows are capped at
+their requested quantity. A holiday maximum is evaluated from the same immutable request
+weeks, marking every week complete and using its configured sum, count or maximum;
+partial horizon weeks retain the existing declaration and eligibility semantics. The whole bounded stage is recorded as
+`not-examined`; later preferences, replay after actual state changes and the final
+full-vector expiry/date pass still run. Other configurations and preference orders
+retain their search. This schedules lower priorities later; it does not claim an
+exhaustive full-vector search in the bounded stage.
+
+When every balance is exhausted and there is no active IF_THEN rule, a complete generic
+iteration that finds no full-vector improvement can be reused for the identical ordered
+state at a later preference. Explicit balance assignments use the same dates, validity,
+provenance and configured move sampling regardless of the current rule. Rule-specific
+bundles still run, and any balance, placement, supporting, provenance or activation change
+invalidates reuse. Bound returns and interrupted iterations never admit a state. Reuse
+is recorded as `not-examined` with the earlier sampled generic decisions retained; the
+final expiry/date pass still examines its neighborhood.
+
+Captured trace vectors, scalar facts, placements, ordered date lists and deltas are immutable detached evidence. Bounded
+request-local indexes share only identical complete values and metadata; the vector
+index uses recorded date keys and holds at most 65,536 entries, including variants in
+one bucket. Eviction changes allocation only, with every examined candidate and its
+ordered factual fields retained. Mutable candidate shells and emitted replacement
+snapshots remain independent. Search never reads these sharing indexes. Calendar facts also reuse a bounded 4,096-entry request-local cache keyed by the complete occupied date set; balance quantities, earned metadata, provenance and supporting classifications are refreshed separately. Removing a placement copies the placement map without editing surviving entries; later assignment and metadata edits still detach them. Candidate locations are resolved from the latest recorded decision only when a later update or selection needs them, avoiding a permanent index for observation-only candidates.
+
+Cancellation retains the best valid examined plan under the captured active vector
+and its original trace. Counterfactual and explanation comparisons use that same
+snapshot; later editor changes and delayed artifact delivery do not alter it.
+An explicit caller-owned planning-work budget remains supported; the application
+introduces no automatic duration-based stop.
+
+## Confirmed decisions and technical assumptions
+
+Confirmed by ADR 0008: one composable model for supplied and personal optimization rules;
+preference-only force; the six recipes' existing business meanings; declared-day and horizon
+semantics; user-controlled active preference order; expiry then date tie-breaks; preserving
+saved user data. The integrated implementation replaces the former implicit policy
+with explicit active rules and performs the one-time saved-data addition.
+
+The supported configuration boundary is only sum/count/maximum and both directions; empty aggregate
+zero; deficit threshold is a positive working-day integer, initially five; every listed
+compatible condition subset and aggregation is supported; no other filters or measures.
+Public-holiday weights retain the existing business definition rather than becoming a parameter.
+
+## Verification scope
+
+Ticket #75 covers saved-rule migration and functional integration of #70–#75.
+Performance acceptance and any further optimization are tracked in #78, after
+original-decision-trace removal in #76 and functional verification in #77. The
+seven-scenario benchmark, its warm-up and two measured repetitions, the 2 GB heap
+limit and the 300-second timeout remain unchanged. CI runs the benchmark as a
+separate non-blocking job at the user's request while #78 is open; functional
+tests and other checks remain required. #78 must restore the required benchmark
+gate after the protocol passes. Completing the functional migration or passing
+CI during this exception does not establish a passing benchmark.
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Plan Statistics Popup

-Local development draft for [issue #3](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/3) and [issue #29](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/issues/29), within [milestone %3: V1 stats](https://gitlab.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/-/milestones/3). The behavior below consolidates the decisions confirmed during grill-with-docs; proposals and remaining presentation choices are identified separately.
+Local development draft for [issue #3](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/3) and [issue #29](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/issues/29), within [milestone V1 stats](https://gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer/milestone/13). The behavior below consolidates the decisions confirmed during grill-with-docs; proposals and remaining presentation choices are identified separately.

 ## Problem Statement

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 		"@angular/platform-browser-dynamic": "22.2.1",
 		"@angular/platform-server": "22.2.1",
 		"@angular/router": "22.2.1",
-		"@angular/ssr": "22.2.1",
+		"@angular/ssr": "22.2.2",
 		"date-holidays": "^3.30.2",
 		"dayjs": "^1.11.21",
 		"express": "^5.2.1",
@@ -49,8 +49,8 @@
 		"@analogjs/platform": "^2.7.5",
 		"@analogjs/vite-plugin-angular": "^2.7.5",
 		"@analogjs/vitest-angular": "^2.7.5",
-		"@angular/build": "22.2.1",
-		"@angular/cli": "22.2.1",
+		"@angular/build": "22.2.2",
+		"@angular/cli": "22.2.2",
 		"@angular/compiler-cli": "22.2.1",
 		"@eslint/js": "^10.0.1",
 		"@nx/devkit": "^23.0.0",
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+import { readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+
+// Gitea exposes its event payload through the GitHub-compatible runner variables.
+export function readCiContext() {
+	const env = process.env;
+	const eventName = env.GITHUB_EVENT_NAME;
+	if (!['push', 'pull_request', 'workflow_dispatch'].includes(eventName)) {
+		throw new Error('Only push, pull_request and workflow_dispatch events are supported.');
+	}
+	const event = JSON.parse(readFileSync(env.GITHUB_EVENT_PATH, 'utf8'));
+	const commit = env.GITHUB_SHA;
+	if (!/^[a-f0-9]{40}$/.test(commit ?? '')) throw new Error('A commit SHA is required.');
+	const pullRequest = eventName === 'pull_request' ? event.pull_request : undefined;
+	if (eventName === 'pull_request' && pullRequest?.head?.sha !== commit) {
+		throw new Error('CI must validate the pull request head commit.');
+	}
+	const tag = env.GITHUB_REF?.startsWith('refs/tags/') ? env.GITHUB_REF.slice(10) : '';
+	const branch = pullRequest
+		? pullRequest.head.ref
+		: env.GITHUB_REF?.startsWith('refs/heads/')
+			? env.GITHUB_REF.slice(11)
+			: '';
+	if (!tag && !branch) throw new Error('A branch or tag ref is required.');
+	const slug = branch
+		.toLowerCase()
+		.replace(/[^a-z0-9]/g, '-')
+		.slice(0, 63)
+		.replace(/^-+|-+$/g, '');
+	const publish =
+		eventName === 'push' ||
+		(eventName === 'pull_request' &&
+			Boolean(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY) &&
+			pullRequest.head.repo?.full_name === env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY);
+	return { commit, tag, branch, slug, publish, pullRequest, before: event.before };
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+import { execFileSync } from 'node:child_process';
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
+import { readCiContext } from './ci-context.mjs';
+
+try {
+	const { commit, tag, slug, publish } = readCiContext();
+	if (!publish) throw new Error('Images can only be published by pushes or same-repository PRs.');
+	execFileSync(process.execPath, [fileURLToPath(new URL('./ci-policy.mjs', import.meta.url))]);
+	const env = process.env;
+	if (!env.REGISTRY_USERNAME || !env.REGISTRY_PASSWORD) {
+		throw new Error('REGISTRY_USERNAME and REGISTRY_PASSWORD are required for publication.');
+	}
+	const registry = new URL(env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL).host;
+	const image = `${registry}/${env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY.toLowerCase()}`;
+	const shaImage = `${image}:sha-${commit}`;
+	const docker = (...args) => execFileSync('docker', args, { stdio: 'inherit' });
+	execFileSync(
+		'docker',
+		['login', registry, '--username', env.REGISTRY_USERNAME, '--password-stdin'],
+		{
+			input: env.REGISTRY_PASSWORD,
+			stdio: ['pipe', 'inherit', 'inherit'],
+		},
+	);
+	if (tag) {
+		docker('pull', shaImage);
+		docker('tag', shaImage, `${image}:${tag}`);
+		docker('push', `${image}:${tag}`);
+		docker('tag', shaImage, `${image}:latest`);
+		docker('push', `${image}:latest`);
+	} else {
+		const branchImage = `${image}:branch-${slug}`;
+		docker('build', '-t', shaImage, '-t', branchImage, '.');
+		docker('push', shaImage);
+		docker('push', branchImage);
+	}
+} catch (error) {
+	console.error(error.message);
+	process.exitCode = 1;
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
+import { execFileSync, spawnSync } from 'node:child_process';
+import { chmodSync, mkdirSync, mkdtempSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
+import { join } from 'node:path';
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
+
+const directory = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'ci-image-'));
+const script = fileURLToPath(new URL('./ci-image.mjs', import.meta.url));
+const git = (...args) => execFileSync('git', args, { cwd: directory, encoding: 'utf8' }).trim();
+const image = 'gitea.nessar.fr/nessar/vac-optimizer';
+const commandsPath = join(directory, 'docker-commands.jsonl');
+const bin = join(directory, 'bin');
+
+const run = (variables = {}, expected = 0) => {
+	const commit = git('rev-parse', 'HEAD');
+	const eventName = variables.eventName ?? 'push';
+	const ref = variables.tag
+		? `refs/tags/${variables.tag}`
+		: eventName === 'pull_request'
+			? 'refs/pull/42/head'
+			: 'refs/heads/feature/calendar';
+	const event = { ref };
+	if (eventName === 'pull_request') {
+		event.pull_request = {
+			title: 'feat: calendar',
+			head: {
+				sha: commit,
+				ref: 'feature/calendar',
+				repo: { full_name: variables.headRepository ?? 'nessar/vac-optimizer' },
+			},
+			base: { ref: 'develop' },
+		};
+	}
+	writeFileSync(join(directory, 'event.json'), JSON.stringify(event));
+	writeFileSync(commandsPath, '');
+	const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [script], {
+		cwd: directory,
+		encoding: 'utf8',
+		env: {
+			PATH: `${bin}:${process.env.PATH}`,
+			GITHUB_EVENT_NAME: eventName,
+			GITHUB_EVENT_PATH: join(directory, 'event.json'),
+			GITHUB_SHA: commit,
+			GITHUB_REF: ref,
+			GITHUB_REPOSITORY: 'nessar/vac-optimizer',
+			GITHUB_SERVER_URL: 'https://gitea.nessar.fr',
+			REGISTRY_USERNAME: 'publisher',
+			REGISTRY_PASSWORD: variables.registryPassword ?? 'test-token',
+			DOCKER_COMMANDS: commandsPath,
+			MISSING_IMAGE: variables.missingImage ? 'true' : '',
+		},
+	});
+	assert.equal(result.status, expected, result.stdout + result.stderr);
+	return readFileSync(commandsPath, 'utf8').trim().split('\n').filter(Boolean).map(JSON.parse);
+};
+
+try {
+	git('init', '--initial-branch=main');
+	git('config', 'user.name', 'CI image test');
+	git('config', 'user.email', 'ci-image@example.invalid');
+	git('remote', 'add', 'origin', directory);
+	writeFileSync(join(directory, 'package.json'), '{"version":"1.5.0"}\n');
+	git('add', 'package.json');
+	git('commit', '-m', 'chore: initial release');
+	git('branch', 'develop');
+	git('switch', '-c', 'feature/calendar');
+	git('commit', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'feat: calendar');
+	mkdirSync(bin);
+	const docker = join(bin, 'docker');
+	writeFileSync(
+		docker,
+		`#!/usr/bin/env node
+import { appendFileSync, readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+const args = process.argv.slice(2);
+const input = args[0] === 'login' ? readFileSync(0, 'utf8') : '';
+appendFileSync(process.env.DOCKER_COMMANDS, JSON.stringify({ args, input }) + '\\n');
+if (args[0] === 'pull' && process.env.MISSING_IMAGE === 'true') process.exit(1);
+`,
+	);
+	chmodSync(docker, 0o755);
+	const commit = git('rev-parse', 'HEAD');
+	const commands = run();
+	assert.deepEqual(commands, [
+		{
+			args: ['login', 'gitea.nessar.fr', '--username', 'publisher', '--password-stdin'],
+			input: 'test-token',
+		},
+		{
+			args: [
+				'build',
+				'-t',
+				`${image}:sha-${commit}`,
+				'-t',
+				`${image}:branch-feature-calendar`,
+				'.',
+			],
+			input: '',
+		},
+		{ args: ['push', `${image}:sha-${commit}`], input: '' },
+		{ args: ['push', `${image}:branch-feature-calendar`], input: '' },
+	]);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ eventName: 'pull_request' }), commands);
+	assert.deepEqual(
+		run({ eventName: 'pull_request', headRepository: 'contributor/vac-optimizer' }, 1),
+		[],
+	);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ eventName: 'workflow_dispatch' }, 1), []);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ registryPassword: '' }, 1), []);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ tag: 'v1.5.0' }, 1), []);
+	git('switch', 'main');
+	git('tag', '-a', 'v1.5.0', '-m', 'Release 1.5.0');
+	const releaseCommit = git('rev-parse', 'HEAD');
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ tag: 'v1.5.0' }), [
+		{
+			args: ['login', 'gitea.nessar.fr', '--username', 'publisher', '--password-stdin'],
+			input: 'test-token',
+		},
+		{ args: ['pull', `${image}:sha-${releaseCommit}`], input: '' },
+		{ args: ['tag', `${image}:sha-${releaseCommit}`, `${image}:v1.5.0`], input: '' },
+		{ args: ['push', `${image}:v1.5.0`], input: '' },
+		{ args: ['tag', `${image}:sha-${releaseCommit}`, `${image}:latest`], input: '' },
+		{ args: ['push', `${image}:latest`], input: '' },
+	]);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ tag: 'v1.5.0', missingImage: true }, 1), [
+		{
+			args: ['login', 'gitea.nessar.fr', '--username', 'publisher', '--password-stdin'],
+			input: 'test-token',
+		},
+		{ args: ['pull', `${image}:sha-${releaseCommit}`], input: '' },
+	]);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ tag: 'v1.5.0-rc.1' }, 1), []);
+	assert.deepEqual(run({ tag: 'v1.6.0' }, 1), []);
+	console.log('CI image publication checks passed.');
+} finally {
+	rmSync(directory, { recursive: true, force: true });
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+import { execFileSync, spawnSync } from 'node:child_process';
+import { appendFileSync, readFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { readCiContext } from './ci-context.mjs';
+
+const env = process.env;
+const git = (...args) => execFileSync('git', args, { encoding: 'utf8' }).trim();
+const ancestor = (base, commit) =>
+	spawnSync('git', ['merge-base', '--is-ancestor', base, commit]).status === 0;
+const conventional = /^[a-z]+(?:\([^()\r\n]+\))?!?: \S.*$/i;
+const requirePolicy = (condition, message) => {
+	if (!condition) throw new Error(message);
+};
+
+try {
+	const { commit, tag, branch, slug, pullRequest, before } = readCiContext();
+	requirePolicy(commit === git('rev-parse', 'HEAD'), 'CI must validate the checked-out commit.');
+	git(
+		'fetch',
+		'--no-tags',
+		'origin',
+		'+refs/heads/main:refs/remotes/origin/main',
+		'+refs/heads/develop:refs/remotes/origin/develop',
+	);
+
+	if (tag) {
+		requirePolicy(
+			/^v(0|[1-9]\d*)\.(0|[1-9]\d*)\.(0|[1-9]\d*)$/.test(tag),
+			'Release tags must use vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH without leading zeroes.',
+		);
+		const { version } = JSON.parse(readFileSync('package.json', 'utf8'));
+		requirePolicy(tag === `v${version}`, 'Release tag must match package.json.');
+		requirePolicy(ancestor(commit, 'origin/main'), 'Release commit must belong to main.');
+	} else {
+		const target = pullRequest
+			? pullRequest.base?.ref
+			: branch === 'main' || branch?.startsWith('hotfix/')
+				? 'main'
+				: 'develop';
+		requirePolicy(branch, 'A branch name is required.');
+		git('check-ref-format', `refs/heads/${branch}`);
+		requirePolicy(['main', 'develop'].includes(target), 'PRs must target main or develop.');
+
+		if (pullRequest) {
+			const title = pullRequest.title?.replace(
+				/^(?:Draft:|WIP:|\[Draft\]|\[WIP\]|\(Draft\)|\(WIP\))\s*/i,
+				'',
+			);
+			requirePolicy(
+				conventional.test(title ?? ''),
+				'PR title must use Conventional Commits.',
+			);
+			requirePolicy(
+				target !== 'main' || /^(release|hotfix)\/.+/.test(branch),
+				'Only release/* and hotfix/* may merge into main.',
+			);
+			if (target === 'develop' && branch !== 'main' && !/^(release|hotfix)\//.test(branch)) {
+				requirePolicy(
+					ancestor('origin/develop', commit),
+					'Rebase the working branch onto origin/develop before merging.',
+				);
+				requirePolicy(
+					!git('rev-list', '--merges', `origin/develop..${commit}`),
+					'Working branches must use rebase, not merge commits.',
+				);
+			}
+		}
+
+		const base =
+			!pullRequest && before && !/^0+$/.test(before) && ancestor(before, commit)
+				? before
+				: git('merge-base', `origin/${target}`, commit);
+		const subjects = git('log', '--format=%h %s', `${base}..${commit}`);
+		for (const line of subjects ? subjects.split('\n') : []) {
+			requirePolicy(
+				conventional.test(line.slice(line.indexOf(' ') + 1)),
+				`Commit must use Conventional Commits: ${line}`,
+			);
+		}
+	}
+	if (env.GITHUB_OUTPUT) {
+		appendFileSync(env.GITHUB_OUTPUT, `slug=${slug}\ntag=${tag}\n`);
+	}
+	console.log('GitFlow, version and commit policy passed.');
+} catch (error) {
+	console.error(error.message);
+	process.exitCode = 1;
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+import assert from 'node:assert/strict';
+import { execFileSync, spawnSync } from 'node:child_process';
+import { mkdtempSync, readFileSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
+import { join } from 'node:path';
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
+
+const directory = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'ci-policy-'));
+const script = fileURLToPath(new URL('./ci-policy.mjs', import.meta.url));
+const git = (...args) => execFileSync('git', args, { cwd: directory, encoding: 'utf8' }).trim();
+const check = (variables = {}, expected = 0) => {
+	const commit = git('rev-parse', 'HEAD');
+	const branch = variables.branch ?? 'feature/test';
+	const eventName = variables.eventName ?? 'push';
+	const ref = variables.tag
+		? `refs/tags/${variables.tag}`
+		: eventName === 'pull_request'
+			? 'refs/pull/42/head'
+			: `refs/heads/${branch}`;
+	const event = { ref, before: variables.before };
+	if (eventName === 'pull_request') {
+		event.pull_request = {
+			title: variables.title ?? 'feat(test): add policy checks',
+			head: {
+				ref: branch,
+				sha: variables.headSha ?? commit,
+				repo: { full_name: variables.headRepository ?? 'nessar/vac-optimizer' },
+			},
+			base: { ref: variables.target ?? 'develop' },
+		};
+	}
+	const eventPath = join(directory, 'event.json');
+	const outputPath = join(directory, 'outputs');
+	writeFileSync(eventPath, JSON.stringify(event));
+	writeFileSync(outputPath, '');
+	const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, [script], {
+		cwd: directory,
+		encoding: 'utf8',
+		env: {
+			PATH: process.env.PATH,
+			GITHUB_EVENT_NAME: eventName,
+			GITHUB_EVENT_PATH: eventPath,
+			GITHUB_REF: ref,
+			GITHUB_SHA: variables.sha ?? commit,
+			GITHUB_REPOSITORY: 'nessar/vac-optimizer',
+			GITHUB_OUTPUT: outputPath,
+		},
+	});
+	assert.equal(result.status, expected, result.stdout + result.stderr);
+	return readFileSync(outputPath, 'utf8');
+};
+const pr = { eventName: 'pull_request' };
+
+try {
+	git('init', '--initial-branch=main');
+	git('config', 'user.name', 'CI policy test');
+	git('config', 'user.email', 'ci-policy@example.invalid');
+	git('remote', 'add', 'origin', directory);
+	writeFileSync(join(directory, 'package.json'), '{"version":"1.5.0"}\n');
+	git('add', 'package.json');
+	git('commit', '-m', 'Legacy history is allowed');
+	git('branch', 'develop');
+	git('switch', '-c', 'feature/test');
+	git('commit', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'feat(test)!: add checks');
+	check({});
+	check(pr);
+	check({ ...pr, headRepository: 'contributor/vac-optimizer' });
+	check({ eventName: 'workflow_dispatch' });
+	assert.match(check({ branch: 'Feature/My_calendar' }), /slug=feature-my-calendar\n/);
+	check({ ...pr, headSha: '0'.repeat(40) }, 1);
+	check({ eventName: 'pull_request_target' }, 1);
+	check({ ...pr, title: 'Draft: feat: test policy' });
+	check({ ...pr, title: '(Draft) feat: test policy' });
+	check({ ...pr, target: 'main' }, 1);
+	check({ ...pr, title: 'Add checks' }, 1);
+	check({ tag: 'v1.5.0' }, 1);
+	check({ sha: '0'.repeat(40) }, 1);
+
+	git('switch', 'develop');
+	git('commit', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'fix: another change');
+	git('switch', 'feature/test');
+	check(pr, 1);
+	git('rebase', 'develop');
+	check(pr);
+	const before = git('rev-parse', 'HEAD');
+	git('commit', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'not conventional');
+	check({ before: before }, 1);
+	check(pr, 1);
+	git('commit', '--amend', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'ci: fix the commit title');
+	check({ before: before });
+
+	git('switch', 'develop');
+	git('merge', '--no-ff', 'feature/test', '-m', 'feat(test): add policy checks');
+	git('switch', '-c', 'release/1.6.0');
+	writeFileSync(join(directory, 'package.json'), '{"version":"1.6.0"}\n');
+	git('add', 'package.json');
+	git('commit', '-m', 'chore(release): prepare 1.6.0');
+	check({
+		...pr,
+		branch: 'release/1.6.0',
+		target: 'main',
+	});
+	check({ ...pr, branch: 'release/1.6.0' });
+	git('switch', 'main');
+	git('merge', '--no-ff', 'release/1.6.0', '-m', 'chore(release): publish 1.6.0');
+	check({ tag: 'v1.6.0' });
+	check({ tag: 'v1.5.0' }, 1);
+	check({ tag: 'v01.6.0' }, 1);
+	check({ tag: 'v1.6.0-rc.1' }, 1);
+	check({ ...pr, branch: 'main' });
+
+	git('switch', '-c', 'hotfix/1.6.1');
+	git('commit', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'fix: production issue');
+	check({
+		...pr,
+		branch: 'hotfix/1.6.1',
+		target: 'main',
+	});
+	check({ ...pr, branch: 'hotfix/1.6.1' });
+
+	// The working branch must not pass by merging develop instead of rebasing.
+	git('switch', 'feature/test');
+	git('commit', '--allow-empty', '-m', 'feat: keep working');
+	git('merge', '--no-ff', 'develop', '-m', 'chore: merge develop');
+	check(pr, 1);
+
+	console.log('CI policy integration checks passed.');
+} finally {
+	rmSync(directory, { recursive: true, force: true });
+}
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ describe('Application Settings', () => {
 		localStorage.clear();
 		localStorage.setItem('app.language', JSON.stringify('en'));
 		localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', savedBalances);
-		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 		localStorage.setItem('unrelated.entry', 'keep this value');
 		mediaQuery = Object.assign(new EventTarget(), {
 			matches: true,
@@ -339,6 +339,53 @@ describe('Application Settings', () => {
 		expect(await dialog.getAllHarnesses(MatButtonHarness)).toHaveLength(1);
 	});

+	it('saves planning dates before balances and recalculates only when Calculate is selected', async () => {
+		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
+		const period = root.querySelector<HTMLElement>('app-user-input .planning-dates')!;
+		expect(
+			period.compareDocumentPosition(root.querySelector('.listOfDays')!) &
+				Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_FOLLOWING,
+		).toBeTruthy();
+		expect(period.querySelector('legend')?.textContent).toBe('Planning period');
+		expect(period.querySelector('#planning-dates-help')?.textContent).toContain(
+			'Calculate plan',
+		);
+		const start = period.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="planningStart"]')!;
+		const last = period.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]')!;
+		start.value = '29/02/2024';
+		start.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
+		last.value = '08/03/2024';
+		last.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(calculate).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('calendarSettings.planningDates')!)).toEqual({
+			start: '2024-02-29',
+			lastPlanningDate: '2024-03-08',
+		});
+
+		root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('.calculate-button')!.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(calculate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+		expect(calculate.mock.calls[1][0].horizon).toEqual({
+			start: '2024-02-29',
+			end: '2024-03-09',
+		});
+		const dialog = await openSettings();
+		expect(await dialog.getContentText()).not.toContain('Planning period');
+		const [, language] = await dialog.getAllHarnesses(MatSelectHarness);
+		await selectOption(language, 'Français');
+		expect(period.querySelector('legend')?.textContent).toBe('Période à planifier');
+		await dialog.close();
+
+		await revisitApp(true);
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('input[name="planningStart"]').value).toBe(
+			'29/02/2024',
+		);
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]').value).toBe(
+			'08/03/2024',
+		);
+	});
+
 	it('supports keyboard theme selection and moves focus into the dialog', async () => {
 		const dialog = await openSettings();
 		const [theme] = await dialog.getAllHarnesses(MatSelectHarness);
@@ -414,7 +461,7 @@ describe('Application Settings', () => {
 			await (await dialog.getHarness(MatSlideToggleHarness)).check();
 			expect(localStorage.getItem('calendarSettings.showWeekNumbers')).toBe('true');
 			expect(localStorage.getItem('leaveBalances')).toBe(savedBalances);
-			expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe('[]');
+			expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe('{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			expect(localStorage.getItem('unrelated.entry')).toBe('keep this value');
 			expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.week-number').length).toBeGreaterThan(
 				0,
@@ -443,7 +490,7 @@ describe('Application Settings', () => {
 			TestBed.resetTestingModule();
 			await createApp();
 			expect(localStorage.getItem('leaveBalances')).toBe(savedBalances);
-			expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe('[]');
+			expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe('{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			expect(localStorage.getItem('unrelated.entry')).toBe('keep this value');
 			expect(document.body.classList.contains('dark-mode')).toBe(true);
 			expect(
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ import {
 describe('leave planner benchmark protocol', () => {
 	beforeEach(() => vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z')));
 	afterEach(() => vi.useRealTimers());
-	// Warm-up and two repetitions include complete trace delivery after planning.
+	// Warm-up and two repetitions include explanation delivery after planning.
 	it('keeps seven deterministic scenarios including two and three years and a later earned consumer', async () => {
 		const scenarios = benchmarkScenarios();
 		expect(scenarios).toHaveLength(7);
@@ -41,10 +41,11 @@ describe('leave planner benchmark protocol', () => {
 					String(rttRule.startDate) <= String(cpRule.endDate),
 			).toBe(true);
 		const chain = scenarios.find((scenario) => scenario.name === 'chained earned entitlements');
-		expect(chain?.request.rules?.map((rule) => rule.id)).toEqual([
-			'wednesday-holidays',
-			'thursday-consumer',
-		]);
+		expect(
+			chain?.request.rules
+				?.filter(({ type }) => type !== 'optimization')
+				.map((rule) => rule.id),
+		).toEqual(['wednesday-holidays', 'thursday-consumer']);

 		const browserWindow = globalThis.window;
 		vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined);
@@ -74,8 +75,6 @@ describe('leave planner benchmark protocol', () => {
 				expect(longer.map((item) => item.lastCompletedStage)).toEqual(['dates', 'dates']);
 				expect(longer.map((item) => item.placements)).toEqual([placements, placements]);
 				expect(longer.map((item) => item.deterministic)).toEqual(['baseline', 'yes']);
-				expect(longer.map((item) => item.traceStatus)).toEqual(['ready', 'ready']);
-				expect(longer[0].traceCandidates).toBeGreaterThan(0);
 			}
 			const chained = measurements.find(
 				(measurement) => measurement.scenario === 'chained earned entitlements',
@@ -90,24 +89,19 @@ describe('leave planner benchmark protocol', () => {
 			expect(loaded[0].deterministic).toBe('baseline');
 			expect(loaded[1].deterministic).toBe('yes');
 			expect(loaded[0].planningMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-			expect(loaded[0].traceDeliveryMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
 			expect(loaded[0].planningWorkMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
 			expect(loaded[0].planningWorkMs).toBeLessThanOrEqual(loaded[0].planningMs);
-			expect(loaded[0].traceCaptureMs).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-			expect(loaded[0].traceMaterializationMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
 			expect(loaded[0].maxUiDelayMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
 			expect(loaded[0].wallMs).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(
-				loaded[0].preparationMs + loaded[0].planningMs + loaded[0].traceDeliveryMs,
+				loaded[0].preparationMs + loaded[0].planningMs,
 			);
-			expect(loaded[0].traceStatus).toBe('ready');
-			expect(loaded[0].traceCandidates).toBeGreaterThan(0);
 			const report = benchmarkReport(measurements);
 			expect(report.split('\n')).toHaveLength(15);
-			expect(report).toContain('planning_ms\ttrace_delivery_ms');
-			expect(report).toContain('planning_work_ms\ttrace_capture_ms');
+			expect(report).toContain('planning_ms\twall_ms');
+			expect(report).toContain('planning_work_ms\tpeak_main_thread_heap_bytes');
 			expect(report).toContain('\tbaseline\t');
 		} finally {
 			vi.stubGlobal('window', browserWindow);
 		}
-	}, 90_000);
+	}, 300_000);
 });
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ import {
 	createPlanningCalculation,
 	PlanningOutcome,
 	PlanningRequest,
-	PlanningTrace,
 } from '../services/leave-planner.service';
+import { createOptimizationPresetRules } from '../services/rule-service';

 export interface BenchmarkScenario {
 	name: string;
@@ -15,21 +15,15 @@ export interface BenchmarkMeasurement {
 	repetition: number;
 	preparationMs: number;
 	planningMs: number;
-	traceDeliveryMs: number;
 	maxUiDelayMs: number;
 	/** Chromium's main-thread heap only; worker memory needs a separate browser profile. */
 	peakMainThreadHeapBytes?: number;
 	planningWorkMs?: number;
-	traceCaptureMs?: number;
-	traceMaterializationMs?: number;
-	traceTransferMs?: number;
 	wallMs: number;
 	outcome: PlanningOutcome['kind'];
 	lastCompletedStage?: string;
 	placements: number;
 	deterministic: 'baseline' | 'yes' | 'no';
-	traceStatus: PlanningTrace['status'] | 'not-produced';
-	traceCandidates: number;
 }

 const balance = (
@@ -47,7 +41,8 @@ const balance = (

 export function benchmarkScenarios(): BenchmarkScenario[] {
 	const horizon = { start: '2024-01-01', end: '2025-01-01' };
-	return [
+	const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();
+	const scenarios: BenchmarkScenario[] = [
 		{
 			name: 'representative year',
 			request: {
@@ -169,6 +164,13 @@ export function benchmarkScenarios(): BenchmarkScenario[] {
 			}),
 		),
 	];
+	return scenarios.map((scenario) => ({
+		...scenario,
+		request: {
+			...scenario.request,
+			rules: [presets[0], ...scenario.request.rules, ...presets.slice(1)],
+		},
+	}));
 }

 function resultSummary(outcome: PlanningOutcome): {
@@ -210,7 +212,8 @@ export async function runLeavePlannerBenchmark(repetitions = 1): Promise<Benchma
 async function warmUpScenario(scenario: BenchmarkScenario): Promise<void> {
 	const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(structuredClone(scenario.request));
 	await calculation.outcome;
-	await calculation.trace;
+	await calculation.explanation;
+	await calculation.timings;
 }

 async function measureRepetition(
@@ -241,24 +244,11 @@ async function measureRepetition(
 		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(request);
 		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
 		const planningMs = performance.now() - calculationStart;
-		const traceStart = performance.now();
-		const trace = await calculation.trace;
-		const traceDeliveryMs = performance.now() - traceStart;
 		const timings = await calculation.timings;
 		const summary = resultSummary(outcome);
 		const stable = JSON.stringify(outcome);
 		const deterministic =
 			baseline === undefined ? 'baseline' : stable === baseline ? 'yes' : 'no';
-		const traceCandidates =
-			trace?.phases.reduce(
-				(total, phase) =>
-					total +
-					phase.decisions.reduce(
-						(decisionTotal, decision) => decisionTotal + decision.candidates.length,
-						0,
-					),
-				0,
-			) ?? 0;
 		const wallMs = performance.now() - wallStart;
 		measureDelay();
 		return {
@@ -267,15 +257,12 @@ async function measureRepetition(
 				repetition,
 				preparationMs,
 				planningMs,
-				traceDeliveryMs,
 				maxUiDelayMs,
 				peakMainThreadHeapBytes,
 				...timings,
 				wallMs,
 				...summary,
 				deterministic,
-				traceStatus: trace?.status ?? 'not-produced',
-				traceCandidates,
 			},
 			stable,
 		};
@@ -286,7 +273,7 @@ async function measureRepetition(

 export function benchmarkReport(measurements: BenchmarkMeasurement[]): string {
 	const header =
-		'scenario\trepetition\tpreparation_ms\tplanning_ms\ttrace_delivery_ms\twall_ms\toutcome\tlast_stage\tplacements\tdeterministic\ttrace_status\ttrace_candidates\tmax_ui_delay_ms\tplanning_work_ms\ttrace_capture_ms\ttrace_materialization_ms\ttrace_transfer_ms\tpeak_main_thread_heap_bytes';
+		'scenario\trepetition\tpreparation_ms\tplanning_ms\twall_ms\toutcome\tlast_stage\tplacements\tdeterministic\tmax_ui_delay_ms\tplanning_work_ms\tpeak_main_thread_heap_bytes';
 	return [
 		header,
 		...measurements.map((item) =>
@@ -295,19 +282,13 @@ export function benchmarkReport(measurements: BenchmarkMeasurement[]): string {
 				item.repetition,
 				item.preparationMs.toFixed(1),
 				item.planningMs.toFixed(1),
-				item.traceDeliveryMs.toFixed(1),
 				item.wallMs.toFixed(1),
 				item.outcome,
 				item.lastCompletedStage ?? '',
 				item.placements,
 				item.deterministic,
-				item.traceStatus,
-				item.traceCandidates,
 				item.maxUiDelayMs.toFixed(1),
 				item.planningWorkMs?.toFixed(1) ?? '',
-				item.traceCaptureMs?.toFixed(1) ?? '',
-				item.traceMaterializationMs?.toFixed(1) ?? '',
-				item.traceTransferMs?.toFixed(1) ?? '',
 				item.peakMainThreadHeapBytes ?? '',
 			].join('\t'),
 		),
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
 						} @else {
 							@let dayTooltip = getDayTooltip(day);
 							@let dateKey = getDateKey(day);
-							@let status = getStatus(day);
 							@let declaredType = getDeclaredType(dateKey);
 							@let previewed = declarationPreview?.dates?.has(dateKey);
 							<button
@@ -45,18 +44,6 @@
 								[class.declared]="!!declaredType"
 								[class.declaration-preview]="previewed"
 								[class.declaration-erase]="previewed && !declaredType"
-								[class.eligible]="status?.kind === 'eligible'"
-								[class.ineligible]="status?.kind === 'ineligible'"
-								[class.chosen]="status?.kind === 'chosen'"
-								[class.evaluated-rejected]="status?.kind === 'evaluated-rejected'"
-								[class.pruned]="status?.kind === 'pruned'"
-								[class.not-examined]="status?.kind === 'not-examined'"
-								[class.change-added]="status?.change === 'added'"
-								[class.change-moved-from]="status?.change === 'moved-from'"
-								[class.change-moved-to]="status?.change === 'moved-to'"
-								[class.change-removed]="status?.change === 'removed'"
-								[class.change-shared]="status?.change === 'shared'"
-								[class.change-unchanged]="status?.change === 'unchanged'"
 								[class]="getDayClasses(day)"
 								class="day number"
 								[disabled]="isDateDisabled(day)"
@@ -70,16 +57,6 @@
 								(click)="dateSelected.emit(dateKey)"
 							>
 								<span>{{ day.getDate() }}</span>
-								@if (status) {
-									<small class="status-marker" aria-hidden="true">{{
-										getStatusMarker(day)
-									}}</small>
-									@if (status.hypotheticalLabel) {
-										<small class="hypothetical-marker" aria-hidden="true">{{
-											getHypotheticalMarker(status)
-										}}</small>
-									}
-								}
 							</button>
 						}
 					}
@@ -108,31 +108,6 @@
 		}
 	}

-	.status-marker {
-		position: absolute;
-		inset-block-start: -0.35rem;
-		inset-inline-end: -0.2rem;
-		min-width: 0.85rem;
-		font-size: 0.65rem;
-		font-weight: 800;
-		line-height: 1;
-		background: var(--ui-card-bg, #fff);
-		border-radius: 999px;
-	}
-
-	.hypothetical-marker {
-		position: absolute;
-		inset-block-end: -0.35rem;
-		inset-inline-start: -0.2rem;
-		min-width: 1.25rem;
-		font-size: 0.55rem;
-		font-weight: 800;
-		line-height: 1;
-		background: var(--ui-card-bg, #fff);
-		border: 1px dashed currentColor;
-		border-radius: 999px;
-	}
-
 	.current {
 		outline: 2px solid var(--today-border-color);
 		outline-offset: -2px;
@@ -142,43 +117,6 @@
 		box-shadow: inset 0 -3px var(--today-border-color);
 	}

-	.eligible,
-	.chosen {
-		border-block-end: 3px solid var(--ui-success-text, #174d26);
-	}
-
-	.ineligible,
-	.evaluated-rejected {
-		text-decoration: line-through;
-		text-decoration-thickness: 2px;
-	}
-
-	.pruned {
-		border: 2px dotted currentColor;
-	}
-
-	.not-examined {
-		border: 2px dashed currentColor;
-	}
-
-	.change-added,
-	.change-moved-to {
-		box-shadow: inset 0 -3px var(--ui-success-text, #174d26);
-	}
-
-	.change-moved-from,
-	.change-removed {
-		box-shadow: inset 0 3px var(--ui-error-text, #8b1a1a);
-	}
-
-	.change-shared {
-		box-shadow: inset 3px 0 var(--today-border-color, #1976d2);
-	}
-
-	.change-unchanged {
-		box-shadow: inset 0 0 0 1px currentColor;
-	}
-
 	.selected {
 		cursor: pointer;
 	}
@@ -15,16 +15,6 @@ import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';
 import { isWorkingPlanningDate } from '../../services/declared-non-working-days';
 import type { LeaveType } from '../../services/leave-planner.service';

-export interface CalendarDayStatus {
-	kind: 'eligible' | 'ineligible' | 'chosen' | 'evaluated-rejected' | 'pruned' | 'not-examined';
-	label: string;
-	reason?: string;
-	hypotheticalLabel?: string;
-	hypotheticalReason?: string;
-	change?: 'added' | 'moved-from' | 'moved-to' | 'removed' | 'shared' | 'unchanged';
-	changeLabel?: string;
-}
-
 export interface DeclarationPreview {
 	dates: ReadonlySet<string>;
 	type: LeaveType | null;
@@ -112,9 +102,6 @@ export class CalendarMonth implements OnInit {
 	@Input()
 	explainedPeriod?: { start: string; end: string };

-	@Input()
-	dateStatuses: Readonly<Record<string, CalendarDayStatus>> = {};
-
 	@Output()
 	readonly dateSelected = new EventEmitter<string>();

@@ -134,10 +121,6 @@ export class CalendarMonth implements OnInit {
 		);
 	}

-	getStatus(day: Date): CalendarDayStatus | undefined {
-		return this.dateStatuses[this.getDateKey(day)];
-	}
-
 	isInExplainedPeriod(day: Date): boolean {
 		const date = this.getDateKey(day);
 		return (
@@ -147,44 +130,6 @@ export class CalendarMonth implements OnInit {
 		);
 	}

-	getStatusMarker(day: Date): string {
-		switch (this.getStatus(day)?.change) {
-			case 'added':
-				return '+';
-			case 'moved-from':
-				return '←';
-			case 'moved-to':
-				return '→';
-			case 'removed':
-				return '−';
-			case 'shared':
-				return '≈';
-			case 'unchanged':
-				return '=';
-		}
-		switch (this.getStatus(day)?.kind) {
-			case 'chosen':
-			case 'eligible':
-				return '✓';
-			case 'ineligible':
-				return '×';
-			case 'evaluated-rejected':
-				return '−';
-			case 'pruned':
-				return '⌁';
-			case 'not-examined':
-				return '?';
-			default:
-				return '';
-		}
-	}
-
-	getHypotheticalMarker(status: CalendarDayStatus): string {
-		return status.hypotheticalLabel === this.translationService.tr().planning.eligible
-			? '~✓'
-			: '~×';
-	}
-
 	getDayAriaLabel(day: Date, tooltip: string | null = this.getDayTooltip(day)): string {
 		const locale = this.translationService.locale();
 		if (!this.dayFormatter || locale !== this.dayFormatterLocale) {
@@ -252,20 +197,6 @@ export class CalendarMonth implements OnInit {
 			tooltips.push(
 				`${this.tr().bookedDays.booked} (${this.declaredTypeLabel(declaredType)}). ${this.tr().bookedDays.fixed}`,
 			);
-		const status = this.getStatus(day);
-		if (status) {
-			tooltips.push(status.label);
-			if (status.changeLabel) tooltips.push(status.changeLabel);
-			if (status.reason) tooltips.push(status.reason);
-			if (status.hypotheticalLabel)
-				tooltips.push(
-					`${this.translationService.tr().planning.counterfactual}: ${status.hypotheticalLabel}`,
-				);
-			if (status.hypotheticalReason)
-				tooltips.push(
-					`${this.translationService.tr().planning.reason}: ${status.hypotheticalReason}`,
-				);
-		}
 		return tooltips.length > 0 ? tooltips.join(' + ') : null;
 	}

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+import { createOptimizationPresetRules } from '../../services/rule-service';
 import { provideZonelessChangeDetection } from '@angular/core';
 import { ComponentFixture, TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
 import { vi } from 'vitest';
@@ -13,7 +14,6 @@ import {
 import {
 	CounterfactualAnalysis,
 	CounterfactualSelection,
-	HistoricalEligibilityReason,
 	LeavePlacement,
 	PlanOutcome,
 	PlanExplanation,
@@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ import {
 	InvalidInputOutcome,
 	PlanningOutcome,
 	PlanningObjectiveVector,
-	PlanningTrace,
-	PlanningTraceUpdate,
 } from '../../services/leave-planner.service';
 import { UserInputService } from '../../services/user-input-service';
 import { CalendarSettingsService } from '../../services/calendar-settings-service';
@@ -146,14 +144,12 @@ function placementForSelection(selection: CounterfactualSelection): LeavePlaceme
 				(candidate) => candidate.date === selection || candidate.balanceId === selection,
 			) ?? plan.placements[0]
 		);
-	return 'decisionId' in selection ? selection.placement : selection;
+	return selection;
 }

 function calculationFor(
 	outcome: PlanningOutcome,
 	stableExplanation?: PlanningExplanation,
-	trace?: PlanningTrace,
-	tracePromise: Promise<PlanningTrace | undefined> = Promise.resolve(trace),
 ): PlanningCalculationContext {
 	const counterfactual: CounterfactualAnalysis = {
 		kind: 'Counterfactual',
@@ -174,7 +170,6 @@ function calculationFor(
 				date: '2024-05-04',
 				status: 'ineligible',
 				reason: { code: 'non-working', message: 'Weekend' },
-				historicalStatus: 'ineligible',
 			},
 			{
 				date: '2024-05-07',
@@ -185,7 +180,6 @@ function calculationFor(
 				date: '2024-05-08',
 				status: 'ineligible',
 				reason: { code: 'non-working', message: 'Public Holiday' },
-				historicalStatus: 'ineligible',
 			},
 		],
 	};
@@ -202,27 +196,15 @@ function calculationFor(
 		outcome: Promise.resolve(outcome),
 		explanation: Promise.resolve(stableExplanation),
 		explanationError: Promise.resolve(undefined),
-		trace: tracePromise,
 		analyzeCounterfactual: vi.fn(async (selection: CounterfactualSelection) => ({
 			...counterfactual,
 			placement: placementForSelection(selection),
 		})),
-		historicalEligibility: vi.fn(async () => [] as readonly HistoricalEligibilityReason[]),
 	};
 }

-function calendarFor(
-	outcome: PlanningOutcome,
-	stableExplanation?: PlanningExplanation,
-	trace?: PlanningTrace,
-	tracePromise?: Promise<PlanningTrace | undefined>,
-) {
-	const calculation = calculationFor(
-		outcome,
-		stableExplanation,
-		trace,
-		tracePromise ?? Promise.resolve(trace),
-	);
+function calendarFor(outcome: PlanningOutcome, stableExplanation?: PlanningExplanation) {
+	const calculation = calculationFor(outcome, stableExplanation);
 	return {
 		calculation,
 		calendar: {
@@ -252,160 +234,7 @@ function activateWithKeyboard(element: HTMLElement, key: 'Enter' | ' ' = 'Enter'
 	element.click();
 }

-function jointTrace(): PlanningTrace {
-	const placementComparison =
-		explanation.kind === 'PlanExplanation' ? explanation.placements[0].comparison : undefined;
-	return {
-		status: 'ready',
-		initialState: {
-			horizon: plan.horizon,
-			balances: [
-				{
-					id: 'cp',
-					type: 'cp',
-					quantity: 2,
-					remaining: 2,
-					availableFrom: '2024-01-01',
-					expiryDate: '2024-12-31',
-					earned: false,
-				},
-				{
-					id: 'earned:spring:2024',
-					type: 'rtt',
-					quantity: 2,
-					remaining: 2,
-					availableFrom: '2024-05-04',
-					expiryDate: '2025-05-04',
-					earned: true,
-					sourceRuleId: 'spring',
-				},
-			],
-			placements: [plan.placements[1]],
-			earnedActivations: [
-				{
-					id: 'earned:spring:2024',
-					ruleId: 'spring',
-					occurrence: '2024',
-					dates: ['2024-05-03', '2024-05-06'],
-				},
-			],
-		},
-		phases: [
-			{
-				id: 'phase:obligations',
-				name: 'obligations',
-				completed: true,
-				status: 'completed',
-				decisions: [
-					{
-						id: 'decision:prior',
-						action: 'validate',
-						dates: ['2024-05-01'],
-						candidates: [],
-						deltas: [
-							{
-								kind: 'balance-changed',
-								balanceId: 'cp',
-								remainingBefore: 2,
-								remainingAfter: 1,
-							},
-						],
-					},
-					{
-						id: 'decision:joint',
-						action: 'choose',
-						dates: ['2024-05-03', '2024-05-06'],
-						branch: {
-							parentDecisionId: 'decision:prior',
-							deltas: [
-								{
-									kind: 'placement-added',
-									date: '2024-05-03',
-									balanceId: 'cp',
-									remainingBefore: 1,
-									remainingAfter: 0,
-									placement: plan.placements[0],
-								},
-								{
-									kind: 'balance-changed',
-									balanceId: 'earned:spring:2024',
-									remainingBefore: 2,
-									remainingAfter: 2,
-									balance: {
-										id: 'earned:spring:2024',
-										type: 'rtt',
-										quantity: 2,
-										remaining: 2,
-										availableFrom: '2024-05-07',
-										expiryDate: '2025-05-07',
-										earned: true,
-										sourceRuleId: 'spring',
-									},
-								},
-							],
-						},
-						candidates: [
-							{
-								status: 'evaluated-rejected',
-								dates: ['2024-05-10', '2024-05-13'],
-								reason: {
-									code: 'joint-date-conflict',
-									message: 'This branch cannot satisfy both required dates.',
-								},
-								technicalComparison: [
-									{
-										name: 'unplaced-at-risk',
-										direction: 'minimize',
-										before: 2,
-										after: 2,
-									},
-									{
-										name: 'preference:spring',
-										direction: 'maximize',
-										before: 1,
-										after: 0,
-									},
-								],
-								firstDecisiveComparator: 'preference:spring',
-								comparison: placementComparison,
-							},
-							{
-								status: 'chosen',
-								dates: ['2024-05-03', '2024-05-06'],
-								comparison: placementComparison,
-							},
-						],
-						deltas: [
-							{
-								kind: 'placement-added',
-								date: '2024-05-03',
-								balanceId: 'cp',
-								remainingBefore: 1,
-								remainingAfter: 0,
-								placement: plan.placements[0],
-							},
-						],
-					},
-					{
-						id: 'decision:later',
-						action: 'reject',
-						dates: ['2024-05-20'],
-						candidates: [],
-						deltas: [],
-					},
-				],
-			},
-			{
-				id: 'phase:dates',
-				name: 'dates',
-				completed: true,
-				status: 'completed',
-				decisions: [],
-			},
-		],
-		completedStages: ['obligations', 'dates'],
-	};
-}
+const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();

 describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 	beforeEach(() => localStorage.clear());
@@ -574,10 +403,9 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		{ partial: false, placements: 0 },
 		{ partial: true, placements: 0 },
 	])(
-		'opens calculated statistics independently of the trace (partial: $partial, placements: $placements)',
+		'opens calculated statistics for the displayed plan (partial: $partial, placements: $placements)',
 		async ({ partial, placements }) => {
 			vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-05-01T12:00:00Z'));
-			const pendingTrace = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
 			const validPlan: PlanOutcome = {
 				...plan,
 				calculationDate: '2024-05-01',
@@ -629,12 +457,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 						reasons: [{ code: 'user-cancelled', message: 'Cancelled' }],
 					}
 				: validPlan;
-			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(
-				outcome,
-				undefined,
-				undefined,
-				pendingTrace.promise,
-			);
+			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(outcome, undefined);
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
 				providers: [
@@ -690,7 +513,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			expect(rules.rules).toEqual(before.rules);
 			expect(calendar.createPlanningCalculation).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
 			expect(calculation.analyzeCounterfactual).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-			pendingTrace.reject(new Error('Trace delivery failed'));
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			expect(statistics()).toEqual(expectedStatistics);
@@ -999,14 +821,12 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		);
 	});

-	it('shows the retained earnings when cancellation interrupts a different generating candidate', async () => {
+	it('shows the retained earnings after cancelling with a valid generating plan', async () => {
 		vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-04-28T12:00:00Z'));
-		// Flush the original trace deterministically so cancellation occurs at the observed branch.
+		// Yield between work slices so cancellation can follow a delivered valid checkpoint.
 		let elapsed = 0;
 		const clock = vi.spyOn(performance, 'now').mockImplementation(() => (elapsed += 30));
-		let checkpoint: PlanOutcome | undefined;
 		let interrupted = false;
-		let latestGenerator: string | undefined;
 		let artifacts: import('../../services/leave-planner.core').PlanningArtifacts = {};
 		try {
 			const core = await import('../../services/leave-planner.core');
@@ -1042,24 +862,11 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 							rewardType: 'other',
 						})),
 					],
-					traceProgress: (_: number, update: PlanningTraceUpdate) => {
-						if (interrupted) return;
-						for (const operation of update.operations) {
-							const deltas =
-								operation.kind === 'delta'
-									? [operation.delta]
-									: operation.kind === 'decision'
-										? (operation.decision.branch?.deltas ?? [])
-										: [];
-							for (const delta of deltas) {
-								if (delta.kind !== 'earned-activated') continue;
-								latestGenerator = delta.activation?.ruleId;
-								if (checkpoint && latestGenerator === 'before') interrupted = true;
-							}
-						}
-					},
 				},
-				(value) => (checkpoint = value),
+				(value) => {
+					if (value.ifThenContributions?.some(({ ruleId }) => ruleId === 'after'))
+						interrupted = true;
+				},
 				(value) => (artifacts = value),
 				undefined,
 				undefined,
@@ -1069,7 +876,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			if (outcome.kind !== 'PlanningIncomplete' || !outcome.incumbent)
 				throw new Error('Expected a real cancellation with a retained valid plan.');
 			expect(interrupted).toBe(true);
-			expect(latestGenerator).toBe('before');
 			expect(outcome.incumbent.ifThenContributions).toMatchObject([
 				{ ruleId: 'after', earnedEntitlement: { quantity: 2, added: true } },
 			]);
@@ -1078,20 +884,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 				'2024-05-02',
 				'2024-05-10',
 			]);
-			const latestBranch = artifacts.trace?.phases
-				.flatMap(({ decisions }) => decisions)
-				.filter(({ branch }) => branch)
-				.at(-1);
-			expect(latestBranch?.candidates).toMatchObject([
-				{ status: 'evaluated-rejected', dates: ['2024-04-29', '2024-04-30'] },
-			]);
-			expect(latestBranch?.branch?.deltas).toContainEqual(
-				expect.objectContaining({
-					kind: 'earned-activated',
-					activation: expect.objectContaining({ ruleId: 'before' }),
-				}),
-			);
-			const { calendar } = calendarFor(outcome, artifacts.explanation, artifacts.trace);
+			const { calendar } = calendarFor(outcome, artifacts.explanation);
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
 				providers: [
@@ -1239,12 +1032,11 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		'replaces open statistics after %s and ignores an older valid outcome',
 		async (_, replacement: PlanningOutcome, focusMoved) => {
 			const oldOutcome = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
-			const oldTrace = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
 			const { calendar } = calendarFor(plan);
 			calendar.createPlanningCalculation
 				.mockReturnValueOnce(calculationFor(plan))
 				.mockReturnValueOnce({
-					...calculationFor(plan, undefined, undefined, oldTrace.promise),
+					...calculationFor(plan, undefined),
 					outcome: oldOutcome.promise,
 				})
 				.mockReturnValueOnce(calculationFor(replacement));
@@ -1277,7 +1069,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			await vi.waitFor(() => expect(document.querySelector('[role="dialog"]')).toBeNull());
 			oldOutcome.resolve(plan);
-			oldTrace.resolve(jointTrace());
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			expect(input.planningOutcomeSignal()).toBe(replacement);
@@ -1342,7 +1133,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			);
 			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error(`Expected Plan, got ${outcome.kind}`);
 			localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
-			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
 				providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
@@ -1350,7 +1141,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			vi.spyOn(TestBed.inject(CalendarService), 'createPlanningCalculation').mockReturnValue({
 				...calculationFor(outcome),
 				explanation: Promise.resolve(artifacts.explanation),
-				trace: Promise.resolve(artifacts.trace),
 			});
 			const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
 			settings.setPlanningDates('2024-01-08', '2024-01-12');
@@ -1421,7 +1211,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			);
 			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error(`Expected Plan, got ${outcome.kind}`);
 			localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
-			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
 				providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
@@ -1429,7 +1219,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			const calculation = {
 				...calculationFor(outcome),
 				explanation: Promise.resolve(artifacts.explanation),
-				trace: Promise.resolve(artifacts.trace),
 			};
 			vi.spyOn(TestBed.inject(CalendarService), 'createPlanningCalculation').mockReturnValue(
 				calculation,
@@ -1481,7 +1270,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 	);

 	it.each([false, true])(
-		'keeps adjacent context declarations attached to the historical anchors (fixed anchor: %s)',
+		'keeps adjacent context declarations attached to displayed anchors (fixed anchor: %s)',
 		async (fixedAnchor) => {
 			const core = await import('../../services/leave-planner.core');
 			const placementDate = fixedAnchor ? '2024-07-30' : '2024-07-31';
@@ -1496,7 +1285,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 						expiryDate: placementDate,
 					},
 				],
-				rules: [],
+				rules: [presets[0]],
 				declaredDays: [
 					{ date: '2024-08-01', type: 'cp' as const },
 					...(fixedAnchor ? [{ date: '2024-07-31', type: 'other' as const }] : []),
@@ -1508,28 +1297,14 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 				undefined,
 				(value) => (artifacts = value),
 			);
-			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan' || !artifacts.trace)
-				throw new Error('Expected a plan and its original trace.');
-			const trace = artifacts.trace;
-			const phaseIndex = trace.phases.findIndex((phase) =>
-				phase.decisions.some((decision) =>
-					decision.deltas.some(
-						(delta) => delta.kind === 'placement-added' && delta.date === placementDate,
-					),
-				),
-			);
-			const decisionIndex = trace.phases[phaseIndex].decisions.findIndex((decision) =>
-				decision.deltas.some(
-					(delta) => delta.kind === 'placement-added' && delta.date === placementDate,
-				),
-			);
+			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a plan.');
 			localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
-			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
 				providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
 			}).compileComponents();
-			const calculation = calculationFor(outcome, artifacts.explanation, trace);
+			const calculation = calculationFor(outcome, artifacts.explanation);
 			vi.spyOn(TestBed.inject(CalendarService), 'createPlanningCalculation').mockReturnValue(
 				calculation,
 			);
@@ -1540,29 +1315,10 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			const root: HTMLElement = fixture.nativeElement;
-			activateWithKeyboard(root.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.trace-explorer summary')!);
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
 			fixture.detectChanges();
-			activateWithKeyboard(
-				root.querySelectorAll<HTMLElement>('.trace-phases > button')[phaseIndex],
-			);
-			fixture.detectChanges();
-			for (let index = 0; index < decisionIndex; index++) {
-				activateWithKeyboard(
-					root.querySelector<HTMLElement>('[aria-label="Next decision"]')!,
-				);
-				fixture.detectChanges();
-			}
-			activateWithKeyboard(root.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.trace-toolbar button')!);
-			fixture.detectChanges();
-			const before = root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('button[data-date="2024-08-01"]');
-			if (fixedAnchor) {
-				expect(before?.classList).toContain('selected');
-				expect(before?.classList).toContain('cp');
-			} else expect(before).toBeNull();
-			activateWithKeyboard(root.querySelectorAll<HTMLElement>('.trace-toolbar button')[1]);
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			const after = root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('button[data-date="2024-08-01"]')!;
 			expect(after.classList).toContain('selected');
@@ -1570,7 +1326,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			expect(after.classList).toContain('context-only');
 			expect(after.disabled).toBe(true);
 			expect(after.getAttribute('aria-label')).toContain('Already booked');
-			expect(fixture.componentInstance['traceState']()?.placements).toEqual(
+			expect(fixture.componentInstance['displayedPlan']()?.placements).toEqual(
 				outcome.placements,
 			);
 			TestBed.inject(UserInputService).toggleDeclaredDay('2024-08-01', 'rtt');
@@ -1582,7 +1338,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 	it('previews a growing and shrinking range across months, then saves it once on release', async () => {
 		localStorage.setItem('app.language', '"fr"');
 		localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
-		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 			imports: [CalendarYear, UserInput],
 			providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
@@ -1749,7 +1505,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {

 	it('edits declarations from configuration and restores the preceding result when switched off', async () => {
 		localStorage.setItem('app.language', '"fr"');
-		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 		localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
 		localStorage.setItem(
 			'declaredNonWorkingDays',
@@ -1844,7 +1600,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 	});

 	it('keeps the preceding calendar until a submitted snapshot returns and ignores later edits', async () => {
-		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 		localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
 		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 			imports: [CalendarYear, UserInput],
@@ -1868,11 +1624,9 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			],
 		};
 		const lateExplanation = deferred<PlanningExplanation | undefined>();
-		const lateTrace = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
 		const initialCalculation = {
 			...calculationFor(initial, oldExplanation),
 			explanation: lateExplanation.promise,
-			trace: lateTrace.promise,
 		};
 		const rule = {
 			id: 'linked',
@@ -1943,26 +1697,10 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			horizon: submitted.horizon,
 			declaredDays: submitted.declaredDays,
 		});
-		const originalTrace: PlanningTrace = {
-			status: 'ready',
-			initialState: {
-				horizon: initial.horizon,
-				declaredDays: initial.declaredDays,
-				balances: [],
-				placements: [],
-				earnedActivations: [],
-			},
-			phases: [],
-			completedStages: initial.completedStages,
-		};
 		lateExplanation.resolve(oldExplanation);
-		lateTrace.resolve(originalTrace);
 		await fixture.whenStable();
 		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
 		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningTrace']()).toBe(originalTrace);
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['traceLoading']()).toBe(false);
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['traceResolved']()).toBe(true);
 		const details = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.plan-details')!;
 		details.open = true;
 		details.dispatchEvent(new Event('toggle'));
@@ -1983,19 +1721,14 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		expect(input.declaredDaysSignal()).toEqual([{ date: '2024-05-10', type: 'other' }]);
 	});

-	it('calibrates the wait through calendar rendering while a long trace remains pending', async () => {
+	it('calibrates the wait through calendar rendering independently of explanation delivery', async () => {
 		let now = 1_000;
 		const clock = vi.spyOn(performance, 'now').mockImplementation(() => now);
 		try {
-			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			const pending = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
-			const trace = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
-			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(
-				plan,
-				undefined,
-				undefined,
-				trace.promise,
-			);
+			const delayedExplanation = deferred<PlanningExplanation | undefined>();
+			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(plan, undefined);
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
 				providers: [
@@ -2018,6 +1751,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			calendar.createPlanningCalculation.mockReturnValue({
 				...calculation,
 				outcome: pending.promise,
+				explanation: delayedExplanation.promise,
 				snapshot: { ...calculation.snapshot, ...submitted },
 			});
 			const fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CalendarYear);
@@ -2033,11 +1767,13 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.loading-overlay')).toBeNull();
 			expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('button.selected')).toHaveLength(2);
 			expect(duration.estimate()).toEqual({ minimum: 10, maximum: 60, unit: 'seconds' });
+			expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningExplanation']()).toBeNull();
 			now = 321_000;
-			trace.reject(new Error('Late trace delivery failed'));
+			delayedExplanation.resolve(explanation);
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
 			fixture.detectChanges();
+			expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningExplanation']()).toBe(explanation);
 			expect(duration.estimate()).toEqual({ minimum: 10, maximum: 60, unit: 'seconds' });
 			expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('button.selected')).toHaveLength(2);
 			expect(calendar.createPlanningCalculation).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
@@ -2100,7 +1836,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		let now = 1_000;
 		const clock = vi.spyOn(performance, 'now').mockImplementation(() => now);
 		try {
-			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			const old = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
 			const latest = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
 			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(plan);
@@ -2173,19 +1909,13 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		'cancels accessibly with a valid incumbent: %s, then allows a new calculation',
 		async (withIncumbent) => {
 			const pending = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
-			const delayedTrace = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
 			const cancelled: PlanningIncompleteOutcome = {
 				kind: 'PlanningIncomplete',
 				incumbent: withIncumbent ? plan : undefined,
 				completedStages: ['validation'],
 				reasons: [{ code: 'user-cancelled', message: 'The calculation was cancelled.' }],
 			};
-			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(
-				cancelled,
-				undefined,
-				undefined,
-				delayedTrace.promise,
-			);
+			const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(cancelled, undefined);
 			calendar.createPlanningCalculation
 				.mockReturnValueOnce({ ...calculation, outcome: pending.promise })
 				.mockReturnValueOnce(calculationFor(plan, explanation));
@@ -2223,7 +1953,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			expect(calendar.createPlanningCalculation).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
 			expect(root.querySelectorAll('button.selected')).toHaveLength(2);
-			delayedTrace.resolve({ ...jointTrace(), status: 'incomplete' });
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			expect(root.querySelectorAll('button.selected')).toHaveLength(2);
 		},
@@ -2301,14 +2030,13 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		},
 	);

-	it('ignores an older outcome, explanation and trace after a new horizon is submitted', async () => {
+	it('ignores an older outcome and explanation after a new horizon is submitted', async () => {
 		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 			imports: [CalendarYear],
 			providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
 		}).compileComponents();
 		const oldOutcome = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
 		const oldExplanation = deferred<PlanningExplanation | undefined>();
-		const oldTrace = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
 		const calendar = TestBed.inject(CalendarService);
 		const calculate = vi
 			.spyOn(calendar, 'createPlanningCalculation')
@@ -2316,7 +2044,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 				...calculationFor(plan),
 				outcome: oldOutcome.promise,
 				explanation: oldExplanation.promise,
-				trace: oldTrace.promise,
 			})
 			.mockReturnValueOnce(calculationFor(conflict));
 		const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
@@ -2329,14 +2056,12 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		await fixture.whenStable();
 		oldOutcome.resolve(plan);
 		oldExplanation.resolve(explanation);
-		oldTrace.resolve(jointTrace());
 		await fixture.whenStable();
 		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
 		fixture.detectChanges();
 		expect(calculate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
 		expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningOutcome']()).toBe(conflict);
 		expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningExplanation']()).toBeNull();
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningTrace']()).toBeNull();
 		expect(fixture.componentInstance['planningHorizon']()).toEqual({
 			start: '2021-05-14',
 			end: '2021-05-15',
@@ -2633,9 +2358,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {

 		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
 		const planDetails = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.plan-details')!;
-		const traceDetails = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.trace-explorer')!;
 		expect(planDetails.open).toBe(false);
-		expect(traceDetails.open).toBe(false);
 		activateWithKeyboard(planDetails.querySelector<HTMLElement>('summary')!);
 		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
 		fixture.detectChanges();
@@ -3125,108 +2848,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		await vi.waitFor(() => expect(document.querySelector('[role="dialog"]')).toBeNull());
 	});

-	it('announces trace loading and completion while keeping the completed plan available', async () => {
-		const outcomeDelivery = deferred<PlanningOutcome>();
-		const traceDelivery = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
-		const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(
-			plan,
-			explanation,
-			undefined,
-			traceDelivery.promise,
-		);
-		calendar.createPlanningCalculation.mockReturnValue({
-			...calculation,
-			outcome: outcomeDelivery.promise,
-		});
-		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
-			imports: [CalendarYear],
-			providers: [
-				provideZonelessChangeDetection(),
-				{ provide: CalendarService, useValue: calendar },
-			],
-		}).compileComponents();
-		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('en');
-		const fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CalendarYear);
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-
-		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
-		expect(root.querySelector('.loading-overlay')).not.toBeNull();
-		expect(root.querySelectorAll('button.selected')).toHaveLength(0);
-		expect(calendar.selectedDatesForPlan).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-		expect(root.querySelector('.cancel-calculation')).not.toBeNull();
-		outcomeDelivery.resolve(plan);
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		const plannedButtons = Array.from(root.querySelectorAll('button.selected'));
-		expect(plannedButtons).toHaveLength(2);
-		expect(root.querySelector('.loading-overlay')).toBeNull();
-		const liveMessage = root.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.calendar-year > p[aria-live]')!;
-		const traceDetails = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.trace-explorer')!;
-		activateWithKeyboard(traceDetails.querySelector('summary')!, ' ');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(traceDetails.querySelector('[role="status"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'decision trace is still loading',
-		);
-		expect(liveMessage.getAttribute('aria-atomic')).toBe('true');
-		expect(root.querySelector('.plan-summary')).not.toBeNull();
-
-		traceDelivery.resolve(jointTrace());
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(liveMessage.textContent).toContain('decision trace has loaded');
-		expect(Array.from(root.querySelectorAll('button.selected'))).toEqual(plannedButtons);
-		expect(calendar.createPlanningCalculation).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
-		expect(calendar.selectedDatesForPlan).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
-		await vi.waitFor(() => expect(traceDetails.querySelector('[role="status"]')).toBeNull());
-		root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>(
-			'.trace-decisions nav button[aria-label="Next decision"]',
-		)!.click();
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(root.querySelector('.candidate-list details')).not.toBeNull();
-	});
-
-	it('announces trace delivery failure without discarding the completed plan', async () => {
-		const traceDelivery = deferred<PlanningTrace | undefined>();
-		const { calendar } = calendarFor(plan, explanation, undefined, traceDelivery.promise);
-		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
-			imports: [CalendarYear],
-			providers: [
-				provideZonelessChangeDetection(),
-				{ provide: CalendarService, useValue: calendar },
-			],
-		}).compileComponents();
-		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('en');
-		const fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CalendarYear);
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
-		const traceDetails = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.trace-explorer')!;
-		activateWithKeyboard(traceDetails.querySelector('summary')!, ' ');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		traceDelivery.reject(new Error('trace transfer failed'));
-		await vi.waitFor(() => {
-			fixture.detectChanges();
-			expect(root.querySelector('.calendar-year > p[aria-live]')?.textContent).toContain(
-				'No decision trace is available',
-			);
-		});
-		expect(root.querySelector('.calendar-year > p[aria-live]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'No decision trace is available',
-		);
-		expect(traceDetails.querySelector('[role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'trace transfer failed',
-		);
-		expect(root.querySelector('.plan-summary')).not.toBeNull();
-	});
-
 	it('announces an explicit comparison failure and retries inside the dialog', async () => {
 		const { calendar, calculation } = calendarFor(plan, explanation);
 		const firstAttempt = deferred<CounterfactualAnalysis>();
@@ -3301,13 +2922,13 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		expect(document.activeElement).toBe(focusedBeforeResult);
 	});

-	it('renders conflict causes and replays an atomic trace decision', async () => {
+	it('renders conflict causes with their reported obligations', async () => {
 		const conflictExplanation: PlanningExplanation = {
 			kind: 'ConflictExplanation',
 			conflictingRules: [{ id: 'rule', label: 'Required spring leave' }],
 			bottleneck: { code: 'typed-capacity', message: 'No CP entitlement is available.' },
 		};
-		let setup = calendarFor(conflict, conflictExplanation);
+		const setup = calendarFor(conflict, conflictExplanation);
 		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 			imports: [CalendarYear],
 			providers: [
@@ -3316,7 +2937,7 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 			],
 		}).compileComponents();
 		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('en');
-		let fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CalendarYear);
+		const fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CalendarYear);
 		fixture.detectChanges();
 		await fixture.whenStable();
 		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
@@ -3327,208 +2948,6 @@ describe('CalendarYear planning outcome boundary', () => {
 		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.conflict-explanation').textContent).toContain(
 			'No CP entitlement is available.',
 		);
-
-		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
-		const trace = jointTrace();
-		setup = calendarFor(plan, explanation, trace);
-		vi.mocked(setup.calculation.historicalEligibility).mockResolvedValue([
-			{
-				date: '2024-01-02',
-				reason: {
-					code: 'unavailable',
-					message: 'This balance is not available until January 4.',
-				},
-			},
-			{
-				date: '2024-01-08',
-				reason: { code: 'expired', message: 'This balance expired on January 7.' },
-			},
-		]);
-		const eligibilityRetry = deferred<readonly HistoricalEligibilityReason[]>();
-		vi.mocked(setup.calculation.historicalEligibility)
-			.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('Historical eligibility unavailable.'))
-			.mockImplementationOnce(() => eligibilityRetry.promise);
-		setup.calendar.selectedDatesForPlan.mockImplementation((value) =>
-			selectedDatesForPlan(value, true),
-		);
-		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
-			imports: [CalendarYear],
-			providers: [
-				provideZonelessChangeDetection(),
-				{ provide: CalendarService, useValue: setup.calendar },
-			],
-		}).compileComponents();
-		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('en');
-		fixture = TestBed.createComponent(CalendarYear);
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
-		const traceDetails = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.trace-explorer')!;
-		activateWithKeyboard(traceDetails.querySelector('summary')!, ' ');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		await new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 0));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(traceDetails.open).toBe(true);
-		const nextDecision = root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>(
-			'.trace-decisions nav button[aria-label="Next decision"]',
-		)!;
-		activateWithKeyboard(nextDecision);
-		await vi.waitFor(() => {
-			expect(fixture.componentInstance['historicalEligibilityError']()).toBe(
-				'Historical eligibility unavailable.',
-			);
-		});
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['traceReplay']()).toBe(true);
-		expect(root.querySelector('[role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'Historical eligibility unavailable.',
-		);
-		expect(root.querySelector('.sr-only[role="status"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'Original date eligibility could not be checked.',
-		);
-		const retryEligibility = Array.from(root.querySelectorAll('button')).find((button) =>
-			button.textContent?.includes('Retry date eligibility check'),
-		)!;
-		activateWithKeyboard(retryEligibility);
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(root.querySelector('[role="status"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'Checking which dates this leave could use',
-		);
-		eligibilityRetry.resolve([
-			{
-				date: '2024-01-02',
-				reason: {
-					code: 'unavailable',
-					message: 'This balance is not available until January 4.',
-				},
-			},
-			{
-				date: '2024-01-08',
-				reason: { code: 'expired', message: 'This balance expired on January 7.' },
-			},
-		]);
-		await vi.waitFor(() => {
-			expect([...fixture.componentInstance['historicalIneligibility']().keys()]).toEqual([
-				'2024-01-02',
-				'2024-01-08',
-			]);
-		});
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(setup.calculation.historicalEligibility).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-			decisionId: 'decision:joint',
-			placement: plan.placements[0],
-		});
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['traceReplay']()).toBe(true);
-		expect(fixture.componentInstance['historicalEligibilityError']()).toBeNull();
-		expect([...fixture.componentInstance['historicalIneligibility']().keys()]).toEqual([
-			'2024-01-02',
-			'2024-01-08',
-		]);
-		const historicalAvailability = fixture.componentInstance['dateStatuses']();
-		expect(historicalAvailability['2024-01-02']).toMatchObject({
-			kind: 'ineligible',
-			reason: 'This leave balance cannot be used on this date.',
-		});
-		expect(historicalAvailability['2024-01-08']).toMatchObject({
-			kind: 'ineligible',
-			reason: 'This date is after the leave balance expires.',
-		});
-		let earnedBalance = Array.from(root.querySelectorAll('.trace-state-balance')).find((item) =>
-			item.textContent?.includes('earned:spring:2024'),
-		)!;
-		expect(earnedBalance.textContent).toContain('Available from 4 May 2024');
-		expect(earnedBalance.textContent).toContain('Expires on 4 May 2025');
-		const jointAfterButton =
-			root.querySelectorAll<HTMLButtonElement>('.trace-toolbar button')[1]!;
-		activateWithKeyboard(jointAfterButton);
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		earnedBalance = Array.from(root.querySelectorAll('.trace-state-balance')).find((item) =>
-			item.textContent?.includes('earned:spring:2024'),
-		)!;
-		expect(earnedBalance.textContent).toContain('Available from 7 May 2024');
-		expect(earnedBalance.textContent).toContain('Expires on 7 May 2025');
-		expect(
-			root
-				.querySelector('.trace-decisions output[aria-current="step"]')
-				?.getAttribute('aria-label'),
-		).toContain('2024-05-03, 2024-05-06');
-		const candidates = Array.from(
-			root.querySelectorAll<HTMLDetailsElement>('.candidate-list > details'),
-		);
-		expect(candidates).toHaveLength(2);
-		expect(candidates[0].querySelector('summary')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'2024-05-10, 2024-05-13',
-		);
-		expect(candidates[1].querySelector('summary')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'2024-05-03, 2024-05-06',
-		);
-		expect(candidates.every((candidate) => !candidate.open)).toBe(true);
-		const technicalComparison = candidates[0].querySelector('.technical-comparison')!;
-		expect(technicalComparison.closest('details')).toBe(candidates[0]);
-		expect(candidates[0].open).toBe(false);
-		activateWithKeyboard(candidates[0].querySelector('summary')!, 'Enter');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(candidates[0].open).toBe(true);
-		expect(candidates[0].textContent).toContain(
-			'This branch cannot satisfy both required dates.',
-		);
-		expect(technicalComparison.textContent).toContain('Actual stage comparison');
-		const traceImpact = candidates[0].querySelector('.criteria-detail')!;
-		expect(traceImpact.textContent).toContain('Full-plan effect of this branch');
-		expect(traceImpact.querySelectorAll('.decisive-row')).toHaveLength(0);
-		expect(traceImpact.textContent).not.toContain('First difference');
-		const decisiveComparator = candidates[0].querySelector(
-			'.technical-comparison tbody tr.decisive-row',
-		)!;
-		expect(decisiveComparator.textContent).toContain('preference:spring');
-		expect(decisiveComparator.textContent).toContain('1');
-		expect(decisiveComparator.textContent).toContain('0');
-		expect(
-			candidates[0].textContent!.indexOf('This branch cannot satisfy both required dates.'),
-		).toBeLessThan(candidates[0].textContent!.indexOf('preference:spring'));
-		expect(document.activeElement).toBe(candidates[0].querySelector('summary'));
-
-		const beforeButton = root.querySelector('.trace-toolbar button') as HTMLButtonElement;
-		const afterButton = root.querySelectorAll('.trace-toolbar button')[1] as HTMLButtonElement;
-		activateWithKeyboard(beforeButton, ' ');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(beforeButton.getAttribute('aria-pressed')).toBe('true');
-		expect(root.querySelector('.trace-state-summary')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'1 earned activations',
-		);
-		expect(root.querySelector('.trace-state-summary')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'cp: 1 remaining',
-		);
-		expect(root.querySelector('.trace-state-summary')?.textContent).toContain('1 placements');
-		activateWithKeyboard(root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('.statistics-button')!);
-		await fixture.whenStable();
-		expect(
-			Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('[role="dialog"] dd'), (value) =>
-				value.textContent?.trim(),
-			),
-		).toEqual(['2', '4', '6', '6', '—', '—', '0', '0']);
-		document.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('[role="dialog"] button')!.click();
-		await vi.waitFor(() => expect(document.querySelector('[role="dialog"]')).toBeNull());
-		activateWithKeyboard(afterButton);
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(afterButton.getAttribute('aria-pressed')).toBe('true');
-		expect(root.querySelector('.trace-state-summary')?.textContent).toContain('2 placements');
-		expect(root.querySelector('.trace-state-summary')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'1 earned activations',
-		);
-		expect(root.querySelector('.trace-state-summary')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'cp: 0 remaining',
-		);
-		const weekend = root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('button[data-date="2024-05-04"]')!;
-		expect(weekend.getAttribute('aria-label')).toContain('Ineligible');
-		expect(weekend.querySelector('.status-marker')?.textContent).toBe('×');
-		const legend = root.querySelector('.calendar-legend')?.textContent ?? '';
-		expect(legend).toContain('Evaluated and rejected');
-		expect(legend).toContain('Not examined');
-		expect(root.querySelector('.counterfactual-result')).toBeNull();
 	});

 	it('turns planner rejection into an incomplete error and clears loading', async () => {
@@ -533,476 +533,8 @@
 				{{ tr().planning.explanationError }} {{ explanationError()!.message }}
 			</p>
 		}
-
-		@if (planningOutcome() && planningOutcome()?.kind !== 'InvalidInput') {
-			<details class="trace-explorer" [open]="traceOpen()" (toggle)="toggleTrace($event)">
-				<summary>
-					<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">account_tree</mat-icon>
-					<span
-						>{{ tr().planning.traceTitle
-						}}<small>{{ tr().planning.traceHelp }}</small></span
-					>
-					<mat-icon class="disclosure-chevron" aria-hidden="true">expand_more</mat-icon>
-				</summary>
-				@if (traceLoading()) {
-					<p role="status">{{ tr().planning.traceLoading }}</p>
-				} @else if (planningTrace(); as trace) {
-					@if (trace.error) {
-						<p class="inline-error" role="alert">{{ trace.error.message }}</p>
-					}
-					<div class="trace-layout">
-						<nav class="trace-phases" [attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.phases">
-							<div class="trace-phase-stepper">
-								<button
-									type="button"
-									data-phase-step="first"
-									[attr.aria-disabled]="tracePhaseIndex() === 0"
-									[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.firstPhase"
-									(click)="stepTracePhase('first')"
-								>
-									<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">first_page</mat-icon>
-								</button>
-								<button
-									type="button"
-									data-phase-step="previous"
-									[attr.aria-disabled]="tracePhaseIndex() === 0"
-									[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.previousPhase"
-									(click)="stepTracePhase('previous')"
-								>
-									<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">chevron_left</mat-icon>
-								</button>
-								<output
-									aria-current="step"
-									[attr.aria-label]="tracePhaseAnnouncement()"
-									>{{ tracePhaseIndex() + 1 }} {{ tr().planning.of }}
-									{{ trace.phases.length }}</output
-								>
-								<button
-									type="button"
-									data-phase-step="next"
-									[attr.aria-disabled]="
-										tracePhaseIndex() === trace.phases.length - 1
-									"
-									[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.nextPhase"
-									(click)="stepTracePhase('next')"
-								>
-									<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">chevron_right</mat-icon>
-								</button>
-								<button
-									type="button"
-									data-phase-step="last"
-									[attr.aria-disabled]="
-										tracePhaseIndex() === trace.phases.length - 1
-									"
-									[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.lastPhase"
-									(click)="stepTracePhase('last')"
-								>
-									<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">last_page</mat-icon>
-								</button>
-							</div>
-							@for (phase of trace.phases; track phase.id; let index = $index) {
-								<button
-									type="button"
-									[class.active]="index === tracePhaseIndex()"
-									[attr.aria-pressed]="index === tracePhaseIndex()"
-									(click)="selectTracePhase(index)"
-								>
-									<span>{{ phaseLabel(phase.name) }}</span>
-									<small>{{ tracePhaseStatusLabel(phase.status) }}</small>
-								</button>
-							}
-						</nav>
-
-						@if (selectedTracePhase(); as phase) {
-							<section class="trace-decisions" aria-labelledby="trace-phase-title">
-								<h3 id="trace-phase-title">{{ phaseLabel(phase.name) }}</h3>
-								@if (phase.decisions.length) {
-									<nav [attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.decisions">
-										<button
-											type="button"
-											[attr.aria-disabled]="traceDecisionIndex() === 0"
-											[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.firstDecision"
-											(click)="stepTraceDecision('first')"
-										>
-											<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">first_page</mat-icon>
-										</button>
-										<button
-											type="button"
-											[attr.aria-disabled]="traceDecisionIndex() === 0"
-											[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.previousDecision"
-											(click)="stepTraceDecision('previous')"
-										>
-											<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">chevron_left</mat-icon>
-										</button>
-										<output
-											aria-current="step"
-											[attr.aria-label]="traceDecisionAnnouncement()"
-											>{{ tr().planning.decision }}
-											{{ traceDecisionIndex() + 1 }} {{ tr().planning.of }}
-											{{ phase.decisions.length }}</output
-										>
-										<button
-											type="button"
-											[attr.aria-disabled]="
-												traceDecisionIndex() === phase.decisions.length - 1
-											"
-											[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.nextDecision"
-											(click)="stepTraceDecision('next')"
-										>
-											<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">chevron_right</mat-icon>
-										</button>
-										<button
-											type="button"
-											[attr.aria-disabled]="
-												traceDecisionIndex() === phase.decisions.length - 1
-											"
-											[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.lastDecision"
-											(click)="stepTraceDecision('last')"
-										>
-											<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">last_page</mat-icon>
-										</button>
-									</nav>
-
-									@if (selectedTraceDecision(); as decision) {
-										<div
-											class="trace-toolbar"
-											role="group"
-											[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.replay"
-										>
-											<button
-												type="button"
-												[attr.aria-pressed]="
-													traceReplay() && traceMoment() === 'before'
-												"
-												(click)="showTraceMoment('before')"
-											>
-												{{ tr().planning.before }}
-											</button>
-											<button
-												type="button"
-												[attr.aria-pressed]="
-													traceReplay() && traceMoment() === 'after'
-												"
-												(click)="showTraceMoment('after')"
-											>
-												{{ tr().planning.after }}
-											</button>
-											<button
-												type="button"
-												[attr.aria-pressed]="!traceReplay()"
-												(click)="showFinalPlan()"
-											>
-												{{ tr().planning.finalPlan }}
-											</button>
-										</div>
-										@if (historicalEligibilityLoading()) {
-											<p role="status">
-												{{ tr().planning.historicalEligibilityLoading }}
-											</p>
-										}
-										@if (historicalEligibilityError(); as error) {
-											<p role="alert">
-												{{ tr().planning.historicalEligibilityError }}
-												{{ error }}
-												<button
-													type="button"
-													(click)="retryHistoricalEligibility()"
-												>
-													{{ tr().planning.retryHistoricalEligibility }}
-												</button>
-											</p>
-										}
-										<p>
-											<strong>{{ tr().planning.dates }}:</strong>
-											{{
-												decision.dates.length
-													? decision.dates.join(', ')
-													: tr().planning.none
-											}}
-										</p>
-										@if (decision.reason) {
-											<p>
-												<strong>{{ tr().planning.reason }}:</strong>
-												{{ decision.reason.message }}
-											</p>
-										}
-
-										<h4>{{ tr().planning.candidates }}</h4>
-										@if (decision.candidates.length > 50) {
-											<nav
-												class="candidate-pagination"
-												[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.candidates"
-											>
-												<button
-													type="button"
-													[attr.aria-disabled]="
-														traceCandidatePage() === 0
-													"
-													[attr.aria-label]="
-														tr().planning.previousCandidates
-													"
-													(click)="stepTraceCandidatePage(-1)"
-												>
-													<mat-icon aria-hidden="true"
-														>chevron_left</mat-icon
-													>
-												</button>
-												<output
-													>{{ tr().planning.page }}
-													{{ traceCandidatePage() + 1 }}
-													{{ tr().planning.of }}
-													{{ traceCandidatePages() }}</output
-												>
-												<button
-													type="button"
-													[attr.aria-disabled]="
-														traceCandidatePage() ===
-														traceCandidatePages() - 1
-													"
-													[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.nextCandidates"
-													(click)="stepTraceCandidatePage(1)"
-												>
-													<mat-icon aria-hidden="true"
-														>chevron_right</mat-icon
-													>
-												</button>
-											</nav>
-										}
-										<div class="candidate-list">
-											@for (
-												candidate of visibleTraceCandidates();
-												track $index
-											) {
-												<details>
-													<summary>
-														<span
-															class="status-symbol"
-															aria-hidden="true"
-															>{{
-																candidate.status === 'chosen'
-																	? '✓'
-																	: candidate.status ===
-																		  'ineligible'
-																		? '×'
-																		: '•'
-															}}</span
-														>
-														{{ traceStatusLabel(candidate.status) }} ·
-														@if (
-															candidate.sourceDate &&
-															candidate.sourceDate !== candidate.date
-														) {
-															{{ candidate.sourceDate }} →
-														}
-														{{
-															candidate.dates?.join(', ') ||
-																candidate.date ||
-																tr().planning.none
-														}}
-													</summary>
-													@if (candidate.reason) {
-														<p>{{ candidate.reason.message }}</p>
-													}
-													@if (candidate.technicalComparison?.length) {
-														<section class="technical-comparison">
-															<h5>
-																{{
-																	tr().planning.details
-																		.traceStageTitle
-																}}
-															</h5>
-															<p class="calculation-intro">
-																{{
-																	tr().planning.details
-																		.traceStageHelp
-																}}
-															</p>
-															<table class="impact-table">
-																<thead>
-																	<tr>
-																		<th scope="col">
-																			{{
-																				tr().planning
-																					.explanation
-																					.criterion
-																			}}
-																		</th>
-																		<th scope="col">
-																			{{
-																				tr().planning.before
-																			}}
-																		</th>
-																		<th scope="col">
-																			{{
-																				tr().planning.after
-																			}}
-																		</th>
-																	</tr>
-																</thead>
-																<tbody>
-																	@for (
-																		comparator of candidate.technicalComparison;
-																		track $index
-																	) {
-																		<tr
-																			[class.decisive-row]="
-																				comparator.name ===
-																				candidate.firstDecisiveComparator
-																			"
-																		>
-																			<th scope="row">
-																				<code>{{
-																					comparator.name
-																				}}</code>
-																				<small>{{
-																					comparator.direction ===
-																					'maximize'
-																						? tr()
-																								.planning
-																								.details
-																								.higher
-																						: tr()
-																								.planning
-																								.details
-																								.lower
-																				}}</small>
-																				@if (
-																					comparator.name ===
-																					candidate.firstDecisiveComparator
-																				) {
-																					<span
-																						class="decisive-label"
-																						>{{
-																							tr()
-																								.planning
-																								.details
-																								.firstDifference
-																						}}</span
-																					>
-																				}
-																			</th>
-																			<td>
-																				{{
-																					comparator.before
-																				}}
-																			</td>
-																			<td>
-																				{{
-																					comparator.after
-																				}}
-																			</td>
-																		</tr>
-																	}
-																</tbody>
-															</table>
-														</section>
-													}
-													@if (candidate.comparison; as comparison) {
-														<div class="calculation-content">
-															<ng-container
-																[ngTemplateOutlet]="
-																	calculationTable
-																"
-																[ngTemplateOutletContext]="{
-																	comparison,
-																	beforeLabel:
-																		tr().planning.before,
-																	afterLabel: tr().planning.after,
-																	audit: comparison,
-																	traceEffect:
-																		!!candidate
-																			.technicalComparison
-																			?.length,
-																}"
-															/>
-														</div>
-													}
-													@if (candidate.placement) {
-														<button
-															type="button"
-															(click)="
-																analyzeTraceCandidate(candidate)
-															"
-														>
-															{{ tr().planning.compareAlternatives }}
-														</button>
-													}
-												</details>
-											}
-										</div>
-
-										<h4>{{ tr().planning.deltas }}</h4>
-										<ul>
-											@for (delta of decision.deltas; track $index) {
-												<li>
-													<strong>{{
-														formatIdentifier(delta.kind)
-													}}</strong>
-													@if (delta.fromDate || delta.date) {
-														· {{ delta.fromDate || delta.date }}
-													}
-													@if (delta.toDate) {
-														→ {{ delta.toDate }}
-													}
-													@if (delta.balanceId) {
-														· {{ delta.balanceId }}
-													}
-													@if (delta.remainingAfter !== undefined) {
-														· {{ delta.remainingBefore }} →
-														{{ delta.remainingAfter }}
-													}
-												</li>
-											}
-										</ul>
-										@if (traceState(); as state) {
-											<p class="trace-state-summary" role="status">
-												{{
-													traceMoment() === 'before'
-														? tr().planning.before
-														: tr().planning.after
-												}}: {{ state.placements.length }}
-												{{ tr().planning.placements }},
-												{{ state.earnedActivations.length }}
-												{{ tr().planning.activations }}
-												@for (balance of state.balances; track balance.id) {
-													<span class="trace-state-balance"
-														>{{ balance.id }}: {{ balance.remaining }}
-														{{ tr().planning.balanceRemaining }}
-														<small
-															>{{ tr().planning.details.available }}
-															{{ displayDate(balance.availableFrom) }}
-															·
-															{{ tr().planning.details.expires }}
-															{{
-																displayDate(balance.expiryDate)
-															}}</small
-														></span
-													>
-												}
-											</p>
-										}
-									}
-								} @else {
-									<p>{{ tr().planning.noDecisions }}</p>
-								}
-							</section>
-						}
-					</div>
-				} @else if (traceResolved()) {
-					<p role="status">{{ tr().planning.traceUnavailable }}</p>
-				}
-			</details>
-		}
 	</div>

-	@if (traceReplay()) {
-		<div class="replay-notice" role="status">
-			<span>{{ tr().planning.replayNotice }}</span>
-			<button type="button" class="quiet-button" (click)="showFinalPlan()">
-				{{ tr().planning.finalPlan }}
-			</button>
-		</div>
-	}
 	<p class="calendar-help">
 		<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">touch_app</mat-icon
 		>{{ declarationEntry() ? tr().bookedDays.help : tr().planning.calendarHelp }}
@@ -1037,7 +569,7 @@
 				<span class="legend-swatch today" aria-hidden="true"></span
 				>{{ tr().dayTypes.today }}
 			</li>
-			@if (planDetailsOpen() || traceReplay()) {
+			@if (planDetailsOpen()) {
 				<li>
 					<span class="legend-swatch current" aria-hidden="true"></span
 					>{{ tr().planning.currentPlacement }}
@@ -1049,62 +581,6 @@
 					>{{ tr().planning.explainedPeriod }}
 				</li>
 			}
-			@if (traceReplay() && counterfactual()) {
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol hypothetical-symbol" aria-hidden="true">~✓</span
-					>{{ tr().planning.eligible }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol hypothetical-symbol" aria-hidden="true">~×</span
-					>{{ tr().planning.ineligible }}
-				</li>
-			}
-			@if (traceReplay()) {
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">✓</span
-					>{{ traceStatusLabel('chosen') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">−</span
-					>{{ traceStatusLabel('evaluated-rejected') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">⌁</span
-					>{{ traceStatusLabel('pruned') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">?</span
-					>{{ traceStatusLabel('not-examined') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">×</span
-					>{{ traceStatusLabel('ineligible') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">+</span
-					>{{ traceChangeLabel('added') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">←</span
-					>{{ traceChangeLabel('moved-from') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">→</span
-					>{{ traceChangeLabel('moved-to') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">−</span
-					>{{ traceChangeLabel('removed') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">≈</span
-					>{{ traceChangeLabel('shared') }}
-				</li>
-				<li>
-					<span class="legend-symbol" aria-hidden="true">=</span
-					>{{ traceChangeLabel('unchanged') }}
-				</li>
-			}
 		</ul>
 	</div>

@@ -1129,7 +605,6 @@
 						[declarationPreview]="declarationPreview()"
 						[currentDate]="declarationEntry() ? null : currentPlacementDate()"
 						[explainedPeriod]="declarationEntry() ? undefined : explainedPeriod()"
-						[dateStatuses]="!declarationEntry() && traceReplay() ? dateStatuses() : {}"
 						(dateSelected)="!declarationEntry() && selectCalendarDate($event)"
 					></app-calendar-month>
 				</mat-card-content>
@@ -1144,22 +619,13 @@
 	let-beforeLabel="beforeLabel"
 	let-afterLabel="afterLabel"
 	let-audit="audit"
-	let-traceEffect="traceEffect"
 >
 	<section class="criteria-detail">
 		<h4>
-			{{
-				traceEffect
-					? tr().planning.details.traceImpactTitle
-					: tr().planning.details.criteria
-			}}
+			{{ tr().planning.details.criteria }}
 		</h4>
 		<p class="calculation-intro">
-			{{
-				traceEffect
-					? tr().planning.details.traceImpactHelp
-					: tr().planning.details.criteriaHelp
-			}}
+			{{ tr().planning.details.criteriaHelp }}
 		</p>
 		<table class="impact-table criteria-table">
 			<thead>
@@ -1178,7 +644,7 @@
 					@if (objective.numeric) {
 						<tr
 							[class.decisive-row]="
-								!traceEffect && objective.id === comparison.firstDecisiveObjective
+								objective.id === comparison.firstDecisiveObjective
 							"
 						>
 							<th scope="row">
@@ -1191,10 +657,7 @@
 										? tr().planning.details.higher
 										: tr().planning.details.lower
 								}}</small>
-								@if (
-									!traceEffect &&
-									objective.id === comparison.firstDecisiveObjective
-								) {
+								@if (objective.id === comparison.firstDecisiveObjective) {
 									<span class="decisive-label">{{
 										tr().planning.details.firstDifference
 									}}</span>
@@ -1218,10 +681,7 @@
 						@if (!objective.numeric) {
 							<li>
 								{{ objective.label }}
-								@if (
-									!traceEffect &&
-									objective.id === comparison.firstDecisiveObjective
-								) {
+								@if (objective.id === comparison.firstDecisiveObjective) {
 									<span class="decisive-label">{{
 										tr().planning.details.firstDifference
 									}}</span>
@@ -1347,11 +807,7 @@
 					{{ tr().planning.comparison.title }}
 				</h2>
 				<p id="comparison-intro">
-					{{
-						traceReplay()
-							? tr().planning.explanation.traceHelp
-							: tr().planning.explanation.moveHelp
-					}}
+					{{ tr().planning.explanation.moveHelp }}
 				</p>
 			</div>
 			<button
@@ -1376,11 +832,7 @@
 			} @else if (counterfactual(); as analysis) {
 				<div class="comparison-date-pair">
 					<div class="original-date">
-						<span>{{
-							traceReplay()
-								? tr().planning.comparison.candidate
-								: tr().planning.explanation.plannedDate
-						}}</span>
+						<span>{{ tr().planning.explanation.plannedDate }}</span>
 						<strong>{{ displayDate(analysis.placement.date) }}</strong>
 					</div>
 					<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">arrow_forward</mat-icon>
@@ -1469,7 +921,7 @@
 									}
 								</div>
 							</div>
-						} @else if (!traceReplay() && result.date === analysis.placement.date) {
+						} @else if (result.date === analysis.placement.date) {
 							<p class="comparison-empty">{{ tr().planning.explanation.sameDate }}</p>
 						} @else {
 							<div class="comparison-result-heading">
@@ -1488,20 +940,10 @@
 													{{ tr().planning.explanation.criterion }}
 												</th>
 												<th scope="col">
-													{{
-														traceReplay()
-															? tr().planning.explanation
-																	.beforeDecision
-															: tr().planning.explanation.currentPlan
-													}}
+													{{ tr().planning.explanation.currentPlan }}
 												</th>
 												<th scope="col">
-													{{
-														traceReplay()
-															? tr().planning.explanation
-																	.withCandidate
-															: tr().planning.explanation.alternative
-													}}
+													{{ tr().planning.explanation.alternative }}
 												</th>
 											</tr>
 										</thead>
@@ -1529,34 +971,14 @@
 						<details class="technical-details date-calculation-details">
 							<summary>{{ tr().planning.technicalDetails }}</summary>
 							<div class="calculation-content">
-								<p>
-									<strong>{{ tr().planning.historical }}:</strong>
-									{{
-										dateStatuses()[result.date]?.label ??
-											traceStatusLabel(
-												result.historicalStatus ?? 'not-examined'
-											)
-									}}
-								</p>
-								@if (dateStatuses()[result.date]?.reason; as historicalReason) {
-									<p>
-										<strong>{{ tr().planning.reason }}:</strong>
-										{{ historicalReason }}
-									</p>
-								}
 								@if (dateComparison(); as comparison) {
 									<ng-container
 										[ngTemplateOutlet]="calculationTable"
 										[ngTemplateOutletContext]="{
 											comparison,
-											beforeLabel: traceReplay()
-												? tr().planning.explanation.beforeDecision
-												: tr().planning.explanation.currentPlan,
-											afterLabel: traceReplay()
-												? tr().planning.explanation.withCandidate
-												: tr().planning.explanation.alternative,
+											beforeLabel: tr().planning.explanation.currentPlan,
+											afterLabel: tr().planning.explanation.alternative,
 											audit: result,
-											traceEffect: traceReplay(),
 										}"
 									/>
 								} @else {
@@ -1583,9 +1005,7 @@
 				{{
 					counterfactualError()
 						? tr().planning.retryCounterfactual
-						: traceReplay()
-							? tr().planning.comparison.backToTrace
-							: tr().planning.comparison.backToPlan
+						: tr().planning.comparison.backToPlan
 				}}
 			</button>
 		</footer>
@@ -85,8 +85,7 @@ summary:focus-visible {
 }

 .results-header,
-.explanation-heading,
-.replay-notice {
+.explanation-heading {
 	display: flex;
 	flex-wrap: wrap;
 	align-items: center;
@@ -249,14 +248,12 @@ summary:focus-visible {
 }

 .placement-explanation,
-.outcome-explanation,
-.trace-decisions {
+.outcome-explanation {
 	display: grid;
 	gap: 1rem;
 	min-width: 0;
 }
-.placement-explanation,
-.trace-layout {
+.placement-explanation {
 	padding: 1.25rem;
 }
 .placement-explanation ul {
@@ -264,8 +261,7 @@ summary:focus-visible {
 	padding-inline-start: 1.25rem;
 }
 .break-story,
-.outcome-explanation,
-.replay-notice {
+.outcome-explanation {
 	padding: 1rem;
 	border-radius: var(--ui-radius-sm);
 	background: var(--ui-panel-bg);
@@ -339,17 +335,13 @@ summary:focus-visible {
 .compare-dates-button {
 	justify-self: start;
 }
-.placement-stepper,
-.trace-toolbar,
-.trace-decisions nav,
-.trace-phase-stepper {
+.placement-stepper {
 	display: flex;
 	flex-wrap: wrap;
 	align-items: center;
 	gap: 0.5rem;
 }
-.placement-stepper button,
-.trace-phase-stepper button {
+.placement-stepper button {
 	padding: 0.375rem;
 }
 output {
@@ -499,52 +491,6 @@ output {
 	box-shadow: none;
 }

-.trace-layout {
-	display: grid;
-	grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 0.35fr) minmax(0, 1fr);
-	gap: 1rem;
-}
-.trace-phases {
-	display: grid;
-	align-content: start;
-	gap: 0.5rem;
-	> button {
-		justify-content: space-between;
-		text-align: start;
-		overflow-wrap: anywhere;
-	}
-	.active {
-		border-inline-start: 4px solid var(--mat-sys-primary);
-	}
-	small {
-		color: var(--ui-text-secondary);
-		flex-shrink: 0;
-		white-space: nowrap;
-	}
-}
-.trace-phase-stepper {
-	justify-content: center;
-}
-.trace-decisions {
-	align-content: start;
-}
-.candidate-list {
-	display: grid;
-	gap: 0.5rem;
-	details {
-		padding: 0.5rem;
-		border: 1px solid var(--ui-border);
-		border-radius: var(--ui-radius-sm);
-		overflow-wrap: anywhere;
-	}
-}
-.trace-state-summary,
-.replay-notice {
-	padding: 0.75rem;
-	border: 1px solid var(--mat-sys-primary);
-	border-radius: var(--ui-radius-sm);
-}
-
 .loading-overlay {
 	position: absolute;
 	inset: 0;
@@ -576,18 +522,6 @@ output {
 	font-weight: 600;
 }

-@container calendar-year (max-width: 48rem) {
-	.trace-layout {
-		grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr);
-	}
-	.trace-phases {
-		grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(10rem, 1fr));
-	}
-	.trace-phase-stepper {
-		grid-column: 1 / -1;
-	}
-}
-
@container calendar-year (max-width: 35rem) {
 	.plan-insights {
 		grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr);
@@ -604,8 +538,7 @@ output {
 			font-size: 0.75rem;
 		}
 	}
-	.placement-explanation,
-	.trace-layout {
+	.placement-explanation {
 		padding: 0.875rem;
 	}
 	.placement-stepper {
@@ -30,17 +30,12 @@ import {
 	MatDialogRef,
 	MatDialogTitle,
 } from '@angular/material/dialog';
-import {
-	CalendarMonth,
-	CalendarDayStatus,
-	DeclarationPreview,
-} from '../calendar-month/calendar-month';
+import { CalendarMonth, DeclarationPreview } from '../calendar-month/calendar-month';
 import { addPlanningDays } from '../../services/planning-date';
 import { isWorkingPlanningDate } from '../../services/declared-non-working-days';
 import {
 	CalendarService,
 	calendarProjectionHorizon,
-	DayType,
 	SelectedDates,
 	SelectableDayType,
 	VacDay,
@@ -50,10 +45,8 @@ import { UserInputService } from '../../services/user-input-service';
 import { CalendarSettingsService } from '../../services/calendar-settings-service';
 import { PlanningDurationService } from '../../services/planning-duration.service';
 import {
-	applyReplayDeltas,
 	CounterfactualAnalysis,
 	CounterfactualSelection,
-	LeavePlacement,
 	LeaveType,
 	DeclaredNonWorkingDay,
 	PlanExplanation,
@@ -64,15 +57,9 @@ import {
 	PlanningObjectiveVector,
 	PlanningOutcome,
 	PlanningReason,
-	PlanningTrace,
-	PlanningTraceCandidate,
-	PlanningTraceDecision,
-	PlanningTraceState,
 } from '../../services/leave-planner.service';

 type PlacementExplanation = PlanExplanation['placements'][number];
-type TraceMoment = 'before' | 'after';
-type TraceTransition = Readonly<{ before: PlanningTraceState; after: PlanningTraceState }>;

@Component({
 	selector: 'app-calendar-year',
@@ -121,12 +108,8 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 	protected readonly planningOutcome = this.userInput.planningOutcomeSignal;
 	protected readonly planningExplanation = signal<PlanningExplanation | null>(null);
 	protected readonly explanationError = signal<PlanningReason | null>(null);
-	protected readonly planningTrace = this.userInput.planningTraceSignal;
-	protected readonly traceLoading = signal(false);
-	protected readonly traceResolved = this.userInput.traceResolvedSignal;
 	protected readonly selectedPlacementIndex = signal(0);
 	protected readonly planDetailsOpen = signal(false);
-	protected readonly traceOpen = signal(false);
 	private readonly planDetails = viewChild<ElementRef<HTMLDetailsElement>>('planDetails');
 	protected readonly counterfactual = signal<CounterfactualAnalysis | null>(null);
 	protected readonly selectedCounterfactualDate = signal<string | null>(null);
@@ -134,18 +117,7 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 	protected readonly counterfactualError = signal<string | null>(null);
 	protected readonly invalidComparisonDate = signal(false);
 	protected readonly comparisonDateInput = signal<Date | null>(null);
-	protected readonly tracePhaseIndex = signal(0);
-	protected readonly traceDecisionIndex = signal(0);
-	protected readonly traceCandidatePage = signal(0);
-	protected readonly traceMoment = signal<TraceMoment>('before');
-	protected readonly traceReplay = signal(false);
-	protected readonly selectedTraceDate = signal<string | null>(null);
 	protected readonly liveMessage = signal('');
-	private readonly historicalIneligibility = signal<ReadonlyMap<string, PlanningReason>>(
-		new Map(),
-	);
-	protected readonly historicalEligibilityLoading = signal(false);
-	protected readonly historicalEligibilityError = signal<string | null>(null);
 	protected readonly planningHorizon = signal<{ start: string; end: string } | null>(null);
 	protected readonly selectedDates = signal(new SelectedDates());
 	protected readonly declarationEntry = this.userInput.declarationEntrySignal;
@@ -179,21 +151,14 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 	protected readonly calendarDeclaredDays = computed<Readonly<Record<string, LeaveType>>>(() => {
 		const days = this.declarationEntry()
 			? this.userInput.declaredDaysSignal()
-			: (this.traceState()?.declaredDays ??
-				this.displayedPlan()?.declaredDays ??
-				this.resultDeclaredDays());
+			: (this.displayedPlan()?.declaredDays ?? this.resultDeclaredDays());
 		return Object.fromEntries(days.map(({ date, type }) => [date, type]));
 	});

 	private calculationVersion = 0;
 	private counterfactualVersion = 0;
-	private historicalEligibilityVersion = 0;
 	private activeCalculation: PlanningCalculationContext | null = null;
 	private runningCalculation: PlanningCalculationContext | null = null;
-	private readonly traceDecisionIndices = new WeakMap<
-		PlanningTrace,
-		ReadonlyMap<string, { decision: PlanningTraceDecision; ordinal: number }>
-	>();
 	private displayDateLocale = '';
 	private displayDateFormatter?: Intl.DateTimeFormat;

@@ -245,28 +210,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		() => this.planExplanation()?.placements[this.selectedPlacementIndex()],
 	);

-	protected readonly selectedTracePhase = computed(
-		() => this.planningTrace()?.phases[this.tracePhaseIndex()],
-	);
-
-	protected readonly selectedTraceDecision = computed(
-		() => this.selectedTracePhase()?.decisions[this.traceDecisionIndex()],
-	);
-	protected readonly selectedTraceTransition = computed(() =>
-		this.traceReplay()
-			? this.replayTraceTransition(this.planningTrace(), this.selectedTraceDecision())
-			: undefined,
-	);
-
-	protected readonly visibleTraceCandidates = computed(() => {
-		const start = this.traceCandidatePage() * 50;
-		return this.selectedTraceDecision()?.candidates.slice(start, start + 50) ?? [];
-	});
-
-	protected readonly traceCandidatePages = computed(() =>
-		Math.max(1, Math.ceil((this.selectedTraceDecision()?.candidates.length ?? 0) / 50)),
-	);
-
 	protected readonly selectedCounterfactualResult = computed(() =>
 		this.counterfactual()?.results.find(
 			(result) => result.date === this.selectedCounterfactualDate(),
@@ -314,12 +257,9 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		const analysis = this.counterfactual();
 		const comparison = this.selectedCounterfactualResult()?.comparison;
 		if (!analysis || !comparison) return undefined;
-		// Final-plan alternatives share a removed-day baseline. Compare their restored
-		// plans; a trace candidate instead uses the exact state before its decision.
-		const before = this.traceReplay()
-			? comparison.before
-			: analysis.results.find((result) => result.date === analysis.placement.date)?.comparison
-					?.after;
+		// Compare restored alternatives against the displayed plan.
+		const before = analysis.results.find((result) => result.date === analysis.placement.date)
+			?.comparison?.after;
 		return before
 			? {
 					before,
@@ -337,10 +277,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		this.numericChanges(this.dateComparison()?.before, this.dateComparison()?.after),
 	);

-	protected readonly traceState = computed(() => {
-		return this.selectedTraceTransition()?.[this.traceMoment()];
-	});
-
 	protected readonly calendarSelectedDates = computed(() => {
 		if (this.declarationEntry()) {
 			const horizon = this.calendarHorizon();
@@ -352,176 +288,22 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 					})
 				: new SelectedDates();
 		}
-		const state = this.traceState();
-		return state
-			? this.calendarService.selectedDatesForPlan({
-					placements: [...state.placements],
-					declaredDays: state.declaredDays,
-					horizon: { ...state.horizon },
-				})
-			: this.selectedDates();
+
+		return this.selectedDates();
 	});

 	protected readonly currentPlacementDate = computed(() => {
-		if (this.traceReplay())
-			return (
-				this.selectedCounterfactualDate() ??
-				this.selectedTraceDate() ??
-				this.selectedTraceDecision()?.dates[0] ??
-				null
-			);
 		return this.planDetailsOpen() ? (this.selectedExplanation()?.placement.date ?? null) : null;
 	});

 	protected readonly explainedPeriod = computed(() =>
-		this.planDetailsOpen() && !this.traceReplay()
-			? this.selectedExplanation()?.timeOffPeriod
-			: undefined,
+		this.planDetailsOpen() ? this.selectedExplanation()?.timeOffPeriod : undefined,
 	);

-	protected readonly dateStatuses = computed<Readonly<Record<string, CalendarDayStatus>>>(() => {
-		const statuses: Record<string, CalendarDayStatus> = {};
-		const trace = this.planningTrace();
-		const closedDayDates = new Set<string>();
-		for (const selected of this.selectedDates().datesSelected) {
-			if (selected.type !== DayType.CLOSED_DAY || !selected.range.start) continue;
-			const day = selected.range.start;
-			closedDayDates.add(
-				`${String(day.getFullYear()).padStart(4, '0')}-${String(day.getMonth() + 1).padStart(2, '0')}-${String(day.getDate()).padStart(2, '0')}`,
-			);
-		}
-		if (this.traceReplay() && trace) {
-			const priority = new Map([
-				['ineligible', 0],
-				['not-examined', 1],
-				['pruned', 2],
-				['evaluated-rejected', 3],
-				['chosen', 4],
-			]);
-			for (
-				let timestamp = Date.parse(`${trace.initialState.horizon.start}T00:00:00Z`),
-					end = Date.parse(`${trace.initialState.horizon.end}T00:00:00Z`);
-				timestamp < end;
-				timestamp += 86_400_000
-			) {
-				const date = new Date(timestamp).toISOString().slice(0, 10);
-				statuses[date] = {
-					kind: 'not-examined',
-					label: this.traceStatusLabel('not-examined'),
-				};
-			}
-			for (const date of Object.keys(statuses)) {
-				const reason = this.nonWorkingDateReason(date, closedDayDates);
-				if (reason)
-					statuses[date] = {
-						kind: 'ineligible',
-						label: this.traceStatusLabel('ineligible'),
-						reason,
-					};
-			}
-			const explicitPriorities = new Map<string, number>();
-			for (const candidate of this.selectedTraceDecision()?.candidates ?? []) {
-				for (const date of candidate.dates ?? (candidate.date ? [candidate.date] : [])) {
-					const candidatePriority = priority.get(candidate.status)!;
-					if (candidatePriority > (explicitPriorities.get(date) ?? -1)) {
-						statuses[date] = {
-							kind: candidate.status,
-							label: this.traceStatusLabel(candidate.status),
-							reason: candidate.reason?.message,
-						};
-						explicitPriorities.set(date, candidatePriority);
-					}
-				}
-			}
-			for (const [date, reason] of this.historicalIneligibility()) {
-				if (statuses[date]?.kind !== 'not-examined') continue;
-				statuses[date] = {
-					kind: 'ineligible',
-					label: this.traceStatusLabel('ineligible'),
-					reason: this.reasonLabel(reason),
-				};
-			}
-			const decision = this.selectedTraceDecision();
-			if (decision) {
-				const changedDates = new Set<string>();
-				const setChange = (
-					date: string | undefined,
-					change: NonNullable<CalendarDayStatus['change']>,
-				) => {
-					if (!date) return;
-					changedDates.add(date);
-					statuses[date] = {
-						...(statuses[date] ?? {
-							kind: 'not-examined',
-							label: this.traceStatusLabel('not-examined'),
-						}),
-						change,
-						changeLabel: this.traceChangeLabel(change),
-					};
-				};
-				for (const delta of decision.branch?.deltas ?? decision.deltas) {
-					if (delta.kind === 'placement-added') setChange(delta.date, 'added');
-					else if (delta.kind === 'placement-removed') setChange(delta.date, 'removed');
-					else if (delta.kind === 'placement-moved') {
-						setChange(delta.fromDate, 'moved-from');
-						setChange(delta.toDate, 'moved-to');
-					} else if (delta.kind === 'placement-updated') setChange(delta.date, 'shared');
-				}
-				const transition = this.selectedTraceTransition();
-				for (const placement of [
-					...(transition?.before.placements ?? []),
-					...(transition?.after.placements ?? []),
-				]) {
-					if (!changedDates.has(placement.date)) setChange(placement.date, 'unchanged');
-				}
-			}
-			for (const result of this.counterfactual()?.results ?? []) {
-				const status = statuses[result.date];
-				const historicalStatus =
-					result.historicalStatus ??
-					(status && status.kind !== 'eligible' ? status.kind : 'not-examined');
-				statuses[result.date] = {
-					...status,
-					kind: historicalStatus,
-					label: this.traceStatusLabel(historicalStatus),
-					reason: result.historicalReason
-						? this.reasonLabel(result.historicalReason)
-						: status?.reason,
-					hypotheticalLabel:
-						result.status === 'eligible'
-							? this.tr().planning.eligible
-							: this.tr().planning.ineligible,
-					hypotheticalReason: result.reason?.message,
-				};
-			}
-			return statuses;
-		}
-		for (const result of this.counterfactual()?.results ?? []) {
-			const nonWorkingReason = this.nonWorkingDateReason(result.date, closedDayDates);
-			const historicalStatus =
-				result.historicalStatus ?? (nonWorkingReason ? 'ineligible' : 'not-examined');
-			statuses[result.date] = {
-				kind: historicalStatus,
-				label: this.traceStatusLabel(historicalStatus),
-				reason: result.historicalReason
-					? this.reasonLabel(result.historicalReason)
-					: historicalStatus === 'ineligible'
-						? nonWorkingReason
-						: undefined,
-				hypotheticalLabel:
-					result.status === 'eligible'
-						? this.tr().planning.eligible
-						: this.tr().planning.ineligible,
-				hypotheticalReason: result.reason?.message,
-			};
-		}
-		return statuses;
-	});
-
 	protected readonly months = computed(() => {
 		const horizon = this.calendarHorizon();
 		if (!horizon) return [];
-		const plan = this.traceState() ?? this.displayedPlan();
+		const plan = this.displayedPlan();
 		const projectionHorizon =
 			!this.declarationEntry() && plan
 				? (calendarProjectionHorizon(plan) ?? horizon)
@@ -555,7 +337,7 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		effect(() => {
 			if (this.declarationEntry())
 				untracked(() => {
-					this.showFinalPlan();
+					this.clearCounterfactual();
 					this.liveMessage.set(this.tr().bookedDays.enter);
 				});
 		});
@@ -670,8 +452,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		};
 		this.applyOutcome({ kind: 'PlanningIncomplete', completedStages: [], reasons: [reason] });
 		this.explanationError.set(reason);
-		this.traceLoading.set(false);
-		this.traceResolved.set(true);
 		this.loadingProgress.set(100);
 		this.isLoading.set(false);
 	}
@@ -683,20 +463,9 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		this.planningOutcome.set(null);
 		this.planningExplanation.set(null);
 		this.explanationError.set(null);
-		this.planningTrace.set(null);
-		this.traceLoading.set(true);
-		this.traceResolved.set(false);
 		this.selectedPlacementIndex.set(0);
 		this.planDetailsOpen.set(false);
-		this.traceOpen.set(false);
 		this.clearCounterfactual();
-		this.tracePhaseIndex.set(0);
-		this.traceDecisionIndex.set(0);
-		this.traceCandidatePage.set(0);
-		this.traceMoment.set('before');
-		this.traceReplay.set(false);
-		this.clearHistoricalEligibility();
-		this.selectedTraceDate.set(null);
 		this.selectedDates.set(this.calendarService.getSelectedDatesForHorizon(horizon));
 		this.userInput.remainingVacationDaysSignal.set([]);
 	}
@@ -736,44 +505,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 				this.explanationError.set(reason);
 				this.liveMessage.set(`${this.tr().planning.explanationError} ${reason.message}`);
 			});
-		void calculation.trace
-			.then((trace) => {
-				if (calculation !== this.activeCalculation) return;
-				this.planningTrace.set(trace ?? null);
-				this.traceResolved.set(true);
-				this.liveMessage.set(
-					trace?.status === 'failed'
-						? this.tr().planning.traceUnavailable
-						: this.tr().planning.traceReady,
-				);
-			})
-			.catch((error: unknown) => {
-				if (calculation !== this.activeCalculation) return;
-				this.planningTrace.set({
-					status: 'failed',
-					initialState: {
-						calculationDate: calculation.snapshot.calculationDate,
-						horizon: calculation.snapshot.horizon,
-						...(calculation.snapshot.declaredDays
-							? { declaredDays: calculation.snapshot.declaredDays }
-							: {}),
-						balances: [],
-						placements: [],
-						earnedActivations: [],
-					},
-					phases: [],
-					completedStages: [],
-					error: {
-						code: 'trace-error',
-						message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error),
-					},
-				});
-				this.traceResolved.set(true);
-				this.liveMessage.set(this.tr().planning.traceUnavailable);
-			})
-			.finally(() => {
-				if (calculation === this.activeCalculation) this.traceLoading.set(false);
-			});
 	}

 	private applyOutcome(outcome: PlanningOutcome): void {
@@ -833,7 +564,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		if (!explanation?.placements.length) return;
 		const selected = Math.max(0, Math.min(index, explanation.placements.length - 1));
 		this.selectedPlacementIndex.set(selected);
-		this.traceReplay.set(false);
 		this.clearCounterfactual();
 		this.selectedCounterfactualDate.set(explanation.placements[selected].placement.date);
 		if (announce) this.liveMessage.set(this.placementAnnouncement());
@@ -863,19 +593,10 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		if (open === this.planDetailsOpen()) return;
 		this.planDetailsOpen.set(open);
 		if (open) {
-			this.traceOpen.set(false);
 			this.selectPlacement(this.selectedPlacementIndex());
 		} else this.clearCounterfactual();
 	}

-	protected toggleTrace(event: Event): void {
-		const open = (event.currentTarget as HTMLDetailsElement).open;
-		if (open === this.traceOpen()) return;
-		this.traceOpen.set(open);
-		if (open) this.planDetailsOpen.set(false);
-		this.showFinalPlan();
-	}
-
 	protected stepPlacement(step: 'first' | 'previous' | 'next' | 'last'): void {
 		const last = (this.planExplanation()?.placements.length ?? 1) - 1;
 		const current = this.selectedPlacementIndex();
@@ -1064,7 +785,7 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 			return;
 		}
 		const declaredType = this.calendarDeclaredDays()[date];
-		if (declaredType && !this.traceReplay() && !this.counterfactual()) {
+		if (declaredType && !this.counterfactual()) {
 			this.liveMessage.set(
 				`${this.displayDate(date)}. ${this.tr().bookedDays.booked} (${this.translationService.getDayTypeLabel(declaredType)}). ${this.tr().bookedDays.fixed}`,
 			);
@@ -1074,212 +795,34 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 			this.invalidComparisonDate.set(false);
 			this.comparisonDateInput.set(new Date(`${date}T00:00:00`));
 		}
-		if (!this.traceReplay() && !this.counterfactual() && !this.counterfactualLoading()) {
+		if (!this.counterfactual() && !this.counterfactualLoading()) {
 			const index = this.planExplanation()?.placements.findIndex(
 				(explanation) => explanation.placement.date === date,
 			);
 			if (index !== undefined && index >= 0) {
 				this.planDetailsOpen.set(true);
-				this.traceOpen.set(false);
 				this.selectPlacement(index);
 				return;
 			}
 		}
-		if (this.traceReplay()) {
-			this.selectedTraceDate.set(date);
-			if (this.counterfactual()?.results.some((result) => result.date === date))
-				this.selectedCounterfactualDate.set(date);
-			this.liveMessage.set(this.dateStatusAnnouncement(date, this.dateStatuses()[date]));
-			return;
-		}
 		if (this.counterfactual()?.results.some((result) => result.date === date)) {
 			this.selectedCounterfactualDate.set(date);
-			this.liveMessage.set(this.dateStatusAnnouncement(date, this.dateStatuses()[date]));
+			this.liveMessage.set(this.dateStatusAnnouncement(date));
 		}
 	}

-	private dateStatusAnnouncement(date: string, status?: CalendarDayStatus): string {
+	private dateStatusAnnouncement(date: string): string {
+		const result = this.counterfactual()?.results.find((result) => result.date === date);
 		return [
 			date,
-			status?.label,
-			status?.reason,
-			status?.hypotheticalLabel
-				? `${this.tr().planning.counterfactual}: ${status.hypotheticalLabel}`
-				: undefined,
-			status?.hypotheticalReason
-				? `${this.tr().planning.reason}: ${status.hypotheticalReason}`
-				: undefined,
-			status?.changeLabel,
+			this.tr().planning.counterfactual,
+			result ? this.tr().planning[result.status] : undefined,
+			result?.reason ? this.reasonLabel(result.reason) : undefined,
 		]
 			.filter(Boolean)
 			.join('. ');
 	}

-	protected selectTracePhase(index: number): void {
-		const last = (this.planningTrace()?.phases.length ?? 1) - 1;
-		index = Math.max(0, Math.min(index, last));
-		this.tracePhaseIndex.set(index);
-		this.traceDecisionIndex.set(0);
-		this.traceCandidatePage.set(0);
-		this.traceMoment.set('before');
-		this.traceReplay.set(false);
-		this.clearHistoricalEligibility();
-		this.selectedTraceDate.set(null);
-		this.clearCounterfactual();
-		this.liveMessage.set(this.tracePhaseAnnouncement());
-	}
-
-	protected stepTracePhase(step: 'first' | 'previous' | 'next' | 'last'): void {
-		const last = (this.planningTrace()?.phases.length ?? 1) - 1;
-		const current = this.tracePhaseIndex();
-		const target =
-			step === 'first'
-				? 0
-				: step === 'last'
-					? last
-					: step === 'previous'
-						? current - 1
-						: current + 1;
-		if (target !== current) this.selectTracePhase(target);
-	}
-
-	protected selectTraceDecision(index: number): void {
-		const last = (this.selectedTracePhase()?.decisions.length ?? 1) - 1;
-		index = Math.max(0, Math.min(index, last));
-		this.traceDecisionIndex.set(index);
-		this.traceCandidatePage.set(0);
-		this.traceMoment.set('before');
-		this.traceReplay.set(true);
-		this.selectedTraceDate.set(this.selectedTraceDecision()?.dates[0] ?? null);
-		this.clearCounterfactual();
-		this.liveMessage.set(this.traceDecisionAnnouncement());
-		void this.loadHistoricalEligibility();
-	}
-
-	private selectedDecisionPlacement(decision: PlanningTraceDecision): LeavePlacement | undefined {
-		const placements = [
-			...decision.candidates.flatMap((candidate) =>
-				candidate.placement ? [candidate.placement] : [],
-			),
-			...(decision.branch?.deltas ?? decision.deltas).flatMap((delta) =>
-				delta.placement ? [delta.placement] : [],
-			),
-		];
-		const selectedDate = this.selectedTraceDate() ?? decision.dates[0];
-		return placements.find((placement) => placement.date === selectedDate) ?? placements[0];
-	}
-
-	private clearHistoricalEligibility(): void {
-		this.historicalEligibilityVersion++;
-		this.historicalIneligibility.set(new Map());
-		this.historicalEligibilityLoading.set(false);
-		this.historicalEligibilityError.set(null);
-	}
-
-	private async loadHistoricalEligibility(): Promise<void> {
-		const version = ++this.historicalEligibilityVersion;
-		this.historicalIneligibility.set(new Map());
-		this.historicalEligibilityLoading.set(false);
-		this.historicalEligibilityError.set(null);
-		const calculation = this.activeCalculation;
-		const decision = this.selectedTraceDecision();
-		const placement = decision && this.selectedDecisionPlacement(decision);
-		if (!this.traceReplay() || !calculation || !decision || !placement) return;
-		this.historicalEligibilityLoading.set(true);
-		this.liveMessage.set(this.tr().planning.historicalEligibilityLoading);
-		try {
-			const reasons = await calculation.historicalEligibility({
-				decisionId: decision.id,
-				placement,
-			});
-			if (
-				version !== this.historicalEligibilityVersion ||
-				calculation !== this.activeCalculation
-			)
-				return;
-			this.historicalIneligibility.set(
-				new Map(reasons.map(({ date, reason }) => [date, reason])),
-			);
-			this.liveMessage.set(this.tr().planning.historicalEligibilityReady);
-		} catch (error) {
-			if (version !== this.historicalEligibilityVersion) return;
-			this.historicalIneligibility.set(new Map());
-			const message = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error);
-			this.historicalEligibilityError.set(message);
-			this.liveMessage.set(`${this.tr().planning.historicalEligibilityError} ${message}`);
-		} finally {
-			if (version === this.historicalEligibilityVersion)
-				this.historicalEligibilityLoading.set(false);
-		}
-	}
-
-	protected retryHistoricalEligibility(): void {
-		void this.loadHistoricalEligibility();
-	}
-
-	protected stepTraceDecision(step: 'first' | 'previous' | 'next' | 'last'): void {
-		const last = (this.selectedTracePhase()?.decisions.length ?? 1) - 1;
-		const current = this.traceDecisionIndex();
-		const target =
-			step === 'first'
-				? 0
-				: step === 'last'
-					? last
-					: step === 'previous'
-						? current - 1
-						: current + 1;
-		if (target !== current) this.selectTraceDecision(target);
-	}
-
-	protected stepTraceCandidatePage(direction: -1 | 1): void {
-		const page = Math.max(
-			0,
-			Math.min(this.traceCandidatePage() + direction, this.traceCandidatePages() - 1),
-		);
-		if (page === this.traceCandidatePage()) return;
-		this.traceCandidatePage.set(page);
-		this.liveMessage.set(
-			`${this.tr().planning.page} ${this.traceCandidatePage() + 1} ${this.tr().planning.of} ${this.traceCandidatePages()}`,
-		);
-	}
-
-	protected showTraceMoment(moment: TraceMoment): void {
-		this.clearCounterfactual();
-		this.traceMoment.set(moment);
-		this.traceReplay.set(true);
-		this.liveMessage.set(`${this.tr().planning[moment]} ${this.traceDecisionAnnouncement()}`);
-		void this.loadHistoricalEligibility();
-	}
-
-	protected showFinalPlan(): void {
-		this.traceReplay.set(false);
-		this.clearHistoricalEligibility();
-		this.clearCounterfactual();
-		this.liveMessage.set(this.tr().planning.finalPlan);
-	}
-
-	protected analyzeTraceCandidate(candidate: PlanningTraceCandidate): void {
-		const decision = this.selectedTraceDecision();
-		if (!candidate.placement || !decision) return;
-		this.traceMoment.set('before');
-		this.traceReplay.set(true);
-		this.selectedTraceDate.set(candidate.placement.date);
-		void this.analyzeSelection(
-			{ decisionId: decision.id, placement: candidate.placement },
-			true,
-		);
-	}
-
-	private nonWorkingDateReason(
-		date: string,
-		closedDayDates: ReadonlySet<string>,
-	): string | undefined {
-		const day = new Date(`${date}T00:00:00`);
-		if (day.getDay() === 0 || day.getDay() === 6) return this.tr().dayTypes.weekend;
-		if (closedDayDates.has(date)) return this.tr().dayTypes.closedDay;
-		return undefined;
-	}
-
 	private counterfactualSelection: CounterfactualSelection | null = null;

 	private async analyzeSelection(
@@ -1295,12 +838,7 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		this.counterfactualLoading.set(true);
 		this.invalidComparisonDate.set(false);
 		if (openDialog) this.openComparisonDialog();
-		const placement =
-			typeof selection === 'string'
-				? selection
-				: 'placement' in selection
-					? selection.placement
-					: selection;
+		const placement = selection;
 		this.liveMessage.set(
 			`${this.tr().planning.counterfactualLoading} ${typeof placement === 'string' ? this.displayDate(placement) : this.displayDate(placement.date)}`,
 		);
@@ -1312,9 +850,7 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 				this.counterfactual.set(result);
 				if (openDialog || this.comparisonDialog)
 					this.selectCalendarDate(
-						this.traceReplay()
-							? result.placement.date
-							: (this.nearbyComparisonDates()[0]?.date ?? result.placement.date),
+						this.nearbyComparisonDates()[0]?.date ?? result.placement.date,
 					);
 				this.liveMessage.set(this.tr().planning.counterfactualReady);
 			}
@@ -1362,113 +898,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		this.comparisonDateInput.set(null);
 	}

-	private replayTraceTransition(
-		trace: PlanningTrace | null,
-		decision: PlanningTraceDecision | undefined,
-	): TraceTransition | undefined {
-		if (!trace || !decision) return undefined;
-		const state = {
-			balances: trace.initialState.balances.map((balance) => ({ ...balance })),
-			placements: new Map(
-				trace.initialState.placements.map((placement) => [
-					placement.date,
-					{ ...placement, ruleIds: [...placement.ruleIds] },
-				]),
-			),
-			earnedActivations: trace.initialState.earnedActivations.map((activation) => ({
-				...activation,
-				dates: [...activation.dates],
-			})),
-		};
-		const snapshot = (): PlanningTraceState => ({
-			calculationDate: trace.initialState.calculationDate,
-			horizon: { ...trace.initialState.horizon },
-			...(trace.initialState.declaredDays
-				? { declaredDays: trace.initialState.declaredDays }
-				: {}),
-			balances: state.balances.map((balance) => ({ ...balance })),
-			placements: [...state.placements.values()].map((placement) => ({
-				...placement,
-				ruleIds: [...placement.ruleIds],
-			})),
-			earnedActivations: state.earnedActivations.map((activation) => ({
-				...activation,
-				dates: [...activation.dates],
-			})),
-		});
-		if (decision.branch) {
-			const decisionIndex = this.getTraceDecisionIndex(trace);
-			const target = decisionIndex.get(decision.id);
-			if (!target) return undefined;
-			const branchAncestors: PlanningTraceDecision[] = [];
-			const visited = new Set([decision.id]);
-			let current = decision;
-			let committedParentOrdinal: number | undefined;
-			while (current.branch) {
-				branchAncestors.unshift(current);
-				const parentId = current.branch.parentDecisionId;
-				if (!parentId) break;
-				if (visited.has(parentId)) return undefined;
-				visited.add(parentId);
-				const parent = decisionIndex.get(parentId);
-				if (!parent) return undefined;
-				if (!parent.decision.branch) {
-					committedParentOrdinal = parent.ordinal;
-					break;
-				}
-				current = parent.decision;
-			}
-			const branchRoot = branchAncestors[0];
-			const branchRootIndex = branchRoot && decisionIndex.get(branchRoot.id)?.ordinal;
-			if (branchRootIndex === undefined || target.ordinal < branchRootIndex) return undefined;
-			const replayThrough = committedParentOrdinal ?? branchRootIndex - 1;
-			if (replayThrough >= branchRootIndex) return undefined;
-			let ordinal = 0;
-			for (const phase of trace.phases) {
-				for (const prior of phase.decisions) {
-					if (ordinal++ > replayThrough) break;
-					applyReplayDeltas(state, prior.deltas);
-				}
-				if (ordinal > replayThrough) break;
-			}
-			for (const ancestor of branchAncestors.slice(0, -1))
-				applyReplayDeltas(state, ancestor.branch!.deltas);
-			const before = snapshot();
-			applyReplayDeltas(state, decision.branch.deltas);
-			return { before, after: snapshot() };
-		}
-		for (const phase of trace.phases) {
-			for (const prior of phase.decisions) {
-				if (prior.id === decision.id) {
-					const before = snapshot();
-					applyReplayDeltas(state, prior.deltas);
-					return { before, after: snapshot() };
-				}
-				applyReplayDeltas(state, prior.deltas);
-			}
-		}
-		return undefined;
-	}
-
-	private getTraceDecisionIndex(
-		trace: PlanningTrace,
-	): ReadonlyMap<string, { decision: PlanningTraceDecision; ordinal: number }> {
-		let index = this.traceDecisionIndices.get(trace);
-		if (!index) {
-			const decisions = new Map<
-				string,
-				{ decision: PlanningTraceDecision; ordinal: number }
-			>();
-			let ordinal = 0;
-			for (const phase of trace.phases)
-				for (const decision of phase.decisions)
-					decisions.set(decision.id, { decision, ordinal: ordinal++ });
-			index = decisions;
-			this.traceDecisionIndices.set(trace, index);
-		}
-		return index;
-	}
-
 	protected placementAnnouncement(): string {
 		const selected = this.selectedExplanation();
 		const count = this.planExplanation()?.placements.length ?? 0;
@@ -1480,18 +909,6 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		return explanation.contributions.some((contribution) => contribution.kind === 'at-risk');
 	}

-	protected tracePhaseAnnouncement(): string {
-		const phases = this.planningTrace()?.phases ?? [];
-		const phase = phases[this.tracePhaseIndex()];
-		return `${this.tr().planning.phases} ${this.tracePhaseIndex() + 1} ${this.tr().planning.of} ${phases.length}${phase ? `: ${this.phaseLabel(phase.name)}` : ''}`;
-	}
-
-	protected traceDecisionAnnouncement(): string {
-		const decisions = this.selectedTracePhase()?.decisions ?? [];
-		const decision = decisions[this.traceDecisionIndex()];
-		return `${this.tr().planning.decision} ${this.traceDecisionIndex() + 1} ${this.tr().planning.of} ${decisions.length}${decision?.dates.length ? `: ${decision.dates.join(', ')}` : ''}`;
-	}
-
 	protected hasPlannerError(): boolean {
 		const outcome = this.planningOutcome();
 		return (
@@ -1536,6 +953,24 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 	}

 	protected objectiveCopy(id: string) {
+		if (id.startsWith('optimization:')) {
+			const ruleId = id.slice('optimization:'.length);
+			const rule = this.activeCalculation?.snapshot.rules.find(
+				(candidate) => candidate.id === ruleId,
+			);
+			const copy = this.tr().planning.explanation.objectives['optimization'];
+			return {
+				...copy,
+				label: copy.label
+					.replace('{rule}', this.ruleLabel(ruleId))
+					.replace(
+						'{summary}',
+						rule && 'configuration' in rule
+							? this.translationService.optimizationSummary(rule.configuration)
+							: '',
+					),
+			};
+		}
 		const key = id.startsWith('preference:') ? 'preference' : id;
 		const copy = this.tr().planning.explanation.objectives[key];
 		const rule =
@@ -1609,22 +1044,10 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		return value instanceof Date ? value.toISOString().slice(0, 10) : value.slice(0, 10);
 	}

-	protected traceStatusLabel(status: PlanningTraceCandidate['status']): string {
-		return this.tr().planning.traceStatuses[status];
-	}
-
 	protected reasonLabel(reason: PlanningReason): string {
 		return this.tr().planning.explanation.unavailable[reason.code] ?? reason.message;
 	}

-	protected tracePhaseStatusLabel(status: 'completed' | 'interrupted' | 'not-run'): string {
-		return this.tr().planning.tracePhaseStatuses[status];
-	}
-
-	protected traceChangeLabel(change: NonNullable<CalendarDayStatus['change']>): string {
-		return this.tr().planning.traceChanges[change];
-	}
-
 	protected formatIdentifier(value: string): string {
 		return value.replaceAll('-', ' ').replaceAll(':', ': ');
 	}
@@ -1645,7 +1068,7 @@ export class CalendarYear {
 		if (stage === 'validation') return 5;
 		if (stage === 'obligations') return 20;
 		if (stage === 'at-risk') return 35;
-		if (stage.startsWith('preference:')) return 50;
+		if (stage.startsWith('preference:') || stage.startsWith('optimization:')) return 50;
 		if (stage === 'holiday-week-value') return 58;
 		if (stage === 'non-working-day-gain') return 65;
 		if (stage === 'longest-work-sequence') return 72;
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+import { provideZonelessChangeDetection } from '@angular/core';
+import { ComponentFixture, TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
+import { By } from '@angular/platform-browser';
+import { MatExpansionPanel } from '@angular/material/expansion';
+import { RulesPanel } from './rules-panel';
+import { RuleService, RuleType, type OptimizationRule } from '../../services/rule-service';
+import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';
+import {
+	OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS,
+	type OptimizationConfiguration,
+} from '../../services/planning-objectives';
+import { calculatePlanningInternal } from '../../services/leave-planner.core';
+
+describe('calendar rule editing and persistence', () => {
+	let fixture: ComponentFixture<RulesPanel>;
+	let service: RuleService;
+	let translations: TranslationService;
+
+	async function openEditor() {
+		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
+			imports: [RulesPanel],
+			providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
+		}).compileComponents();
+		service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		translations = TestBed.inject(TranslationService);
+		translations.setLanguage('fr');
+		fixture = TestBed.createComponent(RulesPanel);
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+		fixture.debugElement.query(By.directive(MatExpansionPanel)).componentInstance.open();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+	}
+
+	beforeEach(async () => {
+		localStorage.clear();
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
+		await openEditor();
+		for (const rule of service.rules) service.deleteRule(rule.id);
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+	});
+	afterEach(() => localStorage.clear());
+
+	async function select(label: string, value: string) {
+		const fields: HTMLElement[] = Array.from(
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('mat-form-field'),
+		);
+		const field = fields.find(
+			(candidate) => candidate.querySelector('mat-label')?.textContent?.trim() === label,
+		);
+		const control = field?.querySelector<HTMLElement>('mat-select');
+		if (!control) throw new Error(`Missing labelled control: ${label}`);
+		const labels = (control.getAttribute('aria-labelledby') ?? '')
+			.split(/\s+/)
+			.map((id) => document.getElementById(id)?.textContent?.trim());
+		expect(labels).toContain(label);
+		control.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const option = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll<HTMLElement>('mat-option')).find(
+			(candidate) => candidate.textContent?.trim() === value,
+		);
+		if (!option) throw new Error(`Missing translated option: ${value}`);
+		option.click();
+		document.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.cdk-overlay-backdrop')?.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+	}
+
+	async function add(name: string, configuration: OptimizationConfiguration) {
+		const tr = translations.tr().rules;
+		const buttons: HTMLButtonElement[] = Array.from(
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.add-buttons button'),
+		);
+		buttons.find((button) => button.textContent?.includes(tr.optimization.newRule))!.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const nameInput: HTMLInputElement =
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.rule-editor input');
+		nameInput.value = name;
+		nameInput.dispatchEvent(new Event('input', { bubbles: true }));
+		await select(
+			tr.optimization.elementsLabel,
+			tr.optimization.elements[configuration.elements],
+		);
+		for (const condition of configuration.conditions)
+			await select(tr.optimization.conditionsLabel, tr.optimization.conditions[condition]);
+		await select(
+			tr.optimization.aggregationLabel,
+			tr.optimization.aggregations[configuration.aggregation],
+		);
+		await select(
+			tr.optimization.directionLabel,
+			tr.optimization.directions[configuration.direction],
+		);
+		const actions: HTMLButtonElement[] = Array.from(
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.editor-actions button'),
+		);
+		actions.find((button) => button.textContent?.trim() === tr.add)!.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+	}
+
+	function calculate() {
+		let objectiveValues: readonly { id: string; value: number | string }[] = [];
+		const plan = calculatePlanningInternal(
+			{
+				calculationDate: '2024-04-01',
+				horizon: { start: '2024-04-29', end: '2024-05-18' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'cp',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 3,
+						availableFrom: '2024-04-29',
+						expiryDate: '2025-01-01',
+					},
+				],
+				rules: service.rules,
+			},
+			undefined,
+			({ explanation }) => {
+				if (explanation?.kind === 'PlanExplanation')
+					objectiveValues = explanation.placements[0]?.objectiveVector.objectives ?? [];
+			},
+		);
+		if (plan.kind !== 'Plan')
+			throw new Error('Expected a plan from saved editor configuration');
+		return { plan, objectiveValues };
+	}
+
+	it('creates both recipes, reverses their order, edits a compatible aggregation and restores it on reload', async () => {
+		await add('Mes semaines fériées', OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue);
+		await add('Mes week-ends', OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain);
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			holidayWeekValue: 5,
+			nonWorkingDayGain: 6,
+		});
+		const items: HTMLElement[] = Array.from(
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.rule-item'),
+		);
+		items[1].querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('.rule-actions button')!.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			holidayWeekValue: 0,
+			nonWorkingDayGain: 9,
+		});
+		const holiday = service.rules.find(
+			(rule): rule is OptimizationRule =>
+				rule.type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION &&
+				rule.configuration.elements === 'public-holiday-weeks',
+		)!;
+		fixture.componentInstance.startEdit(holiday, new Event('click'));
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		await select(
+			translations.tr().rules.optimization.aggregationLabel,
+			translations.tr().rules.optimization.aggregations.count,
+		);
+		fixture.componentInstance.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		await expect
+			.poll(
+				() =>
+					JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).rules[1]?.configuration
+						?.aggregation,
+			)
+			.toBe('count');
+		const saved = service.rules;
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		await openEditor();
+		expect(service.rules).toEqual(saved);
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			holidayWeekValue: 0,
+			nonWorkingDayGain: 9,
+		});
+		fixture.componentInstance.moveRule(1, -1, new Event('click'));
+		const edited = calculate();
+		expect(edited.plan.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(5);
+		expect(
+			edited.objectiveValues.find(
+				(objective) => objective.id === `optimization:${holiday.id}`,
+			)?.value,
+		).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('creates economy, edits its name, moves it with the focusable control and restores disable/delete choices', async () => {
+		await add('Mes semaines fériées', OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue);
+		await add('Économiser les jours d’appoint', OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements);
+		const economy = service.rules[1];
+		expect(economy).toMatchObject({
+			force: 'preference',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+		});
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(3);
+		const move: HTMLButtonElement = fixture.nativeElement
+			.querySelectorAll('.rule-item')[1]
+			.querySelector('.rule-actions button');
+		move.focus();
+		expect(document.activeElement).toBe(move);
+		move.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(calculate().plan.placements).toEqual([]);
+
+		fixture.componentInstance.startEdit(service.rules[0], new Event('click'));
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const input: HTMLInputElement = fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.rule-editor input');
+		input.value = 'Mes jours conservés';
+		input.dispatchEvent(new Event('input', { bubbles: true }));
+		fixture.componentInstance.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const toggle: HTMLButtonElement = fixture.nativeElement
+			.querySelector('.rule-item')
+			.querySelector('button[role="switch"]');
+		toggle.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(3);
+		await expect
+			.poll(() => JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).rules[0]?.enabled)
+			.toBe(false);
+		const saved = service.rules;
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		await openEditor();
+		expect(service.rules).toEqual(saved);
+		expect(service.rules[0]).toMatchObject({ id: economy.id, name: 'Mes jours conservés' });
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(3);
+		fixture.componentInstance.toggleRule(economy.id);
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(calculate().plan.placements).toEqual([]);
+		const remove: HTMLButtonElement = fixture.nativeElement
+			.querySelector('.rule-item')
+			.querySelector(`[aria-label="${translations.tr().rules.deleteRule}"]`);
+		remove.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(3);
+		await expect
+			.poll(() => JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).rules.length)
+			.toBe(1);
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		await openEditor();
+		expect(service.rules.map(({ id }) => id)).not.toContain(economy.id);
+		expect(calculate().plan.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(3);
+	});
+});
@@ -183,6 +183,8 @@
 									</mat-select>
 								</mat-form-field>
 							</div>
+						} @else if ($any(editBuffer).type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION) {
+							<ng-container [ngTemplateOutlet]="optimizationEditor" />
 						} @else {
 							<div class="editor-row">
 								<mat-form-field>
@@ -239,6 +241,9 @@
 							</div>
 						}

+						@if (validationError()) {
+							<p role="alert">{{ validationError() }}</p>
+						}
 						<div class="editor-actions">
 							<button mat-button (click)="cancelEdit()">
 								{{ tr().rules.cancel }}
@@ -338,6 +343,8 @@
 								</mat-select>
 							</mat-form-field>
 						</div>
+					} @else if ($any(editBuffer).type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION) {
+						<ng-container [ngTemplateOutlet]="optimizationEditor" />
 					} @else {
 						<div class="editor-row">
 							<mat-form-field>
@@ -394,6 +401,9 @@
 						</div>
 					}

+					@if (validationError()) {
+						<p role="alert">{{ validationError() }}</p>
+					}
 					<div class="editor-actions">
 						<button mat-button (click)="cancelEdit()">{{ tr().rules.cancel }}</button>
 						<button mat-flat-button color="primary" (click)="saveEdit()">
@@ -411,6 +421,89 @@
 			<button mat-stroked-button (click)="startAddNew(RuleType.TIME_WINDOW)">
 				<mat-icon>add</mat-icon> {{ tr().rules.newTimeWindowRule }}
 			</button>
+			<button mat-stroked-button (click)="startAddNew(RuleType.OPTIMIZATION)">
+				<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">add</mat-icon> {{ tr().rules.optimization.newRule }}
+			</button>
 		</div>
 	</div>
 </mat-expansion-panel>
+
+<ng-template #optimizationEditor>
+	@if (optimizationConfiguration; as configuration) {
+		<div class="editor-row">
+			<mat-form-field>
+				<mat-label>{{ tr().rules.optimization.elementsLabel }}</mat-label>
+				<mat-select
+					[ngModel]="configuration.elements"
+					(ngModelChange)="changeOptimizationElements($event)"
+				>
+					@for (elements of optimizationElements; track elements) {
+						<mat-option [value]="elements">{{
+							tr().rules.optimization.elements[elements]
+						}}</mat-option>
+					}
+				</mat-select>
+			</mat-form-field>
+			<mat-form-field>
+				<mat-label>{{ tr().rules.optimization.measureLabel }}</mat-label>
+				<mat-select
+					[ngModel]="configuration.measure"
+					(ngModelChange)="changeOptimizationMeasure($event)"
+				>
+					@for (row of optimizationMeasures; track row.measure) {
+						<mat-option [value]="row.measure">{{
+							tr().rules.optimization.measures[row.measure]
+						}}</mat-option>
+					}
+				</mat-select>
+			</mat-form-field>
+		</div>
+		@if (optimizationConditions.length) {
+			<mat-form-field class="full-width">
+				<mat-label>{{ tr().rules.optimization.conditionsLabel }}</mat-label>
+				<mat-select multiple [(ngModel)]="configuration.conditions">
+					@for (condition of optimizationConditions; track condition) {
+						<mat-option [value]="condition">{{
+							tr().rules.optimization.conditions[condition]
+						}}</mat-option>
+					}
+				</mat-select>
+			</mat-form-field>
+		}
+		<div class="editor-row">
+			<mat-form-field>
+				<mat-label>{{ tr().rules.optimization.aggregationLabel }}</mat-label>
+				<mat-select [(ngModel)]="configuration.aggregation">
+					@for (aggregation of optimizationAggregations; track aggregation) {
+						<mat-option [value]="aggregation">{{
+							tr().rules.optimization.aggregations[aggregation]
+						}}</mat-option>
+					}
+				</mat-select>
+			</mat-form-field>
+			<mat-form-field>
+				<mat-label>{{ tr().rules.optimization.directionLabel }}</mat-label>
+				<mat-select [(ngModel)]="configuration.direction">
+					@for (direction of optimizationDirections; track direction) {
+						<mat-option [value]="direction">{{
+							tr().rules.optimization.directions[direction]
+						}}</mat-option>
+					}
+				</mat-select>
+			</mat-form-field>
+			@if (configuration.measure === 'work-sequence-deficit') {
+				<mat-form-field>
+					<mat-label>{{ tr().rules.optimization.thresholdLabel }}</mat-label>
+					<input
+						matInput
+						type="number"
+						min="1"
+						step="1"
+						required
+						[(ngModel)]="configuration.thresholdDays"
+					/>
+				</mat-form-field>
+			}
+		</div>
+	}
+</ng-template>
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ import { By } from '@angular/platform-browser';
 import { CdkDragDrop, CdkDropList } from '@angular/cdk/drag-drop';
 import { LiveAnnouncer } from '@angular/cdk/a11y';
 import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from '../../services/planning-objectives';
+import { MatExpansionPanel } from '@angular/material/expansion';

 describe('RulesPanel', () => {
 	let component: RulesPanel;
@@ -36,7 +38,7 @@ describe('RulesPanel', () => {
 	});

 	it('should display initial rules from service', () => {
-		expect(component.rules.length).toBe(2);
+		expect(component.rules.length).toBe(8);
 	});

 	it('should start adding new If-Then rule', () => {
@@ -116,6 +118,69 @@ describe('RulesPanel', () => {
 		expect(component.rules[0].id).toBe(secondRuleId);
 	});

+	it('creates, edits and moves an optimization using the keyboard controls with preference-only mode', async () => {
+		fixture.debugElement.query(By.directive(MatExpansionPanel)).componentInstance.open();
+		component.startAddNew(RuleType.OPTIMIZATION);
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+		expect(component['forceOptions'].map((option) => option.value)).toEqual(['preference']);
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.textContent).toContain('Éléments du planning');
+		component['editBuffer'].name = 'Mes pertes';
+		component.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const rule = component.rules.at(-1)!;
+		expect(rule).toMatchObject({
+			name: 'Mes pertes',
+			type: RuleType.OPTIMIZATION,
+			force: 'preference',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		});
+		expect(component.getRuleSummary(rule)).toContain('Quantité non placée');
+		const announce = vi.spyOn(TestBed.inject(LiveAnnouncer), 'announce').mockResolvedValue();
+		const buttons = fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.rule-item');
+		const moveUp: HTMLButtonElement =
+			buttons[buttons.length - 1].querySelector('.rule-actions button');
+		moveUp.focus();
+		moveUp.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(component.rules[7].id).toBe(rule.id);
+		expect(document.activeElement).toBe(moveUp);
+		expect(announce).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Mes pertes : position 8 sur 9.');
+		component.startEdit(rule, new Event('click'));
+		component['editBuffer'].name = 'Pertes modifiées';
+		component.saveEdit();
+		expect(component.rules[7].name).toBe('Pertes modifiées');
+		component.toggleRule(rule.id);
+		expect(component.rules[7].enabled).toBe(false);
+		component.deleteRule(rule.id, new Event('click'));
+		expect(component.rules.some((candidate) => candidate.id === rule.id)).toBe(false);
+	});
+
+	it('keeps saved optimization parameters when an edit is cancelled and reports invalid parameters', () => {
+		component.startAddNew(RuleType.OPTIMIZATION);
+		component.saveEdit();
+		const rule = component.rules.at(-1)!;
+		component.startEdit(rule, new Event('click'));
+		const configuration = component['optimizationConfiguration']!;
+		configuration.conditions = [];
+		component.cancelEdit();
+		expect(component.rules.at(-1)).toMatchObject({
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		});
+		component.startEdit(rule, new Event('click'));
+		component.changeOptimizationMeasure('work-sequence-deficit');
+		const invalid = component['optimizationConfiguration'];
+		if (invalid?.measure !== 'work-sequence-deficit') throw new Error('Expected deficit');
+		invalid.thresholdDays = 0;
+		component.saveEdit();
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('[role="alert"]').textContent).toContain(
+			'seuil entier positif',
+		);
+		expect(component.rules.at(-1)).toMatchObject({
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		});
+	});
+
 	it('keeps cancelled drops unchanged and announces the position after a completed drop', () => {
 		const initialIds = component.rules.map((rule) => rule.id);
 		const movedName = component.rules[0].name;
@@ -133,8 +198,12 @@ describe('RulesPanel', () => {
 		expect(announce).not.toHaveBeenCalled();

 		list.dropped.emit({ ...drop, isPointerOverContainer: true });
-		expect(component.rules.map((rule) => rule.id)).toEqual([...initialIds].reverse());
-		expect(announce).toHaveBeenCalledWith(`${movedName} : position 2 sur 2.`);
+		expect(component.rules.map((rule) => rule.id)).toEqual([
+			initialIds[1],
+			initialIds[0],
+			...initialIds.slice(2),
+		]);
+		expect(announce).toHaveBeenCalledWith(`${movedName} : position 2 sur 8.`);
 		// CDK restores the original DOM before emitting dropped. The new order must
 		// be rendered before this callback returns, without waiting for another frame.
 		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('.rule-name')[1].textContent).toContain(
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ import {
 	RuleType,
 	IfThenRule,
 	TimeWindowRule,
+	OptimizationRule,
 	VacationRule,
 	PlacementStrategy,
 } from '../../services/rule-service';
@@ -25,7 +26,15 @@ import { MatInputModule } from '@angular/material/input';
 import { MatSelectModule } from '@angular/material/select';
 import { MatDatepickerModule } from '@angular/material/datepicker';
 import { FormsModule } from '@angular/forms';
+import { NgTemplateOutlet } from '@angular/common';
 import { LiveAnnouncer } from '@angular/cdk/a11y';
+import {
+	OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG,
+	OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS,
+	validateOptimizationConfiguration,
+	type OptimizationElements,
+	type OptimizationMeasure,
+} from '../../services/planning-objectives';

 import { DateAdapter } from '@angular/material/core';
 import { DAY_FIRST_DATE_PROVIDERS } from '../../shared/day-first-date-adapter';
@@ -43,6 +52,7 @@ import { CdkDragDrop, CdkDropList, CdkDrag, CdkDragHandle } from '@angular/cdk/d
 		MatSelectModule,
 		MatDatepickerModule,
 		FormsModule,
+		NgTemplateOutlet,
 		CdkDropList,
 		CdkDrag,
 		CdkDragHandle,
@@ -74,10 +84,67 @@ export class RulesPanel {
 	protected readonly rewardDayTypes = Object.values(SelectableDayType).filter(
 		(t) => t !== SelectableDayType.ANY,
 	);
-	protected readonly forceOptions = [
-		{ value: 'obligation' as const, label: () => this.tr().rules.obligation },
-		{ value: 'preference' as const, label: () => this.tr().rules.preference },
+	protected get forceOptions() {
+		const preference = {
+			value: 'preference' as const,
+			label: () => this.tr().rules.preference,
+		};
+		return this.editBuffer.type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION
+			? [preference]
+			: [
+					{ value: 'obligation' as const, label: () => this.tr().rules.obligation },
+					preference,
+				];
+	}
+	protected readonly optimizationElements = [
+		...new Set(OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG.map((row) => row.elements)),
 	];
+	protected get optimizationConfiguration() {
+		return this.editBuffer.type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION
+			? this.editBuffer.configuration
+			: undefined;
+	}
+	protected get optimizationMeasures() {
+		return OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG.filter(
+			(row) => row.elements === this.optimizationConfiguration?.elements,
+		);
+	}
+	protected get optimizationConditions() {
+		return (
+			this.optimizationMeasures.find(
+				(row) => row.measure === this.optimizationConfiguration?.measure,
+			)?.conditions ?? []
+		);
+	}
+	protected readonly optimizationAggregations = ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'] as const;
+	protected readonly optimizationDirections = ['minimize', 'maximize'] as const;
+	protected validationError = signal('');
+
+	public changeOptimizationElements(elements: OptimizationElements) {
+		this.changeOptimizationMeasure(
+			OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG.find((row) => row.elements === elements)!.measure,
+		);
+	}
+
+	public changeOptimizationMeasure(measure: OptimizationMeasure) {
+		if (this.editBuffer.type !== RuleType.OPTIMIZATION) return;
+		const row = OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG.find((item) => item.measure === measure)!;
+		const previous = this.editBuffer.configuration;
+		const conditions: readonly string[] = row.conditions;
+		this.editBuffer.configuration = {
+			elements: row.elements,
+			conditions:
+				previous?.conditions.filter((condition) => conditions.includes(condition)) ?? [],
+			aggregation: previous?.aggregation ?? 'sum',
+			direction: previous?.direction ?? 'minimize',
+			...(measure === 'work-sequence-deficit'
+				? {
+						measure,
+						thresholdDays: previous?.measure === measure ? previous.thresholdDays : 5,
+					}
+				: { measure }),
+		};
+	}

 	protected get daysOfWeek() {
 		const tr = this.tr();
@@ -128,9 +195,20 @@ export class RulesPanel {

 	public moveRule(index: number, offset: -1 | 1, event: Event) {
 		event.stopPropagation();
+		const trigger = event.currentTarget;
 		const destination = index + offset;
-		if (destination >= 0 && destination < this.rules.length)
+		if (destination >= 0 && destination < this.rules.length) {
 			this.reorderRule(index, destination);
+			this.changeDetector.detectChanges();
+			if (trigger instanceof HTMLButtonElement) {
+				const next = trigger.disabled
+					? trigger.parentElement?.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>(
+							'button:not([disabled])',
+						)
+					: trigger;
+				next?.focus();
+			}
+		}
 	}

 	private reorderRule(from: number, to: number) {
@@ -152,16 +230,29 @@ export class RulesPanel {
 		event.stopPropagation();
 		this.editingRuleId.set(rule.id);
 		this.isAddingNew.set(false);
-		this.editBuffer = { ...rule };
+		this.editBuffer = structuredClone(rule);
+		this.validationError.set('');
 	}

 	public cancelEdit() {
 		this.editingRuleId.set(null);
 		this.isAddingNew.set(false);
 		this.editBuffer = {};
+		this.validationError.set('');
 	}

 	public saveEdit() {
+		if (!this.editBuffer.name?.trim()) {
+			this.validationError.set(this.tr().rules.optimization.nameRequired);
+			return;
+		}
+		if (this.editBuffer.type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION) {
+			if (!validateOptimizationConfiguration(this.editBuffer.configuration).valid) {
+				this.validationError.set(this.tr().rules.optimization.invalidConfiguration);
+				return;
+			}
+			this.editBuffer.force = 'preference';
+		}
 		if (this.editBuffer.id) {
 			this.ruleService.updateRule(this.editBuffer as VacationRule);
 		} else {
@@ -183,6 +274,7 @@ export class RulesPanel {
 		this.isAddingNew.set(true);
 		this.editingRuleId.set(null);
 		this.newRuleType.set(type);
+		this.validationError.set('');

 		if (type === RuleType.IF_THEN) {
 			this.editBuffer = {
@@ -196,6 +288,13 @@ export class RulesPanel {
 				rewardDays: 1,
 				rewardType: SelectableDayType.OTHER,
 			} as Partial<IfThenRule>;
+		} else if (type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION) {
+			this.editBuffer = {
+				name: this.tr().rules.optimization.defaultName,
+				type,
+				force: 'preference',
+				configuration: structuredClone(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk),
+			} satisfies Partial<OptimizationRule>;
 		} else {
 			this.editBuffer = {
 				name: this.tr().rules.defaultNewPeriodName,
@@ -216,6 +315,8 @@ export class RulesPanel {

 	public getRuleSummary(rule: VacationRule): string {
 		const tr = this.tr();
+		if (rule.type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION)
+			return this.translationService.optimizationSummary(rule.configuration);
 		if (rule.type === RuleType.IF_THEN) {
 			const ifThen = rule as IfThenRule;
 			const dayLabel = this.daysOfWeek.find((d) => d.value === ifThen.dayOfWeek)?.label ?? '';
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+import { provideZonelessChangeDetection } from '@angular/core';
+import { TestBed, type ComponentFixture } from '@angular/core/testing';
+import { By } from '@angular/platform-browser';
+import { MatExpansionPanel } from '@angular/material/expansion';
+import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import { RuleService, RuleType } from '../../services/rule-service';
+import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';
+import { calculatePlanningInternal } from '../../services/leave-planner.core';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from '../../services/planning-objectives';
+import { RulesPanel } from './rules-panel';
+
+describe('work-sequence rule editor and reload', () => {
+	let fixture: ComponentFixture<RulesPanel>;
+	let component: RulesPanel;
+
+	async function choose(label: string, text: string) {
+		const fields: HTMLElement[] = Array.from(
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll('mat-form-field'),
+		);
+		const select = fields
+			.find((field) => field.querySelector('mat-label')?.textContent?.trim() === label)
+			?.querySelector<HTMLElement>('mat-select');
+		if (!select) throw new Error(`Missing select ${label}`);
+		select.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const option = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll<HTMLElement>('mat-option')).find(
+			(candidate) => candidate.textContent?.trim() === text,
+		);
+		if (!option) throw new Error(`Missing option ${text}`);
+		option.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		document.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.cdk-overlay-backdrop')?.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+	}
+
+	async function setInput(selector: string, value: string) {
+		const input: HTMLInputElement = fixture.nativeElement.querySelector(selector);
+		input.value = value;
+		input.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+	}
+
+	beforeEach(async () => {
+		localStorage.clear();
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
+		vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z'));
+		await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
+			imports: [RulesPanel],
+			providers: [provideZonelessChangeDetection()],
+		}).compileComponents();
+		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('fr');
+		fixture = TestBed.createComponent(RulesPanel);
+		component = fixture.componentInstance;
+		fixture.detectChanges();
+		fixture.debugElement.query(By.directive(MatExpansionPanel)).componentInstance.open();
+	});
+	afterEach(() => {
+		localStorage.clear();
+		vi.useRealTimers();
+	});
+
+	it('creates threshold five, edits it to three, and restores its effect, order and activation after reload', async () => {
+		component.startAddNew(RuleType.OPTIMIZATION);
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		await setInput('input:not([type="number"])', 'Mes reprises');
+		await choose('Éléments du planning', 'Séquences de travail');
+		await choose('Mesure', 'Déficit des séquences de travail');
+		await choose('Conditions (toutes doivent être vérifiées)', 'Internes');
+		await choose('Conditions (toutes doivent être vérifiées)', 'Non vides');
+		const threshold: HTMLInputElement =
+			fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('input[type="number"]');
+		expect(threshold.value).toBe('5');
+		expect(threshold.min).toBe('1');
+		expect(threshold.step).toBe('1');
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.textContent).toContain('Seuil de préférence en jours ouvrés');
+		component.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const rule = component.rules[0];
+		expect(rule).toMatchObject({ configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit });
+		expect(component.getRuleSummary(rule)).toContain(
+			'Déficit des séquences de travail (jours ouvrés)',
+		);
+		const request = {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-12'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+		};
+		expect(calculatePlanningInternal({ ...request, rules: component.rules })).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [{ date: '2024-01-09' }, { date: '2024-01-10' }, { date: '2024-01-11' }],
+		});
+		component.startEdit(rule, new Event('click'));
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		await setInput('input[type="number"]', '3');
+		component.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(component.getRuleSummary(component.rules[0])).toContain(
+			'seuil de préférence : 3 jours ouvrés',
+		);
+		expect(calculatePlanningInternal({ ...request, rules: component.rules })).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [],
+		});
+
+		component.startAddNew(RuleType.OPTIMIZATION);
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		await setInput('input:not([type="number"])', 'Ma séquence maximale');
+		await choose('Éléments du planning', 'Séquences de travail');
+		await choose('Agrégation', 'Maximum');
+		component.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const maximum = component.rules[1];
+		expect(maximum).toMatchObject({ configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence });
+		component.toggleRule(maximum.id);
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const moveUp: HTMLButtonElement = fixture.nativeElement
+			.querySelectorAll('.rule-actions')[1]
+			.querySelector('button');
+		moveUp.focus();
+		moveUp.click();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const saved = component.rules;
+		await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 350));
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		const restored = TestBed.inject(RuleService).rules;
+		expect(restored).toEqual(saved);
+		expect(restored.map(({ id }) => id)).toEqual([maximum.id, rule.id]);
+		expect(restored[0].enabled).toBe(false);
+		expect(restored[1]).toMatchObject({
+			name: 'Mes reprises',
+			enabled: true,
+			configuration: { thresholdDays: 3 },
+		});
+		expect(calculatePlanningInternal({ ...request, rules: restored })).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [],
+		});
+	});
+
+	it('keeps the saved threshold and shows an accessible error for fractional input', async () => {
+		component.startAddNew(RuleType.OPTIMIZATION);
+		component.changeOptimizationMeasure('work-sequence-deficit');
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		await setInput('input[type="number"]', '1.5');
+		component.saveEdit();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		expect(component.rules).toEqual([]);
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('[role="alert"]').textContent).toContain(
+			'seuil entier positif',
+		);
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('input[type="number"]').value).toBe('1.5');
+	});
+
+	it('distinguishes aggregation units from the working-day threshold', () => {
+		const translations = TestBed.inject(TranslationService);
+		expect(
+			translations.optimizationSummary(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence),
+		).toContain('Longueur des séquences de travail (jours ouvrés)');
+		expect(
+			translations.optimizationSummary({
+				...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+				aggregation: 'count',
+			}),
+		).toContain('Déficit des séquences de travail (Nombre)');
+		expect(
+			translations.optimizationSummary({
+				...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+				aggregation: 'count',
+			}),
+		).toContain('seuil de préférence : 5 jours ouvrés');
+	});
+});
@@ -7,6 +7,60 @@
 		>
 	</header>

+	<fieldset class="planning-dates">
+		<legend>{{ tr().settings.planningHorizon }}</legend>
+		<p id="planning-dates-help">{{ tr().settings.planningDatesHelp }}</p>
+		<mat-form-field appearance="outline">
+			<mat-label>{{ tr().settings.planningStart }}</mat-label>
+			<input
+				matInput
+				[matDatepicker]="planningStartPicker"
+				name="planningStart"
+				required
+				[ngModel]="planningDates().start"
+				(ngModelChange)="setPlanningDate('start', $event)"
+				[attr.aria-invalid]="!!calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()"
+				[attr.aria-describedby]="
+					calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()
+						? 'planning-dates-help planning-dates-error'
+						: 'planning-dates-help'
+				"
+			/>
+			<mat-datepicker-toggle
+				matIconSuffix
+				[for]="planningStartPicker"
+			></mat-datepicker-toggle>
+			<mat-datepicker #planningStartPicker></mat-datepicker>
+		</mat-form-field>
+		<mat-form-field appearance="outline">
+			<mat-label>{{ tr().settings.lastPlanningDate }}</mat-label>
+			<input
+				matInput
+				[matDatepicker]="lastPlanningDatePicker"
+				name="lastPlanningDate"
+				required
+				[ngModel]="planningDates().lastPlanningDate"
+				(ngModelChange)="setPlanningDate('lastPlanningDate', $event)"
+				[attr.aria-invalid]="!!calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()"
+				[attr.aria-describedby]="
+					calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()
+						? 'planning-dates-help planning-dates-error'
+						: 'planning-dates-help'
+				"
+			/>
+			<mat-datepicker-toggle
+				matIconSuffix
+				[for]="lastPlanningDatePicker"
+			></mat-datepicker-toggle>
+			<mat-datepicker #lastPlanningDatePicker></mat-datepicker>
+		</mat-form-field>
+		@if (calendarSettings.planningHorizonError(); as error) {
+			<p id="planning-dates-error" class="validation-error" role="alert">
+				{{ tr().settings[error] }}
+			</p>
+		}
+	</fieldset>
+
 	<div class="listOfDays">
 		@for (day of daysOff; track day.id) {
 			<div class="day-input-wrapper" animate.enter="day-enter" animate.leave="day-leave">
@@ -80,7 +134,7 @@
 		[disabled]="!!calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()"
 		[attr.aria-describedby]="
 			calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()
-				? 'invalid-planning-horizon'
+				? 'planning-dates-error'
 				: 'planning-duration-estimate'
 		"
 		(click)="triggerComputation()"
@@ -88,9 +142,6 @@
 		<mat-icon aria-hidden="true">auto_awesome</mat-icon>
 		{{ tr().userInput.calculate }}
 	</button>
-	@if (calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()) {
-		<p id="invalid-planning-horizon" role="alert">{{ tr().settings.invalidHorizon }}</p>
-	}

 	@if (hasRemainingDays()) {
 		<mat-card class="warning-card" [class.is-informational]="!hasAtRiskDays()">
@@ -122,113 +173,7 @@
 								@if (day.suggestion) {
 									<p>{{ day.suggestion }}</p>
 								}
-								<details
-									name="remaining-balances"
-									[open]="historyBalanceId() === day.id"
-									(toggle)="toggleRemainingHistory(day.id, $event)"
-								>
-									<summary
-										[attr.aria-label]="
-											tr().userInput.remainingWhy +
-											' : ' +
-											day.title +
-											'. ' +
-											day.validity
-										"
-									>
-										{{ tr().userInput.remainingWhy }}
-									</summary>
-									<p>{{ day.horizon }}</p>
-									@if (historyBalanceId() === day.id) {
-										@if (!traceResolved()) {
-											<p role="status">{{ tr().loading }}</p>
-										} @else {
-											@if (!trace() || trace()?.status === 'failed') {
-												<p>{{ tr().planning.traceUnavailable }}</p>
-											}
-											@if (remainingHistory().length) {
-												<p>{{ tr().userInput.remainingHistoryHelp }}</p>
-												<ol
-													class="remaining-history"
-													[attr.start]="historyPage() * 20 + 1"
-												>
-													@for (
-														attempt of visibleHistory();
-														track $index
-													) {
-														<li>
-															<strong>{{ attempt.date }}</strong> ·
-															{{ attempt.status }}
-															@if (attempt.phase) {
-																<p>{{ attempt.phase }}</p>
-															}
-															@if (attempt.reason) {
-																<p>{{ attempt.reason }}</p>
-															}
-															@for (
-																criterion of attempt.criteria;
-																track $index
-															) {
-																<p
-																	[class.decisive]="
-																		criterion.decisive
-																	"
-																>
-																	@if (criterion.decisive) {
-																		{{
-																			tr().planning.details
-																				.firstDifference
-																		}}
-																		:
-																	}
-																	{{ criterion.text }}
-																</p>
-															}
-														</li>
-													}
-												</ol>
-												@if (historyPageCount() > 1) {
-													<nav
-														class="history-pagination"
-														[attr.aria-label]="tr().planning.candidates"
-													>
-														<button
-															mat-button
-															type="button"
-															[disabled]="historyPage() === 0"
-															(click)="
-																historyPage.set(historyPage() - 1)
-															"
-														>
-															{{ tr().planning.previousCandidates }}
-														</button>
-														<span
-															>{{ tr().planning.page }}
-															{{ historyPage() + 1 }}
-															{{ tr().planning.of }}
-															{{ historyPageCount() }}</span
-														>
-														<button
-															mat-button
-															type="button"
-															[disabled]="
-																historyPage() + 1 >=
-																historyPageCount()
-															"
-															(click)="
-																historyPage.set(historyPage() + 1)
-															"
-														>
-															{{ tr().planning.nextCandidates }}
-														</button>
-													</nav>
-												}
-											} @else if (trace() && trace()?.status !== 'failed') {
-												<p>{{ tr().userInput.remainingNoEvaluations }}</p>
-											}
-										}
-									}
-								</details>
+								<p>{{ day.horizon }}</p>
 							</li>
 						}
 					</ul>
@@ -31,6 +31,41 @@
 	}
 }

+.planning-dates {
+	display: grid;
+	grid-template-columns: minmax(0, 1fr);
+	grid-column: 1 / -1;
+	column-gap: 1rem;
+	min-width: 0;
+	margin: 0;
+	padding: 0;
+	border: 0;
+
+	legend {
+		font-weight: 600;
+	}
+
+	mat-form-field {
+		min-width: 0;
+		width: 100%;
+	}
+
+	p {
+		grid-column: 1 / -1;
+		margin: 0.5rem 0 1rem;
+		color: var(--ui-text-secondary);
+		font-size: 0.875rem;
+		line-height: 1.5;
+	}
+
+	.validation-error {
+		color: var(--ui-error-text);
+		background: var(--ui-error-bg);
+		padding: 0.75rem;
+		border-radius: 0.5rem;
+	}
+}
+
 .listOfDays {
 	display: flex;
 	flex-direction: column;
@@ -204,33 +239,13 @@ form {
 	}
 }

-.remaining-balances,
-.remaining-history {
+.remaining-balances {
 	display: grid;
 	gap: 1rem;
 	margin: 0.5rem 0;
 	padding-inline-start: 1.25rem;
 }

-.remaining-day-detail summary {
-	min-height: 2.75rem;
-	align-content: center;
-	cursor: pointer;
-	text-decoration: underline;
-	text-underline-offset: 0.25em;
-}
-
-.decisive {
-	font-weight: 700;
-}
-
-.history-pagination {
-	display: flex;
-	flex-wrap: wrap;
-	align-items: center;
-	gap: 0.5rem;
-}
-
 :host {
 	display: block;
 	container: user-input / inline-size;
@@ -250,6 +265,9 @@ form {
 }

@container user-input (min-width: 40rem) {
+	.planning-dates {
+		grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr));
+	}
 	.listOfDays {
 		display: grid;
 		grid-template-columns: repeat(2, minmax(0, 1fr));
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+import { createOptimizationPresetRules } from '../../services/rule-service';
 import { ComponentFixture, TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
 import { provideZonelessChangeDetection } from '@angular/core';
 import { TestbedHarnessEnvironment } from '@angular/cdk/testing/testbed';
@@ -14,6 +15,8 @@ import { CalendarSettingsService } from '../../services/calendar-settings-servic
 import { createPlanningCalculation, PlanningRequest } from '../../services/leave-planner.service';
 import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';

+const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();
+
 describe('UserInput', () => {
 	let component: UserInput;
 	let fixture: ComponentFixture<UserInput>;
@@ -43,6 +46,7 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 		component = fixture.componentInstance;
 		userInputService = TestBed.inject(UserInputService);
 		fixture.detectChanges();
+		await fixture.whenStable();
 	}

 	async function revisit(): Promise<void> {
@@ -94,11 +98,9 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 		} finally {
 			vi.stubGlobal('window', browserWindow);
 		}
-		const [outcome, trace] = await Promise.all([calculation.outcome, calculation.trace]);
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
 		userInputService.planningSnapshotSignal.set(calculation.snapshot);
 		userInputService.planningOutcomeSignal.set(outcome);
-		userInputService.planningTraceSignal.set(trace ?? null);
-		userInputService.traceResolvedSignal.set(true);
 		fixture.detectChanges();
 	}

@@ -130,7 +132,7 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 		expect(card.textContent).toBe(explanation);
 	});

-	it('shows genuine recorded attempts on demand for usable leave kept for later', async () => {
+	it('explains usable leave kept for later and incomplete balances without attempt controls', async () => {
 		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('fr');
 		await calculate({
 			horizon: { start: '2024-06-04', end: '2024-06-13' },
@@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 				},
 			],
 			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-06-07', type: 'cp' }],
-			rules: [],
+			rules: [presets[3]],
 		});
 		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
 		const card = root.querySelector<HTMLElement>('.warning-card')!;
@@ -154,17 +156,9 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 		expect(card.textContent).not.toContain('Disponible seulement');
 		expect(root.querySelector('.remaining-history')).toBeNull();
 		const outcome = JSON.stringify(userInputService.planningOutcomeSignal());
-		const trace = JSON.stringify(userInputService.planningTraceSignal());
-		const details = root.querySelector<HTMLDetailsElement>('.remaining-day-detail details')!;
-		details.open = true;
-		details.dispatchEvent(new Event('toggle'));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(root.querySelectorAll('.remaining-history > li').length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-		expect(details.textContent).toContain('Ces dates ont réellement été examinées');
-		expect(details.textContent).toContain('Maximum de jours travaillés entre congés');
-		expect(details.textContent).toContain('Évalué et rejeté');
+		expect(card.querySelector('details')).toBeNull();
+		expect(card.textContent).not.toContain('trace');
 		expect(JSON.stringify(userInputService.planningOutcomeSignal())).toBe(outcome);
-		expect(JSON.stringify(userInputService.planningTraceSignal())).toBe(trace);

 		const plan = userInputService.displayedPlanSignal()!;
 		userInputService.planningOutcomeSignal.set({
@@ -173,17 +167,11 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 			completedStages: [],
 			reasons: [{ code: 'user-cancelled', message: 'Cancelled' }],
 		});
-		userInputService.planningTraceSignal.set(null);
 		fixture.detectChanges();
 		expect(card.textContent).toContain('Sa non-utilisation n’est pas une décision définitive');
 		expect(card.textContent).not.toContain('Conservé pour plus tard');
 		expect(root.querySelector('.remaining-history')).toBeNull();
-		details.open = true;
-		details.dispatchEvent(new Event('toggle'));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(details.textContent).toContain(
-			TestBed.inject(TranslationService).tr().planning.traceUnavailable,
-		);
+		expect(card.querySelector('details')).toBeNull();
 	});

 	it('describes Calculate with an indicative range that follows unsubmitted edits', () => {
@@ -200,26 +188,103 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 		expect(userInputService.computeTriggerSignal()).toBe(0);
 	});

-	it('prevents calculation while planning dates are invalid and re-enables it after correction', () => {
+	it('saves both calendar selections as inclusive planning dates without recalculating', async () => {
 		const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
-		settings.setPlanningDates('2024-03-01', '2024-02-29');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
+		settings.setPlanningDates('2024-02-29', '2024-03-08');
+		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('fr');
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const toggles = fixture.nativeElement.querySelectorAll(
+			'.planning-dates mat-datepicker-toggle button',
+		);
+		expect(toggles).toHaveLength(2);
+		for (const [index, day] of ['27', '9'].entries()) {
+			toggles[index].click();
+			await fixture.whenStable();
+			const calendar = document.querySelector<HTMLElement>('mat-calendar')!;
+			if (index === 0)
+				expect(
+					calendar
+						.querySelector('.mat-calendar-period-button')
+						?.textContent?.toLowerCase(),
+				).toContain('févr');
+			Array.from(calendar.querySelectorAll<HTMLButtonElement>('.mat-calendar-body-cell'))
+				.find((cell) => cell.textContent?.trim() === day)!
+				.click();
+			await fixture.whenStable();
+			await expect.poll(() => document.querySelector('mat-calendar')).toBeNull();
+		}
+		expect(settings.planningHorizon()).toEqual({ start: '2024-02-27', end: '2024-03-10' });
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('calendarSettings.planningDates')!)).toEqual({
+			start: '2024-02-27',
+			lastPlanningDate: '2024-03-09',
+		});
+		expect(userInputService.computeTriggerSignal()).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('prevents calculation while planning dates are invalid and re-enables it after correction', async () => {
+		const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
+		settings.setPlanningDates('2024-03-01', '2024-03-01');
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		editInput('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]', '29/02/2024');
 		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
 		const calculate = root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('.calculate-button')!;
 		expect(calculate.disabled).toBe(true);
-		expect(root.querySelector('[role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-			'planning dates in Settings',
-		);
+		expect(root.querySelector('#planning-dates-error')?.textContent).toContain('on or after');
+		expect(calculate.getAttribute('aria-describedby')).toBe('planning-dates-error');
 		calculate.click();
 		component.triggerComputation();
 		expect(userInputService.computeTriggerSignal()).toBe(0);
-		settings.setPlanningDates('2024-02-29', '2024-02-29');
-		fixture.detectChanges();
+		editInput('input[name="planningStart"]', '29/02/2024');
 		expect(calculate.disabled).toBe(false);
 		calculate.click();
 		expect(userInputService.computeTriggerSignal()).toBe(1);
 	});

+	it.each(['', '30/02/2024', 'not-a-date', '2'])(
+		'reports an invalid planning date without saving it: %s',
+		async (value) => {
+			const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
+			settings.setPlanningDates('2024-02-29', '2027-02-28');
+			await fixture.whenStable();
+			editInput('input[name="planningStart"]', value);
+			await fixture.whenStable();
+			expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('input[name="planningStart"]').value).toBe(
+				value,
+			);
+			expect(
+				fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('#planning-dates-error')?.textContent,
+			).toContain('two valid calendar dates');
+			expect(settings.planningHorizon()).toBeNull();
+			expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('calendarSettings.planningDates')!)).toEqual({
+				start: '2024-02-29',
+				lastPlanningDate: '2027-02-28',
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('edits inclusive dates with inline validation while preserving the saved planning horizon', async () => {
+		const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
+		settings.setPlanningDates('2024-02-29', '2027-02-28');
+		await fixture.whenStable();
+		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
+		const start = root.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="planningStart"]')!;
+		const last = root.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]')!;
+		expect(start.value).toBe('29/02/2024');
+		expect(last.value).toBe('28/02/2027');
+		expect(root.textContent).toContain('Last planning date (inclusive)');
+		editInput('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]', '28/02/2024');
+		expect(root.querySelector('#planning-dates-error')?.textContent).toContain('on or after');
+		expect(last.getAttribute('aria-invalid')).toBe('true');
+		expect(last.getAttribute('aria-describedby')).toContain('planning-dates-error');
+		expect(settings.planningHorizon()).toBeNull();
+		editInput('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]', '29/02/2024');
+		expect(root.querySelector('#planning-dates-error')).toBeNull();
+		expect(last.getAttribute('aria-invalid')).toBe('false');
+		expect(last.getAttribute('aria-describedby')).not.toContain('planning-dates-error');
+		expect(settings.planningHorizon()).toEqual({ start: '2024-02-29', end: '2024-03-01' });
+		expect(userInputService.computeTriggerSignal()).toBe(0);
+	});
+
 	it('should initialize with vacation days from service', () => {
 		const vacationDays = userInputService.vacationNumberSignal();
 		expect(vacationDays).toBeDefined();
@@ -449,7 +514,7 @@ describe('UserInput', () => {
 		);
 		await rule.uncheck();
 		await expect.poll(() => localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).not.toBeNull();
-		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!)[0].enabled).toBe(false);
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).rules[0].enabled).toBe(false);
 		fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('.calculate-button').click();
 		await fixture.whenStable();

@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
-import {
-	Component,
-	computed,
-	effect,
-	inject,
-	signal,
-	ChangeDetectionStrategy,
-} from '@angular/core';
+import { Component, computed, effect, inject, ChangeDetectionStrategy } from '@angular/core';
 import { MatInputModule } from '@angular/material/input';
+import { MatFormFieldModule } from '@angular/material/form-field';
+import { MatDatepickerModule } from '@angular/material/datepicker';
+import { DateAdapter } from '@angular/material/core';
+import { FormsModule } from '@angular/forms';
+import dayjs from 'dayjs';
 import { UserInputService } from '../../services/user-input-service';
 import { RulesPanel } from '../rules-panel/rules-panel';
 import { MatCard, MatCardContent } from '@angular/material/card';
@@ -18,12 +16,16 @@ import type { LeaveType } from '../../services/leave-planner.service';
 import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';
 import { CalendarSettingsService } from '../../services/calendar-settings-service';
 import { PlanningDurationService } from '../../services/planning-duration.service';
-import { addPlanningDays } from '../../services/planning-date';
+import { addPlanningDays, isPlanningDate } from '../../services/planning-date';
+import { DAY_FIRST_DATE_PROVIDERS } from '../../shared/day-first-date-adapter';

@Component({
 	selector: 'app-user-input',
 	imports: [
 		MatInputModule,
+		MatFormFieldModule,
+		MatDatepickerModule,
+		FormsModule,
 		RulesPanel,
 		MatCard,
 		MatCardContent,
@@ -34,6 +36,7 @@ import { addPlanningDays } from '../../services/planning-date';
 	templateUrl: './user-input.html',
 	styleUrl: './user-input.scss',
 	changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush,
+	providers: DAY_FIRST_DATE_PROVIDERS,
 })
 export class UserInput {
 	private userInputService: UserInputService = inject(UserInputService);
@@ -43,6 +46,16 @@ export class UserInput {
 	protected readonly calendarSettings = inject(CalendarSettingsService);
 	protected readonly duration = inject(PlanningDurationService);
 	protected readonly translationService = inject(TranslationService);
+	private readonly dateAdapter = inject<DateAdapter<Date>>(DateAdapter);
+	protected readonly planningDates = computed(() => {
+		const { start, lastPlanningDate } = this.calendarSettings.planningDates();
+		return {
+			start: isPlanningDate(start) ? new Date(`${start}T00:00:00`) : null,
+			lastPlanningDate: isPlanningDate(lastPlanningDate)
+				? new Date(`${lastPlanningDate}T00:00:00`)
+				: null,
+		};
+	});
 	protected readonly durationLabel = computed(() => {
 		const estimate = this.duration.estimate();
 		if (!estimate) return '';
@@ -58,10 +71,6 @@ export class UserInput {
 		return this.translationService.tr;
 	}

-	protected readonly trace = this.userInputService.planningTraceSignal;
-	protected readonly traceResolved = this.userInputService.traceResolvedSignal;
-	protected readonly historyBalanceId = signal<string | null>(null);
-	protected readonly historyPage = signal(0);
 	protected readonly remainingDays = computed(() =>
 		(this.userInputService.displayedPlanSignal()?.remainingBalances ?? []).reduce(
 			(total, balance) => total + balance.quantity,
@@ -82,7 +91,8 @@ export class UserInput {
 		const copy = this.tr().userInput;
 		return plan.remainingBalances.map((balance) => {
 			const code =
-				incomplete && ['preserved', 'not-established'].includes(balance.reason.code)
+				incomplete &&
+				['preserved', 'active-priorities', 'not-established'].includes(balance.reason.code)
 					? 'calculation-incomplete'
 					: balance.reason.code;
 			return {
@@ -124,56 +134,16 @@ export class UserInput {
 		});
 	});

-	protected readonly remainingHistory = computed(() => {
-		const id = this.historyBalanceId();
-		if (!id) return [];
-		return (
-			this.trace()?.phases.flatMap((phase) =>
-				phase.decisions.flatMap((decision) =>
-					decision.candidates
-						.filter((candidate) => candidate.placement?.balanceId === id)
-						.map((candidate) => ({ candidate, phase: phase.name })),
-				),
-			) ?? []
-		);
-	});
-	protected readonly historyPageCount = computed(() =>
-		Math.ceil(this.remainingHistory().length / 20),
-	);
-	protected readonly visibleHistory = computed(() =>
-		this.remainingHistory()
-			.slice(this.historyPage() * 20, (this.historyPage() + 1) * 20)
-			.map(({ candidate, phase }) => ({
-				date: (candidate.dates ?? (candidate.date ? [candidate.date] : []))
-					.map((date) => this.translationService.formatPlanningDate(date))
-					.join(', '),
-				phase: this.tr().planning.explanation.stages[phase] ?? this.criterionLabel(phase),
-				status: this.tr().planning.traceStatuses[candidate.status],
-				reason: candidate.reason
-					? (this.tr().userInput.remainingCandidateReasons[candidate.reason.code] ??
-						this.tr().planning.explanation.unavailable[candidate.reason.code] ??
-						this.tr().userInput.remainingCandidateReasons['unknown'])
-					: '',
-				criteria: (candidate.technicalComparison ?? []).flatMap((value) => {
-					const label = this.criterionLabel(value.name);
-					return label
-						? [
-								{
-									text: `${label} : ${value.before} → ${value.after}`,
-									decisive: value.name === candidate.firstDecisiveComparator,
-								},
-							]
-						: [];
-				}),
-			})),
-	);
-
 	constructor() {
-		effect(() => {
-			this.userInputService.planningOutcomeSignal();
-			this.historyBalanceId.set(null);
-			this.historyPage.set(0);
-		});
+		effect(() => this.dateAdapter.setLocale(this.translationService.locale()));
+	}
+
+	protected setPlanningDate(field: 'start' | 'lastPlanningDate', value: Date | null): void {
+		const dates = {
+			...this.calendarSettings.planningDates(),
+			[field]: value ? dayjs(value).format('YYYY-MM-DD') : '',
+		};
+		this.calendarSettings.setPlanningDates(dates.start, dates.lastPlanningDate);
 	}

 	private ruleName(id: string): string {
@@ -183,28 +153,6 @@ export class UserInput {
 		);
 	}

-	private criterionLabel(name: string): string | undefined {
-		const id = name.replace(/^protected:/, '');
-		const key =
-			id === 'obligations'
-				? 'obligation-validity'
-				: id.startsWith('preference:')
-					? 'preference'
-					: id;
-		return this.tr().planning.explanation.objectives[key]?.label.replace(
-			'{rule}',
-			this.ruleName(id.slice('preference:'.length)),
-		);
-	}
-
-	protected toggleRemainingHistory(id: string, event: Event): void {
-		const open = (event.currentTarget as HTMLDetailsElement).open;
-		if (open && id !== this.historyBalanceId()) {
-			this.historyPage.set(0);
-			this.historyBalanceId.set(id);
-		} else if (!open && id === this.historyBalanceId()) this.historyBalanceId.set(null);
-	}
-
 	protected hasRemainingDays = computed(() => this.remainingDays() > 0);

 	protected get daysOff() {
@@ -2,53 +2,6 @@
 <mat-dialog-content>
 	<p>{{ tr().settings.description }}</p>
 	<div class="settings-controls">
-		<fieldset class="planning-dates">
-			<legend>{{ tr().settings.planningHorizon }}</legend>
-			<p id="planning-dates-help">{{ tr().settings.planningDatesHelp }}</p>
-			<mat-form-field appearance="outline">
-				<mat-label>{{ tr().settings.planningStart }}</mat-label>
-				<input
-					matInput
-					type="date"
-					name="planningStart"
-					required
-					#planningStart
-					[value]="calendarSettings.planningDates().start"
-					[attr.aria-invalid]="!!calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()"
-					aria-describedby="planning-dates-help planning-dates-error"
-					(input)="
-						calendarSettings.setPlanningDates(
-							planningStart.value,
-							lastPlanningDate.value
-						)
-					"
-				/>
-			</mat-form-field>
-			<mat-form-field appearance="outline">
-				<mat-label>{{ tr().settings.lastPlanningDate }}</mat-label>
-				<input
-					matInput
-					type="date"
-					name="lastPlanningDate"
-					required
-					#lastPlanningDate
-					[value]="calendarSettings.planningDates().lastPlanningDate"
-					[attr.aria-invalid]="!!calendarSettings.planningHorizonError()"
-					aria-describedby="planning-dates-help planning-dates-error"
-					(input)="
-						calendarSettings.setPlanningDates(
-							planningStart.value,
-							lastPlanningDate.value
-						)
-					"
-				/>
-			</mat-form-field>
-			@if (calendarSettings.planningHorizonError(); as error) {
-				<p id="planning-dates-error" class="validation-error" role="alert">
-					{{ tr().settings[error] }}
-				</p>
-			}
-		</fieldset>
 		<mat-form-field appearance="outline">
 			<mat-label>{{ tr().settings.selectTheme }}</mat-label>
 			<mat-select
@@ -20,26 +20,3 @@ mat-dialog-content > p {
 mat-form-field {
 	width: 100%;
 }
-
-.planning-dates {
-	min-width: 0;
-	margin: 0 0 1rem;
-	padding: 0;
-	border: 0;
-
-	legend {
-		font-weight: 600;
-	}
-
-	p {
-		margin: 0.5rem 0 1rem;
-		color: var(--ui-text-secondary);
-	}
-
-	.validation-error {
-		color: var(--ui-error-text);
-		background: var(--ui-error-bg);
-		padding: 0.75rem;
-		border-radius: 0.5rem;
-	}
-}
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 import { ComponentFixture, TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
 import { provideZonelessChangeDetection } from '@angular/core';
 import { UserSettings } from './user-settings';
-import { CalendarSettingsService } from '../../services/calendar-settings-service';
 import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';

 describe('UserSettings', () => {
@@ -16,7 +15,6 @@ describe('UserSettings', () => {
 		}).compileComponents();

 		TestBed.inject(TranslationService).setLanguage('en');
-		TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService).setPlanningDates('2024-02-29', '2027-02-28');
 		fixture = TestBed.createComponent(UserSettings);
 		component = fixture.componentInstance;
 		fixture.detectChanges();
@@ -24,49 +22,8 @@ describe('UserSettings', () => {

 	afterEach(() => localStorage.clear());

-	it.each(['', '2024-02-30', 'not-a-date'])(
-		'reports an invalid date entry without saving it: %s',
-		(value) => {
-			const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
-			const start = root.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="planningStart"]')!;
-			start.value = value;
-			start.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
-			fixture.detectChanges();
-			expect(root.querySelector('[role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain(
-				'two valid calendar dates',
-			);
-			expect(TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService).planningHorizon()).toBeNull();
-			expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('calendarSettings.planningDates')!)).toEqual({
-				start: '2024-02-29',
-				lastPlanningDate: '2027-02-28',
-			});
-		},
-	);
-
-	it('edits inclusive dates with an inline validation indication while preserving the saved horizon', () => {
-		const root = fixture.nativeElement as HTMLElement;
-		const start = root.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="planningStart"]')!;
-		const last = root.querySelector<HTMLInputElement>('input[name="lastPlanningDate"]')!;
-		expect(start.value).toBe('2024-02-29');
-		expect(last.value).toBe('2027-02-28');
-		expect(root.textContent).toContain('Last planning date (inclusive)');
-		last.value = '2024-02-28';
-		last.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(root.querySelector('[role="alert"]')?.textContent).toContain('on or after');
-		expect(last.getAttribute('aria-invalid')).toBe('true');
-		expect(TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService).planningHorizon()).toBeNull();
-		last.value = '2024-02-29';
-		last.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
-		fixture.detectChanges();
-		expect(root.querySelector('[role="alert"]')).toBeNull();
-		expect(TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService).planningHorizon()).toEqual({
-			start: '2024-02-29',
-			end: '2024-03-01',
-		});
-	});
-
 	it('should create', () => {
 		expect(component).toBeTruthy();
+		expect(fixture.nativeElement.querySelector('input[type="date"]')).toBeNull();
 	});
 });
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ import {
 import { MatFormFieldModule } from '@angular/material/form-field';
 import { MatSelectModule } from '@angular/material/select';
 import { MatSlideToggle } from '@angular/material/slide-toggle';
-import { MatInputModule } from '@angular/material/input';
 import { CalendarSettingsService } from '../../services/calendar-settings-service';
 import { ThemeService } from '../../services/theme-service';
 import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';
@@ -25,7 +24,6 @@ import { TranslationService } from '../../services/translation-service';
 		MatFormFieldModule,
 		MatSelectModule,
 		MatSlideToggle,
-		MatInputModule,
 	],
 	templateUrl: './user-settings.html',
 	styleUrl: './user-settings.scss',
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+import { execFile } from 'node:child_process';
+import { mkdtempSync, rmSync, writeFileSync } from 'node:fs';
+import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
+import { join, resolve } from 'node:path';
+import { promisify } from 'node:util';
+import { Worker as NodeWorker } from 'node:worker_threads';
+import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
+import type { OptimizationPlanningRule } from './leave-planner.core';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from './planning-objectives';
+
+describe('calendar objectives in the real worker', () => {
+	let directory: string;
+	let bundle: string;
+	const threads = new Set<NodeWorker>();
+	const messages: string[] = [];
+	let stopped = 0;
+
+	beforeAll(async () => {
+		directory = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'vac-calendar-worker-'));
+		bundle = join(directory, 'worker.mjs');
+		const entry = join(directory, 'entry.ts');
+		writeFileSync(
+			entry,
+			`import { parentPort } from 'node:worker_threads';
+globalThis.self = { postMessage: (message) => parentPort.postMessage(message) };
+await import(${JSON.stringify(resolve('src/app/services/leave-planner.worker.ts'))});
+parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
+`,
+		);
+		await promisify(execFile)('bun', ['build', entry, '--target=node', '--outfile', bundle]);
+	});
+
+	beforeEach(() => {
+		messages.length = 0;
+		stopped = 0;
+		vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-04-01T12:00:00Z'));
+		class BrowserWorker {
+			onmessage: ((event: MessageEvent) => void) | null = null;
+			onerror: (() => void) | null = null;
+			private readonly thread = new NodeWorker(bundle);
+			constructor() {
+				threads.add(this.thread);
+				this.thread.on('message', (data) => {
+					messages.push(data.type);
+					this.onmessage?.({ data } as MessageEvent);
+				});
+				this.thread.on('error', () => this.onerror?.());
+			}
+			postMessage(message: unknown) {
+				this.thread.postMessage(message);
+			}
+			terminate() {
+				stopped++;
+				void this.thread.terminate();
+			}
+		}
+		vi.stubGlobal('Worker', BrowserWorker);
+	});
+
+	afterEach(async () => {
+		await Promise.all([...threads].map((thread) => thread.terminate()));
+		threads.clear();
+		vi.useRealTimers();
+		vi.unstubAllGlobals();
+	});
+	afterAll(() => rmSync(directory, { recursive: true, force: true }));
+
+	it.each([false, true])(
+		'retains the submitted configuration, plan and artifact order (gain first: %s)',
+		async (gainFirst) => {
+			const holiday: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+				id: 'holiday',
+				type: 'optimization' as const,
+				name: 'Captured holiday rule',
+				configuration: structuredClone(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue),
+			};
+			const gain: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+				id: 'gain',
+				type: 'optimization' as const,
+				name: 'Captured gain rule',
+				configuration: structuredClone(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain),
+			};
+			const rules = gainFirst ? [gain, holiday] : [holiday, gain];
+			const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+				horizon: { start: '2024-04-29', end: '2024-05-18' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'cp',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 3,
+						availableFrom: '2024-04-29',
+						expiryDate: '2025-01-01',
+					},
+				],
+				rules,
+			});
+			holiday.configuration = {
+				...holiday.configuration,
+				conditions: [],
+				direction: 'minimize',
+			};
+			const plan = await calculation.outcome;
+			if (plan.kind !== 'Plan')
+				throw new Error(`Expected a worker plan, received ${plan.kind}`);
+			expect(plan.metrics).toMatchObject(
+				gainFirst
+					? { holidayWeekValue: 0, nonWorkingDayGain: 9 }
+					: { holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 },
+			);
+			expect(calculation.snapshot.rules.find((rule) => rule.id === 'holiday')).toMatchObject({
+				name: 'Captured holiday rule',
+				configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue,
+			});
+			const first = `optimization:${rules[0].id}`;
+			const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+			if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+				throw new Error('Expected a worker explanation');
+			expect(explanation.placements[0].firstDecisiveObjective).toBe(first);
+			await calculation.timings;
+			expect(new Set(messages)).toEqual(
+				new Set([
+					'heartbeat',
+					'progress',
+					'checkpoint',
+					'result',
+					'explanation',
+					'artifacts',
+				]),
+			);
+			expect(messages.indexOf('result')).toBeLessThan(messages.indexOf('explanation'));
+			expect(stopped).toBe(1);
+			const comparison = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(plan.placements[0]);
+			if (comparison.kind !== 'Counterfactual')
+				throw new Error('Expected a worker comparison');
+			expect(
+				comparison.results.find((result) => result.date === plan.placements[0].date)
+					?.comparison?.firstDecisiveObjective,
+			).toBe(first);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it.each([false, true])(
+		'lets economy block or permit the complete holiday bundle in a real worker (economy first: %s)',
+		async (economyFirst) => {
+			const economy: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+				id: 'economy',
+				name: 'Captured supporting economy',
+				type: 'optimization',
+				configuration: structuredClone(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements),
+			};
+			const holiday: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+				id: 'holiday',
+				type: 'optimization',
+				configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue,
+			};
+			const rules = economyFirst ? [economy, holiday] : [holiday, economy];
+			const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+				horizon: { start: '2026-11-09', end: '2026-11-14' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'cp',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 2,
+						availableFrom: '2026-11-09',
+						expiryDate: '2027-01-01',
+					},
+				],
+				declaredDays: ['2026-11-09', '2026-11-10'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+				rules,
+			});
+			economy.name = 'Edited later';
+			economy.configuration.conditions = [];
+			const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a worker plan');
+			expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject(
+				economyFirst
+					? { holidayWeekValue: 0, supportingPlacements: 0 }
+					: { holidayWeekValue: 3, supportingPlacements: 2 },
+			);
+			expect(calculation.snapshot.rules.find(({ id }) => id === 'economy')).toMatchObject({
+				name: 'Captured supporting economy',
+				configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+			});
+			const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+			if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+			if (economyFirst) {
+				expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([]);
+				expect(outcome.remainingBalances[0]).toMatchObject({
+					id: 'cp',
+					quantity: 2,
+					classification: 'deferred',
+				});
+				expect(explanation.placements).toEqual([]);
+				return;
+			}
+			expect(outcome.remainingBalances).toEqual([]);
+			expect(explanation.placements.every(({ supporting }) => supporting)).toBe(true);
+			expect(explanation.placements[0].firstDecisiveObjective).toBe('optimization:holiday');
+			expect(explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					id: 'optimization:economy',
+					value: 2,
+					label: 'Captured supporting economy',
+				}),
+			);
+			const analysis = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(outcome.placements[0]);
+			if (analysis.kind !== 'Counterfactual') throw new Error('Expected a counterfactual');
+			expect(
+				analysis.results.find(({ date }) => date === outcome.placements[0].date)?.comparison
+					?.after.objectives,
+			).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ id: 'optimization:economy', value: 2 }));
+		},
+	);
+});
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import {
 	LeaveType,
 	PlanOutcome,
 	PlanningReason,
-	PlanningTraceState,
+	PlanningStateSnapshot,
 	RemainingClassification,
 } from './leave-planner.service';
 import { addPlanningDays, addPlanningYears, planningDateInParis } from './planning-date';
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ import { addPlanningDays, addPlanningYears, planningDateInParis } from './planni
 dayjs.extend(weekOfYear);
 dayjs.extend(isoWeek);

-type CalendarPlan = Pick<PlanningTraceState, 'placements' | 'declaredDays'> & {
-	horizon?: PlanningTraceState['horizon'];
+type CalendarPlan = Pick<PlanningStateSnapshot, 'placements' | 'declaredDays'> & {
+	horizon?: PlanningStateSnapshot['horizon'];
 	timeOffPeriods?: PlanOutcome['timeOffPeriods'];
 };

@@ -0,0 +1,462 @@
+import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
+import {
+	analyzeCounterfactualInternal,
+	calculatePlanningInternal,
+	type OptimizationPlanningRule,
+	type PlanningArtifacts,
+	type PlanningRequest,
+} from './leave-planner.core';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS, type OptimizationConfiguration } from './planning-objectives';
+
+const holiday: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+	id: 'holiday',
+	name: 'Complete public-holiday weeks',
+	type: 'optimization',
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue,
+};
+const gain: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+	id: 'gain',
+	name: 'Enjoy weekends and public holidays',
+	type: 'optimization',
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain,
+};
+const samedi: PlanningRequest['rules'][number] = {
+	id: 'samedi',
+	type: 'if_then',
+	dayOfWeek: 6,
+	placeDays: 2,
+	placeType: 'cp',
+	placement: 'auto',
+	rewardDays: 1,
+	rewardType: 'other',
+};
+const concurrent: PlanningRequest = {
+	horizon: { start: '2024-04-29', end: '2024-05-18' },
+	balances: [
+		{
+			id: 'cp',
+			type: 'cp',
+			quantity: 3,
+			availableFrom: '2024-04-29',
+			expiryDate: '2025-01-01',
+		},
+	],
+	rules: [],
+};
+
+function calculate(request: PlanningRequest, calculationDate = '2024-04-01') {
+	let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts = {};
+	const plan = calculatePlanningInternal(
+		{ ...request, calculationDate },
+		undefined,
+		(value) => (artifacts = value),
+	);
+	if (plan.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error(`Expected a plan, received ${plan.kind}`);
+	return { plan, artifacts };
+}
+
+describe('composed calendar objectives', () => {
+	it('follows either displayed order when a completed holiday week competes with greater natural gain', () => {
+		const holidayFirst = calculate({ ...concurrent, rules: [holiday, gain] }).plan;
+		const gainFirst = calculate({ ...concurrent, rules: [gain, holiday] }).plan;
+		expect(holidayFirst.placements.map((placement) => placement.date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-05-06',
+			'2024-05-07',
+			'2024-05-10',
+		]);
+		expect(holidayFirst.metrics).toMatchObject({ holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 });
+		expect(gainFirst.placements.map((placement) => placement.date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-04-29',
+			'2024-05-10',
+			'2024-05-17',
+		]);
+		expect(gainFirst.metrics).toMatchObject({ holidayWeekValue: 0, nonWorkingDayGain: 9 });
+	});
+
+	it('regroups existing placements as a complete week without leaving higher-priority at-risk leave unused', () => {
+		const loss: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+			id: 'loss',
+			type: 'optimization',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		};
+		const { plan } = calculate({
+			...concurrent,
+			balances: [{ ...concurrent.balances[0], expiryDate: '2024-05-17' }],
+			rules: [loss, holiday, gain],
+		});
+		expect(plan.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			unplacedAtRisk: 0,
+			holidayWeekValue: 5,
+			nonWorkingDayGain: 6,
+		});
+		expect(plan.placements.map((placement) => placement.date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-05-06',
+			'2024-05-07',
+			'2024-05-10',
+		]);
+		expect(plan.placements.every((placement) => !placement.supporting)).toBe(true);
+	});
+
+	it('preserves an earlier preference that minimizes supporting placements', () => {
+		const { plan } = calculate({
+			...concurrent,
+			rules: [
+				{
+					id: 'economy',
+					type: 'optimization',
+					configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+				},
+				holiday,
+			],
+		});
+		expect(plan.placements).toEqual([]);
+	});
+
+	it('uses edited holiday conditions and aggregation without dispatching by a preset identity', () => {
+		const counted: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+			...holiday,
+			id: 'my-complete-weeks',
+			configuration: { ...holiday.configuration, aggregation: 'count' },
+		};
+		const { plan, artifacts } = calculate({ ...concurrent, rules: [counted] });
+		expect(plan.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(5);
+		if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+			throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+		expect(artifacts.explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives[1]).toMatchObject({
+			id: 'optimization:my-complete-weeks',
+			value: 1,
+		});
+		const allWeeks = calculate({
+			...concurrent,
+			rules: [{ ...counted, configuration: { ...counted.configuration, conditions: [] } }],
+		}).plan;
+		expect(allWeeks.placements).toEqual([]);
+	});
+
+	it('attributes a coordinated holiday addition and its explanation to the active rule', () => {
+		const { plan, artifacts } = calculate(
+			{
+				horizon: { start: '2026-11-09', end: '2026-11-14' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'deferred-cp',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 2,
+						availableFrom: '2026-11-01',
+						expiryDate: '2027-01-01',
+					},
+				],
+				declaredDays: ['2026-11-09', '2026-11-10'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+				rules: [holiday],
+			},
+			'2026-11-01',
+		);
+		expect(plan.placements).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({ date: '2026-11-12', ruleIds: ['holiday'], supporting: true }),
+			expect.objectContaining({ date: '2026-11-13', ruleIds: ['holiday'], supporting: true }),
+		]);
+		if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+			throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+		for (const placement of artifacts.explanation.placements) {
+			expect(placement.firstDecisiveObjective).toBe('optimization:holiday');
+			expect(placement.contributions).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'rule', ruleId: 'holiday' }),
+			);
+		}
+	});
+
+	it.each<OptimizationConfiguration>([
+		{ ...gain.configuration, aggregation: 'maximum' },
+		{ ...gain.configuration, aggregation: 'count', direction: 'minimize' },
+	])(
+		'bridges fixed periods for the personal configuration $aggregation/$direction',
+		(configuration) => {
+			const { plan, artifacts } = calculate({
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-01-13' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'rtt',
+						type: 'rtt',
+						quantity: 4,
+						availableFrom: '2024-01-05',
+						expiryDate: '2025-01-01',
+					},
+				],
+				declaredDays: ['2024-01-05', '2024-01-12'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+				rules: [
+					{
+						...gain,
+						id: 'personal-maximum',
+						configuration,
+					},
+				],
+			});
+			expect(plan.placements.map((placement) => placement.date)).toEqual([
+				'2024-01-08',
+				'2024-01-09',
+				'2024-01-10',
+				'2024-01-11',
+			]);
+			expect(plan.timeOffPeriods).toHaveLength(1);
+			expect(plan.timeOffPeriods[0].nonWorkingDates).toEqual([
+				'2024-01-06',
+				'2024-01-07',
+				'2024-01-13',
+				'2024-01-14',
+			]);
+			expect(plan.metrics.nonWorkingDayGain).toBe(4);
+			expect(
+				plan.placements.every(({ ruleIds }) => ruleIds.includes('personal-maximum')),
+			).toBe(true);
+			if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+				throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+			for (const placement of artifacts.explanation.placements)
+				expect(placement.contributions).toContainEqual(
+					expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'rule', ruleId: 'personal-maximum' }),
+				);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it.each([false, true])(
+		'finishes a rejected bridge with an irrelevant typed rule: %s',
+		(withSamedi) => {
+			const { plan } = calculate({
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-02-06' },
+				balances: (['cp', 'rtt', 'other'] as const).map((type) => ({
+					id: type,
+					type,
+					quantity: 20,
+					availableFrom: '2024-01-05',
+					expiryDate: '2025-01-01',
+				})),
+				declaredDays: ['2024-01-05', '2024-02-05'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+				rules: [
+					{
+						id: 'economy',
+						type: 'optimization',
+						configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+					},
+					{
+						...gain,
+						configuration: {
+							...gain.configuration,
+							aggregation: 'count',
+							direction: 'minimize',
+						},
+					},
+					...(withSamedi ? [samedi] : []),
+				],
+				deadlineMs: 2_000,
+			});
+			expect(plan.placements).toEqual([]);
+			expect(plan.timeOffPeriods).toHaveLength(2);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('does not label a period-count bridge supporting when it adds no domain calendar benefit', () => {
+		const { plan } = calculate({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-31' },
+			balances: [{ ...concurrent.balances[0], quantity: 5, availableFrom: '2024-01-02' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-05', '2024-01-15'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [
+				{
+					...gain,
+					configuration: {
+						...gain.configuration,
+						aggregation: 'count',
+						direction: 'minimize',
+					},
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(plan.timeOffPeriods).toHaveLength(1);
+		expect(plan.placements).toHaveLength(5);
+		expect(plan.placements.every((placement) => !placement.supporting)).toBe(true);
+		expect(plan.metrics.nonWorkingDayGain).toBe(4);
+	});
+
+	it('can place the holiday preference before or after Samedi Malin', () => {
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2021-11-01', end: '2021-12-29' },
+			balances: [
+				{
+					id: 'cp',
+					type: 'cp',
+					quantity: 4,
+					availableFrom: '2021-11-01',
+					expiryDate: '2022-01-01',
+				},
+			],
+			rules: [],
+		};
+		const first = calculate({ ...request, rules: [holiday, samedi] }, '2021-10-01').plan;
+		const second = calculate({ ...request, rules: [samedi, holiday] }, '2021-10-01').plan;
+		expect(first.placements.map((placement) => placement.date)).toEqual([
+			'2021-11-08',
+			'2021-11-09',
+			'2021-11-10',
+			'2021-11-12',
+		]);
+		expect(first.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(2);
+		expect(first.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(0);
+		expect(second.placements.map((placement) => placement.date)).toEqual([
+			'2021-12-23',
+			'2021-12-24',
+		]);
+		expect(second.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(0);
+		expect(second.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+		expect(second.remainingBalances.find((balance) => balance.earned)).toMatchObject({
+			id: 'earned:samedi:2021-12-25',
+			quantity: 1,
+		});
+	});
+
+	it.each(['obligation', 'preference'] as const)(
+		'preserves a higher %s when completing a week would take its last balance',
+		(force) => {
+			const { plan } = calculate({
+				...concurrent,
+				rules: [
+					{
+						id: 'monday',
+						type: 'time_window',
+						force,
+						startDate: '2024-04-29',
+						endDate: '2024-04-29',
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+					},
+					holiday,
+				],
+			});
+			expect(plan.placements).toMatchObject([{ date: '2024-04-29', ruleIds: ['monday'] }]);
+			expect(plan.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(0);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('adds no residual loss-prevention or calendar placements when their rules are disabled', () => {
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-04-29', end: '2024-05-04' },
+			balances: [{ ...concurrent.balances[0], quantity: 5, expiryDate: '2024-05-03' }],
+			rules: [holiday],
+		};
+		const absent = calculate(request).plan;
+		const disabled = calculate({
+			...request,
+			rules: [
+				holiday,
+				{
+					id: 'loss',
+					type: 'optimization',
+					enabled: false,
+					configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+				},
+				{ ...gain, enabled: false },
+			],
+		}).plan;
+		expect(disabled).toEqual(absent);
+		expect(absent.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(1);
+		expect(absent.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(3);
+		expect(absent.placements).toHaveLength(4);
+		expect(
+			calculate({ ...request, rules: [{ ...holiday, enabled: false }] }).plan.placements,
+		).toEqual([]);
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		{ start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-11' },
+		{ start: '2024-05-10', end: '2024-05-11' },
+	])(
+		'uses declarations outside the horizon to complete a genuine holiday week ($start)',
+		(horizon) => {
+			const { plan } = calculate({
+				horizon,
+				balances: [{ ...concurrent.balances[0], quantity: 1, availableFrom: '2024-05-06' }],
+				declaredDays: ['2024-05-06', '2024-05-07'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+				rules: [holiday],
+			});
+			expect(plan.placements).toMatchObject([{ date: '2024-05-10', supporting: true }]);
+			expect(plan.metrics).toMatchObject({ holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 });
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('cannot fill missing weekdays outside the horizon or with unavailable balances', () => {
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-05-10', end: '2024-05-11' },
+			balances: [{ ...concurrent.balances[0], quantity: 1 }],
+			rules: [holiday],
+		};
+		expect(calculate(request).plan.placements).toEqual([]);
+		const unavailable = calculate({
+			...request,
+			balances: [{ ...request.balances[0], availableFrom: '2024-05-11' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-05-06', '2024-05-07'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+		}).plan;
+		expect(unavailable.placements).toEqual([]);
+		expect(unavailable.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('measures only distinct natural dates and leaves ordinary declared weeks ordinary', () => {
+		const christmas = calculate({
+			horizon: { start: '2021-12-24', end: '2021-12-25' },
+			balances: [],
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2021-12-24', type: 'other' }],
+			rules: [holiday, gain],
+		}).plan;
+		expect(christmas.metrics).toMatchObject({ holidayWeekValue: 0, nonWorkingDayGain: 2 });
+		expect(christmas.timeOffPeriods[0].nonWorkingDates).toEqual(['2021-12-25', '2021-12-26']);
+		const ordinary = calculate({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [],
+			declaredDays: ['08', '09', '10', '11', '12'].map((day) => ({
+				date: `2024-01-${day}`,
+				type: 'other',
+			})),
+			rules: [holiday],
+		}).plan;
+		expect(ordinary.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('uses the same first calendar objective in the explanation and date comparison', () => {
+		for (const rules of [
+			[holiday, gain],
+			[gain, holiday],
+		]) {
+			const request = { ...concurrent, rules };
+			const { plan, artifacts } = calculate(request);
+			const explanation = artifacts.explanation;
+			if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+			const first = `optimization:${rules[0].id}`;
+			expect(explanation.placements[0].firstDecisiveObjective).toBe(first);
+			expect(
+				explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives.map(
+					(objective) => objective.id,
+				),
+			).toEqual([
+				'obligation-validity',
+				first,
+				`optimization:${rules[1].id}`,
+				'balance-expiry',
+				'placement-date',
+			]);
+			const placement = rules[0].id === 'holiday' ? plan.placements[1] : plan.placements[0];
+			const alternative = rules[0].id === 'holiday' ? '2024-04-30' : '2024-05-02';
+			const comparison = analyzeCounterfactualInternal(
+				request,
+				plan,
+				placement,
+				artifacts.finalState,
+			);
+			const original = comparison.results.find((result) => result.date === placement.date)
+				?.comparison?.after;
+			const alternativeVector = comparison.results.find(
+				(result) => result.date === alternative,
+			)?.comparison?.after;
+			expect(
+				alternativeVector?.objectives.find(
+					(objective, index) => objective.value !== original?.objectives[index].value,
+				)?.id,
+			).toBe(first);
+		}
+	});
+});
@@ -1,9 +1,6 @@
+import { createOptimizationPresetRules } from './rule-service';
 import { vi } from 'vitest';
-import {
-	createPlanningCalculation,
-	type PlanningIncompleteOutcome,
-	type PlanningTraceUpdate,
-} from './leave-planner.service';
+import { createPlanningCalculation, type PlanningIncompleteOutcome } from './leave-planner.service';

 const request = {
 	horizon: { start: '2024-01-01', end: '2025-01-01' },
@@ -14,6 +11,8 @@ const request = {
 beforeEach(() => vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z')));
 afterEach(() => vi.useRealTimers());

+const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();
+
 describe('user cancellation', () => {
 	const workers: CancellableWorker[] = [];
 	const currentWorker = () => workers[workers.length - 1];
@@ -43,7 +42,6 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			kind: 'PlanningIncomplete',
 			reasons: [{ code: 'user-cancelled' }],
 		});
-		expect((await calculation.trace)?.status).toBe('incomplete');
 	});

 	it('retains the same declared-only periods and metrics in a cancelled valid plan', async () => {
@@ -51,7 +49,7 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 		const submitted = {
 			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-09' },
 			balances: [],
-			rules: [],
+			rules: [presets[2]],
 			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-05', type: 'other' as const }],
 		};
 		let interrupted = false;
@@ -60,7 +58,7 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			{
 				...submitted,
 				progress: (stage: string) => {
-					if (stage === 'non-working-day-gain') interrupted = true;
+					if (stage === 'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain') interrupted = true;
 				},
 			},
 			undefined,
@@ -93,7 +91,6 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			placements: [],
 			incomplete: { reason: { code: 'user-cancelled' } },
 		});
-		expect(artifacts.trace?.status).toBe('incomplete');
 		expect(artifacts.finalState?.declaredDays).toEqual(submitted.declaredDays);
 	});

@@ -115,14 +112,17 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 				{ date: '2024-01-11', type: 'rtt' as const },
 			],
 			rules: [
-				{ id: 'exact-cp', force: 'obligation', placeDays: 2, placeType: 'cp' },
-				{ id: 'preferred-rtt', force: 'preference', placeDays: 1, placeType: 'rtt' },
-			].map((rule) => ({
-				...rule,
-				type: 'time_window',
-				startDate: '2024-01-08',
-				endDate: '2024-01-12',
-			})),
+				presets[1],
+				...[
+					{ id: 'exact-cp', force: 'obligation', placeDays: 2, placeType: 'cp' },
+					{ id: 'preferred-rtt', force: 'preference', placeDays: 1, placeType: 'rtt' },
+				].map((rule) => ({
+					...rule,
+					type: 'time_window',
+					startDate: '2024-01-08',
+					endDate: '2024-01-12',
+				})),
+			],
 		};
 		let interrupted = false;
 		let artifacts: import('./leave-planner.core').PlanningArtifacts = {};
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			{
 				...submitted,
 				progress: (stage: string) => {
-					if (stage === 'holiday-week-value') interrupted = true;
+					if (stage === 'optimization:default-holiday-week-value') interrupted = true;
 				},
 			},
 			undefined,
@@ -187,20 +187,20 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			kind: 'IncompleteExplanation',
 			reason: { code: 'stale-calculation' },
 		});
-		expect((await replaced.trace)?.error).toMatchObject({ code: 'stale-calculation' });
 		expect(await current.outcome).toMatchObject({ kind: 'Plan' });
-		await current.trace;
 	});

-	it('retains a plan at least as good as every valid candidate actually evaluated before cancellation', async () => {
+	it('retains a plan at least as good as every valid checkpoint before cancellation', async () => {
 		const core = await import('./leave-planner.core');
 		let cancelled = false;
 		let artifacts: import('./leave-planner.core').PlanningArtifacts = {};
-		const outcome = await core.calculatePlanningAsyncInternal(
-			{
-				horizon: request.horizon,
-				balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-12-31' }],
-				rules: [
+		const checkpoints: (readonly import('./leave-planner.core').PlanningObjective[])[] = [];
+		const submitted = {
+			horizon: request.horizon,
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-12-31' }],
+			rules: [
+				presets[0],
+				...[
 					{
 						id: 'january',
 						type: 'time_window',
@@ -211,11 +211,23 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 						placeType: 'cp',
 					},
 				],
-				progress: (stage: string) => {
-					if (stage === 'longest-work-sequence') cancelled = true;
-				},
+				...presets.slice(1),
+			],
+			progress: (stage: string) => {
+				if (stage === 'optimization:default-longest-work-sequence') cancelled = true;
+			},
+		};
+		const outcome = await core.calculatePlanningAsyncInternal(
+			submitted,
+			(plan, state) => {
+				if (!state) return;
+				const explained = core.explainIncompleteCheckpoint(submitted, plan, state, {
+					code: 'user-cancelled',
+					message: 'Cancelled',
+				}).explanation;
+				if (explained?.kind === 'PlanExplanation' && explained.placements.length)
+					checkpoints.push(explained.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives);
 			},
-			undefined,
 			(value) => (artifacts = value),
 			undefined,
 			undefined,
@@ -225,36 +237,25 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			kind: 'PlanningIncomplete',
 			reasons: [{ code: 'user-cancelled' }],
 		});
-		if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation' || !artifacts.trace)
-			throw new Error('Expected a retained plan explanation and its original trace.');
+		if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+			throw new Error('Expected a retained plan explanation.');
 		const retained = artifacts.explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives;
-		const evaluated = artifacts.trace.phases.flatMap((phase) =>
-			phase.decisions.flatMap((decision) =>
-				decision.candidates.flatMap((candidate) =>
-					candidate.comparison?.after.objectives[0].value === 0
-						? [candidate.comparison.after.objectives]
-						: [],
-				),
-			),
-		);
-		expect(evaluated.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-		for (const candidate of evaluated) {
+		expect(checkpoints.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+		for (const candidate of checkpoints) {
 			expect(candidate.map(({ id }) => id)).toEqual(retained.map(({ id }) => id));
-			const firstDifference = retained.findIndex(
+			const first = retained.findIndex(
 				(objective, index) => objective.value !== candidate[index].value,
 			);
-			if (firstDifference < 0) continue;
-			const chosen = retained[firstDifference];
-			const alternative = candidate[firstDifference];
+			if (first < 0) continue;
 			expect(
-				chosen.direction === 'minimize'
-					? chosen.value < alternative.value
-					: chosen.value > alternative.value,
+				retained[first].direction === 'minimize'
+					? retained[first].value < candidate[first].value
+					: retained[first].value > candidate[first].value,
 			).toBe(true);
 		}
 	});

-	it('requests interruption before a valid plan without terminating trace delivery', async () => {
+	it('requests interruption before a valid plan and terminates after required delivery', async () => {
 		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(request);
 		calculation.cancel();
 		calculation.cancel();
@@ -275,27 +276,23 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 		expect(await calculation.outcome).toEqual({ ...cancelled, calculationDate: '2024-01-01' });
 		expect(currentWorker().terminate).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
 		currentWorker().emit({ type: 'artifacts', artifacts: {} });
-		await calculation.trace;
 		expect(currentWorker().terminate).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
 	});

-	it('drains records queued before and after cancellation while keeping the partial plan on artifact error', async () => {
+	it('keeps a cancelled partial plan after explanation delivery fails', async () => {
 		const core = await import('./leave-planner.core');
-		const updates: PlanningTraceUpdate[] = [];
 		let interrupted = false;
 		let artifacts: import('./leave-planner.core').PlanningArtifacts = {};
 		const submitted = {
 			horizon: { start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-02-01' },
 			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp' as const, quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-01-31' }],
-			rules: [],
+			rules: presets,
 		};
 		const cancelled = await core.calculatePlanningAsyncInternal(
 			{
 				...submitted,
-				traceProgress: (_: number, update: PlanningTraceUpdate) =>
-					updates.push(structuredClone(update)),
 				progress: (stage: string) => {
-					if (stage === 'non-working-day-gain') interrupted = true;
+					if (stage === 'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain') interrupted = true;
 				},
 			},
 			undefined,
@@ -304,20 +301,9 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			undefined,
 			() => interrupted,
 		);
-		if (cancelled.kind !== 'PlanningIncomplete' || !cancelled.incumbent || !artifacts.trace)
-			throw new Error('Expected a cancelled fixture with a valid plan and original trace.');
+		if (cancelled.kind !== 'PlanningIncomplete' || !cancelled.incumbent)
+			throw new Error('Expected a cancelled fixture with a valid plan.');
 		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(submitted);
-		const operations = updates.flatMap(({ operations }) => operations);
-		const split = Math.floor(operations.length / 2);
-		currentWorker().emit({
-			type: 'trace-update',
-			totalMs: 0,
-			acknowledge: true,
-			update: {
-				...updates[0],
-				operations: operations.slice(0, split),
-			},
-		});
 		calculation.cancel();
 		currentWorker().emit({ type: 'result', outcome: cancelled });
 		currentWorker().emit({ type: 'result', outcome: cancelled.incumbent });
@@ -326,29 +312,14 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			explanationError: { code: 'explanation-error', message: 'Unavailable' },
 		});
 		currentWorker().emit({
-			type: 'trace-update',
-			totalMs: 0,
-			acknowledge: true,
-			update: {
-				operations: operations.slice(split),
-			},
-		});
-		const trace = artifacts.trace;
-		currentWorker().emit({
-			type: 'artifacts-start',
+			type: 'artifacts',
 			artifacts: {},
-			trace: {
-				status: trace.status,
-				initialState: trace.initialState,
-				completedStages: trace.completedStages,
-				nonWorkingDates: trace.nonWorkingDates,
-				error: trace.error,
-			},
 		});
-		currentWorker().emit({ type: 'artifacts-complete' });
 		expect(await calculation.outcome).toEqual({ ...cancelled, calculationDate: '2024-01-01' });
 		expect(await calculation.explanationError).toMatchObject({ code: 'explanation-error' });
-		expect(await calculation.trace).toEqual(trace);
+		expect(currentWorker().terminate).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
+		expect(currentWorker().postMessage).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+		expect(artifacts.finalState?.placements).toEqual(cancelled.incumbent.placements);
 	});

 	it.each([false, true])(
@@ -389,7 +360,6 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			kind: 'PlanningIncomplete',
 			reasons: [{ code: 'worker-error' }],
 		});
-		expect((await calculation.trace)?.status).toBe('failed');
 	});

 	it('keeps a cancellation accepted before a queued completion and adapts its explanation without replay', async () => {
@@ -414,7 +384,6 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 			kind: 'PlanExplanation',
 			incomplete: { reason: { code: 'user-cancelled' } },
 		});
-		expect((await calculation.trace)?.status).toBe('incomplete');
 		expect(currentWorker().postMessage).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
 	});

@@ -443,7 +412,6 @@ describe('user cancellation', () => {
 		currentWorker().emit({ type: 'result', outcome });
 		currentWorker().emit({ type: 'artifacts', artifacts: {} });
 		expect(await newer.outcome).toEqual({ ...outcome, calculationDate: '2024-01-01' });
-		await newer.trace;
 		const sent = currentWorker().postMessage.mock.calls.length;
 		newer.cancel();
 		expect(currentWorker().postMessage).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(sent);
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+import { createOptimizationPresetRules } from './rule-service';
+import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
+import { calculatePlanningInternal, type PlanningArtifacts } from './leave-planner.core';
+import {
+	evaluateOptimization,
+	OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS,
+	type OptimizationObservations,
+} from './planning-objectives';
+
+const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();
+
+describe('planning objective observations', () => {
+	it.each([
+		{ start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-13' },
+		{ start: '2024-05-10', end: '2024-05-11' },
+	])(
+		'evaluates the same declared holiday week and supporting placement at horizon boundaries',
+		(horizon) => {
+			const result = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				horizon,
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'cp',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 1,
+						availableFrom: '2024-05-06',
+						expiryDate: '2025-05-06',
+					},
+				],
+				rules: presets,
+				declaredDays: ['2024-05-06', '2024-05-07'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			});
+			expect(result.kind).toBe('Plan');
+			if (result.kind !== 'Plan') return;
+			expect(result.placements).toEqual([
+				{
+					date: '2024-05-10',
+					balanceId: 'cp',
+					type: 'cp',
+					ruleIds: ['default-holiday-week-value'],
+					supporting: true,
+				},
+			]);
+			const observations: OptimizationObservations = {
+				leaveBalances: [{ unplacedQuantity: 0, atRisk: false }],
+				publicHolidayWeeks: [{ value: 5, complete: true }],
+				timeOffPeriods: result.timeOffPeriods,
+				workSequences: [
+					{ length: 0, internal: false },
+					{ length: 0, internal: false },
+				],
+				leavePlacements: result.placements,
+			};
+			expect(
+				Object.values(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS).map((configuration) =>
+					evaluateOptimization(configuration, observations),
+				),
+			).toEqual([0, 5, 6, 0, 0, 1]);
+			expect(result.metrics).toMatchObject({
+				unplacedAtRisk: 0,
+				holidayWeekValue: 5,
+				nonWorkingDayGain: 6,
+				longestWorkSequence: 0,
+				shortSequenceDeficit: 0,
+				supportingPlacements: 1,
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('uses internal working-day deficits while retaining both horizon edges in the maximum', () => {
+		const result = calculatePlanningInternal({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-18' },
+			balances: [],
+			rules: [],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-05', '2024-01-09'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+		});
+		expect(result.kind).toBe('Plan');
+		if (result.kind !== 'Plan') return;
+		expect(result.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			longestWorkSequence: 6,
+			shortSequenceDeficit: 4,
+			nonWorkingDayGain: 2,
+		});
+		const observations: OptimizationObservations = {
+			leaveBalances: [],
+			publicHolidayWeeks: [],
+			timeOffPeriods: result.timeOffPeriods,
+			workSequences: [
+				{ length: 3, internal: false },
+				{ length: 1, internal: true },
+				{ length: 6, internal: false },
+			],
+			leavePlacements: result.placements,
+		};
+		expect(evaluateOptimization(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, observations)).toBe(
+			4,
+		);
+		expect(
+			evaluateOptimization(
+				{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, thresholdDays: 3 },
+				observations,
+			),
+		).toBe(2);
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		['2024-01-01', '2024-01-06', ['2024-01-02', '2024-01-03', '2024-01-04', '2024-01-05'], 1],
+		['2018-04-30', '2018-05-05', ['2018-04-30', '2018-05-02', '2018-05-03', '2018-05-04'], 2],
+		['2024-04-29', '2024-05-04', ['2024-04-29', '2024-04-30', '2024-05-02', '2024-05-03'], 3],
+		['2024-08-12', '2024-08-17', ['2024-08-12', '2024-08-13', '2024-08-14', '2024-08-16'], 2],
+		['2024-10-28', '2024-11-02', ['2024-10-28', '2024-10-29', '2024-10-30', '2024-10-31'], 1],
+	] as const)(
+		'retains the weekday holiday weight in the completed week starting %s',
+		(start, end, dates, value) => {
+			const result = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				horizon: { start, end },
+				balances: [],
+				rules: [],
+				declaredDays: dates.map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			});
+			expect(result.kind).toBe('Plan');
+			if (result.kind === 'Plan') expect(result.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(value);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('keeps the historical objective order in the explanation of a jointly valid plan', () => {
+		let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts | undefined;
+		const result = calculatePlanningInternal(
+			{
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-18' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'cp',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 1,
+						availableFrom: '2024-01-02',
+						expiryDate: '2024-01-17',
+					},
+				],
+				rules: [
+					presets[0],
+					...[
+						{
+							id: 'fixed',
+							type: 'time_window',
+							force: 'obligation',
+							startDate: '2024-01-05',
+							endDate: '2024-01-05',
+							placeDays: 1,
+							placeType: 'cp',
+						},
+						{
+							id: 'personal',
+							type: 'time_window',
+							force: 'preference',
+							startDate: '2024-01-09',
+							endDate: '2024-01-09',
+							placeDays: 1,
+							placeType: 'cp',
+						},
+					],
+					...presets.slice(1),
+				],
+			},
+			undefined,
+			(value) => (artifacts = value),
+		);
+		expect(result.kind).toBe('Plan');
+		expect(artifacts?.explanation?.kind).toBe('PlanExplanation');
+		if (artifacts?.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') return;
+		const placement = artifacts.explanation.placements[0];
+		expect(placement.objectiveVector.objectives.map((objective) => objective.id)).toEqual([
+			'obligation-validity',
+			'optimization:default-unplaced-at-risk',
+			'preference:personal',
+			'optimization:default-holiday-week-value',
+			'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain',
+			'optimization:default-longest-work-sequence',
+			'optimization:default-short-sequence-deficit',
+			'optimization:default-supporting-placements',
+			'balance-expiry',
+			'placement-date',
+		]);
+		expect(placement.firstDecisiveObjective).toBe('obligation-validity');
+	});
+});
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-import { afterEach, beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest';
-import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
-
-beforeEach(() => vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined));
-afterEach(() => vi.unstubAllGlobals());
-
-describe('quality calculation trace', () => {
-	it('separates source effects from the actual incumbent comparison', async () => {
-		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
-			horizon: { start: '2024-01-01', end: '2024-02-01' },
-			balances: [
-				{
-					id: 'cp',
-					type: 'cp',
-					quantity: 2,
-					availableFrom: '2024-01-01',
-					expiryDate: '2024-01-31',
-				},
-			],
-			rules: [],
-		});
-		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
-		const trace = await calculation.trace;
-		expect(outcome.kind).toBe('Plan');
-		expect(trace?.status).toBe('ready');
-		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan' || !trace) return;
-
-		const phase = trace.phases.find((item) => item.name === 'non-working-day-gain');
-		const jan3Decision = phase?.decisions.find((decision) =>
-			decision.candidates.some((candidate) => candidate.sourceDate === '2024-01-03'),
-		);
-		const jan2Decision = phase?.decisions.find((decision) =>
-			decision.candidates.some((candidate) => candidate.sourceDate === '2024-01-02'),
-		);
-		const jan5 = jan3Decision?.candidates.find(
-			(candidate) => candidate.sourceDate === '2024-01-03' && candidate.date === '2024-01-05',
-		);
-		const jan8 = jan3Decision?.candidates.find(
-			(candidate) => candidate.sourceDate === '2024-01-03' && candidate.date === '2024-01-08',
-		);
-
-		expect(jan2Decision).toBeDefined();
-		expect(jan3Decision).toBeDefined();
-		expect(jan3Decision).not.toBe(jan2Decision);
-		expect(jan3Decision?.dates).toEqual(['2024-01-03', '2024-01-05']);
-		expect(jan5?.status).toBe('chosen');
-		expect(jan8?.status).toBe('evaluated-rejected');
-		expect(jan3Decision?.deltas).toContainEqual(
-			expect.objectContaining({
-				kind: 'placement-moved',
-				fromDate: '2024-01-03',
-				toDate: '2024-01-05',
-			}),
-		);
-
-		const sourceValue = (
-			candidate: typeof jan5,
-			state: 'before' | 'after',
-			objective: string,
-		) => candidate?.comparison?.[state].objectives.find((item) => item.id === objective)?.value;
-		expect(sourceValue(jan5, 'before', 'non-working-day-gain')).toBe(3);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan5, 'after', 'non-working-day-gain')).toBe(5);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan5, 'before', 'longest-work-sequence')).toBe(20);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan5, 'after', 'longest-work-sequence')).toBe(18);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan8, 'before', 'non-working-day-gain')).toBe(3);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan8, 'after', 'non-working-day-gain')).toBe(5);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan8, 'before', 'longest-work-sequence')).toBe(20);
-		expect(sourceValue(jan8, 'after', 'longest-work-sequence')).toBe(17);
-		expect(jan8?.comparison?.firstDecisiveObjective).toBe('non-working-day-gain');
-
-		expect(jan8?.technicalComparison).toEqual(
-			expect.arrayContaining([
-				expect.objectContaining({
-					name: 'non-working-day-gain',
-					direction: 'maximize',
-					before: 5,
-					after: 5,
-				}),
-			]),
-		);
-		expect(
-			jan8?.technicalComparison?.some((item) => item.name === 'longest-work-sequence'),
-		).toBe(false);
-		expect(jan8?.firstDecisiveComparator).toBeUndefined();
-		expect(jan8?.reason?.message).toContain('did not improve the current best result');
-	});
-});
@@ -0,0 +1,735 @@
+import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import {
+	calculatePlanningAsyncInternal,
+	calculatePlanningInternal,
+	type OptimizationPlanningRule,
+	type PlanOutcome,
+	type PlanningArtifacts,
+	type PlanningRequest,
+} from './leave-planner.core';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from './planning-objectives';
+import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
+
+const economy: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+	id: 'economy',
+	name: 'Économiser les jours d’appoint',
+	type: 'optimization',
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+};
+const gain: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+	id: 'gain',
+	type: 'optimization',
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain,
+};
+const requested: PlanningRequest['rules'][number] = {
+	id: 'requested',
+	type: 'time_window',
+	startDate: '2024-01-05',
+	endDate: '2024-01-05',
+	placeDays: 1,
+	placeType: 'cp',
+};
+const weekend: PlanningRequest = {
+	horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-01-10' },
+	balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2025-01-01' }],
+	rules: [],
+};
+const bundles: {
+	name: string;
+	rule: OptimizationPlanningRule;
+	request: PlanningRequest;
+	dates: string[];
+}[] = [
+	{
+		name: 'complete public-holiday week',
+		rule: {
+			id: 'holiday',
+			type: 'optimization',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue,
+		},
+		request: {
+			horizon: { start: '2026-11-09', end: '2026-11-14' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2027-01-01' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2026-11-09', '2026-11-10'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [],
+		},
+		dates: ['2026-11-12', '2026-11-13'],
+	},
+	{
+		name: 'non-working-day gain',
+		rule: gain,
+		request: weekend,
+		dates: ['2024-01-05'],
+	},
+	{
+		name: 'maximum non-working gain of a joined period',
+		rule: {
+			...gain,
+			configuration: { ...gain.configuration, aggregation: 'maximum' },
+		},
+		request: {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 4, expiryDate: '2025-01-01' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-05', '2024-01-12'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [],
+		},
+		dates: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-09', '2024-01-10', '2024-01-11'],
+	},
+	{
+		name: 'complete short internal work sequence',
+		rule: {
+			id: 'deficit',
+			type: 'optimization',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+		},
+		request: {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-12'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [],
+		},
+		dates: ['2024-01-09', '2024-01-10', '2024-01-11'],
+	},
+	{
+		name: 'tied longest work sequences',
+		rule: {
+			id: 'longest',
+			type: 'optimization',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence,
+		},
+		request: {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-10', type: 'other' }],
+			rules: [],
+		},
+		dates: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-11'],
+	},
+];
+
+function plan(request: PlanningRequest): PlanOutcome {
+	const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal(request);
+	if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error(`Expected a plan, got ${outcome.kind}`);
+	return outcome;
+}
+
+describe('supporting placement economy and provenance', () => {
+	beforeEach(() => vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z')));
+	afterEach(() => vi.useRealTimers());
+
+	it.each(bundles)(
+		'compares the whole $name bundle against economy in either order',
+		({ rule, request, dates }) => {
+			const improve = plan({ ...request, rules: [rule, economy] });
+			const preserve = plan({ ...request, rules: [economy, rule] });
+			expect(improve.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(dates);
+			expect(improve.placements.every(({ supporting }) => supporting)).toBe(true);
+			expect(improve.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(dates.length);
+			expect(improve.remainingBalances).toEqual([]);
+			expect(preserve.placements).toEqual([]);
+			expect(preserve.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+			expect(preserve.remainingBalances[0]).toMatchObject({
+				id: 'cp',
+				quantity: request.balances[0].quantity,
+				classification: 'deferred',
+				reason: { code: 'preserved' },
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it.each(bundles)(
+		'makes disabled economy identical to absence for the $name bundle',
+		({ rule, request }) => {
+			const absent = plan({ ...request, rules: [rule] });
+			for (const rules of [
+				[{ ...economy, enabled: false }, rule],
+				[rule, { ...economy, enabled: false }],
+			])
+				expect(plan({ ...request, rules })).toEqual(absent);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('does not add placements merely because economy is disabled or removed', () => {
+		for (const rules of [[], [economy], [{ ...economy, enabled: false }]]) {
+			const outcome = plan({ ...weekend, rules });
+			expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([]);
+			expect(outcome.remainingBalances[0].quantity).toBe(1);
+		}
+	});
+
+	it('credits an earlier supporting placement to a later explicit window without counting an extra day', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...weekend,
+			rules: [gain, economy, requested],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2024-01-05',
+				balanceId: 'cp',
+				ruleIds: ['gain', 'requested'],
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject({ nonWorkingDayGain: 2, supportingPlacements: 0 });
+		expect(outcome.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('exempts only the requested window quantity, including fixed declared days', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...weekend,
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-01-20' },
+			balances: [{ ...weekend.balances[0], quantity: 3 }],
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-09', type: 'cp' }],
+			rules: [gain, economy, { ...requested, endDate: '2024-01-19', placeDays: 2 }],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date, supporting }) => ({ date, supporting }))).toEqual([
+			{ date: '2024-01-05', supporting: false },
+			{ date: '2024-01-12', supporting: true },
+			{ date: '2024-01-19', supporting: true },
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(2);
+		expect(outcome.timeWindowContributions?.[0]).toMatchObject({
+			requested: 2,
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-09', type: 'cp' }],
+			placementDates: ['2024-01-05'],
+		});
+	});
+
+	it.each([false, true])(
+		'bounds explicit calendar credit before accepting further window improvements (declared: %s)',
+		(declared) => {
+			const windowRule = { ...requested, endDate: '2024-01-19' };
+			const request: PlanningRequest = {
+				...weekend,
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-01-20' },
+				balances: [{ ...weekend.balances[0], quantity: 4 }],
+				declaredDays: declared ? [{ date: '2024-01-09', type: 'cp' }] : [],
+				rules: [economy, gain, windowRule],
+			};
+			const preserve = plan(request);
+			expect(preserve.placements).toEqual(
+				declared
+					? []
+					: [
+							expect.objectContaining({
+								date: '2024-01-05',
+								ruleIds: ['requested'],
+								supporting: false,
+							}),
+						],
+			);
+			expect(preserve.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+			expect(preserve.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+			expect(preserve.remainingBalances[0]).toMatchObject({
+				id: 'cp',
+				quantity: declared ? 4 : 3,
+			});
+			const improve = plan({ ...request, rules: [gain, economy, windowRule] });
+			expect(improve.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual([
+				'2024-01-05',
+				'2024-01-12',
+				'2024-01-19',
+			]);
+			expect(
+				improve.placements.filter(({ ruleIds }) => ruleIds.includes('requested')),
+			).toHaveLength(declared ? 0 : 1);
+			expect(improve.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(declared ? 3 : 2);
+			expect(
+				plan({ ...request, rules: [{ ...economy, enabled: false }, gain, windowRule] }),
+			).toEqual(plan({ ...request, rules: [gain, windowRule] }));
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('restores supporting classification when a moved placement loses its explicit calendar request', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...weekend,
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-05', end: '2024-01-20' },
+			balances: [{ ...weekend.balances[0], quantity: 4 }],
+			rules: [
+				gain,
+				{ ...requested, startDate: '2024-01-08', endDate: '2024-01-09' },
+				bundles[4].rule,
+				economy,
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			nonWorkingDayGain: 6,
+			longestWorkSequence: 3,
+			supportingPlacements: 3,
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.filter(({ supporting }) => !supporting)).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2024-01-08',
+				ruleIds: ['gain', 'requested'],
+			}),
+		]);
+	});
+
+	it.each(['preference', 'obligation'] as const)(
+		'keeps explicitly requested deferred days outside economy (%s)',
+		(force) => {
+			const outcome = plan({ ...weekend, rules: [economy, { ...requested, force }, gain] });
+			expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					date: '2024-01-05',
+					ruleIds: ['requested'],
+					supporting: false,
+				}),
+			]);
+			expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject({
+				nonWorkingDayGain: 2,
+				supportingPlacements: 0,
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('credits the complete explicit IF_THEN pattern without treating its deferred day as support', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-11' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2025-01-01' }],
+			rules: [
+				gain,
+				economy,
+				{
+					id: 'thursday',
+					type: 'if_then',
+					dayOfWeek: 4,
+					placeDays: 1,
+					placeType: 'cp',
+					placement: 'after',
+					rewardDays: 0,
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2024-05-10',
+				ruleIds: ['gain', 'thursday'],
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it.each(['preference', 'obligation'] as const)(
+		'limits IF_THEN credit to its declared producer pattern when another complete pattern improves rest (%s)',
+		(force) => {
+			const request: PlanningRequest = {
+				horizon: { start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-11' },
+				balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 4, expiryDate: '2025-01-01' }],
+				declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-05-07', type: 'cp' }],
+				rules: [
+					economy,
+					gain,
+					{
+						id: 'producer',
+						type: 'if_then',
+						force,
+						dayOfWeek: 3,
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+						placement: 'auto',
+						rewardDays: 1,
+						rewardType: 'rtt',
+					},
+				],
+			};
+			const preserve = plan(request);
+			expect(preserve.placements).toEqual([]);
+			expect(preserve.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+			expect(preserve.remainingBalances).toEqual([
+				expect.objectContaining({ id: 'cp', quantity: 4 }),
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					id: 'earned:producer:2024-05-08',
+					quantity: 1,
+					availableFrom: '2024-05-10',
+				}),
+			]);
+			expect(preserve.ifThenContributions?.[0]).toMatchObject({
+				declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-05-07', type: 'cp' }],
+				placementDates: [],
+				earnedEntitlement: { availableFrom: '2024-05-10', added: true },
+			});
+			const improve = plan({ ...request, rules: [gain, economy, request.rules[2]] });
+			expect(improve.placements).toEqual([
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					date: '2024-05-06',
+					ruleIds: ['gain'],
+					supporting: true,
+				}),
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					date: '2024-05-10',
+					ruleIds: ['gain'],
+					supporting: true,
+				}),
+			]);
+			expect(improve.metrics).toMatchObject({
+				nonWorkingDayGain: 6,
+				supportingPlacements: 2,
+			});
+			expect(improve.remainingBalances).toEqual([
+				expect.objectContaining({ id: 'cp', quantity: 2 }),
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					id: 'earned:producer:2024-05-08',
+					quantity: 1,
+					availableFrom: '2024-05-13',
+				}),
+			]);
+			expect(improve.ifThenContributions?.[0]).toMatchObject({
+				declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-05-07', type: 'cp' }],
+				placementDates: [],
+				earnedEntitlement: { availableFrom: '2024-05-13', added: true },
+			});
+			expect(
+				plan({
+					...request,
+					rules: [{ ...economy, enabled: false }, gain, request.rules[2]],
+				}),
+			).toEqual(plan({ ...request, rules: [gain, request.rules[2]] }));
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('uses expiry then dates when active rules tie, without restoring a removed gain objective', () => {
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-09', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'later', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-03-01' },
+				{ id: 'earlier', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' },
+			],
+			rules: [economy, { ...requested, startDate: '2024-01-09', endDate: '2024-01-12' }],
+		};
+		const outcome = plan(request);
+		expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2024-01-09',
+				balanceId: 'earlier',
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.nonWorkingDayGain).toBe(0);
+		expect(
+			plan({ ...request, rules: [{ ...gain, enabled: false }, ...request.rules] }),
+		).toEqual(outcome);
+	});
+
+	it('reclassifies a deferred support addition when an eligible earlier-expiring balance replaces it', () => {
+		const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-11' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'deferred', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2025-01-01' },
+				{
+					id: 'at-risk',
+					type: 'rtt',
+					quantity: 1,
+					availableFrom: '2024-05-07',
+					expiryDate: '2024-05-07',
+				},
+			],
+			rules: [bundles[0].rule, economy],
+		});
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a plan');
+		expect(
+			outcome.placements.map(({ date, balanceId, supporting }) => ({
+				date,
+				balanceId,
+				supporting,
+			})),
+		).toEqual([
+			{ date: '2024-05-06', balanceId: 'deferred', supporting: true },
+			{ date: '2024-05-07', balanceId: 'at-risk', supporting: false },
+			{ date: '2024-05-10', balanceId: 'deferred', supporting: true },
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(2);
+		expect(outcome.remainingBalances[0]).toMatchObject({ id: 'deferred', quantity: 1 });
+	});
+
+	it('compares new deferred support when at-risk holiday placements relocate into an explicit window', async () => {
+		const holiday = bundles[0].rule;
+		const early: PlanningRequest['rules'][number] = {
+			id: 'early',
+			type: 'time_window',
+			startDate: '2026-11-02',
+			endDate: '2026-11-03',
+			placeDays: 2,
+			placeType: 'cp',
+		};
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2026-11-02', end: '2026-11-14' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'at-risk', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2026-11-13' },
+				{
+					id: 'deferred',
+					type: 'cp',
+					quantity: 2,
+					availableFrom: '2026-11-12',
+					expiryDate: '2027-01-01',
+				},
+			],
+			declaredDays: ['2026-11-09', '2026-11-10'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [],
+		};
+		const economyFirst = plan({ ...request, rules: [holiday, economy, early] });
+		let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts | undefined;
+		const windowFirst = calculatePlanningInternal(
+			{
+				...request,
+				rules: [holiday, early, economy],
+			},
+			(checkpoint, state) => expect(state?.placements).toEqual(checkpoint.placements),
+			(value) => (artifacts = value),
+		);
+		if (windowFirst.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a plan');
+		expect(economyFirst.placements).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2026-11-12',
+				balanceId: 'at-risk',
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2026-11-13',
+				balanceId: 'at-risk',
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+		]);
+		expect(economyFirst.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+		expect(economyFirst.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(0);
+		expect(economyFirst.remainingBalances[0]).toMatchObject({ id: 'deferred', quantity: 2 });
+		expect(windowFirst.placements).toEqual([
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2026-11-02',
+				balanceId: 'at-risk',
+				ruleIds: ['early'],
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2026-11-03',
+				balanceId: 'at-risk',
+				ruleIds: ['early'],
+				supporting: false,
+			}),
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2026-11-12',
+				balanceId: 'deferred',
+				ruleIds: ['holiday'],
+				supporting: true,
+			}),
+			expect.objectContaining({
+				date: '2026-11-13',
+				balanceId: 'deferred',
+				ruleIds: ['holiday'],
+				supporting: true,
+			}),
+		]);
+		expect(windowFirst.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(2);
+		expect(windowFirst.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(2);
+		expect(windowFirst.metrics.holidayWeekValue).toBe(3);
+		if (artifacts?.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation' || !artifacts.finalState)
+			throw new Error('Expected matching explanation and state snapshots');
+		expect(artifacts.finalState.placements).toEqual(windowFirst.placements);
+		expect(artifacts.explanation.placements.map(({ placement }) => placement)).toEqual(
+			windowFirst.placements,
+		);
+		for (const placement of artifacts.explanation.placements) {
+			const contribution = expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'rule', ruleId: 'holiday' });
+			if (placement.supporting) {
+				expect(placement.ruleIds).toEqual(['holiday']);
+				expect(placement.contributions).toContainEqual(contribution);
+				expect(placement.firstDecisiveObjective).toBe('optimization:holiday');
+			} else {
+				expect(placement.ruleIds).toEqual(['early']);
+				expect(placement.contributions).not.toContainEqual(contribution);
+			}
+		}
+		let cancelled = false;
+		let cancelledArtifacts: PlanningArtifacts | undefined;
+		let published: PlanOutcome | undefined;
+		const partial = await calculatePlanningAsyncInternal(
+			{
+				...request,
+				rules: [holiday, early, economy],
+				progress: (stage: string) => {
+					if (stage === 'optimization:economy') cancelled = true;
+				},
+			},
+			(checkpoint, state) => {
+				expect(state?.placements).toEqual(checkpoint.placements);
+				if (checkpoint.lastCompletedStage === 'preference:early') published = checkpoint;
+			},
+			(value) => (cancelledArtifacts = value),
+			undefined,
+			undefined,
+			() => cancelled,
+		);
+		if (
+			partial.kind !== 'PlanningIncomplete' ||
+			!partial.incumbent ||
+			cancelledArtifacts?.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation'
+		)
+			throw new Error('Expected an explained cancelled incumbent');
+		expect(partial.reasons[0].code).toBe('user-cancelled');
+		expect(partial.incumbent.placements).toEqual(windowFirst.placements);
+		expect(partial.incumbent.placements).toEqual(published?.placements);
+		expect(partial.incumbent.preferences).toMatchObject([{ ruleId: 'early', satisfied: 2 }]);
+		expect(cancelledArtifacts.finalState?.placements).toEqual(partial.incumbent.placements);
+		expect(cancelledArtifacts.explanation.placements.map(({ placement }) => placement)).toEqual(
+			partial.incumbent.placements,
+		);
+		for (const placement of cancelledArtifacts.explanation.placements.slice(0, 2)) {
+			expect(placement.ruleIds).toEqual(['early']);
+			expect(placement.contributions).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'rule', ruleId: 'early' }),
+			);
+		}
+	});
+
+	it('keeps established maximum credit when a later earned period masks its local contribution', () => {
+		let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts | undefined;
+		const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal(
+			{
+				horizon: { start: '2024-05-01', end: '2024-05-11' },
+				balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-05-03' }],
+				rules: [
+					{ ...gain, configuration: { ...gain.configuration, aggregation: 'maximum' } },
+					{
+						id: 'producer',
+						type: 'if_then',
+						dayOfWeek: 3,
+						placement: 'after',
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+						rewardDays: 2,
+						rewardType: 'rtt',
+					},
+				],
+			},
+			undefined,
+			(value) => (artifacts = value),
+		);
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan' || artifacts?.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+			throw new Error('Expected an explained plan');
+		expect(outcome.placements).toMatchObject([
+			{ date: '2024-05-02', ruleIds: ['gain', 'producer'], supporting: false },
+			{ date: '2024-05-03', ruleIds: ['gain'], supporting: false },
+			{ date: '2024-05-10', ruleIds: ['gain'], supporting: true },
+		]);
+		for (const placement of artifacts.explanation.placements.slice(0, 2)) {
+			expect(placement.comparison.delta).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({ id: 'optimization:gain', value: 0 }),
+			);
+			expect(placement.contributions).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'rule', ruleId: 'gain' }),
+			);
+		}
+	});
+
+	it('counts reverse deferred reassignment for an edited optimization without explicit calendar credit', () => {
+		const request = bundles[0].request;
+		const forgoAtRisk: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+			id: 'forgo',
+			type: 'optimization',
+			configuration: { ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk, direction: 'maximize' },
+		};
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...request,
+			balances: [
+				{ ...request.balances[0], id: 'at-risk', expiryDate: '2026-11-13' },
+				{ ...request.balances[0], id: 'deferred' },
+			],
+			rules: [bundles[0].rule, forgoAtRisk, economy],
+		});
+		expect(
+			outcome.placements.map(({ balanceId, supporting }) => ({ balanceId, supporting })),
+		).toEqual([
+			{ balanceId: 'deferred', supporting: true },
+			{ balanceId: 'deferred', supporting: true },
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject({
+			holidayWeekValue: 3,
+			unplacedAtRisk: 2,
+			supportingPlacements: 2,
+		});
+	});
+
+	it('keeps earned support chronological and preserves the captured economy rule in explanations and counterfactuals', async () => {
+		vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined);
+		try {
+			const capturedEconomy = structuredClone(economy);
+			const request: PlanningRequest = {
+				horizon: { start: '2024-04-29', end: '2024-05-08' },
+				balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2025-01-01' }],
+				rules: [
+					gain,
+					capturedEconomy,
+					{
+						id: 'producer',
+						type: 'if_then',
+						force: 'obligation',
+						dayOfWeek: 3,
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+						placement: 'after',
+						rewardDays: 1,
+						rewardType: 'rtt',
+					},
+				],
+			};
+			const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(request);
+			capturedEconomy.configuration.conditions = [];
+			capturedEconomy.name = 'Changed later';
+			const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a plan');
+			expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					date: '2024-05-02',
+					ruleIds: ['producer'],
+					supporting: false,
+				}),
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					date: '2024-05-06',
+					balanceId: 'earned:producer:2024-05-01',
+					supporting: true,
+				}),
+			]);
+			expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject({
+				nonWorkingDayGain: 3,
+				supportingPlacements: 1,
+			});
+			expect(calculation.snapshot.rules[1]).toMatchObject({
+				name: 'Économiser les jours d’appoint',
+				configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+			});
+			const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+			if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+			const supporting = explanation.placements.find(({ supporting }) => supporting)!;
+			expect(supporting.firstDecisiveObjective).toBe('optimization:gain');
+			expect(supporting.objectiveVector.objectives.map(({ id }) => id)).toEqual([
+				'obligation-validity',
+				'optimization:gain',
+				'optimization:economy',
+				'balance-expiry',
+				'placement-date',
+			]);
+			expect(supporting.contributions).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'supporting' }),
+			);
+			const analysis = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(outcome.placements[1]);
+			if (analysis.kind !== 'Counterfactual') throw new Error('Expected a counterfactual');
+			expect(analysis.results.find(({ date }) => date === '2024-05-03')).toMatchObject({
+				status: 'ineligible',
+				reason: { code: 'unavailable' },
+			});
+			expect(
+				analysis.results.find(({ date }) => date === '2024-05-06')?.comparison?.after
+					.objectives,
+			).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ id: 'optimization:economy', value: 1 }));
+			expect(
+				analysis.results.find(({ date }) => date === '2024-05-07')?.comparison?.after
+					.objectives,
+			).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ id: 'optimization:economy', value: 1 }));
+			expect(outcome.placements[1]).toMatchObject({ date: '2024-05-06', supporting: true });
+		} finally {
+			vi.unstubAllGlobals();
+		}
+	});
+});
@@ -0,0 +1,453 @@
+import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import {
+	calculatePlanningInternal,
+	type OptimizationPlanningRule,
+	type PlanOutcome,
+	type PlanningRequest,
+} from './leave-planner.core';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from './planning-objectives';
+import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
+
+const deficit: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+	id: 'deficit',
+	name: 'Internal work-sequence deficit',
+	type: 'optimization',
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+};
+const longest: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+	id: 'longest',
+	name: 'Longest work sequence',
+	type: 'optimization',
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence,
+};
+const gap: PlanningRequest = {
+	horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+	balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+	declaredDays: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-12'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+	rules: [deficit],
+};
+
+function plan(request: PlanningRequest): PlanOutcome {
+	const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal(request);
+	if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error(`Expected a plan, got ${outcome.kind}`);
+	return outcome;
+}
+
+describe('composed work-sequence preferences', () => {
+	beforeEach(() => vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z')));
+	afterEach(() => vi.useRealTimers());
+
+	it('fills a complete internal sequence despite the worse deficit of partial additions', () => {
+		const outcome = plan(gap);
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-01-09',
+			'2024-01-10',
+			'2024-01-11',
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.placements.every(({ supporting }) => supporting)).toBe(true);
+		expect(outcome.declaredDays).toEqual(gap.declaredDays);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.remainingBalances).toEqual([]);
+	});
+
+	it('splits tied longest sequences together when neither single addition improves the maximum', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...gap,
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-10', type: 'other' }],
+			rules: [longest],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-08', '2024-01-11']);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('leaves a three-day internal sequence intact at threshold three instead of filling it at five', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...gap,
+			rules: [
+				{
+					...deficit,
+					configuration: {
+						...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+						thresholdDays: 3,
+					},
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([]);
+		expect(outcome.remainingBalances[0].quantity).toBe(3);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(2);
+	});
+
+	it('counts selected internal sequences even when their measured deficit is zero', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...gap,
+			rules: [
+				{
+					...deficit,
+					configuration: {
+						...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+						thresholdDays: 3,
+						aggregation: 'count',
+					},
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-01-09',
+			'2024-01-10',
+			'2024-01-11',
+		]);
+	});
+
+	it('evaluates two parameterized configurations separately and follows their order', () => {
+		const maximizeThree: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+			...deficit,
+			id: 'three',
+			configuration: {
+				...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+				thresholdDays: 3,
+				direction: 'maximize',
+			},
+		};
+		const fiveFirst = plan({ ...gap, rules: [deficit, maximizeThree] });
+		const threeFirst = plan({ ...gap, rules: [maximizeThree, deficit] });
+		expect(fiveFirst.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-01-09',
+			'2024-01-10',
+			'2024-01-11',
+		]);
+		expect(threeFirst.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-10']);
+		expect(threeFirst.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(8);
+	});
+
+	it('obeys the order between the longest-sequence preference and a personal window', () => {
+		const personal = {
+			id: 'personal',
+			type: 'time_window' as const,
+			startDate: '2024-01-08',
+			endDate: '2024-01-08',
+			placeDays: 1,
+			placeType: 'cp',
+		};
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-20' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			rules: [],
+		};
+		const longestFirst = plan({ ...request, rules: [longest, personal] });
+		const personalFirst = plan({ ...request, rules: [personal, longest] });
+		expect(longestFirst.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-12']);
+		expect(longestFirst.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(5);
+		expect(personalFirst.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-08']);
+		expect(personalFirst.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(9);
+	});
+
+	it('keeps obligations and earlier preferences when a complete gap would consume their balance', () => {
+		const personal = {
+			id: 'personal',
+			type: 'time_window' as const,
+			startDate: '2024-01-15',
+			endDate: '2024-01-15',
+			placeDays: 1,
+			placeType: 'cp',
+		};
+		const request = { ...gap, horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-16' } };
+		expect(
+			plan({ ...request, rules: [deficit, personal] }).placements.map(({ date }) => date),
+		).toEqual(['2024-01-09', '2024-01-10', '2024-01-11']);
+		for (const force of ['preference', 'obligation'] as const) {
+			const outcome = plan({ ...request, rules: [{ ...personal, force }, deficit] });
+			expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-15']);
+			expect(outcome.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(2);
+		}
+	});
+
+	it('uses only eligible balance dates when completing the entire gap', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...gap,
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'early', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-09' },
+				{
+					id: 'late',
+					type: 'cp',
+					quantity: 2,
+					availableFrom: '2024-01-10',
+					expiryDate: '2024-02-01',
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date, balanceId }) => ({ date, balanceId }))).toEqual([
+			{ date: '2024-01-09', balanceId: 'early' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-10', balanceId: 'late' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-11', balanceId: 'late' },
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ supporting }) => supporting)).toEqual([false, true, true]);
+		const unavailable = plan({
+			...gap,
+			balances: [
+				{
+					id: 'late',
+					type: 'cp',
+					quantity: 3,
+					availableFrom: '2024-01-10',
+					expiryDate: '2024-02-01',
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(unavailable.placements).toEqual([]);
+	});
+
+	it('adds no neutral placement when the budget cannot split all tied maxima', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			...gap,
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-10', type: 'other' }],
+			rules: [longest],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(2);
+	});
+
+	it('splits tied sequences at eligible dates when their centers are unavailable', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-19' },
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-12', type: 'other' }],
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'early', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-08' },
+				{
+					id: 'late',
+					type: 'cp',
+					quantity: 1,
+					availableFrom: '2024-01-18',
+					expiryDate: '2024-02-01',
+				},
+			],
+			rules: [longest],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-08', '2024-01-18']);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(3);
+	});
+
+	it('coordinates scarce balances when individually eligible centers cannot be funded together', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-19' },
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-12', type: 'other' }],
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'early', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-08' },
+				{ id: 'flexible', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' },
+			],
+			rules: [longest],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-08', '2024-01-15']);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(3);
+	});
+
+	it('eliminates tied maximum deficits as one complete gap bundle', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-17' },
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-11', '2024-01-16'].map((date) => ({
+				date,
+				type: 'other',
+			})),
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 4, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			rules: [
+				{
+					...deficit,
+					configuration: {
+						...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+						aggregation: 'maximum',
+					},
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-01-09',
+			'2024-01-10',
+			'2024-01-12',
+			'2024-01-15',
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('includes both horizon edges in the maximum while excluding them from the deficit', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-25' },
+			balances: [],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-11', '2024-01-15', '2024-01-22'].map((date) => ({
+				date,
+				type: 'other',
+			})),
+			rules: [longest, deficit],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.metrics).toMatchObject({ longestWorkSequence: 4, shortSequenceDeficit: 5 });
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		{ horizon: { start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-15' }, dates: [], longest: 5 },
+		{
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-11' },
+			dates: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-09', '2024-01-10'],
+			longest: 0,
+		},
+		{ horizon: { start: '2024-01-06', end: '2024-01-08' }, dates: [], longest: 0 },
+		{
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			dates: ['2024-01-09', '2024-01-10'],
+			longest: 2,
+		},
+	])(
+		'keeps holiday/weekend continuity and zero for empty sequences: $horizon.start',
+		({ horizon, dates, longest: expected }) => {
+			const outcome = plan({
+				horizon,
+				balances: [],
+				declaredDays: dates.map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+				rules: [longest, deficit],
+			});
+			expect(outcome.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(expected);
+			expect(outcome.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(0);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('disabling work-sequence rules removes their influence even with deferred balances', () => {
+		const absent = plan({ ...gap, rules: [] });
+		const disabled = plan({
+			...gap,
+			rules: [
+				{ ...deficit, enabled: false },
+				{ ...longest, enabled: false },
+			],
+		});
+		expect(disabled).toEqual(absent);
+		const personal = {
+			id: 'personal',
+			type: 'time_window' as const,
+			startDate: '2024-01-09',
+			endDate: '2024-01-09',
+			placeDays: 1,
+			placeType: 'cp',
+		};
+		const requested = plan({ ...gap, rules: [{ ...deficit, enabled: false }, personal] });
+		expect(requested.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-09']);
+		expect(requested.metrics.shortSequenceDeficit).toBe(3);
+	});
+
+	it('finishes a rejected tied-sequence bundle without retrying equivalent balance allocations', () => {
+		const outcome = plan({
+			deadlineMs: 1500,
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-02-10' },
+			declaredDays: [
+				'2024-01-08',
+				'2024-01-10',
+				'2024-01-12',
+				'2024-01-16',
+				'2024-01-18',
+				'2024-01-22',
+				'2024-01-24',
+				'2024-01-26',
+				'2024-01-30',
+				'2024-02-01',
+				'2024-02-05',
+				'2024-02-07',
+				'2024-02-09',
+			].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			balances: ['cp', 'rtt', 'other'].map((type) => ({
+				id: type,
+				type,
+				quantity: 12,
+				expiryDate: '2024-03-01',
+			})),
+			rules: [
+				{
+					id: 'support',
+					type: 'optimization',
+					configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+				},
+				longest,
+				{
+					id: 'typed',
+					type: 'time_window',
+					startDate: '2024-01-09',
+					endDate: '2024-01-09',
+					placeType: 'cp',
+					placeDays: 1,
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual(['2024-01-09']);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.longestWorkSequence).toBe(1);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it.each([0, -1, 1.5, Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1])(
+		'rejects an invalid preference threshold %s at the planning boundary',
+		(thresholdDays) => {
+			const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				...gap,
+				rules: [
+					{
+						...deficit,
+						configuration: {
+							...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+							thresholdDays,
+						},
+					},
+				],
+			});
+			expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'InvalidInput',
+				reasons: [
+					expect.objectContaining({
+						code: 'invalid-optimization-configuration',
+						ruleIds: ['deficit'],
+					}),
+				],
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('captures distinct threshold values in explanations and date comparisons', async () => {
+		vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined);
+		try {
+			const five = structuredClone(deficit);
+			const three: OptimizationPlanningRule = {
+				...deficit,
+				id: 'three',
+				configuration: { ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, thresholdDays: 3 },
+			};
+			const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({ ...gap, rules: [three, five] });
+			if (five.configuration.measure !== 'work-sequence-deficit')
+				throw new Error('Expected deficit');
+			five.configuration.thresholdDays = 1;
+			const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a plan');
+			expect(outcome.placements).toHaveLength(3);
+			expect(
+				calculation.snapshot.rules.map((rule) =>
+					'configuration' in rule ? rule.configuration : undefined,
+				),
+			).toMatchObject([{ thresholdDays: 3 }, { thresholdDays: 5 }]);
+			const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+			if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+			expect(
+				explanation.placements[0].comparison.before.objectives
+					.filter(({ id }) => id.startsWith('optimization:'))
+					.map(({ value }) => value),
+			).toEqual([2, 4]);
+			const counterfactual = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(outcome.placements[0]);
+			if (counterfactual.kind !== 'Counterfactual')
+				throw new Error('Expected a counterfactual');
+			expect(
+				counterfactual.baseline.objectives
+					.filter(({ id }) => id.startsWith('optimization:'))
+					.map(({ id, value }) => ({ id, value })),
+			).toEqual([
+				{ id: 'optimization:three', value: 2 },
+				{ id: 'optimization:deficit', value: 4 },
+			]);
+		} finally {
+			vi.unstubAllGlobals();
+		}
+	});
+});
@@ -15,11 +15,14 @@ import { CalendarYear } from '../components/calendar-year/calendar-year';
 import { CalendarService, SelectableDayType } from './calendar-service';
 import { CalendarSettingsService } from './calendar-settings-service';
 import { UserInputService } from './user-input-service';
-import { RuleService, RuleType } from './rule-service';
+import { RuleService, RuleType, createOptimizationPresetRules } from './rule-service';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS, type OptimizationConfiguration } from './planning-objectives';

 beforeEach(() => vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z')));
 afterEach(() => vi.useRealTimers());

+const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();
+
 describe('real planning worker cancellation', () => {
 	let directory: string;
 	let bundle: string;
@@ -43,7 +46,7 @@ const originalNow = performance.now.bind(performance);
 if (workerData.simulateLongCalculation)
  Object.defineProperty(performance, 'now', { value: () => originalNow() + elapsed });
 globalThis.self = { postMessage: (message) => {
-  if (workerData.simulateLongCalculation && message.type === 'progress' && message.stage === 'at-risk')
+  if (workerData.simulateLongCalculation && message.type === 'progress' && message.stage === 'optimization:default-unplaced-at-risk')
    setTimeout(() => { elapsed = 20_000; parentPort.postMessage({ type: 'test-clock', elapsed }); }, 0);
  parentPort.postMessage(message);
 } };
@@ -73,15 +76,7 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 						simulatedElapsed = data.elapsed;
 						return;
 					}
-					if (
-						holdArtifacts &&
-						[
-							'explanation',
-							'artifacts-start',
-							'trace-status-index',
-							'artifacts-complete',
-						].includes(data.type)
-					) {
+					if (holdArtifacts && ['explanation', 'artifacts'].includes(data.type)) {
 						heldArtifactMessages.push(() => this.onmessage?.({ data } as MessageEvent));
 						return;
 					}
@@ -109,6 +104,106 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 	});
 	afterAll(() => rmSync(directory, { recursive: true, force: true }));

+	it('preserves a complete optimization configuration and active order in the real worker snapshot', async () => {
+		const configuration: OptimizationConfiguration = structuredClone(
+			OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		);
+		configuration.aggregation = 'maximum';
+		const submitted = structuredClone(configuration);
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-05' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-04' }],
+			rules: [
+				{
+					id: 'personal-loss',
+					name: 'Captured loss rule',
+					type: 'optimization',
+					force: 'preference',
+					configuration,
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		configuration.conditions = [];
+		configuration.direction = 'maximize';
+		configuration.aggregation = 'count';
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a worker plan');
+		expect(outcome.placements).toHaveLength(1);
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(calculation.snapshot.rules[0]).toMatchObject({
+			name: 'Captured loss rule',
+			configuration: submitted,
+		});
+		const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+		if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected worker explanation');
+		expect(
+			explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives.map((objective) => objective.id),
+		).toEqual([
+			'obligation-validity',
+			'optimization:personal-loss',
+			'balance-expiry',
+			'placement-date',
+		]);
+		const comparison = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(outcome.placements[0]);
+		if (comparison.kind !== 'Counterfactual') throw new Error('Expected worker comparison');
+		expect(comparison.baseline.objectives.map((objective) => objective.id)).toEqual([
+			'obligation-validity',
+			'optimization:personal-loss',
+			'balance-expiry',
+			'placement-date',
+		]);
+	});
+
+	it('keeps the submitted work-sequence threshold in the real worker and date comparisons', async () => {
+		const configuration: OptimizationConfiguration = structuredClone(
+			OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+		);
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-08', end: '2024-01-13' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2024-01-08', '2024-01-12'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [
+				{
+					id: 'deficit',
+					name: 'Captured five-day preference',
+					type: 'optimization',
+					configuration,
+				},
+			],
+		});
+		configuration.thresholdDays = 3;
+		configuration.conditions = [];
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a worker plan');
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date }) => date)).toEqual([
+			'2024-01-09',
+			'2024-01-10',
+			'2024-01-11',
+		]);
+		expect(calculation.snapshot.rules[0]).toMatchObject({
+			configuration: { thresholdDays: 5, conditions: ['internal', 'non-empty'] },
+		});
+		const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+		if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+		expect(
+			explanation.placements[0].comparison.before.objectives.find(
+				({ id }) => id === 'optimization:deficit',
+			)?.value,
+		).toBe(4);
+		const counterfactual = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(outcome.placements[0]);
+		if (counterfactual.kind !== 'Counterfactual') throw new Error('Expected a counterfactual');
+		expect(
+			counterfactual.baseline.objectives.find(({ id }) => id === 'optimization:deficit')
+				?.value,
+		).toBe(4);
+		expect(
+			counterfactual.results
+				.find(({ date }) => date === '2024-01-09')
+				?.comparison?.after.objectives.find(({ id }) => id === 'optimization:deficit')
+				?.value,
+		).toBe(0);
+	});
+
 	it.each([
 		[false, false],
 		[true, false],
@@ -120,7 +215,7 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			localStorage.clear();
 			localStorage.setItem('app.language', '"fr"');
 			localStorage.setItem('leaveBalances', '[]');
-			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 			vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-05-01T21:59:59Z'));
 			await TestBed.configureTestingModule({
 				imports: [CalendarYear],
@@ -131,6 +226,7 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			for (const date of ['2024-04-29', '2024-04-30']) input.toggleDeclaredDay(date, 'cp');
 			input.toggleDeclaredDay('2024-05-06', 'other');
 			const rules = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+			rules.addRule(presets[0]);
 			rules.addRule({
 				id: 'producer',
 				name: 'CP autour du férié',
@@ -155,6 +251,7 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 				placeDays: 2,
 				placeType: SelectableDayType.OTHER,
 			});
+			for (const preset of presets.slice(1)) rules.addRule(preset);
 			const calendar = TestBed.inject(CalendarService);
 			const original = calendar.createPlanningCalculation.bind(calendar);
 			let calculation!: PlanningCalculationContext;
@@ -168,7 +265,10 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 							...request,
 							progress: (stage) => {
 								request.progress?.(stage);
-								if (cancelled && stage === 'non-working-day-gain') {
+								if (
+									cancelled &&
+									stage === 'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain'
+								) {
 									fixture.detectChanges();
 									fixture.nativeElement
 										.querySelector('button.cancel-calculation')
@@ -249,7 +349,10 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			expect(dialog.textContent?.includes('Planning partiel')).toBe(cancelled);
 			const originalDeclarations = structuredClone(calculation.snapshot.declaredDays);
 			input.toggleDeclaredDay('2024-04-30', 'rtt');
-			rules.updateRule({ ...rules.rules[0], name: 'Règle modifiée après calcul' });
+			rules.updateRule({
+				...rules.rules.find(({ id }) => id === 'producer')!,
+				name: 'Règle modifiée après calcul',
+			});
 			rules.deleteRule('producer');
 			input.updateBalances(() => []);
 			if (worker) {
@@ -262,7 +365,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 				for (const deliver of heldArtifactMessages.splice(0)) deliver();
 			}
 			const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
-			const trace = await calculation.trace;
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			fixture.detectChanges();
 			expect(connectedHolidays()).toBe('1');
@@ -288,11 +390,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 					},
 				],
 			});
-			expect(trace?.initialState).toMatchObject({
-				calculationDate: '2024-05-01',
-				declaredDays: originalDeclarations,
-			});
-			expect(trace?.status).toBe(cancelled ? 'incomplete' : 'ready');
 			const core = await import('./leave-planner.core');
 			const direct = core.calculatePlanningInternal(calculation.snapshot);
 			if (direct.kind !== 'Plan')
@@ -322,24 +419,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			expect(comparison?.results.find(({ date }) => date === '2024-05-03')?.status).toBe(
 				'eligible',
 			);
-			fixture.componentInstance['showFinalPlan']();
-			if (!trace) throw new Error('Expected the original trace.');
-			const phaseIndex = trace.phases.findIndex(({ decisions }) =>
-				decisions.some(({ deltas }) =>
-					deltas.some(({ placement }) => placement?.balanceId.startsWith('earned:')),
-				),
-			);
-			expect(phaseIndex).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0);
-			fixture.componentInstance['selectTracePhase'](phaseIndex);
-			const decisionIndex = trace.phases[phaseIndex].decisions.findIndex(({ deltas }) =>
-				deltas.some(({ placement }) => placement?.balanceId.startsWith('earned:')),
-			);
-			fixture.componentInstance['selectTraceDecision'](decisionIndex);
-			fixture.componentInstance['showTraceMoment']('after');
-			expect(fixture.componentInstance['selectedTraceTransition']()?.after).toMatchObject({
-				calculationDate: '2024-05-01',
-				declaredDays: originalDeclarations,
-			});
 			root.querySelector<HTMLButtonElement>('.statistics-button')!.click();
 			await fixture.whenStable();
 			expect(connectedHolidays()).toBe('1');
@@ -355,7 +434,7 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 				balances: [
 					{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp' as const, quantity: 4, expiryDate: '2024-01-05' },
 				],
-				rules: [],
+				rules: presets,
 				declaredDays: [
 					{ date: '2024-01-02', type: 'cp' as const },
 					{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'rtt' as const },
@@ -370,7 +449,8 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 						{
 							...submitted,
 							progress: (stage: string) => {
-								if (stage === 'non-working-day-gain') interruption = true;
+								if (stage === 'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain')
+									interruption = true;
 							},
 						},
 						undefined,
@@ -383,7 +463,8 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
 				...submitted,
 				progress: (stage) => {
-					if (cancelled && stage === 'non-working-day-gain') calculation.cancel();
+					if (cancelled && stage === 'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain')
+						calculation.cancel();
 				},
 			});
 			const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
@@ -411,9 +492,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 				kind: 'PlanExplanation',
 				declaredDays: submitted.declaredDays,
 			});
-			expect((await calculation.trace)?.initialState.declaredDays).toEqual(
-				submitted.declaredDays,
-			);
 			const original = structuredClone(outcome);
 			const comparison = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(plan!.placements[0]);
 			for (const { date } of submitted.declaredDays)
@@ -447,10 +525,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 		expect(outcome.incumbent).toBeUndefined();
 		expect(preparationUpdates).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
 		expect(stages).not.toContain('obligations');
-		expect(await calculation.trace).toMatchObject({
-			status: 'incomplete',
-			initialState: { declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-02', type: 'other' }] },
-		});
 		expect(await calculation.explanationError).toBeUndefined();
 		expect(heartbeats).toBeGreaterThan(0);
 	});
@@ -481,10 +555,9 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 		});
 		if (outcome.kind !== 'PlanningIncomplete') return;
 		expect(outcome.incumbent).toBeUndefined();
-		expect((await calculation.trace)?.status).toBe('incomplete');
 	});

-	it('stops an active obligation search and retains a jointly valid incumbent and its history', async () => {
+	it('stops an active obligation search and retains a jointly valid incumbent', async () => {
 		let cancelledAt = 0;
 		afterCheckpoint = () => {
 			afterCheckpoint = undefined;
@@ -533,39 +606,37 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			);
 			expect(explanation.incomplete?.reason.code).toBe('user-cancelled');
 		}
-		const trace = await calculation.trace;
-		expect(trace?.status).toBe('incomplete');
-		expect(
-			trace?.phases.find((phase) => phase.name === 'obligations')?.decisions.length,
-		).toBeGreaterThan(0);
-		expect(trace?.phases.find((phase) => phase.name === 'dates')?.status).toBe('not-run');
 	});

-	it('preserves balances and provenance after a valid checkpoint and drains every produced trace packet', async () => {
+	it('preserves balances and provenance after a valid checkpoint', async () => {
 		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
 			horizon: { start: '2024-01-01', end: '2025-01-01' },
 			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2024-12-31' }],
 			rules: [
-				{
-					id: 'fixed',
-					type: 'time_window',
-					force: 'obligation',
-					startDate: '2024-01-02',
-					endDate: '2024-01-02',
-					placeDays: 1,
-					placeType: 'cp',
-				},
+				presets[0],
+				...[
+					{
+						id: 'fixed',
+						type: 'time_window',
+						force: 'obligation',
+						startDate: '2024-01-02',
+						endDate: '2024-01-02',
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+					},
+				],
+				...presets.slice(1),
 			],
 			progress: (stage) => {
-				if (stage === 'non-working-day-gain') calculation.cancel();
+				if (stage === 'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain') calculation.cancel();
 			},
 		});
 		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
 		expect(outcome.kind).toBe('PlanningIncomplete');
 		if (outcome.kind !== 'PlanningIncomplete') return;
 		expect(outcome.reasons[0].code).toBe('user-cancelled');
-		expect(outcome.completedStages).toContain('holiday-week-value');
-		expect(outcome.completedStages).not.toContain('non-working-day-gain');
+		expect(outcome.completedStages).toContain('optimization:default-holiday-week-value');
+		expect(outcome.completedStages).not.toContain('optimization:default-non-working-day-gain');
 		const incumbent = outcome.incumbent!;
 		expect(incumbent.placements).toHaveLength(3);
 		expect(incumbent.placements).toContainEqual({
@@ -582,12 +653,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 			expect(explanation.placements.map(({ placement }) => placement)).toEqual(
 				incumbent.placements,
 			);
-		const trace = await calculation.trace;
-		expect(trace?.status).toBe('incomplete');
-		expect(trace?.error?.code).toBe('user-cancelled');
-		expect(trace?.phases.find((phase) => phase.name === 'non-working-day-gain')?.status).toBe(
-			'interrupted',
-		);
 		const frozenOutcome = structuredClone(outcome);
 		calculation.cancel();
 		expect(await calculation.outcome).toEqual(frozenOutcome);
@@ -605,7 +670,7 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 					expiryDate: '2026-12-24',
 				},
 			],
-			rules: [],
+			rules: presets,
 		};
 		const { calculatePlanningInternal } = await import('./leave-planner.core');
 		const expected = calculatePlanningInternal(submitted);
@@ -614,7 +679,6 @@ parentPort.on('message', (data) => globalThis.self.onmessage({ data }));
 		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(submitted);
 		expect(await calculation.outcome).toEqual(expected);
 		expect(simulatedElapsed).toBe(20_000);
-		expect((await calculation.trace)?.status).toBe('ready');
 		expect(await calculation.explanationError).toBeUndefined();
 	});
 });
@@ -7,18 +7,13 @@ import type {
 	PlanningExplanation,
 	PlanningOutcome,
 	PlanningReason,
-	PlanningTrace,
-	PlanningTraceUpdate,
 	PlanningSnapshot,
-	PlanningTraceState,
-	TraceCandidateStatus,
+	PlanningStateSnapshot,
 } from './leave-planner.service';
 import {
 	analyzeCounterfactualInternal,
 	calculatePlanningAsyncInternal,
 	explainIncompleteCheckpoint,
-	historicalCounterfactualReasons,
-	type CounterfactualBaselineOptions,
 	type PlanningArtifacts,
 } from './leave-planner.core';

@@ -39,271 +34,52 @@ type WorkerRequest =
 			type: 'plan';
 			request: WorkerPlanningRequest;
 	  }
-	| { type: 'trace-ack'; count: number }
 	| { type: 'cancel' }
 	| {
 			type: 'counterfactual';
 			request: PlanningSnapshot;
 			plan: PlanOutcome;
 			placement: LeavePlacement;
-			state?: PlanningTraceState;
-			options?: CounterfactualBaselineOptions;
-	  }
-	| {
-			type: 'historical-eligibility';
-			request: PlanningSnapshot;
-			placement: LeavePlacement;
-			state: PlanningTraceState;
-			options?: CounterfactualBaselineOptions;
+			state?: PlanningStateSnapshot;
 	  }
 	| {
 			type: 'explain-checkpoint';
 			request: PlanningSnapshot;
 			plan: PlanOutcome;
-			state: PlanningTraceState;
+			state: PlanningStateSnapshot;
 			interruption: PlanningReason;
 	  };

 type WorkerResponse =
 	| { type: 'heartbeat' }
 	| { type: 'progress'; stage: string }
-	| { type: 'trace-overhead'; totalMs: number }
-	| { type: 'checkpoint'; plan: PlanOutcome; state?: PlanningTraceState }
+	| { type: 'checkpoint'; plan: PlanOutcome; state?: PlanningStateSnapshot }
 	| { type: 'result'; outcome: PlanningOutcome }
 	| { type: 'artifacts'; artifacts: PlanningArtifacts }
 	| {
 			type: 'explanation';
 			explanation?: PlanningExplanation;
 			explanationError?: PlanningReason;
-			finalState?: PlanningTraceState;
+			finalState?: PlanningStateSnapshot;
 	  }
-	| {
-			type: 'artifacts-start';
-			artifacts: Omit<
-				PlanningArtifacts,
-				'trace' | 'explanation' | 'explanationError' | 'finalState'
-			>;
-			trace?: Omit<PlanningTrace, 'phases'>;
-	  }
-	| {
-			type: 'trace-update';
-			totalMs: number;
-			update: PlanningTraceUpdate;
-			acknowledge?: true;
-	  }
-	| {
-			type: 'trace-status-index';
-			statuses: ReadonlyMap<string, TraceCandidateStatus>;
-			nonWorkingDates: readonly string[];
-	  }
-	| { type: 'artifacts-complete'; traceTransferMs: number }
 	| { type: 'counterfactual-result'; analysis: CounterfactualAnalysis }
-	| {
-			type: 'historical-eligibility-result';
-			entries: ReturnType<typeof historicalCounterfactualReasons>;
-	  }
 	| { type: 'error'; code?: string; message: string };

 const worker = self as DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope;
-const TRACE_OPERATIONS_PER_MESSAGE = 64;
-const MAX_TRACE_PACKETS_IN_FLIGHT = 16;
-
-interface StagedTraceUpdate {
-	totalMs: number;
-	update?: PlanningTraceUpdate;
-	nextOperation: number;
-}
-
-interface TraceDelivery {
-	updates: StagedTraceUpdate[];
-	nextUpdate: number;
-	inFlight: number;
-	traceTransferMs: number;
-	artifacts?: PlanningArtifacts;
-	calculationComplete: boolean;
-}
-
-let activeTraceDelivery: TraceDelivery | undefined;
 let activeCalculation: { cancelled: boolean } | undefined;

-function traceStatusIndex(trace: PlanningTrace): {
-	statuses: Map<string, TraceCandidateStatus>;
-	nonWorkingDates: string[];
-} {
-	const priority: Record<TraceCandidateStatus, number> = {
-		ineligible: 0,
-		'not-examined': 1,
-		pruned: 2,
-		'evaluated-rejected': 3,
-		chosen: 4,
-	};
-	const statuses = new Map<string, TraceCandidateStatus>();
-	const nonWorkingDates = new Set(trace.nonWorkingDates?.map(({ date }) => date) ?? []);
-	for (const phase of trace.phases) {
-		for (const decision of phase.decisions) {
-			for (const candidate of decision.candidates) {
-				const dates = candidate.dates ?? (candidate.date ? [candidate.date] : []);
-				for (const date of dates) {
-					const previous = statuses.get(date);
-					if (!previous || priority[candidate.status] > priority[previous])
-						statuses.set(date, candidate.status);
-				}
-			}
-		}
-	}
-	return { statuses, nonWorkingDates: [...nonWorkingDates] };
-}
-
-function sendArtifacts(artifacts: PlanningArtifacts, deferredTraceTransferMs = 0): void {
-	const trace = artifacts.trace;
-	let traceMaterializationMs = artifacts.timings?.traceMaterializationMs ?? 0;
-	let traceTransferMs = (artifacts.timings?.traceTransferMs ?? 0) + deferredTraceTransferMs;
-	if (trace) {
-		const materializationStarted = performance.now();
-		const statusIndex = traceStatusIndex(trace);
-		traceMaterializationMs += Math.max(0, performance.now() - materializationStarted);
-		const transferStarted = performance.now();
-		worker.postMessage({
-			type: 'trace-status-index',
-			statuses: statusIndex.statuses,
-			nonWorkingDates: statusIndex.nonWorkingDates,
-		} satisfies WorkerResponse);
-		traceTransferMs += Math.max(0, performance.now() - transferStarted);
-	}
-	const rest: Omit<
-		PlanningArtifacts,
-		'trace' | 'explanation' | 'explanationError' | 'finalState'
-	> = artifacts.timings
-		? {
-				timings: {
-					...artifacts.timings,
-					traceMaterializationMs,
-					traceTransferMs,
-				},
-			}
-		: {};
-	const transferStarted = performance.now();
-	worker.postMessage({
-		type: 'artifacts-start',
-		artifacts: rest,
-		trace: trace
-			? {
-					status: trace.status,
-					initialState: trace.initialState,
-					completedStages: trace.completedStages,
-					nonWorkingDates: trace.nonWorkingDates,
-					error: trace.error,
-				}
-			: undefined,
-	} satisfies WorkerResponse);
-	traceTransferMs += Math.max(0, performance.now() - transferStarted);
-	// Capture updates already carried every candidate in bounded operations.
-	// The final packet closes the trace without cloning it a second time.
-	worker.postMessage({ type: 'artifacts-complete', traceTransferMs } satisfies WorkerResponse);
-}
-
-function finishTraceDelivery(delivery: TraceDelivery): void {
-	if (
-		!delivery.calculationComplete ||
-		delivery.nextUpdate < delivery.updates.length ||
-		delivery.inFlight > 0 ||
-		!delivery.artifacts
-	)
-		return;
-	if (activeTraceDelivery === delivery) activeTraceDelivery = undefined;
-	try {
-		sendArtifacts(delivery.artifacts, delivery.traceTransferMs);
-	} catch (error) {
-		worker.postMessage({
-			type: 'error',
-			code: 'trace-error',
-			message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error),
-		} satisfies WorkerResponse);
-	}
-	delivery.updates = [];
-}
-
-function pumpTraceUpdates(delivery: TraceDelivery): void {
-	while (
-		delivery.inFlight < MAX_TRACE_PACKETS_IN_FLIGHT &&
-		delivery.nextUpdate < delivery.updates.length
-	) {
-		const staged = delivery.updates[delivery.nextUpdate];
-		const update = staged.update;
-		if (!update) {
-			delivery.nextUpdate++;
-			continue;
-		}
-		const start = staged.nextOperation;
-		const end = Math.min(start + TRACE_OPERATIONS_PER_MESSAGE, update.operations.length);
-		const firstPacket = start === 0;
-		const packet: WorkerResponse = {
-			type: 'trace-update',
-			totalMs: staged.totalMs,
-			acknowledge: true,
-			update: {
-				initialState: firstPacket ? update.initialState : undefined,
-				nonWorkingDates: firstPacket ? update.nonWorkingDates : undefined,
-				operations: update.operations.slice(start, end),
-			},
-		};
-		const transferStarted = performance.now();
-		try {
-			worker.postMessage(packet satisfies WorkerResponse);
-		} catch (error) {
-			if (activeTraceDelivery === delivery) activeTraceDelivery = undefined;
-			delivery.updates = [];
-			worker.postMessage({
-				type: 'error',
-				code: 'trace-error',
-				message: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error),
-			} satisfies WorkerResponse);
-			return;
-		}
-		delivery.traceTransferMs += Math.max(0, performance.now() - transferStarted);
-		delivery.inFlight++;
-		staged.nextOperation = end;
-		if (update.operations.length === 0 || end >= update.operations.length) {
-			// Drop the full drain array as soon as its last bounded packet is posted.
-			staged.update = undefined;
-			delivery.nextUpdate++;
-		}
-	}
-	if (delivery.nextUpdate === delivery.updates.length) {
-		// All queued operation arrays are released; only in-flight structured clones remain.
-		delivery.updates = [];
-		delivery.nextUpdate = 0;
-	}
-	finishTraceDelivery(delivery);
-}
-
 worker.onmessage = async (event: MessageEvent<WorkerRequest>) => {
 	try {
 		if (event.data?.type === 'cancel') {
 			if (activeCalculation) activeCalculation.cancelled = true;
 			return;
 		}
-		if (event.data?.type === 'trace-ack') {
-			const delivery = activeTraceDelivery;
-			if (!delivery || !Number.isInteger(event.data.count) || event.data.count <= 0) return;
-			delivery.inFlight = Math.max(0, delivery.inFlight - event.data.count);
-			pumpTraceUpdates(delivery);
-			return;
-		}
 		if (event.data?.type === 'plan') {
 			const calculation = { cancelled: false };
 			activeCalculation = calculation;
 			let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts = {};
 			let outcomePosted = false;
 			let outcome: PlanningOutcome;
-			const traceDelivery: TraceDelivery = {
-				updates: [],
-				nextUpdate: 0,
-				inFlight: 0,
-				traceTransferMs: 0,
-				calculationComplete: false,
-			};
-			activeTraceDelivery = traceDelivery;
 			// The cooperative driver yields during preparation and search, even within one phase.
 			const heartbeat = () =>
 				worker.postMessage({ type: 'heartbeat' } satisfies WorkerResponse);
@@ -318,13 +94,6 @@ worker.onmessage = async (event: MessageEvent<WorkerRequest>) => {
 								type: 'progress',
 								stage,
 							} satisfies WorkerResponse),
-						traceProgress: (totalMs: number, update: PlanningTraceUpdate) => {
-							worker.postMessage({
-								type: 'trace-overhead',
-								totalMs,
-							} satisfies WorkerResponse);
-							traceDelivery.updates.push({ totalMs, update, nextOperation: 0 });
-						},
 					},
 					(plan, state) =>
 						worker.postMessage({
@@ -350,8 +119,6 @@ worker.onmessage = async (event: MessageEvent<WorkerRequest>) => {
 					() => calculation.cancelled,
 				);
 			} catch (error) {
-				if (activeTraceDelivery === traceDelivery) activeTraceDelivery = undefined;
-				traceDelivery.updates = [];
 				worker.postMessage({
 					type: 'error',
 					code: 'planner-error',
@@ -364,9 +131,7 @@ worker.onmessage = async (event: MessageEvent<WorkerRequest>) => {
 			}
 			if (!outcomePosted)
 				worker.postMessage({ type: 'result', outcome } satisfies WorkerResponse);
-			traceDelivery.artifacts = artifacts;
-			traceDelivery.calculationComplete = true;
-			pumpTraceUpdates(traceDelivery);
+			worker.postMessage({ type: 'artifacts', artifacts } satisfies WorkerResponse);
 			return;
 		}
 		if (event.data?.type === 'explain-checkpoint') {
@@ -379,44 +144,14 @@ worker.onmessage = async (event: MessageEvent<WorkerRequest>) => {
 			worker.postMessage({ type: 'explanation', ...result } satisfies WorkerResponse);
 			return;
 		}
-		if (event.data?.type === 'historical-eligibility') {
-			worker.postMessage({
-				type: 'historical-eligibility-result',
-				entries: historicalCounterfactualReasons(
-					event.data.request,
-					event.data.state,
-					event.data.placement,
-					event.data.options,
-				),
-			} satisfies WorkerResponse);
-			return;
-		}
 		if (event.data?.type !== 'counterfactual') return;
 		try {
-			let analysis = analyzeCounterfactualInternal(
+			const analysis = analyzeCounterfactualInternal(
 				event.data.request,
 				event.data.plan,
 				event.data.placement,
 				event.data.state,
-				event.data.options,
 			);
-			if (event.data.options && event.data.state) {
-				const historicalReasons = new Map(
-					historicalCounterfactualReasons(
-						event.data.request,
-						event.data.state,
-						event.data.placement,
-						event.data.options,
-					).map(({ date, reason }) => [date, reason]),
-				);
-				analysis = {
-					...analysis,
-					results: analysis.results.map((result) => {
-						const historicalReason = historicalReasons.get(result.date);
-						return historicalReason ? { ...result, historicalReason } : result;
-					}),
-				};
-			}
 			worker.postMessage({
 				type: 'counterfactual-result',
 				analysis,
@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
+import {
+	calculatePlanningInternal,
+	type PlanningArtifacts,
+	type PlanningRequest,
+} from './leave-planner.core';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from './planning-objectives';
+import { createOptimizationPresetRules } from './rule-service';
+
+const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules();
+const composedRequest: PlanningRequest & { calculationDate: string } = {
+	calculationDate: '2024-04-01',
+	horizon: { start: '2024-05-06', end: '2024-05-18' },
+	balances: [
+		{
+			id: 'cp',
+			type: 'cp',
+			quantity: 3,
+			availableFrom: '2024-05-06',
+			expiryDate: '2024-05-17',
+		},
+	],
+	rules: presets,
+};
+
+describe('integrated optimization and earned leave', () => {
+	it.each(presets)(
+		'makes disabled $name identical to its absence in the complete configuration',
+		(disabled) => {
+			const absent = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				...composedRequest,
+				rules: presets.filter(({ id }) => id !== disabled.id),
+			});
+			const inactive = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				...composedRequest,
+				rules: presets.map((rule) =>
+					rule.id === disabled.id ? { ...rule, enabled: false } : rule,
+				),
+			});
+			expect(absent.kind).toBe('Plan');
+			expect(inactive).toEqual(absent);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('uses the complete configuration after the sole obligation state', () => {
+		let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts = {};
+		const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal(
+			composedRequest,
+			undefined,
+			(value) => (artifacts = value),
+		);
+		expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [{ date: '2024-05-06' }, { date: '2024-05-07' }, { date: '2024-05-10' }],
+			metrics: { unplacedAtRisk: 0, holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 },
+		});
+		if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+			throw new Error('Expected an explanation.');
+		expect(
+			artifacts.explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives.map(({ id }) => id),
+		).toEqual([
+			'obligation-validity',
+			'optimization:default-unplaced-at-risk',
+			'optimization:default-holiday-week-value',
+			'optimization:default-non-working-day-gain',
+			'optimization:default-longest-work-sequence',
+			'optimization:default-short-sequence-deficit',
+			'optimization:default-supporting-placements',
+			'balance-expiry',
+			'placement-date',
+		]);
+	});
+
+	it('preserves the first equivalent funder while evaluating typed window alternatives', () => {
+		const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+			...composedRequest,
+			balances: ['first-cp', 'second-cp', 'rtt'].map((id) => ({
+				id,
+				type: id === 'rtt' ? 'rtt' : 'cp',
+				quantity: 1,
+				availableFrom: '2024-05-06',
+				expiryDate: '2024-05-17',
+			})),
+			rules: [
+				presets[0],
+				{
+					id: 'typed-window',
+					type: 'time_window',
+					startDate: '2024-05-07',
+					endDate: '2024-05-07',
+					placeDays: 1,
+					placeType: 'rtt',
+				},
+				...presets.slice(1),
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [
+				{ date: '2024-05-06', balanceId: 'second-cp' },
+				{ date: '2024-05-07', balanceId: 'rtt' },
+				{ date: '2024-05-10', balanceId: 'first-cp' },
+			],
+			preferences: [{ ruleId: 'typed-window', satisfied: 1 }],
+			metrics: { unplacedAtRisk: 0, holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 },
+		});
+	});
+
+	it.each(['maximum', 'unsafe-total'] as const)(
+		'keeps distinct funding evaluations when equivalence cannot be proved (%s)',
+		(control) => {
+			const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				calculationDate: '2024-01-01',
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-03' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: 'first',
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: control === 'maximum' ? 1 : Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER,
+						expiryDate: '2024-01-02',
+					},
+					{
+						id: 'second',
+						type: 'rtt',
+						quantity: control === 'maximum' ? 2 : 1,
+						expiryDate: '2024-01-02',
+					},
+				],
+				rules: [
+					presets[0],
+					...(control === 'maximum'
+						? [
+								{
+									id: 'largest-balance',
+									type: 'optimization',
+									configuration: {
+										...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+										aggregation: 'maximum',
+									},
+								},
+							]
+						: []),
+				],
+			});
+			expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'Plan',
+				placements: [{ balanceId: control === 'maximum' ? 'second' : 'first' }],
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('finishes a renamed first quantity rule at zero and still evaluates later priorities and final ties', () => {
+		const loss = { ...presets[0], id: 'personal-quantity', name: 'Personal quantity' };
+		const run = (rules: PlanningRequest['rules']) => {
+			const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({ ...composedRequest, rules });
+			return { outcome };
+		};
+		const window = {
+			id: 'already-satisfied',
+			type: 'time_window',
+			startDate: '2024-05-06',
+			endDate: '2024-05-06',
+			placeDays: 1,
+			placeType: 'cp',
+		};
+		const first = run([loss, window, ...presets.slice(1)]);
+		expect(first.outcome).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [{ date: '2024-05-06' }, { date: '2024-05-07' }, { date: '2024-05-10' }],
+			metrics: { unplacedAtRisk: 0, holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 },
+		});
+		const reordered = run([presets[1], loss, ...presets.slice(2)]);
+		expect(reordered.outcome.kind).toBe('Plan');
+	});
+
+	it.each(['sum', 'count', 'maximum'] as const)(
+		'finishes a configured maximize holiday prefix at its evaluator bound (%s)',
+		(aggregation) => {
+			const holiday = {
+				...presets[1],
+				id: 'personal-holiday',
+				configuration: { ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue, aggregation },
+			};
+			const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				...composedRequest,
+				rules: [presets[0], holiday, ...presets.slice(2)],
+			});
+			expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'Plan',
+				placements: [
+					{ date: '2024-05-06' },
+					{ date: '2024-05-07' },
+					{ date: '2024-05-10' },
+				],
+				metrics: { unplacedAtRisk: 0, holidayWeekValue: 5, nonWorkingDayGain: 6 },
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('commits a strict holiday bundle before deferring old generic alternatives and preserves higher rules', () => {
+		const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+			calculationDate: '2026-11-01',
+			horizon: { start: '2026-11-02', end: '2026-11-14' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 3, expiryDate: '2026-11-30' }],
+			declaredDays: ['2026-11-09', '2026-11-10'].map((date) => ({ date, type: 'other' })),
+			rules: [
+				{
+					id: 'mandatory',
+					type: 'time_window',
+					force: 'obligation',
+					startDate: '2026-11-02',
+					endDate: '2026-11-02',
+					placeDays: 1,
+					placeType: 'cp',
+				},
+				presets[0],
+				{
+					id: 'earlier-window',
+					type: 'time_window',
+					startDate: '2026-11-02',
+					endDate: '2026-11-02',
+					placeDays: 1,
+					placeType: 'cp',
+				},
+				...presets.slice(1),
+			],
+		});
+		expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			placements: [{ date: '2026-11-02' }, { date: '2026-11-12' }, { date: '2026-11-13' }],
+			preferences: [{ ruleId: 'earlier-window', satisfied: 1 }],
+			metrics: { unplacedAtRisk: 0, holidayWeekValue: 3 },
+		});
+	});
+
+	it.each([false, true])(
+		'earns an already-complete preference occurrence before comparisons (minimize every balance: %s)',
+		(minimizeEveryBalance) => {
+			const request: PlanningRequest & { calculationDate: string } = {
+				calculationDate: '2026-11-01',
+				horizon: { start: '2026-11-09', end: '2026-11-14' },
+				balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2027-01-01' }],
+				rules: [
+					{
+						id: 'mandatory',
+						type: 'time_window',
+						force: 'obligation',
+						startDate: '2026-11-12',
+						endDate: '2026-11-12',
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+					},
+					...(minimizeEveryBalance
+						? [
+								{
+									id: 'all-balances',
+									type: 'optimization' as const,
+									configuration: {
+										...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+										conditions: [],
+									},
+								},
+							]
+						: []),
+					{
+						id: 'producer',
+						type: 'if_then',
+						dayOfWeek: 3,
+						placeDays: 1,
+						placeType: 'cp',
+						placement: 'after',
+						rewardDays: 1,
+						rewardType: 'rtt',
+					},
+				],
+			};
+			let artifacts: PlanningArtifacts = {};
+			const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal(
+				request,
+				undefined,
+				(value) => (artifacts = value),
+			);
+			expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'Plan',
+				placements: [
+					{ date: '2026-11-12', type: 'cp', ruleIds: ['mandatory', 'producer'] },
+				],
+				preferences: [{ ruleId: 'producer', satisfied: 1 }],
+				remainingBalances: [
+					{
+						id: 'earned:producer:2026-11-11',
+						type: 'rtt',
+						quantity: 1,
+						availableFrom: '2026-11-13',
+						expiryDate: '2027-11-13',
+						sourceRuleId: 'producer',
+					},
+				],
+			});
+			expect(artifacts.finalState?.earnedActivations).toEqual([
+				{
+					id: 'earned:producer:2026-11-11',
+					ruleId: 'producer',
+					occurrence: '2026-11-11',
+					dates: ['2026-11-12'],
+				},
+			]);
+			if (artifacts.explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation')
+				throw new Error('Expected an explanation.');
+			expect(artifacts.explanation.placements[0].contributions).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({ kind: 'rule', ruleId: 'producer' }),
+			);
+			expect(artifacts.explanation.ifThenContributions).toContainEqual(
+				expect.objectContaining({
+					ruleId: 'producer',
+					earnedEntitlement: {
+						id: 'earned:producer:2026-11-11',
+						type: 'rtt',
+						quantity: 1,
+						availableFrom: '2026-11-13',
+						expiryDate: '2027-11-13',
+						added: true,
+					},
+				}),
+			);
+			if (minimizeEveryBalance)
+				expect(
+					artifacts.explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives,
+				).toContainEqual(
+					expect.objectContaining({ id: 'optimization:all-balances', value: 1 }),
+				);
+		},
+	);
+});
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import { calculatePlanningInternal } from './leave-planner.core';
+import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
+import type { PlanningRequest } from './leave-planner.service';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS, type OptimizationConfiguration } from './planning-objectives';
+
+const loss = {
+	id: 'loss',
+	name: 'Prevent losses',
+	type: 'optimization' as const,
+	force: 'preference' as const,
+	configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+};
+const personal = {
+	id: 'personal',
+	name: 'Personal CP day',
+	type: 'time_window' as const,
+	force: 'preference' as const,
+	startDate: '2024-01-02',
+	endDate: '2024-01-02',
+	placeDays: 1,
+	placeType: 'cp' as const,
+};
+const concurrent: PlanningRequest = {
+	horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-03' },
+	balances: [
+		{ id: 'risk-rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-02' },
+		{ id: 'deferred-cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-02-01' },
+	],
+	rules: [],
+};
+
+describe('explicit active planning objectives', () => {
+	beforeEach(() => {
+		vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01T12:00:00Z'));
+		vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined);
+	});
+	afterEach(() => {
+		vi.useRealTimers();
+		vi.unstubAllGlobals();
+	});
+
+	it('rejects a sparse selector list consistently at direct and calculation boundaries', async () => {
+		const request = {
+			...concurrent,
+			rules: [
+				{ ...loss, configuration: { ...loss.configuration, conditions: new Array(1) } },
+			],
+		};
+		const direct = calculatePlanningInternal(request);
+		const calculation = await createPlanningCalculation(request).outcome;
+		for (const result of [direct, calculation])
+			expect(result).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'InvalidInput',
+				reasons: [{ code: 'invalid-optimization-configuration', ruleIds: ['loss'] }],
+			});
+	});
+
+	it('adds no leave without active rules and retains declared days', async () => {
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-05' },
+			balances: [{ id: 'rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-01-04' }],
+			rules: [],
+			declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'other' }],
+		});
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		expect(outcome.kind).toBe('Plan');
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') return;
+		expect(outcome.placements).toEqual([]);
+		expect(outcome.declaredDays).toEqual([{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'other' }]);
+		expect(outcome.remainingBalances[0].quantity).toBe(2);
+		expect(outcome.remainingBalances[0]).toMatchObject({
+			classification: 'at-risk',
+			reason: { code: 'active-priorities' },
+		});
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		['z-early', 'a-later'],
+		['a-early', 'z-later'],
+	])(
+		'compares equal expirations before dates without preferring balance identity %s',
+		(earlyId, laterId) => {
+			const result = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-09', end: '2024-01-13' },
+				balances: [
+					{
+						id: earlyId,
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 1,
+						availableFrom: '2024-01-09',
+						expiryDate: '2024-02-01',
+					},
+					{
+						id: laterId,
+						type: 'cp',
+						quantity: 1,
+						availableFrom: '2024-01-10',
+						expiryDate: '2024-02-01',
+					},
+				],
+				rules: [{ ...personal, startDate: '2024-01-09', endDate: '2024-01-12' }],
+			});
+			expect(result).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'Plan',
+				placements: [{ date: '2024-01-09', balanceId: earlyId }],
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('follows the displayed order when loss prevention competes with a personal preference', async () => {
+		const first = await createPlanningCalculation({ ...concurrent, rules: [loss, personal] })
+			.outcome;
+		const second = await createPlanningCalculation({ ...concurrent, rules: [personal, loss] })
+			.outcome;
+		if (first.kind !== 'Plan' || second.kind !== 'Plan')
+			throw new Error('Expected valid plans');
+		expect(first.placements.map((placement) => placement.balanceId)).toEqual(['risk-rtt']);
+		expect(first.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(first.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(0);
+		expect(second.placements.map((placement) => placement.balanceId)).toEqual(['deferred-cp']);
+		expect(second.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(1);
+		expect(second.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('keeps typed obligations valid when an optimization would prefer another balance', async () => {
+		const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			...concurrent,
+			rules: [{ ...personal, force: 'obligation' }, loss],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.placements[0]).toMatchObject({
+			type: 'cp',
+			balanceId: 'deferred-cp',
+			ruleIds: ['personal'],
+		});
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('preserves scarce expiry dates before a lower personal preference', async () => {
+		const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-04' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-03' },
+				{ id: 'rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-02' },
+			],
+			rules: [loss, personal],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date, type }) => ({ date, type }))).toEqual([
+			{ date: '2024-01-02', type: 'rtt' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'cp' },
+		]);
+		expect(outcome.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('can relocate a short chain before adding a balance with a scarce date', async () => {
+		const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-05' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-03' },
+				{
+					id: 'flexible',
+					type: 'rtt',
+					quantity: 1,
+					availableFrom: '2024-01-03',
+					expiryDate: '2024-01-04',
+				},
+				{ id: 'scarce', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-02' },
+			],
+			rules: [loss, personal],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date, balanceId }) => ({ date, balanceId }))).toEqual([
+			{ date: '2024-01-02', balanceId: 'scarce' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-03', balanceId: 'cp' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-04', balanceId: 'flexible' },
+		]);
+	});
+
+	it.each(['2024-01-23', '2024-01-24'])(
+		'finishes oversubscribed balances without an eligible free endpoint through %s',
+		async (end) => {
+			const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+				deadlineMs: 500,
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end },
+				balances: [
+					{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 7, expiryDate: '2024-01-22' },
+					{ id: 'rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 8, expiryDate: '2024-01-22' },
+					{ id: 'other', type: 'other', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-22' },
+				],
+				rules: [loss],
+			}).outcome;
+			if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a completed valid plan');
+			expect(outcome.placements).toHaveLength(15);
+			expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(1);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('relocates repeated balance tokens across mandatory windows as a complete chain', async () => {
+		const windows = [
+			['cp-first', 'cp', '2024-01-02', '2024-01-03'],
+			['rtt-middle', 'rtt', '2024-01-03', '2024-01-04'],
+			['cp-last', 'cp', '2024-01-04', '2024-01-05'],
+		].map(([id, placeType, startDate, endDate]) => ({
+			id,
+			type: 'time_window' as const,
+			force: 'obligation' as const,
+			placeType,
+			placeDays: 1,
+			startDate,
+			endDate,
+		}));
+		const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-06' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-01-05' },
+				{ id: 'rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-05' },
+				{ id: 'scarce', type: 'other', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-02' },
+			],
+			rules: [...windows, loss],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.placements.map(({ date, type }) => ({ date, type }))).toEqual([
+			{ date: '2024-01-02', type: 'other' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'cp' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-04', type: 'rtt' },
+			{ date: '2024-01-05', type: 'cp' },
+		]);
+	});
+
+	it('relocates same-balance tokens with different mandatory provenance', async () => {
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-05' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-01-04' },
+				{ id: 'scarce', type: 'other', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-02' },
+			],
+			rules: [
+				{ ...personal, id: 'first', force: 'obligation', endDate: '2024-01-03' },
+				{
+					...personal,
+					id: 'second',
+					force: 'obligation',
+					startDate: '2024-01-03',
+					endDate: '2024-01-04',
+				},
+				loss,
+			],
+		});
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('satisfies a lower IF_THEN pattern by reassigning its complete typed bundle', async () => {
+		const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			horizon: { start: '2027-12-20', end: '2027-12-28' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'A-cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2027-12-27' },
+				{ id: 'B-rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 4, expiryDate: '2027-12-27' },
+			],
+			rules: [
+				loss,
+				{
+					id: 'samedi',
+					name: 'Samedi Malin',
+					type: 'if_then',
+					dayOfWeek: 6,
+					placeDays: 2,
+					placeType: 'cp',
+					placement: 'auto',
+					rewardDays: 1,
+					rewardType: 'other',
+				},
+			],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+		expect(
+			outcome.placements.filter(({ type }) => type === 'cp').map(({ date }) => date),
+		).toEqual(['2027-12-23', '2027-12-24']);
+	});
+
+	it('does not classify a period extension without a calendar benefit as supporting', async () => {
+		const base: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2026-12-28', end: '2027-01-09' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'rtt', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2027-01-08' },
+				{
+					id: 'cp',
+					type: 'cp',
+					quantity: 1,
+					availableFrom: '2027-01-05',
+					expiryDate: '2027-02-01',
+				},
+			],
+			rules: [
+				{
+					...personal,
+					force: 'obligation',
+					startDate: '2027-01-04',
+					endDate: '2027-01-04',
+					placeType: 'rtt',
+				},
+			],
+		};
+		const before = await createPlanningCalculation(base).outcome;
+		const after = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			...base,
+			rules: [
+				...base.rules,
+				{ ...loss, configuration: { ...loss.configuration, conditions: [] } },
+			],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (before.kind !== 'Plan' || after.kind !== 'Plan')
+			throw new Error('Expected valid plans');
+		expect(after.placements.find(({ balanceId }) => balanceId === 'cp')).toMatchObject({
+			date: '2027-01-05',
+			supporting: false,
+		});
+		for (const key of [
+			'holidayWeekValue',
+			'nonWorkingDayGain',
+			'longestWorkSequence',
+			'shortSequenceDeficit',
+		] as const)
+			expect(after.metrics[key]).toBe(before.metrics[key]);
+		expect(after.metrics.supportingPlacements).toBe(0);
+	});
+
+	it('keeps joint window obligations and active priority when large previews are sampled', async () => {
+		const obligations = [
+			['2024-01-02', '2024-01-15'],
+			['2024-01-16', '2024-01-29'],
+			['2024-02-01', '2024-02-14'],
+		].map(([startDate, endDate], index) => ({
+			id: `mandatory-${index}`,
+			type: 'time_window' as const,
+			force: 'obligation' as const,
+			startDate,
+			endDate,
+			placeDays: 2,
+			placeType: 'any' as const,
+		}));
+		const request: PlanningRequest = {
+			horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-02-16' },
+			balances: [
+				{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 5, expiryDate: '2024-02-15' },
+				{ id: 'scarce', type: 'rtt', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-01-02' },
+				{ id: 'deferred', type: 'cp', quantity: 1, expiryDate: '2024-05-01' },
+			],
+			rules: [...obligations, loss, personal],
+		};
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(request);
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(0);
+		expect(outcome.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(0);
+		for (const rule of obligations)
+			expect(
+				outcome.placements.filter(({ ruleIds }) => ruleIds.includes(rule.id)),
+			).toHaveLength(2);
+		const reversed = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			...request,
+			rules: [...obligations, personal, loss],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (reversed.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(reversed.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+		expect(reversed.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(1);
+	}, 20_000);
+
+	it('allows a lower typed preference to choose the balance when loss quantities tie', async () => {
+		const outcome = await createPlanningCalculation({
+			...concurrent,
+			balances: concurrent.balances.map((balance) => ({
+				...balance,
+				expiryDate: '2024-01-02',
+			})),
+			rules: [loss, personal],
+		}).outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a valid plan');
+		expect(outcome.placements[0].type).toBe('cp');
+		expect(outcome.metrics.unplacedAtRisk).toBe(1);
+		expect(outcome.preferences[0].satisfied).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('makes a disabled optimization equivalent to its absence, including all-disabled requests', async () => {
+		for (const otherRules of [[], [personal]]) {
+			const absent = await createPlanningCalculation({ ...concurrent, rules: otherRules })
+				.outcome;
+			const disabled = await createPlanningCalculation({
+				...concurrent,
+				rules: [{ ...loss, enabled: false }, ...otherRules],
+			}).outcome;
+			expect(disabled).toEqual(absent);
+		}
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk, aggregation: 'average' },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk, conditions: ['complete'] },
+		null,
+	])(
+		'rejects incompatible or malformed active configurations without an obligation conflict: %s',
+		async (configuration) => {
+			const outcome = calculatePlanningInternal({
+				...concurrent,
+				rules: [{ ...loss, configuration }],
+			});
+			expect(outcome.kind).toBe('InvalidInput');
+			if (outcome.kind !== 'InvalidInput') return;
+			expect(outcome.reasons[0].ruleIds).toEqual(['loss']);
+			expect(outcome.reasons[0].code).toMatch(
+				/^(invalid|unsupported)-optimization-configuration$/,
+			);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('rejects obligation mode for an optimization and ignores a malformed disabled rule', async () => {
+		const invalid = calculatePlanningInternal({
+			...concurrent,
+			rules: [{ ...loss, force: 'obligation' }],
+		});
+		expect(invalid).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'InvalidInput',
+			reasons: [expect.objectContaining({ code: 'rule-force', ruleIds: ['loss'] })],
+		});
+		const disabled = calculatePlanningInternal({
+			...concurrent,
+			rules: [{ ...loss, enabled: false, configuration: null }],
+		});
+		expect(disabled).toMatchObject({ kind: 'Plan', placements: [] });
+	});
+
+	it('keeps direct snapshots and every explanation/comparison in the submitted active order', async () => {
+		const configuration: OptimizationConfiguration = structuredClone(
+			OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		);
+		const rule = { ...loss, configuration };
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({ ...concurrent, rules: [rule, personal] });
+		configuration.conditions = [];
+		configuration.aggregation = 'count';
+		configuration.direction = 'maximize';
+		rule.name = 'Edited later';
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		if (outcome.kind !== 'Plan') throw new Error('Expected a plan');
+		expect(outcome.placements[0].balanceId).toBe('risk-rtt');
+		expect(calculation.snapshot.rules[0]).toMatchObject({
+			name: 'Prevent losses',
+			configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+		});
+		expect(Object.isFrozen(calculation.snapshot.rules[0])).toBe(true);
+		const explanation = await calculation.explanation;
+		if (explanation?.kind !== 'PlanExplanation') throw new Error('Expected an explanation');
+		const ids = [
+			'obligation-validity',
+			'optimization:loss',
+			'preference:personal',
+			'balance-expiry',
+			'placement-date',
+		];
+		expect(
+			explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives.map((objective) => objective.id),
+		).toEqual(ids);
+		expect(explanation.placements[0].objectiveVector.objectives[1].label).toBe(
+			'Prevent losses',
+		);
+		const comparison = await calculation.analyzeCounterfactual(outcome.placements[0]);
+		if (comparison.kind !== 'Counterfactual') throw new Error('Expected comparison');
+		expect(comparison.baseline.objectives.map((objective) => objective.id)).toEqual(ids);
+	});
+});
@@ -5,11 +5,12 @@ import { RuleService, RuleType } from './rule-service';
 import { UserInputService } from './user-input-service';
 import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
 import { PlanningDurationService } from './planning-duration.service';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from './planning-objectives';

 describe('Planning duration estimate', () => {
 	beforeEach(() => {
 		localStorage.clear();
-		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '{"version":1,"rules":[]}');
 		TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService).setPlanningDates('2024-01-01', '2024-12-31');
 		TestBed.inject(UserInputService).updateBalances(() => [
 			{
@@ -34,6 +35,22 @@ describe('Planning duration estimate', () => {
 		expect(TestBed.inject(RuleService).rules).toEqual([]);
 	});

+	it('estimates and calibrates optimization rules without a requested leave quantity', () => {
+		const rules = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		rules.addRule({
+			id: 'loss',
+			name: 'Loss',
+			type: RuleType.OPTIMIZATION,
+			enabled: true,
+			force: 'preference',
+			configuration: structuredClone(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk),
+		});
+		const duration = TestBed.inject(PlanningDurationService);
+		expect(Number.isFinite(duration.estimate()!.maximum)).toBe(true);
+		duration.recordCompletion(duration.request()!, 20_000);
+		expect(duration.estimate()).toEqual({ minimum: 10, maximum: 60, unit: 'seconds' });
+	});
+
 	it('updates for dates, balances and active rules without requesting a calculation', () => {
 		const duration = TestBed.inject(PlanningDurationService);
 		const settings = TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService);
@@ -41,7 +41,9 @@ function initialDurationMs(request: PlanningRequest): number {
 			(dateTime(rule.startDate) >= end || dateTime(rule.endDate) < start)
 		)
 			continue;
-		ruleWeight += (rule.force === 'obligation' ? 0.5 : 0.15) * Math.max(1, rule.placeDays / 3);
+		ruleWeight +=
+			(rule.force === 'obligation' ? 0.5 : 0.15) *
+			Math.max(1, 'placeDays' in rule ? rule.placeDays / 3 : 1);
 		if ('rewardDays' in rule) placements += (Math.max(0, rule.rewardDays) * days) / 365.25;
 	}
 	// Rough prior from the browser references in docs/planning-duration.md, not a deadline.
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
+import {
+	compareObjectiveLists,
+	compareObjectiveValues,
+	evaluateOptimization,
+	firstDifferentObjective,
+	OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS,
+	optimizationUnit,
+	validateOptimizationConfiguration,
+	type OptimizationObservations,
+} from './planning-objectives';
+
+const empty: OptimizationObservations = {
+	leaveBalances: [],
+	publicHolidayWeeks: [],
+	timeOffPeriods: [],
+	workSequences: [],
+	leavePlacements: [],
+};
+
+describe('composable planning objectives', () => {
+	it('evaluates each internal non-empty sequence with its own working-day threshold', () => {
+		const observations: OptimizationObservations = {
+			...empty,
+			workSequences: [
+				{ length: 1, internal: false },
+				{ length: 0, internal: true },
+				{ length: 1, internal: true },
+				{ length: 4, internal: true },
+				{ length: 6, internal: false },
+			],
+		};
+		expect(evaluateOptimization(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, observations)).toBe(
+			5,
+		);
+		expect(
+			evaluateOptimization(
+				{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, thresholdDays: 3 },
+				observations,
+			),
+		).toBe(2);
+		expect(evaluateOptimization(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence, observations)).toBe(
+			6,
+		);
+	});
+
+	it('evaluates all six recipes from the same concrete observations', () => {
+		const observations: OptimizationObservations = {
+			leaveBalances: [
+				{ unplacedQuantity: 3, atRisk: true },
+				{ unplacedQuantity: 8, atRisk: false },
+			],
+			publicHolidayWeeks: [
+				{ value: 3, complete: true },
+				{ value: 1, complete: false },
+				{ value: 4, complete: true },
+			],
+			timeOffPeriods: [
+				{ nonWorkingDates: ['2024-01-06', '2024-01-07'] },
+				{ nonWorkingDates: ['2024-05-08', '2024-05-09', '2024-05-09'] },
+			],
+			workSequences: [
+				{ length: 1, internal: false },
+				{ length: 0, internal: true },
+				{ length: 1, internal: true },
+				{ length: 4, internal: true },
+				{ length: 6, internal: false },
+			],
+			leavePlacements: [{ supporting: true }, { supporting: false }, { supporting: true }],
+		};
+		expect(
+			Object.values(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS).map((configuration) =>
+				evaluateOptimization(configuration, observations),
+			),
+		).toEqual([3, 7, 4, 6, 5, 2]);
+	});
+
+	it.each(['sum', 'count', 'maximum'] as const)(
+		'defines empty %s as zero for every measure',
+		(aggregation) => {
+			for (const configuration of Object.values(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS)) {
+				expect(evaluateOptimization({ ...configuration, aggregation }, empty)).toBe(0);
+			}
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('composes conditions, aggregation and direction independently of a rule name or identity', () => {
+		const configuration = {
+			...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence,
+			conditions: ['internal', 'non-empty'] as const,
+			aggregation: 'sum' as const,
+			direction: 'maximize' as const,
+		};
+		const observations: OptimizationObservations = {
+			...empty,
+			workSequences: [
+				{ length: 20, internal: false },
+				{ length: 0, internal: true },
+				{ length: 2, internal: true },
+				{ length: 4, internal: true },
+			],
+		};
+		const rules = [
+			{ id: 'provided', name: 'Original name', configuration },
+			{ id: 'personal', name: 'Renamed rule', configuration: structuredClone(configuration) },
+		];
+		expect(rules.map((rule) => evaluateOptimization(rule.configuration, observations))).toEqual(
+			[6, 6],
+		);
+		expect(evaluateOptimization({ ...configuration, aggregation: 'count' }, observations)).toBe(
+			2,
+		);
+		expect(
+			evaluateOptimization({ ...configuration, aggregation: 'maximum' }, observations),
+		).toBe(4);
+		expect(optimizationUnit(configuration)).toBe('working-days');
+		expect(optimizationUnit({ ...configuration, aggregation: 'count' })).toBe('count');
+		expect(optimizationUnit(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain)).toBe('calendar-days');
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		0,
+		-1,
+		1.5,
+		Number.NaN,
+		Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY,
+		undefined,
+		'3',
+		Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1,
+	])('rejects the invalid working-day deficit threshold %s', (thresholdDays) => {
+		expect(
+			validateOptimizationConfiguration({
+				...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+				thresholdDays,
+			}),
+		).toMatchObject({ valid: false, code: 'invalid-optimization-configuration' });
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain, elements: 'work-sequences' },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain, conditions: ['at-risk'] },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence, aggregation: 'average' },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence, thresholdDays: 3 },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, thresholdUnit: 'calendar-days' },
+	])('identifies an unsupported composition', (configuration) => {
+		expect(validateOptimizationConfiguration(configuration)).toMatchObject({
+			valid: false,
+			code: 'unsupported-optimization-configuration',
+		});
+	});
+
+	it.each([
+		null,
+		[],
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit, conditions: ['internal', 'internal'] },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence, direction: 'up' },
+		{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk, conditions: new Array(1) },
+	])('rejects malformed configurations', (configuration) => {
+		expect(validateOptimizationConfiguration(configuration)).toMatchObject({
+			valid: false,
+			code: 'invalid-optimization-configuration',
+		});
+	});
+
+	it('never evaluates an unsupported configuration as a preset', () => {
+		expect(() =>
+			evaluateOptimization(
+				{ ...OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain, elements: 'work-sequences' },
+				empty,
+			),
+		).toThrow('unsupported-optimization-configuration');
+	});
+
+	it('compares ordered objectives lexicographically with the configured directions', () => {
+		const before = [
+			{ id: 'first', direction: 'minimize' as const, value: 3 },
+			{ id: 'second', direction: 'maximize' as const, value: 100 },
+			{ id: 'date', direction: 'minimize' as const, value: '2024-01-10' },
+		];
+		const earlierPriority = [{ ...before[0], value: 2 }, { ...before[1], value: 0 }, before[2]];
+		expect(compareObjectiveLists(earlierPriority, before)).toBeLessThan(0);
+		expect(firstDifferentObjective(earlierPriority, before)).toBe(0);
+		const laterPriority = [before[0], { ...before[1], value: 101 }, before[2]];
+		expect(compareObjectiveLists(laterPriority, before)).toBeLessThan(0);
+		expect(firstDifferentObjective(laterPriority, before)).toBe(1);
+		const earlierDate = [before[0], before[1], { ...before[2], value: '2024-01-09' }];
+		expect(compareObjectiveLists(earlierDate, before)).toBeLessThan(0);
+		expect(firstDifferentObjective(earlierDate, before)).toBe(2);
+		expect(compareObjectiveLists(before, structuredClone(before))).toBe(0);
+		expect(firstDifferentObjective(before, structuredClone(before))).toBe(-1);
+		expect(compareObjectiveValues('maximize', 0, 0)).toBe(0);
+	});
+});
@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+export type OptimizationElements =
+	| 'leave-balances'
+	| 'public-holiday-weeks'
+	| 'time-off-periods'
+	| 'work-sequences'
+	| 'leave-placements';
+export type OptimizationCondition =
+	| 'at-risk'
+	| 'complete'
+	| 'internal'
+	| 'non-empty'
+	| 'supporting';
+export type OptimizationMeasure =
+	| 'unplaced-quantity'
+	| 'public-holiday-week-value'
+	| 'non-working-day-gain'
+	| 'work-sequence-length'
+	| 'work-sequence-deficit'
+	| 'placement-count';
+export type OptimizationAggregation = 'sum' | 'count' | 'maximum';
+export type OptimizationDirection = 'minimize' | 'maximize';
+export type OptimizationUnit = 'working-days' | 'calendar-days' | 'count';
+
+interface OptimizationConfigurationBase {
+	elements: OptimizationElements;
+	conditions: readonly OptimizationCondition[];
+	aggregation: OptimizationAggregation;
+	direction: OptimizationDirection;
+}
+
+export type OptimizationConfiguration = OptimizationConfigurationBase &
+	(
+		| { measure: 'work-sequence-deficit'; thresholdDays: number }
+		| { measure: Exclude<OptimizationMeasure, 'work-sequence-deficit'>; thresholdDays?: never }
+	);
+
+/** Each row accepts any subset of its conditions and both comparison directions. */
+export const OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG = [
+	{
+		elements: 'leave-balances',
+		measure: 'unplaced-quantity',
+		conditions: ['at-risk'],
+		aggregations: ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'],
+		unit: 'working-days',
+	},
+	{
+		elements: 'public-holiday-weeks',
+		measure: 'public-holiday-week-value',
+		conditions: ['complete'],
+		aggregations: ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'],
+		unit: 'calendar-days',
+	},
+	{
+		elements: 'time-off-periods',
+		measure: 'non-working-day-gain',
+		conditions: [],
+		aggregations: ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'],
+		unit: 'calendar-days',
+	},
+	{
+		elements: 'work-sequences',
+		measure: 'work-sequence-length',
+		conditions: ['internal', 'non-empty'],
+		aggregations: ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'],
+		unit: 'working-days',
+	},
+	{
+		elements: 'work-sequences',
+		measure: 'work-sequence-deficit',
+		conditions: ['internal', 'non-empty'],
+		aggregations: ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'],
+		unit: 'working-days',
+	},
+	{
+		elements: 'leave-placements',
+		measure: 'placement-count',
+		conditions: ['supporting'],
+		aggregations: ['sum', 'count', 'maximum'],
+		unit: 'count',
+	},
+] as const;
+
+export type OptimizationValidation =
+	| { valid: true; configuration: OptimizationConfiguration }
+	| {
+			valid: false;
+			code: 'invalid-optimization-configuration' | 'unsupported-optimization-configuration';
+			message: string;
+	  };
+
+export function validateOptimizationConfiguration(value: unknown): OptimizationValidation {
+	const invalid = (message: string): OptimizationValidation => ({
+		valid: false,
+		code: 'invalid-optimization-configuration',
+		message,
+	});
+	const unsupported = (message: string): OptimizationValidation => ({
+		valid: false,
+		code: 'unsupported-optimization-configuration',
+		message,
+	});
+	if (!value || typeof value !== 'object' || Array.isArray(value))
+		return invalid('An optimization configuration must be an object.');
+	const config = value as Record<string, unknown>;
+	const fields = [
+		'elements',
+		'conditions',
+		'measure',
+		'aggregation',
+		'direction',
+		'thresholdDays',
+	];
+	if (Object.keys(config).some((key) => !fields.includes(key)))
+		return unsupported('The optimization configuration contains an unsupported field.');
+	if (config['direction'] !== 'minimize' && config['direction'] !== 'maximize')
+		return invalid('The optimization direction must be minimize or maximize.');
+	if (
+		!Array.isArray(config['conditions']) ||
+		[...config['conditions']].some((condition) => typeof condition !== 'string') ||
+		new Set(config['conditions']).size !== config['conditions'].length
+	)
+		return invalid('Optimization conditions must be a list of distinct conditions.');
+	const row = OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG.find(
+		(item) => item.elements === config['elements'] && item.measure === config['measure'],
+	);
+	if (!row) return unsupported('The planning elements and measure are not compatible.');
+	const conditions: readonly string[] = row.conditions;
+	if (config['conditions'].some((condition) => !conditions.includes(condition)))
+		return unsupported('A condition is not supported for these planning elements.');
+	const aggregations: readonly string[] = row.aggregations;
+	if (typeof config['aggregation'] !== 'string' || !aggregations.includes(config['aggregation']))
+		return unsupported('The aggregation is not supported for this measure.');
+	if (config['measure'] === 'work-sequence-deficit') {
+		if (!Number.isSafeInteger(config['thresholdDays']) || Number(config['thresholdDays']) <= 0)
+			return invalid('The deficit threshold must be a positive integer in working days.');
+	} else if ('thresholdDays' in config)
+		return unsupported('Only the work-sequence deficit accepts a working-day threshold.');
+	return { valid: true, configuration: value as OptimizationConfiguration };
+}
+
+export function optimizationUnit(configuration: OptimizationConfiguration): OptimizationUnit {
+	return configuration.aggregation === 'count'
+		? 'count'
+		: OPTIMIZATION_CATALOG.find(
+				(row) =>
+					row.elements === configuration.elements &&
+					row.measure === configuration.measure,
+			)!.unit;
+}
+
+export const OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS = {
+	unplacedAtRisk: {
+		elements: 'leave-balances',
+		conditions: ['at-risk'],
+		measure: 'unplaced-quantity',
+		aggregation: 'sum',
+		direction: 'minimize',
+	},
+	holidayWeekValue: {
+		elements: 'public-holiday-weeks',
+		conditions: ['complete'],
+		measure: 'public-holiday-week-value',
+		aggregation: 'sum',
+		direction: 'maximize',
+	},
+	nonWorkingDayGain: {
+		elements: 'time-off-periods',
+		conditions: [],
+		measure: 'non-working-day-gain',
+		aggregation: 'sum',
+		direction: 'maximize',
+	},
+	longestWorkSequence: {
+		elements: 'work-sequences',
+		conditions: [],
+		measure: 'work-sequence-length',
+		aggregation: 'maximum',
+		direction: 'minimize',
+	},
+	shortSequenceDeficit: {
+		elements: 'work-sequences',
+		conditions: ['internal', 'non-empty'],
+		measure: 'work-sequence-deficit',
+		thresholdDays: 5,
+		aggregation: 'sum',
+		direction: 'minimize',
+	},
+	supportingPlacements: {
+		elements: 'leave-placements',
+		conditions: ['supporting'],
+		measure: 'placement-count',
+		aggregation: 'count',
+		direction: 'minimize',
+	},
+} as const satisfies Record<string, OptimizationConfiguration>;
+
+/** Concrete observations from one plan; they carry no rule identity or display name. */
+export interface OptimizationObservations {
+	leaveBalances: readonly { unplacedQuantity: number; atRisk: boolean }[];
+	publicHolidayWeeks: readonly { value: number; complete: boolean }[];
+	timeOffPeriods: readonly { nonWorkingDates: readonly string[] }[];
+	workSequences: readonly { length: number; internal: boolean }[];
+	leavePlacements: readonly { supporting: boolean }[];
+}
+
+export function evaluateOptimization(
+	configuration: OptimizationConfiguration,
+	observations: OptimizationObservations,
+): number {
+	const validation = validateOptimizationConfiguration(configuration);
+	if (!validation.valid) throw new Error(`${validation.code}: ${validation.message}`);
+	const selected = (condition: OptimizationCondition) =>
+		configuration.conditions.includes(condition);
+	let values: number[];
+	switch (configuration.elements) {
+		case 'leave-balances':
+			values = observations.leaveBalances
+				.filter((balance) => !selected('at-risk') || balance.atRisk)
+				.map((balance) => balance.unplacedQuantity);
+			break;
+		case 'public-holiday-weeks':
+			values = observations.publicHolidayWeeks
+				.filter((week) => !selected('complete') || week.complete)
+				.map((week) => week.value);
+			break;
+		case 'time-off-periods':
+			values = observations.timeOffPeriods.map(
+				(period) => new Set(period.nonWorkingDates).size,
+			);
+			break;
+		case 'work-sequences':
+			values = observations.workSequences
+				.filter(
+					(sequence) =>
+						(!selected('internal') || sequence.internal) &&
+						(!selected('non-empty') || sequence.length > 0),
+				)
+				.map((sequence) =>
+					configuration.measure === 'work-sequence-deficit'
+						? sequence.length > 0
+							? Math.max(0, configuration.thresholdDays - sequence.length)
+							: 0
+						: sequence.length,
+				);
+			break;
+		case 'leave-placements':
+			values = observations.leavePlacements
+				.filter((placement) => !selected('supporting') || placement.supporting)
+				.map(() => 1);
+	}
+	switch (configuration.aggregation) {
+		case 'count':
+			return values.length;
+		case 'sum':
+			return values.reduce((total, value) => total + value, 0);
+		case 'maximum':
+			return values.reduce((maximum, value) => Math.max(maximum, value), 0);
+	}
+}
+
+export interface ComparableObjective {
+	id: string;
+	direction: OptimizationDirection;
+	value: number | string;
+}
+
+/** Negative means the left candidate is preferred. Strings retain lexical tie-break ordering. */
+export function compareObjectiveValues(
+	direction: OptimizationDirection,
+	left: number | string,
+	right: number | string,
+): number {
+	if (left === right) return 0;
+	const difference =
+		typeof left === 'number' && typeof right === 'number'
+			? left - right
+			: left < right
+				? -1
+				: left > right
+					? 1
+					: 0;
+	return direction === 'minimize' ? difference : -difference;
+}
+
+export function firstDifferentObjective(
+	left: readonly ComparableObjective[],
+	right: readonly ComparableObjective[],
+): number {
+	return left.findIndex((objective, index) => objective.value !== right[index]?.value);
+}
+
+export function compareObjectiveLists(
+	left: readonly ComparableObjective[],
+	right: readonly ComparableObjective[],
+): number {
+	const index = firstDifferentObjective(left, right);
+	return index < 0
+		? 0
+		: compareObjectiveValues(left[index].direction, left[index].value, right[index].value);
+}
@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
+import { TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
+import { RuleService, RuleType } from './rule-service';
+import { vi } from 'vitest';
+import { CalendarSettingsService } from './calendar-settings-service';
+import { PlanningDurationService } from './planning-duration.service';
+import { UserInputService } from './user-input-service';
+import { SelectableDayType } from './calendar-service';
+import { createPlanningCalculation } from './leave-planner.service';
+
+describe('saved rule migration', () => {
+	beforeEach(() => localStorage.clear());
+	afterEach(() => {
+		vi.restoreAllMocks();
+		vi.unstubAllGlobals();
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		localStorage.clear();
+	});
+
+	it('restores every legacy record unchanged between loss prevention and the other five presets', () => {
+		const legacy = [
+			{
+				id: 'personal-window',
+				name: 'My fixed window',
+				type: RuleType.TIME_WINDOW,
+				enabled: true,
+				force: 'obligation',
+				startDate: '2024-01-10',
+				endDate: '2024-01-12',
+				placeDays: 2,
+				placeType: 'cp',
+			},
+			{
+				id: 'personal-pattern',
+				name: 'My disabled pattern',
+				type: RuleType.IF_THEN,
+				enabled: false,
+				dayOfWeek: 6,
+				placeDays: 2,
+				placeType: 'cp',
+				placement: 'around',
+				rewardDays: 1,
+				rewardType: 'other',
+			},
+		];
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', JSON.stringify(legacy));
+		const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules).toHaveLength(8);
+		expect(service.rules.slice(1, 3).map(({ id }) => id)).toEqual([
+			'personal-window',
+			'personal-pattern',
+		]);
+		const saved = JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!);
+		expect(saved.version).toBe(1);
+		expect(saved.rules.slice(1, 3)).toEqual(legacy);
+		expect(service.rules[2].force).toBe('preference');
+		expect(saved.rules[2]).not.toHaveProperty('force');
+	});
+
+	it('gives fresh users the six active presets around the two existing initial rules', () => {
+		const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules.map(({ id }) => id)).toEqual([
+			'default-unplaced-at-risk',
+			'default-samedi-malin',
+			'default-christmas',
+			'default-holiday-week-value',
+			'default-non-working-day-gain',
+			'default-longest-work-sequence',
+			'default-short-sequence-deficit',
+			'default-supporting-placements',
+		]);
+		const presets = service.rules.filter(({ type }) => type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION);
+		expect(presets).toHaveLength(6);
+		expect(presets.every(({ enabled, force }) => enabled && force === 'preference')).toBe(true);
+	});
+
+	it('migrates an old empty list once and retains editing, order, disabled and deleted choices immediately', () => {
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		let service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules).toHaveLength(6);
+		const deficit = service.rules[4];
+		if (
+			deficit.type !== RuleType.OPTIMIZATION ||
+			deficit.configuration.measure !== 'work-sequence-deficit'
+		)
+			throw new Error('Expected the deficit preset');
+		service.updateRule({
+			...deficit,
+			name: 'My three-day deficit',
+			configuration: { ...deficit.configuration, thresholdDays: 3 },
+		});
+		service.reorderRules(4, 0);
+		service.toggleRule(deficit.id);
+		service.deleteRule('default-holiday-week-value');
+		const expected = service.rules;
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules).toEqual(expected);
+		expect(service.rules[0]).toMatchObject({
+			name: 'My three-day deficit',
+			enabled: false,
+			configuration: { thresholdDays: 3 },
+		});
+		for (const rule of service.rules) service.deleteRule(rule.id);
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		expect(TestBed.inject(RuleService).rules).toEqual([]);
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!)).toEqual({
+			version: 1,
+			rules: [],
+		});
+	});
+
+	it('avoids colliding with existing custom identities without replacing their records', () => {
+		const custom = ['default-unplaced-at-risk', 'default-unplaced-at-risk-2'].map((id) => ({
+			id,
+			name: id,
+			type: RuleType.IF_THEN,
+			enabled: false,
+			dayOfWeek: 6,
+			placeDays: 2,
+			placeType: 'cp',
+			placement: 'auto',
+			rewardDays: 1,
+			rewardType: 'other',
+		}));
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', JSON.stringify(custom));
+		const rules = TestBed.inject(RuleService).rules;
+		expect(rules[0].id).toBe('default-unplaced-at-risk-3');
+		expect(new Set(rules.map(({ id }) => id)).size).toBe(8);
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).rules.slice(1, 3)).toEqual(
+			custom,
+		);
+	});
+
+	it('saves the migrated list and version in one atomic write and retries after a failed save', () => {
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		vi.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+		const save = vi.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'setItem').mockImplementation(() => {
+			throw new Error('quota');
+		});
+		let service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules).toHaveLength(6);
+		expect(save).toHaveBeenCalledOnce();
+		expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe('[]');
+		service.toggleRule(service.rules[0].id);
+		expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe('[]');
+		save.mockRestore();
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules).toHaveLength(6);
+		expect(service.rules[0].enabled).toBe(true);
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).version).toBe(1);
+	});
+
+	it('keeps edits usable and saves the entire current list once storage recovers', () => {
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		const prior = localStorage.getItem('vacationRules');
+		vi.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+		const save = vi.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'setItem').mockImplementation(() => {
+			throw new Error('quota');
+		});
+		service.toggleRule(service.rules[0].id);
+		expect(service.rules[0].enabled).toBe(false);
+		expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe(prior);
+		save.mockRestore();
+		service.deleteRule(service.rules[1].id);
+		const expected = service.rules;
+		TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+		expect(TestBed.inject(RuleService).rules).toEqual(expected);
+	});
+
+	it.each(['{"version":2,"rules":[]}', '{broken', 'null', '[null]'])(
+		'preserves unsupported saved data through subsequent edits: %s',
+		(saved) => {
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', saved);
+			vi.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+			const save = vi.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'setItem');
+			const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+			service.toggleRule(service.rules[0].id);
+			expect(save).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+			expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe(saved);
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('prevents edits from overwriting unknown valid saved data after a read failure', () => {
+		const saved = '{"version":1,"rules":[]}';
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', saved);
+		vi.spyOn(console, 'warn').mockImplementation(() => undefined);
+		const read = vi.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'getItem').mockImplementation(() => {
+			throw new Error('denied');
+		});
+		const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		read.mockRestore();
+		const write = vi.spyOn(Storage.prototype, 'setItem');
+		service.toggleRule(service.rules[0].id);
+		expect(write).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+		expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe(saved);
+	});
+
+	it('works in memory when browser storage is unavailable', () => {
+		vi.stubGlobal('localStorage', undefined);
+		const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+		expect(service.rules).toHaveLength(8);
+		service.toggleRule(service.rules[0].id);
+		expect(service.rules[0].enabled).toBe(false);
+	});
+
+	it.each(['disabled', 'deleted'])(
+		'keeps a migrated %s list inactive after reload while preserving declarations and at-risk quantities',
+		async (choice) => {
+			localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+			const service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+			for (const rule of service.rules) {
+				if (choice === 'disabled') service.toggleRule(rule.id);
+				else service.deleteRule(rule.id);
+			}
+			const saved = localStorage.getItem('vacationRules');
+			TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+			const restored = TestBed.inject(RuleService).rules;
+			expect(restored).toHaveLength(choice === 'disabled' ? 6 : 0);
+			expect(restored.every(({ enabled }) => !enabled)).toBe(true);
+			expect(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')).toBe(saved);
+			vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined);
+			const calculation = createPlanningCalculation({
+				horizon: { start: '2024-01-02', end: '2024-01-05' },
+				balances: [{ id: 'cp', type: 'cp', quantity: 2, expiryDate: '2024-01-04' }],
+				declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'other' }],
+				rules: restored,
+			});
+			const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+			expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'Plan',
+				placements: [],
+				declaredDays: [{ date: '2024-01-03', type: 'other' }],
+				remainingBalances: [
+					{
+						id: 'cp',
+						quantity: 2,
+						classification: 'at-risk',
+						reason: { code: 'active-priorities' },
+					},
+				],
+			});
+			expect(await calculation.explanation).toMatchObject({
+				kind: 'PlanExplanation',
+				placements: [],
+			});
+		},
+	);
+
+	it('migrates before the first duration request and actual calculation', async () => {
+		localStorage.setItem('vacationRules', '[]');
+		TestBed.inject(CalendarSettingsService).setPlanningDates('2024-01-02', '2024-01-05');
+		TestBed.inject(UserInputService).updateBalances(() => [
+			{
+				id: 'cp',
+				type: SelectableDayType.CP,
+				numberOfDays: 1,
+				availableDate: new Date('2024-01-02'),
+				expiryDate: new Date('2024-01-05'),
+			},
+		]);
+		const request = TestBed.inject(PlanningDurationService).request()!;
+		expect(request.rules).toHaveLength(6);
+		expect(JSON.parse(localStorage.getItem('vacationRules')!).version).toBe(1);
+		vi.stubGlobal('window', undefined);
+		const calculation = createPlanningCalculation(request);
+		const outcome = await calculation.outcome;
+		expect(outcome).toMatchObject({
+			kind: 'Plan',
+			metrics: { unplacedAtRisk: 0 },
+			placements: [{ balanceId: 'cp' }],
+		});
+	});
+});
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
 import { TestBed } from '@angular/core/testing';
-import { RuleService, RuleType, IfThenRule, TimeWindowRule } from './rule-service';
+import {
+	RuleService,
+	RuleType,
+	IfThenRule,
+	TimeWindowRule,
+	OptimizationRule,
+} from './rule-service';
 import { SelectableDayType } from './calendar-service';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS } from './planning-objectives';
+import { vi } from 'vitest';

 describe('RuleService', () => {
 	let service: RuleService;
@@ -18,9 +26,10 @@ describe('RuleService', () => {

 	it('should initialize with default rules', () => {
 		const rules = service.rules;
-		expect(rules.length).toBe(2);
-		expect(rules[0].id).toBe('default-samedi-malin');
-		expect(rules[1].id).toBe('default-christmas');
+		expect(rules.length).toBe(8);
+		expect(rules[0].id).toBe('default-unplaced-at-risk');
+		expect(rules[1].id).toBe('default-samedi-malin');
+		expect(rules[2].id).toBe('default-christmas');
 	});

 	it('should parse dates correctly for TimeWindowRules', () => {
@@ -62,9 +71,12 @@ describe('RuleService', () => {
 		TestBed.configureTestingModule({});
 		service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);

-		expect(service.rules.map((rule) => rule.id)).toEqual(['legacy-first', 'legacy-second']);
-		expect(service.rules[0].force).toBe('preference');
-		const first = service.rules[0] as TimeWindowRule;
+		expect(service.rules.slice(1, 3).map((rule) => rule.id)).toEqual([
+			'legacy-first',
+			'legacy-second',
+		]);
+		expect(service.rules[1].force).toBe('preference');
+		const first = service.rules[1] as TimeWindowRule;
 		expect(first.startDate.toISOString().slice(0, 10)).toBe('2024-02-01');
 	});

@@ -84,13 +96,13 @@ describe('RuleService', () => {

 		service.addRule(newRule);
 		const rules = service.rules;
-		expect(rules.length).toBe(3);
+		expect(rules.length).toBe(9);
 		expect(rules.find((r) => r.id === 'test-rule')).toBeDefined();
 	});

 	it('should update an existing rule', () => {
 		const rules = service.rules;
-		const targetRule = { ...rules[0] } as IfThenRule;
+		const targetRule = { ...rules.find((rule) => rule.type === RuleType.IF_THEN)! };
 		targetRule.name = 'Updated Name';

 		service.updateRule(targetRule);
@@ -107,7 +119,7 @@ describe('RuleService', () => {
 		service.deleteRule(idToDelete);

 		const updatedRules = service.rules;
-		expect(updatedRules.length).toBe(1);
+		expect(updatedRules.length).toBe(7);
 		expect(updatedRules.find((r) => r.id === idToDelete)).toBeUndefined();
 	});

@@ -132,4 +144,42 @@ describe('RuleService', () => {
 		expect(rulesAfter[0].id).toBe(secondRuleId);
 		expect(rulesAfter[1].id).toBe(firstRuleId);
 	});
+
+	it('restores the full optimization identity, parameters, enabled state and position', () => {
+		vi.useFakeTimers();
+		try {
+			TestBed.tick();
+			const optimization: OptimizationRule = {
+				id: 'personal-loss',
+				name: 'My loss priority',
+				type: RuleType.OPTIMIZATION,
+				enabled: true,
+				force: 'preference',
+				configuration: structuredClone(OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk),
+			};
+			service.addRule(optimization);
+			optimization.configuration.conditions = [];
+			service.reorderRules(
+				service.rules.findIndex(({ id }) => id === optimization.id),
+				0,
+			);
+			service.toggleRule('personal-loss');
+			const saved = service.rules;
+			TestBed.tick();
+			vi.advanceTimersByTime(350);
+			TestBed.resetTestingModule();
+			service = TestBed.inject(RuleService);
+			expect(service.rules).toEqual(saved);
+			expect(service.rules[0]).toMatchObject({
+				id: 'personal-loss',
+				name: 'My loss priority',
+				enabled: false,
+				configuration: OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk,
+			});
+			service.deleteRule('personal-loss');
+			expect(service.rules.some((rule) => rule.id === 'personal-loss')).toBe(false);
+		} finally {
+			vi.useRealTimers();
+		}
+	});
 });
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
-import { Injectable, WritableSignal, Injector, inject } from '@angular/core';
+import { Injectable, WritableSignal, signal } from '@angular/core';
 import { SelectableDayType } from './calendar-service';
-import { storedSignal } from '../shared/utils/stored-signal';
+import { OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS, type OptimizationConfiguration } from './planning-objectives';

 export enum RuleType {
 	IF_THEN = 'if_then',
 	TIME_WINDOW = 'time_window',
+	OPTIMIZATION = 'optimization',
 }

 export type RuleForce = 'obligation' | 'preference';
@@ -14,7 +15,7 @@ export interface BaseRule {
 	name: string;
 	type: RuleType;
 	enabled: boolean;
-	/** Missing force is a legacy preference and is migrated on read. */
+	/** Missing force is read as a legacy preference without rewriting the saved entry. */
 	force?: RuleForce;
 }

@@ -38,29 +39,88 @@ export interface TimeWindowRule extends BaseRule {
 	placeType: SelectableDayType;
 }

-export type VacationRule = IfThenRule | TimeWindowRule;
+export interface OptimizationRule extends BaseRule {
+	type: RuleType.OPTIMIZATION;
+	force: 'preference';
+	configuration: OptimizationConfiguration;
+}

-interface SerializedRule {
-	id: string;
-	name: string;
-	type: RuleType;
-	enabled: boolean;
-	force?: RuleForce;
-	dayOfWeek?: number;
-	placeDays: number;
-	placeType: SelectableDayType;
-	placement?: PlacementStrategy;
-	rewardDays?: number;
-	rewardType?: SelectableDayType;
-	startDate?: string | Date;
-	endDate?: string | Date;
+export type VacationRule = IfThenRule | TimeWindowRule | OptimizationRule;
+
+type SerializedRule =
+	| IfThenRule
+	| (Omit<TimeWindowRule, 'startDate' | 'endDate'> & {
+			startDate: string | Date;
+			endDate: string | Date;
+	  })
+	| (Omit<OptimizationRule, 'force'> & { force?: 'preference' });
+
+export function createOptimizationPresetRules(
+	existingIds: readonly string[] = [],
+): OptimizationRule[] {
+	const ids = new Set(existingIds);
+	return (
+		[
+			['unplaced-at-risk', 'Prévention des pertes', OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.unplacedAtRisk],
+			['holiday-week-value', 'Semaines fériées', OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.holidayWeekValue],
+			[
+				'non-working-day-gain',
+				'Gain de jours non ouvrés',
+				OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.nonWorkingDayGain,
+			],
+			[
+				'longest-work-sequence',
+				'Séquence de travail maximale',
+				OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.longestWorkSequence,
+			],
+			[
+				'short-sequence-deficit',
+				'Déficit des reprises',
+				OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.shortSequenceDeficit,
+			],
+			[
+				'supporting-placements',
+				'Économie des jours d’appoint',
+				OPTIMIZATION_PRESETS.supportingPlacements,
+			],
+		] as const
+	).map<OptimizationRule>(([key, name, configuration]) => {
+		const base = `default-${key}`;
+		let id = base;
+		let suffix = 2;
+		while (ids.has(id)) id = `${base}-${suffix++}`;
+		ids.add(id);
+		return {
+			id,
+			name,
+			type: RuleType.OPTIMIZATION,
+			enabled: true,
+			force: 'preference',
+			configuration: structuredClone(configuration),
+		};
+	});
+}
+
+function isRuleList(value: unknown): value is SerializedRule[] {
+	return (
+		Array.isArray(value) &&
+		value.every(
+			(rule) =>
+				rule &&
+				typeof rule === 'object' &&
+				typeof rule.id === 'string' &&
+				typeof rule.name === 'string' &&
+				typeof rule.enabled === 'boolean' &&
+				Object.values(RuleType).includes(rule.type),
+		)
+	);
 }

@Injectable({
 	providedIn: 'root',
 })
 export class RuleService {
-	private readonly injector = inject(Injector);
+	private canPersist = true;

 	private readonly defaultRules: VacationRule[] = [
 		{
@@ -92,11 +152,56 @@ export class RuleService {
 	private rawRulesSignal: WritableSignal<SerializedRule[]>;

 	constructor() {
-		this.rawRulesSignal = storedSignal<SerializedRule[]>(
-			'vacationRules',
-			this.defaultRules as unknown as SerializedRule[],
-			this.injector,
-		);
+		let rules = this.initialRules(this.defaultRules);
+		let migrate = true;
+		try {
+			const stored =
+				typeof localStorage === 'undefined' ? null : localStorage.getItem('vacationRules');
+			if (stored !== null) {
+				const parsed: unknown = JSON.parse(stored);
+				if (isRuleList(parsed)) rules = this.initialRules(parsed);
+				else if (
+					parsed &&
+					typeof parsed === 'object' &&
+					'version' in parsed &&
+					parsed.version === 1 &&
+					'rules' in parsed &&
+					isRuleList(parsed.rules)
+				) {
+					rules = parsed.rules;
+					migrate = false;
+				} else throw new Error('Unsupported saved rule format.');
+			}
+		} catch (error) {
+			// A failed read must not allow a later edit to replace unknown saved rules.
+			this.canPersist = false;
+			console.warn('Failed to restore planning rules from localStorage.', error);
+		}
+		this.rawRulesSignal = signal(rules);
+		if (migrate) this.saveRules();
+	}
+
+	private initialRules(existing: SerializedRule[]): SerializedRule[] {
+		const presets = createOptimizationPresetRules(existing.map(({ id }) => id));
+		return [presets[0], ...existing, ...presets.slice(1)];
+	}
+
+	private saveRules(): void {
+		if (!this.canPersist) return;
+		try {
+			if (typeof localStorage !== 'undefined')
+				localStorage.setItem(
+					'vacationRules',
+					JSON.stringify({ version: 1, rules: this.rawRulesSignal() }),
+				);
+		} catch (error) {
+			console.warn('Failed to save planning rules to localStorage.', error);
+		}
+	}
+
+	private updateRules(update: (rules: SerializedRule[]) => SerializedRule[]): void {
+		this.rawRulesSignal.update(update);
+		this.saveRules();
 	}

 	public get rules(): VacationRule[] {
@@ -106,46 +211,42 @@ export class RuleService {
 				return {
 					...rule,
 					force: rule.force ?? 'preference',
-					startDate: new Date(rule.startDate as string),
-					endDate: new Date(rule.endDate as string),
-				} as TimeWindowRule;
+					startDate: new Date(rule.startDate),
+					endDate: new Date(rule.endDate),
+				};
 			}
-			return { ...rule, force: rule.force ?? 'preference' } as IfThenRule;
+			if (rule.type === RuleType.OPTIMIZATION)
+				return structuredClone({ ...rule, force: rule.force ?? ('preference' as const) });
+			return structuredClone({ ...rule, force: rule.force ?? 'preference' });
 		});
 	}

 	public addRule(rule: VacationRule): void {
-		this.rawRulesSignal.update((rules) => [
-			...rules,
-			{ ...rule, force: rule.force ?? 'preference' } as unknown as SerializedRule,
-		]);
+		const saved = structuredClone(rule);
+		saved.force ??= 'preference';
+		this.updateRules((rules) => [...rules, saved]);
 	}

 	public updateRule(updatedRule: VacationRule): void {
-		this.rawRulesSignal.update((rules) =>
-			rules.map((rule) =>
-				rule.id === updatedRule.id
-					? ({
-							...updatedRule,
-							force: updatedRule.force ?? 'preference',
-						} as unknown as SerializedRule)
-					: rule,
-			),
+		const saved = structuredClone(updatedRule);
+		saved.force ??= 'preference';
+		this.updateRules((rules) =>
+			rules.map((rule) => (rule.id === updatedRule.id ? saved : rule)),
 		);
 	}

 	public deleteRule(id: string): void {
-		this.rawRulesSignal.update((rules) => rules.filter((rule) => rule.id !== id));
+		this.updateRules((rules) => rules.filter((rule) => rule.id !== id));
 	}

 	public toggleRule(id: string): void {
-		this.rawRulesSignal.update((rules) =>
+		this.updateRules((rules) =>
 			rules.map((rule) => (rule.id === id ? { ...rule, enabled: !rule.enabled } : rule)),
 		);
 	}

 	public reorderRules(previousIndex: number, currentIndex: number): void {
-		this.rawRulesSignal.update((rules) => {
+		this.updateRules((rules) => {
 			const updatedRules = [...rules];
 			const [movedRule] = updatedRules.splice(previousIndex, 1);
 			updatedRules.splice(currentIndex, 0, movedRule);
@@ -3,6 +3,16 @@ import { Injectable, inject, Injector, computed } from '@angular/core';
 import { storedSignal } from '../shared/utils/stored-signal';
 import type { PlanOutcome, RemainingBalance } from './leave-planner.service';
 import { addPlanningDays } from './planning-date';
+import {
+	optimizationUnit,
+	validateOptimizationConfiguration,
+	type OptimizationConfiguration,
+	type OptimizationElements,
+	type OptimizationCondition,
+	type OptimizationMeasure,
+	type OptimizationAggregation,
+	type OptimizationDirection,
+} from './planning-objectives';

 export interface AppTranslations {
 	locale: string;
@@ -29,14 +39,10 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		durationEstimate: string;
 		durationUnits: { seconds: string; minutes: string };
 		remainingDaysWarning: string;
-		remainingWhy: string;
 		remainingValidity: string;
 		remainingHorizon: string;
 		remainingEarnedFrom: string;
-		remainingHistoryHelp: string;
-		remainingNoEvaluations: string;
 		remainingSuggestions: Record<string, string>;
-		remainingCandidateReasons: Record<string, string>;
 		deleteEntry: string;
 		chooseDate: string;
 		availableDate: string;
@@ -77,6 +83,25 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		invalidHorizon: string;
 	};
 	rules: {
+		optimization: {
+			newRule: string;
+			defaultName: string;
+			elementsLabel: string;
+			conditionsLabel: string;
+			measureLabel: string;
+			aggregationLabel: string;
+			directionLabel: string;
+			thresholdLabel: string;
+			thresholdSummary: string;
+			summary: string;
+			invalidConfiguration: string;
+			nameRequired: string;
+			elements: Record<OptimizationElements, string>;
+			conditions: Record<OptimizationCondition, string>;
+			measures: Record<OptimizationMeasure, string>;
+			aggregations: Record<OptimizationAggregation, string>;
+			directions: Record<OptimizationDirection, string>;
+		};
 		title: string;
 		subtitle: string;
 		active: string;
@@ -148,7 +173,6 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		includedEntitlement: string;
 		comparison: {
 			title: string;
-			candidate: string;
 			preview: string;
 			nearby: string;
 			noAlternatives: string;
@@ -159,7 +183,6 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 			available: string;
 			unavailable: string;
 			backToPlan: string;
-			backToTrace: string;
 		};
 		details: {
 			intro: string;
@@ -168,10 +191,6 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 			expires: string;
 			criteria: string;
 			criteriaHelp: string;
-			traceImpactTitle: string;
-			traceImpactHelp: string;
-			traceStageTitle: string;
-			traceStageHelp: string;
 			firstDifference: string;
 			higher: string;
 			lower: string;
@@ -204,9 +223,6 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 			alternative: string;
 			sameDate: string;
 			moveHelp: string;
-			traceHelp: string;
-			beforeDecision: string;
-			withCandidate: string;
 			comparisonUnavailable: string;
 			objectives: Record<string, { label: string; help: string }>;
 			preferenceHelp: Record<string, string | undefined>;
@@ -216,11 +232,9 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		title: string;
 		calendarHelp: string;
 		explanationHelp: string;
-		traceHelp: string;
 		technicalDetails: string;
 		compareDates: string;
 		stopComparing: string;
-		replayNotice: string;
 		daysPlaced: string;
 		daysGained: string;
 		longestWorkSequence: string;
@@ -238,7 +252,6 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		placementNavigation: string;
 		placement: string;
 		placements: string;
-		decision: string;
 		of: string;
 		first: string;
 		previous: string;
@@ -251,13 +264,8 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		counterfactualReady: string;
 		counterfactualError: string;
 		retryCounterfactual: string;
-		historicalEligibilityLoading: string;
-		historicalEligibilityReady: string;
-		historicalEligibilityError: string;
-		retryHistoricalEligibility: string;
 		eligible: string;
 		ineligible: string;
-		historical: string;
 		reason: string;
 		explanationError: string;
 		conflictDetails: string;
@@ -271,53 +279,6 @@ export interface AppTranslations {
 		currentPlacement: string;
 		explainedPeriod: string;
 		outsideHorizon: string;
-		traceTitle: string;
-		traceLoading: string;
-		traceReady: string;
-		traceUnavailable: string;
-		phases: string;
-		firstPhase: string;
-		previousPhase: string;
-		nextPhase: string;
-		lastPhase: string;
-		decisions: string;
-		firstDecision: string;
-		previousDecision: string;
-		nextDecision: string;
-		lastDecision: string;
-		replay: string;
-		before: string;
-		after: string;
-		finalPlan: string;
-		dates: string;
-		candidates: string;
-		previousCandidates: string;
-		nextCandidates: string;
-		page: string;
-		compareAlternatives: string;
-		deltas: string;
-		activations: string;
-		noDecisions: string;
-		traceStatuses: {
-			chosen: string;
-			'evaluated-rejected': string;
-			pruned: string;
-			'not-examined': string;
-			ineligible: string;
-		};
-		tracePhaseStatuses: {
-			completed: string;
-			interrupted: string;
-			'not-run': string;
-		};
-		traceChanges: {
-			added: string;
-			'moved-from': string;
-			'moved-to': string;
-			removed: string;
-			shared: string;
-			unchanged: string;
-		};
 	};
 	benchmark: {
 		title: string;
@@ -390,6 +351,29 @@ export class TranslationService {
 		}
 	}

+	public optimizationSummary(configuration: OptimizationConfiguration): string {
+		const tr = this.tr().rules.optimization;
+		if (!validateOptimizationConfiguration(configuration).valid) return tr.invalidConfiguration;
+		const unit = optimizationUnit(configuration);
+		const unitLabel =
+			unit === 'count'
+				? tr.aggregations.count
+				: this.tr().planning.statistics[
+						unit === 'working-days' ? 'workingDays' : 'calendarDays'
+					];
+		const conditions = configuration.conditions.map((condition) => tr.conditions[condition]);
+		if (configuration.measure === 'work-sequence-deficit')
+			conditions.push(
+				tr.thresholdSummary.replace('{count}', String(configuration.thresholdDays)),
+			);
+		return tr.summary
+			.replace('{direction}', tr.directions[configuration.direction])
+			.replace('{aggregation}', tr.aggregations[configuration.aggregation])
+			.replace('{measure}', `${tr.measures[configuration.measure]} (${unitLabel})`)
+			.replace('{elements}', tr.elements[configuration.elements])
+			.replace('{conditions}', conditions.length ? ` (${conditions.join(', ')})` : '');
+	}
+
 	public getLanguageName(langCode: string): string {
 		try {
 			// Using native Intl.DisplayNames to get name of language in its own language
@@ -421,7 +405,8 @@ export class TranslationService {
 		const reasons = this.tr().planning.details.remainingReasons;
 		if (!plan) return reasons['not-established'];
 		const code =
-			incomplete && ['preserved', 'not-established'].includes(balance.reason.code)
+			incomplete &&
+			['preserved', 'active-priorities', 'not-established'].includes(balance.reason.code)
 				? 'calculation-incomplete'
 				: balance.reason.code;
 		return (reasons[code] ?? reasons['not-established'])
@@ -6,12 +6,7 @@ import {
 	isWorkingPlanningDate,
 	parseDeclaredDays,
 } from './declared-non-working-days';
-import type {
-	LeaveType,
-	PlanningOutcome,
-	PlanningSnapshot,
-	PlanningTrace,
-} from './leave-planner.service';
+import type { LeaveType, PlanningOutcome, PlanningSnapshot } from './leave-planner.service';

@Injectable({
 	providedIn: 'root',
@@ -169,8 +164,6 @@ export class UserInputService {
 	readonly remainingVacationDaysSignal = signal<VacDay[]>([]);
 	readonly planningOutcomeSignal = signal<PlanningOutcome | null>(null);
 	readonly planningSnapshotSignal = signal<PlanningSnapshot | null>(null);
-	readonly planningTraceSignal = signal<PlanningTrace | null>(null);
-	readonly traceResolvedSignal = signal(false);
 	readonly displayedPlanSignal = computed(() => {
 		const outcome = this.planningOutcomeSignal();
 		return outcome?.kind === 'Plan'
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 	},
 	"userInput": {
 		"title": "Urlaub konfigurieren",
-		"description": "Fügen Sie jedes Urlaubskonto und seinen Gültigkeitszeitraum hinzu.",
+		"description": "Wählen Sie den Planungszeitraum und fügen Sie jedes Urlaubskonto und seinen Gültigkeitszeitraum hinzu.",
 		"addVacationDay": "Urlaubskonto hinzufügen",
 		"calculate": "Plan berechnen",
 		"durationEstimate": "Ungefähre Wartezeit: {range} {unit}",
@@ -34,25 +34,15 @@
 		"daySuffix": "Tag",
 		"daysSuffix": "Tage",
 		"expires": "abl.",
-		"remainingWhy": "Warum?",
 		"remainingValidity": "Nutzbar vom {available} bis zum {expiry}.",
 		"remainingHorizon": "Berechneter Plan vom {start} bis zum {end}.",
 		"remainingEarnedFrom": "Durch die Regel „{rule}“ erworbener Urlaub.",
-		"remainingHistoryHelp": "Diese Daten wurden während der Berechnung tatsächlich geprüft. Die Werte vergleichen jeden Versuch mit seinem Ausgangszustand; der endgültige Plan kann abweichen.",
-		"remainingNoEvaluations": "Für dieses Urlaubskonto wurde kein zuordenbarer Versuch aufgezeichnet. Die Ablaufkategorie allein erklärt nicht, warum es ungenutzt bleibt.",
 		"remainingSuggestions": {
 			"available-after-horizon": "Sie können den Planungszeitraum über das Verfügbarkeitsdatum hinaus verlängern und neu berechnen.",
 			"no-working-date": "Prüfen Sie den Planungszeitraum und die Gültigkeitsdaten dieses Urlaubskontos.",
 			"all-dates-occupied": "Sie können den Zeitraum bei entsprechender Gültigkeit verlängern oder Ihre bereits gebuchten Tage und Regeln anpassen und neu berechnen.",
 			"preserved": "Keine Aktion nötig. Um die Nutzung anzufordern, fügen Sie eine Regel innerhalb der Gültigkeit hinzu und berechnen Sie neu.",
 			"calculation-incomplete": "Starten Sie die Berechnung erneut, wenn Sie die Planung abschließen möchten."
-		},
-		"remainingCandidateReasons": {
-			"quality-no-improvement": "Diese Möglichkeit wurde in dieser Berechnungsphase nicht ausgewählt.",
-			"quality-protected-objective": "Diese Möglichkeit würde eine zu erhaltende Priorität verschlechtern.",
-			"quality-outperformed": "Die Berechnung fand später eine besser bewertete Möglichkeit.",
-			"earned-entitlement-order": "Diese Möglichkeit hält die Verfügbarkeitsdaten des erworbenen Urlaubs nicht ein.",
-			"unknown": "Der genaue Grund für diesen Versuch ist nicht verfügbar."
 		}
 	},
 	"dayTypes": {
@@ -83,7 +73,7 @@
 		"planningDatesHelp": "Wählen Sie beliebige Daten, auch vergangene. Der Kalender wird aktualisiert, wenn Sie Plan berechnen auswählen.",
 		"invalidDate": "Geben Sie zwei gültige Kalenderdaten ein.",
 		"horizonOrder": "Der letzte Planungstag muss am oder nach dem Startdatum liegen.",
-		"invalidHorizon": "Korrigieren Sie die Planungsdaten in den Einstellungen vor der Berechnung."
+		"invalidHorizon": "Korrigieren Sie die Planungsdaten vor der Berechnung."
 	},
 	"rules": {
 		"title": "Planungsregeln",
@@ -133,6 +123,51 @@
 			"after": "danach",
 			"around": "darum herum",
 			"auto": "automatisch"
+		},
+		"optimization": {
+			"newRule": "Neue Optimierungsregel",
+			"defaultName": "Verluste vermeiden",
+			"elementsLabel": "Planungselemente",
+			"conditionsLabel": "Bedingungen (alle müssen erfüllt sein)",
+			"measureLabel": "Messgröße",
+			"aggregationLabel": "Aggregation",
+			"directionLabel": "Richtung",
+			"thresholdLabel": "Präferenzschwelle in Arbeitstagen",
+			"thresholdSummary": "Präferenzschwelle: {count} Arbeitstage",
+			"summary": "{direction} {aggregation}: {measure} — {elements}{conditions}.",
+			"invalidConfiguration": "Wählen Sie passende Elemente, Bedingungen, Messgrößen und Aggregationen sowie bei Bedarf eine positive ganzzahlige Tagesschwelle.",
+			"nameRequired": "Geben Sie einen Regelnamen ein.",
+			"elements": {
+				"leave-balances": "Urlaubsguthaben",
+				"public-holiday-weeks": "Feiertagswochen",
+				"time-off-periods": "Arbeitsfreie Zeiträume",
+				"work-sequences": "Arbeitsfolgen",
+				"leave-placements": "Geplante Urlaubstage"
+			},
+			"conditions": {
+				"at-risk": "Vom Verfall bedroht",
+				"complete": "Vollständig",
+				"internal": "Intern",
+				"non-empty": "Nicht leer",
+				"supporting": "Unterstützend"
+			},
+			"measures": {
+				"unplaced-quantity": "Nicht eingeplante Menge",
+				"public-holiday-week-value": "Wert der Feiertagswochen",
+				"non-working-day-gain": "Gewinn arbeitsfreier Tage",
+				"work-sequence-length": "Länge der Arbeitsfolgen",
+				"work-sequence-deficit": "Defizit der Arbeitsfolgen",
+				"placement-count": "Anzahl der Platzierungen"
+			},
+			"aggregations": {
+				"sum": "Summe",
+				"count": "Anzahl",
+				"maximum": "Maximum"
+			},
+			"directions": {
+				"minimize": "Minimieren",
+				"maximize": "Maximieren"
+			}
 		}
 	},
 	"planning": {
@@ -173,7 +208,6 @@
 		"placementNavigation": "Navigation der Platzierungserklärungen",
 		"placement": "Urlaubstag",
 		"placements": "Platzierungen",
-		"decision": "Entscheidung",
 		"of": "von",
 		"first": "Erste Platzierung",
 		"previous": "Vorherige Platzierung",
@@ -186,13 +220,8 @@
 		"counterfactualReady": "Alternative Termine sind bereit.",
 		"counterfactualError": "Alternative Termine konnten nicht berechnet werden.",
 		"retryCounterfactual": "Datumsanalyse erneut versuchen",
-		"historicalEligibilityLoading": "Prüfe, an welchen Tagen dieses Urlaubsguthaben verfügbar war …",
-		"historicalEligibilityReady": "Die historische Datumseignung ist bereit.",
-		"historicalEligibilityError": "Die historische Datumseignung konnte nicht geprüft werden.",
-		"retryHistoricalEligibility": "Historische Datumseignung erneut prüfen",
 		"eligible": "Geeignet",
 		"ineligible": "Nicht geeignet",
-		"historical": "Status der ursprünglichen Suche",
 		"reason": "Grund",
 		"explanationError": "Die Erklärung konnte nicht erstellt werden.",
 		"conflictDetails": "Warum kein Plan die Verpflichtungen erfüllt",
@@ -206,60 +235,11 @@
 		"currentPlacement": "Aktuell erklärte Platzierung",
 		"explainedPeriod": "Erklärter Freizeitzeitraum",
 		"outsideHorizon": "Kontextdatum außerhalb des Planungshorizonts",
-		"traceTitle": "Erweitert: ursprüngliche Entscheidungsspur",
-		"traceLoading": "Der Plan ist fertig; seine Entscheidungsspur wird noch geladen…",
-		"traceReady": "Der Plan ist fertig und seine Entscheidungsspur wurde geladen.",
-		"traceUnavailable": "Für dieses Ergebnis ist keine Entscheidungsspur verfügbar.",
-		"phases": "Spurphasen",
-		"firstPhase": "Erste Phase",
-		"previousPhase": "Vorherige Phase",
-		"nextPhase": "Nächste Phase",
-		"lastPhase": "Letzte Phase",
-		"decisions": "Atomare Entscheidungen",
-		"firstDecision": "Erste Entscheidung",
-		"previousDecision": "Vorherige Entscheidung",
-		"nextDecision": "Nächste Entscheidung",
-		"lastDecision": "Letzte Entscheidung",
-		"replay": "Entscheidungszustand",
-		"before": "Vorher",
-		"after": "Nachher",
-		"finalPlan": "Endgültiger Plan",
-		"dates": "Daten",
-		"candidates": "Kandidaten",
-		"previousCandidates": "Vorherige Kandidatenseite",
-		"nextCandidates": "Nächste Kandidatenseite",
-		"page": "Seite",
-		"compareAlternatives": "Diesen Kandidaten im gesamten Horizont vergleichen",
-		"deltas": "Zustandsänderungen",
-		"activations": "erworbene Aktivierungen",
-		"noDecisions": "Diese Phase enthält keine atomare Entscheidung.",
-		"traceStatuses": {
-			"chosen": "Ausgewählt",
-			"evaluated-rejected": "Bewertet und abgelehnt",
-			"pruned": "Verworfen",
-			"not-examined": "Nicht untersucht",
-			"ineligible": "Nicht geeignet"
-		},
-		"tracePhaseStatuses": {
-			"completed": "Abgeschlossen",
-			"interrupted": "Unterbrochen",
-			"not-run": "Nicht ausgeführt"
-		},
-		"traceChanges": {
-			"added": "Durch diese Entscheidung hinzugefügt",
-			"moved-from": "Von diesem Datum verschoben",
-			"moved-to": "Auf dieses Datum verschoben",
-			"removed": "Durch diese Entscheidung entfernt",
-			"shared": "Durch diese Entscheidung geteilt",
-			"unchanged": "Durch diese Entscheidung unverändert"
-		},
 		"calendarHelp": "Wählen Sie einen Urlaubstag, um seinen Beitrag zum Plan zu sehen.",
 		"explanationHelp": "Sehen Sie Ihre Auszeit und den Beitrag jedes Tages.",
-		"traceHelp": "Erkunden Sie die Berechnung, Entscheidung für Entscheidung.",
 		"technicalDetails": "Berechnungsdetails",
 		"compareDates": "Andere Termine vergleichen",
 		"stopComparing": "Datumsvergleich schließen",
-		"replayNotice": "Sie sehen einen Berechnungsschritt.",
 		"explanation": {
 			"breakTitle": "Ihre Auszeit",
 			"leaveDays": "eingesetzte Urlaubstage",
@@ -276,16 +256,13 @@
 			"withoutDay": "Ohne diesen Tag",
 			"withDay": "Mit diesem Tag",
 			"noChange": "Diese Werte sind gleich. Regeln und die letzten Entscheidungskriterien (Verfall des Guthabens, dann Datum) können die Auswahl weiterhin beeinflussen.",
-			"priorityHelp": "Die Kriterien stehen in Prioritätsreihenfolge. Der erste Unterschied hat Vorrang vor den folgenden.",
+			"priorityHelp": "Verpflichtungen werden gemeinsam erfüllt. Aktive Präferenzen werden in Ihrer Regelreihenfolge verglichen. Nur diese Regeln führen zu neuen Urlaubstagen; früherer Verfall und dann frühere Daten entscheiden bei Gleichstand.",
 			"tryDate": "Anderes Datum testen",
 			"plannedDate": "Derzeit geplant für:",
 			"currentPlan": "Aktueller Plan",
 			"alternative": "Mit diesem Datum",
 			"sameDate": "Dies ist das geplante Datum. Wählen Sie oben ein anderes Datum, um den Unterschied zu sehen.",
 			"moveHelp": "Verschieben Sie probeweise diesen Tag. Alle anderen Urlaubstermine bleiben gleich.",
-			"traceHelp": "Vergleichen Sie diesen Kandidaten mit dem Zustand vor seiner ursprünglichen Entscheidung.",
-			"beforeDecision": "Vor dieser Entscheidung",
-			"withCandidate": "Mit diesem Kandidaten",
 			"comparisonUnavailable": "Der Vergleich für das ursprüngliche Datum ist nicht verfügbar. Daher lässt sich die Änderung nicht anzeigen.",
 			"objectives": {
 				"obligation-validity": {
@@ -327,6 +304,10 @@
 				"placement-date": {
 					"label": "Frühere Daten bevorzugen",
 					"help": "Letztes Kriterium, wenn alle anderen Kriterien gleich sind."
+				},
+				"optimization": {
+					"label": "{rule}: {summary}",
+					"help": "Diese Optimierungspräferenz bewertet ihre gespeicherte Konfiguration. Aktive Präferenzen werden in der angezeigten Reihenfolge verglichen; frühere haben Vorrang."
 				}
 			},
 			"stages": {
@@ -342,7 +323,9 @@
 				"unavailable": "Dieses Urlaubsguthaben kann an diesem Datum nicht verwendet werden.",
 				"expired": "Dieses Datum liegt nach dem Verfall des Urlaubsguthabens.",
 				"type-incompatible": "Diese Urlaubsart kann an diesem Datum nicht verwendet werden.",
-				"rule-invalid": "Dieses Datum würde eine Planungsregel verletzen."
+				"rule-invalid": "Dieses Datum würde eine Planungsregel verletzen.",
+				"invalid-optimization-configuration": "Wählen Sie passende Elemente, Bedingungen, Messgrößen und Aggregationen sowie bei Bedarf eine positive ganzzahlige Tagesschwelle.",
+				"unsupported-optimization-configuration": "Diese Regel kombiniert unvereinbare Planungselemente und Messgrößen."
 			},
 			"preferenceHelp": {
 				"time_window": "Urlaubstage im bevorzugten Zeitraum. Mehr ist besser.",
@@ -356,10 +339,6 @@
 			"expires": "Verfällt am",
 			"criteria": "Die Prioritäten des Planers",
 			"criteriaHelp": "Von oben nach unten lesen: Der erste Unterschied hat Vorrang. Wählen Sie ein Kriterium, um seine Berechnung zu sehen.",
-			"traceImpactTitle": "Auswirkung dieses Zweigs auf den Gesamtplan",
-			"traceImpactHelp": "Diese Werte vergleichen den vollständigen Zustand vor und nach diesem Zweig. Sie zeigen seine Auswirkungen, aber nicht, warum der Planer ihn gewählt hat.",
-			"traceStageTitle": "Tatsächlicher Vergleich in dieser Planungsstufe",
-			"traceStageHelp": "Diese Rohwerte wurden bei dieser Entscheidung verglichen; der erste Unterschied erklärt den Status des Zweigs. Die Tabelle zum Gesamtplan unten zeigt die Auswirkung dieser Wahl.",
 			"firstDifference": "Erster Unterschied",
 			"higher": "Höher ist besser",
 			"lower": "Niedriger ist besser",
@@ -373,13 +352,13 @@
 				"no-working-date": "Kein Arbeitstag liegt sowohl im Planungszeitraum als auch zwischen Verfügbarkeits- und Ablaufdatum.",
 				"all-dates-occupied": "Alle Arbeitstage, an denen dieses Urlaubskonto nutzbar ist, sind bereits durch geplanten Urlaub oder gebuchte Tage belegt.",
 				"preserved": "Für später aufbewahrt: Das Urlaubskonto läuft nach dem Planungszeitraum ab und die Berechnung hat gemäß Ihren Prioritäten keine zusätzliche Platzierung ausgewählt.",
+				"active-priorities": "Die Berechnung hat dieses Urlaubskonto gemäß Ihren aktiven Regeln ungenutzt gelassen. Ändern Sie die Regeln oder ihre Reihenfolge, um einen anderen Plan anzufordern.",
 				"calculation-incomplete": "Die Berechnung wurde vor Abschluss der Planung unterbrochen. Die Nichtnutzung ist keine endgültige Entscheidung.",
 				"not-established": "Diese Berechnung hat keinen genauen Grund für die Nichtnutzung ermittelt."
 			}
 		},
 		"comparison": {
 			"title": "Daten vergleichen",
-			"candidate": "Datum des Kandidaten",
 			"preview": "Nur eine Vorschau. Ihr Plan bleibt unverändert.",
 			"nearby": "Verfügbare Termine in der Nähe",
 			"noAlternatives": "Dieser Urlaubstag kann auf kein anderes Datum gelegt werden. Sie können trotzdem ein Datum prüfen, um den Grund zu sehen.",
@@ -389,8 +368,7 @@
 			"changes": "Was sich ändern würde",
 			"available": "Verfügbares Datum",
 			"unavailable": "Dieses Datum ist nicht möglich",
-			"backToPlan": "Zurück zu meinem Plan",
-			"backToTrace": "Zurück zur Berechnung"
+			"backToPlan": "Zurück zu meinem Plan"
 		}
 	},
 	"benchmark": {
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 	},
 	"userInput": {
 		"title": "Configure your leave",
-		"description": "Add each leave balance and its validity period.",
+		"description": "Choose a planning period, then add each leave balance and its validity period.",
 		"addVacationDay": "Add leave balance",
 		"calculate": "Calculate plan",
 		"durationEstimate": "Approximate wait: {range} {unit}",
@@ -34,25 +34,15 @@
 		"daySuffix": "day",
 		"daysSuffix": "days",
 		"expires": "exp.",
-		"remainingWhy": "See why",
 		"remainingValidity": "Usable from {available} through {expiry}.",
 		"remainingHorizon": "Calculated plan from {start} through {end}.",
 		"remainingEarnedFrom": "Leave earned through the rule “{rule}”.",
-		"remainingHistoryHelp": "These dates were actually examined during the calculation. The values compare each attempt with its starting state; the final plan may differ.",
-		"remainingNoEvaluations": "No attempt attributable to this balance was recorded. Its expiry category alone does not explain why it remains unused.",
 		"remainingSuggestions": {
 			"available-after-horizon": "You can extend the planning period beyond its availability date, then recalculate.",
 			"no-working-date": "Check the planning period and this balance’s validity dates.",
 			"all-dates-occupied": "You can extend the period if validity allows, or adjust your already booked days and rules, then recalculate.",
 			"preserved": "No action needed. To request its use, add a rule within its validity period, then recalculate.",
 			"calculation-incomplete": "Run the calculation again if you want it to finish planning."
-		},
-		"remainingCandidateReasons": {
-			"quality-no-improvement": "This option was not retained at this stage of the calculation.",
-			"quality-protected-objective": "This option would worsen a priority that must be preserved.",
-			"quality-outperformed": "The calculation later found a better-ranked option.",
-			"earned-entitlement-order": "This option does not respect the availability dates of earned leave.",
-			"unknown": "The precise reason for this attempt is unavailable."
 		}
 	},
 	"dayTypes": {
@@ -77,13 +67,13 @@
 			"dark": "Dark"
 		},
 		"systemAppearance": "Current system appearance",
-		"planningHorizon": "Planning horizon",
+		"planningHorizon": "Planning period",
 		"planningStart": "Start date (inclusive)",
 		"lastPlanningDate": "Last planning date (inclusive)",
 		"planningDatesHelp": "Choose any dates, including past dates. Your calendar updates when you select Calculate plan.",
 		"invalidDate": "Enter two valid calendar dates.",
 		"horizonOrder": "The last planning date must be on or after the start date.",
-		"invalidHorizon": "Correct the planning dates in Settings before calculating."
+		"invalidHorizon": "Correct the planning dates before calculating."
 	},
 	"rules": {
 		"title": "Planning rules",
@@ -133,6 +123,51 @@
 			"after": "After",
 			"around": "Around",
 			"auto": "Auto (Best choice)"
+		},
+		"optimization": {
+			"newRule": "New Optimization Rule",
+			"defaultName": "Loss prevention",
+			"elementsLabel": "Planning elements",
+			"conditionsLabel": "Conditions (all must match)",
+			"measureLabel": "Measure",
+			"aggregationLabel": "Aggregation",
+			"directionLabel": "Direction",
+			"thresholdLabel": "Preference threshold in working days",
+			"thresholdSummary": "preference threshold: {count} working days",
+			"summary": "{direction} {aggregation}: {measure} — {elements}{conditions}.",
+			"invalidConfiguration": "Choose compatible planning elements, conditions, measure and aggregation, with a positive whole-day threshold when needed.",
+			"nameRequired": "Enter a rule name.",
+			"elements": {
+				"leave-balances": "Leave balances",
+				"public-holiday-weeks": "Public-holiday weeks",
+				"time-off-periods": "Time-off periods",
+				"work-sequences": "Work sequences",
+				"leave-placements": "Leave placements"
+			},
+			"conditions": {
+				"at-risk": "At risk of expiry",
+				"complete": "Complete",
+				"internal": "Internal",
+				"non-empty": "Non-empty",
+				"supporting": "Supporting"
+			},
+			"measures": {
+				"unplaced-quantity": "Unplaced quantity",
+				"public-holiday-week-value": "Public-holiday week value",
+				"non-working-day-gain": "Non-working-day gain",
+				"work-sequence-length": "Work-sequence length",
+				"work-sequence-deficit": "Work-sequence deficit",
+				"placement-count": "Placement count"
+			},
+			"aggregations": {
+				"sum": "Sum",
+				"count": "Count",
+				"maximum": "Maximum"
+			},
+			"directions": {
+				"minimize": "Minimize",
+				"maximize": "Maximize"
+			}
 		}
 	},
 	"planning": {
@@ -173,7 +208,6 @@
 		"placementNavigation": "Placement explanation navigation",
 		"placement": "Leave day",
 		"placements": "placements",
-		"decision": "Decision",
 		"of": "of",
 		"first": "First placement",
 		"previous": "Previous placement",
@@ -186,13 +220,8 @@
 		"counterfactualReady": "Date alternatives are ready.",
 		"counterfactualError": "Date alternatives could not be calculated.",
 		"retryCounterfactual": "Retry date analysis",
-		"historicalEligibilityLoading": "Checking which dates this leave could use…",
-		"historicalEligibilityReady": "Original date eligibility is ready.",
-		"historicalEligibilityError": "Original date eligibility could not be checked.",
-		"retryHistoricalEligibility": "Retry date eligibility check",
 		"eligible": "Eligible",
 		"ineligible": "Ineligible",
-		"historical": "Original search status",
 		"reason": "Reason",
 		"explanationError": "The explanation could not be produced.",
 		"conflictDetails": "Why no plan can satisfy the obligations",
@@ -206,60 +235,11 @@
 		"currentPlacement": "Current explained placement",
 		"explainedPeriod": "Explained time-off period",
 		"outsideHorizon": "Context date outside the planning horizon",
-		"traceTitle": "Advanced: original decision trace",
-		"traceLoading": "The plan is ready; its decision trace is still loading…",
-		"traceReady": "The plan is ready and its decision trace has loaded.",
-		"traceUnavailable": "No decision trace is available for this result.",
-		"phases": "Trace phases",
-		"firstPhase": "First phase",
-		"previousPhase": "Previous phase",
-		"nextPhase": "Next phase",
-		"lastPhase": "Last phase",
-		"decisions": "Atomic decisions",
-		"firstDecision": "First decision",
-		"previousDecision": "Previous decision",
-		"nextDecision": "Next decision",
-		"lastDecision": "Last decision",
-		"replay": "Decision state",
-		"before": "Before",
-		"after": "After",
-		"finalPlan": "Final plan",
-		"dates": "Dates",
-		"candidates": "Candidates",
-		"previousCandidates": "Previous candidate page",
-		"nextCandidates": "Next candidate page",
-		"page": "Page",
-		"compareAlternatives": "Compare this candidate across the horizon",
-		"deltas": "State changes",
-		"activations": "earned activations",
-		"noDecisions": "This phase recorded no atomic decision.",
-		"traceStatuses": {
-			"chosen": "Chosen",
-			"evaluated-rejected": "Evaluated and rejected",
-			"pruned": "Pruned",
-			"not-examined": "Not examined",
-			"ineligible": "Ineligible"
-		},
-		"tracePhaseStatuses": {
-			"completed": "Completed",
-			"interrupted": "Interrupted",
-			"not-run": "Not run"
-		},
-		"traceChanges": {
-			"added": "Added by this decision",
-			"moved-from": "Moved from this date",
-			"moved-to": "Moved to this date",
-			"removed": "Removed by this decision",
-			"shared": "Shared by this decision",
-			"unchanged": "Unchanged by this decision"
-		},
 		"calendarHelp": "Select a leave day to see its contribution to your plan.",
 		"explanationHelp": "See the break you get and what each day changes.",
-		"traceHelp": "Explore the calculation, decision by decision.",
 		"technicalDetails": "Calculation details",
 		"compareDates": "Compare other dates",
 		"stopComparing": "Close date comparison",
-		"replayNotice": "You are viewing a calculation step.",
 		"explanation": {
 			"breakTitle": "Your break",
 			"leaveDays": "leave days used",
@@ -276,16 +256,13 @@
 			"withoutDay": "Without this day",
 			"withDay": "With this day",
 			"noChange": "These totals are unchanged. Rules and the final tie-breakers (balance expiry, then date) can still affect the choice.",
-			"priorityHelp": "Criteria are listed in priority order. The first difference takes precedence over later ones.",
+			"priorityHelp": "Obligations are satisfied together. Active preferences are compared in your rule order. Only those rules drive new placements; earlier expiry and then dates break equal results.",
 			"tryDate": "Try another date",
 			"plannedDate": "Currently planned for:",
 			"currentPlan": "Current plan",
 			"alternative": "With this date",
 			"sameDate": "This is the planned date. Choose another date above to see the difference.",
 			"moveHelp": "Try moving this one day. All other leave dates stay the same.",
-			"traceHelp": "Test this candidate against the state before its original decision.",
-			"beforeDecision": "Before this decision",
-			"withCandidate": "With this candidate",
 			"comparisonUnavailable": "The comparison for the original date is unavailable, so the change cannot be shown.",
 			"objectives": {
 				"obligation-validity": {
@@ -327,6 +304,10 @@
 				"placement-date": {
 					"label": "Earlier dates first",
 					"help": "Final tie-breaker when all other criteria are equal."
+				},
+				"optimization": {
+					"label": "{rule}: {summary}",
+					"help": "This optimization preference evaluates its saved configuration. Active preferences follow the displayed order; earlier preferences win before later ones."
 				}
 			},
 			"stages": {
@@ -342,7 +323,9 @@
 				"unavailable": "This leave balance cannot be used on this date.",
 				"expired": "This date is after the leave balance expires.",
 				"type-incompatible": "This leave type cannot be used on this date.",
-				"rule-invalid": "Using this date would break a planning rule."
+				"rule-invalid": "Using this date would break a planning rule.",
+				"invalid-optimization-configuration": "Choose compatible planning elements, conditions, measure and aggregation, with a positive whole-day threshold when needed.",
+				"unsupported-optimization-configuration": "This rule uses an unsupported combination of planning elements and measures."
 			},
 			"preferenceHelp": {
 				"time_window": "Leave days in this preferred period. More is better.",
@@ -356,10 +339,6 @@
 			"expires": "Expires on",
 			"criteria": "The planner’s priorities",
 			"criteriaHelp": "Read from top to bottom: the first difference takes priority. Select a criterion to see how it is calculated.",
-			"traceImpactTitle": "Full-plan effect of this branch",
-			"traceImpactHelp": "These values compare the complete state before and after this branch. They show its impact; they do not explain why the planner chose it.",
-			"traceStageTitle": "Actual stage comparison",
-			"traceStageHelp": "These raw values were compared at this decision; the first difference explains the candidate’s status. The full-plan table below shows the effect after this choice.",
 			"firstDifference": "First difference",
 			"higher": "Higher is better",
 			"lower": "Lower is better",
@@ -373,13 +352,13 @@
 				"no-working-date": "No working day falls within both the planning period and its availability and expiry dates.",
 				"all-dates-occupied": "All working days on which this balance can be used are already occupied by planned leave or already booked days.",
 				"preserved": "Kept for later: it expires after the planning period and the calculation retained no additional placement under your priorities.",
+				"active-priorities": "The calculation kept this balance unused under your active planning rules. Change the rules or their order to request a different plan.",
 				"calculation-incomplete": "The calculation was interrupted before planning finished. Leaving it unused is not a final decision.",
 				"not-established": "This calculation did not establish a precise reason for leaving it unused."
 			}
 		},
 		"comparison": {
 			"title": "Compare dates",
-			"candidate": "Candidate date",
 			"preview": "Preview only. Your plan stays unchanged.",
 			"nearby": "Nearby available dates",
 			"noAlternatives": "No other date can use this leave day. You can still check a date to see why.",
@@ -389,8 +368,7 @@
 			"changes": "What would change",
 			"available": "Available date",
 			"unavailable": "This date can’t be used",
-			"backToPlan": "Back to my plan",
-			"backToTrace": "Back to the calculation"
+			"backToPlan": "Back to my plan"
 		}
 	},
 	"benchmark": {
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 	},
 	"userInput": {
 		"title": "Configura tus vacaciones",
-		"description": "Añade cada saldo de vacaciones y su periodo de validez.",
+		"description": "Elige el período de planificación y añade cada saldo de vacaciones y su periodo de validez.",
 		"addVacationDay": "Añadir saldo de vacaciones",
 		"calculate": "Calcular plan",
 		"durationEstimate": "Espera aproximada: {range} {unit}",
@@ -34,25 +34,15 @@
 		"daySuffix": "día",
 		"daysSuffix": "días",
 		"expires": "exp.",
-		"remainingWhy": "Ver por qué",
 		"remainingValidity": "Utilizable del {available} al {expiry}.",
 		"remainingHorizon": "Plan calculado del {start} al {end}.",
 		"remainingEarnedFrom": "Permiso obtenido gracias a la regla «{rule}».",
-		"remainingHistoryHelp": "Estas fechas se examinaron realmente durante el cálculo. Los valores comparan cada intento con su estado inicial; el plan final puede ser diferente.",
-		"remainingNoEvaluations": "No se registró ningún intento atribuible a este saldo. Su categoría de caducidad por sí sola no explica por qué sigue sin utilizarse.",
 		"remainingSuggestions": {
 			"available-after-horizon": "Puedes ampliar el período planificado más allá de su fecha de disponibilidad y volver a calcular.",
 			"no-working-date": "Comprueba el período planificado y las fechas de validez de este saldo.",
 			"all-dates-occupied": "Puedes ampliar el período si la validez lo permite, o ajustar los días ya reservados y tus reglas, y volver a calcular.",
 			"preserved": "No es necesario hacer nada. Para solicitar su uso, añade una regla dentro de su período de validez y vuelve a calcular.",
 			"calculation-incomplete": "Repite el cálculo si quieres que termine la planificación."
-		},
-		"remainingCandidateReasons": {
-			"quality-no-improvement": "Esta opción no se seleccionó en esta fase del cálculo.",
-			"quality-protected-objective": "Esta opción empeoraría una prioridad que debe conservarse.",
-			"quality-outperformed": "El cálculo encontró después una opción mejor clasificada.",
-			"earned-entitlement-order": "Esta opción no respeta las fechas de disponibilidad de los permisos obtenidos.",
-			"unknown": "El motivo preciso de este intento no está disponible."
 		}
 	},
 	"dayTypes": {
@@ -77,13 +67,13 @@
 			"dark": "Oscuro"
 		},
 		"systemAppearance": "Apariencia actual del sistema",
-		"planningHorizon": "Horizonte de planificación",
+		"planningHorizon": "Período de planificación",
 		"planningStart": "Fecha de inicio (incluida)",
 		"lastPlanningDate": "Última fecha de planificación (incluida)",
 		"planningDatesHelp": "Elige cualquier fecha, incluso pasada. El calendario se actualiza al seleccionar Calcular plan.",
 		"invalidDate": "Introduce dos fechas válidas.",
 		"horizonOrder": "La última fecha de planificación debe ser igual o posterior a la fecha de inicio.",
-		"invalidHorizon": "Corrige las fechas de planificación en Ajustes antes de calcular."
+		"invalidHorizon": "Corrige las fechas de planificación antes de calcular."
 	},
 	"rules": {
 		"title": "Reglas de planificación",
@@ -133,6 +123,51 @@
 			"after": "Después",
 			"around": "Alrededor",
 			"auto": "Auto (Mejor opción)"
+		},
+		"optimization": {
+			"newRule": "Nueva regla de Optimización",
+			"defaultName": "Prevención de pérdidas",
+			"elementsLabel": "Elementos del plan",
+			"conditionsLabel": "Condiciones (deben cumplirse todas)",
+			"measureLabel": "Medida",
+			"aggregationLabel": "Agregación",
+			"directionLabel": "Dirección",
+			"thresholdLabel": "Umbral de preferencia en días laborables",
+			"thresholdSummary": "umbral de preferencia: {count} días laborables",
+			"summary": "{direction} {aggregation}: {measure} — {elements}{conditions}.",
+			"invalidConfiguration": "Elija elementos, condiciones, medidas y agregaciones compatibles, con un umbral entero positivo cuando sea necesario.",
+			"nameRequired": "Introduzca un nombre para la regla.",
+			"elements": {
+				"leave-balances": "Saldos de vacaciones",
+				"public-holiday-weeks": "Semanas con festivos",
+				"time-off-periods": "Períodos sin trabajo",
+				"work-sequences": "Secuencias de trabajo",
+				"leave-placements": "Vacaciones colocadas"
+			},
+			"conditions": {
+				"at-risk": "En riesgo de caducar",
+				"complete": "Completas",
+				"internal": "Internas",
+				"non-empty": "No vacías",
+				"supporting": "De apoyo"
+			},
+			"measures": {
+				"unplaced-quantity": "Cantidad no colocada",
+				"public-holiday-week-value": "Valor de las semanas festivas",
+				"non-working-day-gain": "Ganancia de días sin trabajo",
+				"work-sequence-length": "Longitud de las secuencias de trabajo",
+				"work-sequence-deficit": "Déficit de las secuencias de trabajo",
+				"placement-count": "Número de colocaciones"
+			},
+			"aggregations": {
+				"sum": "Suma",
+				"count": "Cantidad",
+				"maximum": "Máximo"
+			},
+			"directions": {
+				"minimize": "Minimizar",
+				"maximize": "Maximizar"
+			}
 		}
 	},
 	"planning": {
@@ -173,7 +208,6 @@
 		"placementNavigation": "Navegación por las explicaciones de las asignaciones",
 		"placement": "Día de permiso",
 		"placements": "asignaciones",
-		"decision": "Decisión",
 		"of": "de",
 		"first": "Primera asignación",
 		"previous": "Asignación anterior",
@@ -186,13 +220,8 @@
 		"counterfactualReady": "Las fechas alternativas están listas.",
 		"counterfactualError": "No se pudieron calcular las fechas alternativas.",
 		"retryCounterfactual": "Reintentar el análisis de fechas",
-		"historicalEligibilityLoading": "Comprobando qué fechas podía usar este permiso…",
-		"historicalEligibilityReady": "La elegibilidad histórica de las fechas está lista.",
-		"historicalEligibilityError": "No se pudo comprobar la elegibilidad histórica de las fechas.",
-		"retryHistoricalEligibility": "Reintentar la comprobación de elegibilidad",
 		"eligible": "Válida",
 		"ineligible": "No válida",
-		"historical": "Estado de la búsqueda original",
 		"reason": "Motivo",
 		"explanationError": "No se pudo generar la explicación.",
 		"conflictDetails": "Por qué ningún plan satisface las obligaciones",
@@ -206,60 +235,11 @@
 		"currentPlacement": "Asignación explicada actualmente",
 		"explainedPeriod": "Período de descanso explicado",
 		"outsideHorizon": "Fecha de contexto fuera del horizonte de planificación",
-		"traceTitle": "Avanzado: traza de decisiones original",
-		"traceLoading": "El plan está listo; su traza de decisiones aún se está cargando…",
-		"traceReady": "El plan está listo y se ha cargado su traza de decisiones.",
-		"traceUnavailable": "No hay una traza de decisiones disponible para este resultado.",
-		"phases": "Fases de la traza",
-		"firstPhase": "Primera fase",
-		"previousPhase": "Fase anterior",
-		"nextPhase": "Fase siguiente",
-		"lastPhase": "Última fase",
-		"decisions": "Decisiones atómicas",
-		"firstDecision": "Primera decisión",
-		"previousDecision": "Decisión anterior",
-		"nextDecision": "Decisión siguiente",
-		"lastDecision": "Última decisión",
-		"replay": "Estado de la decisión",
-		"before": "Antes",
-		"after": "Después",
-		"finalPlan": "Plan final",
-		"dates": "Fechas",
-		"candidates": "Candidatos",
-		"previousCandidates": "Página de candidatos anterior",
-		"nextCandidates": "Página de candidatos siguiente",
-		"page": "Página",
-		"compareAlternatives": "Comparar este candidato en todo el horizonte",
-		"deltas": "Cambios de estado",
-		"activations": "activaciones obtenidas",
-		"noDecisions": "Esta fase no registró ninguna decisión atómica.",
-		"traceStatuses": {
-			"chosen": "Elegido",
-			"evaluated-rejected": "Evaluado y rechazado",
-			"pruned": "Podado",
-			"not-examined": "No examinado",
-			"ineligible": "No válido"
-		},
-		"tracePhaseStatuses": {
-			"completed": "Completada",
-			"interrupted": "Interrumpida",
-			"not-run": "No ejecutada"
-		},
-		"traceChanges": {
-			"added": "Añadido por esta decisión",
-			"moved-from": "Movido desde esta fecha",
-			"moved-to": "Movido a esta fecha",
-			"removed": "Eliminado por esta decisión",
-			"shared": "Compartido por esta decisión",
-			"unchanged": "Sin cambios por esta decisión"
-		},
 		"calendarHelp": "Selecciona un día de permiso para ver su aportación al plan.",
 		"explanationHelp": "Consulta tu descanso y qué cambia con cada día.",
-		"traceHelp": "Explora el cálculo, decisión a decisión.",
 		"technicalDetails": "Detalles del cálculo",
 		"compareDates": "Comparar otras fechas",
 		"stopComparing": "Cerrar comparación",
-		"replayNotice": "Estás viendo un paso del cálculo.",
 		"explanation": {
 			"breakTitle": "Tu descanso",
 			"leaveDays": "días de permiso usados",
@@ -276,16 +256,13 @@
 			"withoutDay": "Sin este día",
 			"withDay": "Con este día",
 			"noChange": "Estos totales son iguales. Las reglas y los últimos criterios de desempate (vencimiento del saldo y después fecha) aún pueden influir en la elección.",
-			"priorityHelp": "Los criterios se muestran por prioridad. La primera diferencia prevalece sobre las siguientes.",
+			"priorityHelp": "Las obligaciones se resuelven conjuntamente. Las preferencias activas se comparan en el orden de sus reglas. Solo esas reglas añaden vacaciones; la caducidad y luego las fechas resuelven los empates.",
 			"tryDate": "Probar otra fecha",
 			"plannedDate": "Fecha prevista actualmente:",
 			"currentPlan": "Plan actual",
 			"alternative": "Con esta fecha",
 			"sameDate": "Esta es la fecha prevista. Elige otra fecha arriba para ver la diferencia.",
 			"moveHelp": "Prueba a mover este día. Las demás fechas de permiso no cambian.",
-			"traceHelp": "Compara este candidato con el estado anterior a su decisión original.",
-			"beforeDecision": "Antes de esta decisión",
-			"withCandidate": "Con este candidato",
 			"comparisonUnavailable": "La comparación de la fecha original no está disponible, por lo que no se puede mostrar el cambio.",
 			"objectives": {
 				"obligation-validity": {
@@ -327,6 +304,10 @@
 				"placement-date": {
 					"label": "Primero las fechas más tempranas",
 					"help": "Último desempate cuando los demás criterios son iguales."
+				},
+				"optimization": {
+					"label": "{rule}: {summary}",
+					"help": "Esta preferencia de optimización evalúa su configuración guardada. Las preferencias activas siguen el orden mostrado; las anteriores tienen prioridad."
 				}
 			},
 			"stages": {
@@ -342,7 +323,9 @@
 				"unavailable": "Este saldo de permisos no se puede usar en esta fecha.",
 				"expired": "Esta fecha es posterior al vencimiento del saldo.",
 				"type-incompatible": "Este tipo de permiso no se puede usar en esta fecha.",
-				"rule-invalid": "Usar esta fecha incumpliría una regla del plan."
+				"rule-invalid": "Usar esta fecha incumpliría una regla del plan.",
+				"invalid-optimization-configuration": "Elija elementos, condiciones, medidas y agregaciones compatibles, con un umbral entero positivo cuando sea necesario.",
+				"unsupported-optimization-configuration": "Esta regla combina elementos del plan y medidas incompatibles."
 			},
 			"preferenceHelp": {
 				"time_window": "Días de permiso dentro del período preferido. Más es mejor.",
@@ -356,10 +339,6 @@
 			"expires": "Vence el",
 			"criteria": "Las prioridades del cálculo",
 			"criteriaHelp": "Lee de arriba abajo: la primera diferencia tiene prioridad. Selecciona un criterio para ver cómo se calcula.",
-			"traceImpactTitle": "Efecto de esta rama en el plan completo",
-			"traceImpactHelp": "Estos valores comparan el estado completo antes y después de esta rama. Muestran su efecto, no por qué el planificador la eligió.",
-			"traceStageTitle": "Comparación real en esta etapa",
-			"traceStageHelp": "Estos valores brutos se compararon en esta decisión; la primera diferencia explica el estado de la opción. La tabla del plan completo muestra el efecto de esta elección.",
 			"firstDifference": "Primera diferencia",
 			"higher": "Más es mejor",
 			"lower": "Menos es mejor",
@@ -373,13 +352,13 @@
 				"no-working-date": "Ningún día laborable está dentro del período planificado y entre sus fechas de disponibilidad y caducidad.",
 				"all-dates-occupied": "Todos los días laborables en los que puede utilizarse este saldo ya están ocupados por permisos planificados o días ya reservados.",
 				"preserved": "Guardado para más adelante: caduca después del período planificado y el cálculo no seleccionó ninguna colocación adicional según tus prioridades.",
+				"active-priorities": "El cálculo conservó este saldo sin utilizar según tus reglas activas. Cambia las reglas o su orden para solicitar otro plan.",
 				"calculation-incomplete": "El cálculo se interrumpió antes de terminar la planificación. Su falta de uso no es una decisión definitiva.",
 				"not-established": "Este cálculo no determinó un motivo preciso para dejarlo sin utilizar."
 			}
 		},
 		"comparison": {
 			"title": "Comparar fechas",
-			"candidate": "Fecha del candidato",
 			"preview": "Solo una vista previa. Tu plan no cambia.",
 			"nearby": "Fechas cercanas disponibles",
 			"noAlternatives": "No hay otra fecha disponible para este día de permiso. Puedes comprobar una fecha para ver el motivo.",
@@ -389,8 +368,7 @@
 			"changes": "Qué cambiaría",
 			"available": "Fecha disponible",
 			"unavailable": "Esta fecha no se puede usar",
-			"backToPlan": "Volver a mi plan",
-			"backToTrace": "Volver al cálculo"
+			"backToPlan": "Volver a mi plan"
 		}
 	},
 	"benchmark": {
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
nessar	d9d9befa12	refactor(planning): remove the original decision trace CI / policy (push) Successful in 7s Details CI / validate (push) Successful in 1m15s Details CI / test (push) Successful in 3m18s Details CI / benchmark (push) Failing after 5m53s Details CI / build (push) Successful in 1m23s Details CI / security (push) Successful in 7m6s Details CI / policy (pull_request) Successful in 7s Details CI / validate (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s Details CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 43s Details CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m19s Details CI / images (push) Successful in 3m7s Details CI / required (push) Successful in 2s Details CI / benchmark (pull_request) Failing after 5m28s Details CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 6m37s Details CI / images (pull_request) Successful in 3m18s Details CI / required (pull_request) Successful in 1s Details	2026-10-15 20:42:33 +02:00
nessar	ea4256107f	Merge pull request 'ci: migrate to Gitea Actions' (#271 ) from feature/gitea-actions into develop CI / policy (push) Failing after 8s Details CI / validate (push) Successful in 1m18s Details CI / test (push) Successful in 3m42s Details CI / benchmark (push) Failing after 5m59s Details CI / build (push) Successful in 1m16s Details CI / security (push) Successful in 6m51s Details CI / images (push) Skipped Details CI / required (push) Failing after 1s Details Reviewed-on: #271	2026-10-15 19:55:10 +02:00
nessar	d74dfb9938	ci: migrate to Gitea Actions CI / policy (push) Successful in 48s Details CI / validate (push) Successful in 1m25s Details CI / test (push) Successful in 3m43s Details CI / build (push) Successful in 1m20s Details CI / security (push) Successful in 1m31s Details CI / benchmark (push) Failing after 5m52s Details CI / images (push) Failing after 1m2s Details CI / required (push) Failing after 1s Details CI / policy (pull_request) Successful in 9s Details CI / validate (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s Details CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m30s Details CI / benchmark (pull_request) Canceled after 3s Details CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 1m5s Details CI / security (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s Details CI / images (pull_request) Successful in 2m24s Details CI / required (pull_request) Successful in 5s Details	2026-10-13 19:43:08 +02:00
nessar	7d60157863	docs: migrate repository guidance to Gitea	2026-10-13 19:38:32 +02:00
nessar	0d900fd72d	feat(planning): make optimization rules composable Closes #70, #71, #72, #73, and #74 See merge request nessar/vac-optimizer!189	2026-10-10 14:56:48 +00:00
nessar	ae68e31575	docs: describe the advisory planning benchmark	2026-10-10 16:42:04 +02:00
nessar	98e87fecee	ci: make the deferred planning benchmark non-blocking Run the unchanged benchmark as a separate advisory job while #78 is open. Keep functional coverage and other checks required, and retain the 2 GB heap and 300-second protocol limit. Record #78's obligation to restore the gate. Refs: #75, #78	2026-10-10 16:36:11 +02:00
nessar	6811142299	feat(planning): make optimization rules composable Evaluate explicit, ordered optimization configurations through one shared planner model. Add six editable presets, durable one-time legacy migration, and consistent completed and cancelled plan provenance. Include functional regressions and the agreed trace-removal and benchmark follow-up specs. Performance acceptance remains in #78 under unchanged gates. Refs: #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78	2026-10-10 16:07:34 +02:00
nessar	209bf05f36	feat(docs): add detailed planning objectives and optimization rules documentation	2026-10-08 23:20:40 +02:00
nessar	0c266a4b9d	fix(deps): update angular-cli monorepo to v22.2.2 See merge request nessar/vac-optimizer!185	2026-10-08 19:08:11 +00:00
nessar	f786872a18	feat(ui): configure planning horizon alongside leave balances See merge request nessar/vac-optimizer!183	2026-10-08 19:07:27 +00:00
nessar	ad5ef69f5f	docs: document GitFlow rules for agents See merge request nessar/vac-optimizer!186	2026-10-08 08:10:35 +00:00
nessar	749348ec0d	docs: document GitFlow rules for agents	2026-10-08 08:56:00 +02:00
nessar	6777cbc282	feat(ui): use Material datepickers for planning horizon	2026-10-08 06:49:06 +00:00
nessar	31d4333783	feat(ui): configure planning horizon alongside leave balances	2026-10-08 06:49:06 +00:00
renovate Bot	db561a31e6	fix(deps): update angular-cli monorepo to v22.2.2	2026-10-08 06:49:01 +00:00
nessar	964abd3546	ci: enforce GitFlow and publish branch images See merge request nessar/vac-optimizer!184	2026-10-08 06:48:18 +00:00
nessar	42f1114709	ci: serialize test workers and cap Node memory	2026-10-08 01:05:41 +02:00
nessar	8fcd53fc32	ci: allow the complete benchmark to finish on shared runners	2026-10-08 00:54:49 +02:00
nessar	6b3113de9a	ci: bound the benchmark heap on shared runners	2026-10-08 00:43:21 +02:00
nessar	2a53bb6cb4	ci: enforce GitFlow and publish branch images	2026-10-08 00:09:29 +02:00